|
The Monero bloat argument is just a rehash of the old bitcoin bloat argument.
It's still a non-issue that's used as FUD by the nonbelievers.
|
|
|
|
|
Cheap is relative. If you really believe the price will go up 10x anytime soon, then perhaps it is cheap.
|
|
|
|
|
Is there a precompiled skein miner for linux anywhere?
|
|
|
|
|
SHA or Scrypt? No thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm still hodling. Who knows, maybe they'll come through at some point.
|
|
|
|
|
What do you guys think of Bryce Weiner and his promised contributions?
I'm beginning to think he's just a pump and dump artist, but maybe he'll pull through with liberdade.
|
|
|
|
Will this be merge mineable with myriad?
Fuck no No, why would it be? DigiByte isn't going ot merge mining with any coin ATM. And i hope that it won't happen even in future. Because it would increase the security of both networks, and potentially be more profitable for miners. |
|
|
|
|
Will this be merge mineable with myriad?
|
|
|
|
I'm trying to run this on opensuse.
If I try compiling it myself, I get:
Making all in submodules
make[2]: Entering directory `/home/jacob/bin/sgminer/submodules'
Making all in jansson
make[3]: Entering directory `/home/jacob/bin/sgminer/submodules/jansson'
make[3]: *** No rule to make target `all'. Stop.
make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/jacob/bin/sgminer/submodules/jansson'
make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/jacob/bin/sgminer/submodules'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/jacob/bin/sgminer'
make: *** [all] Error 2
If I try running the x86_64 binary from nicehash, I get a libcurl error: no version information available
I have libcurl and all dependencies.
do git submodule init git submodule update first or when doing git git clone --recursive -b v5_0 git://github.com/sgminer-dev/sgminer.git It's working great now. Thanks! |
|
|
|
|
I'm trying to run this on opensuse.
If I try compiling it myself, I get:
Making all in submodules
make[2]: Entering directory `/home/jacob/bin/sgminer/submodules'
Making all in jansson
make[3]: Entering directory `/home/jacob/bin/sgminer/submodules/jansson'
make[3]: *** No rule to make target `all'. Stop.
make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/jacob/bin/sgminer/submodules/jansson'
make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/jacob/bin/sgminer/submodules'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/jacob/bin/sgminer'
make: *** [all] Error 2
If I try running the x86_64 binary from nicehash, I get a libcurl error: no version information available
I have libcurl and all dependencies.
|
|
|
|
|
Furthermore, I propose we move forward the first block halving to 7/31/14. Keep the total # of coins at 2 billions.
You obviously can't cut the block reward every time the price dips, but I believe something drastic should be done while everyone is waiting on upcoming projects/events. The community is slowly becoming more toxic, and potential investors/project creators are turning to other coins. There is a dangerous lack of enthusiasm and support for MYR at this early stage.
|
|
|
|
Why would anyone want to remove the "ASIC-algos"? It's completely stupid. Let's say you go ahead with that - what will you do once the algos in place get ASICs created for them? Will MYR be forked every time ASICs are created for an algo? MYR isn't being dumped because of that - it's because there is no perception of solidity in the project as it stands right now. Lots of brilliant ideas, a true anti-51% attack system in place which will be utilised by Bitcoin sooner or later - but there is no proper driving force in place. Using cuss words on twitter or bla-blahing any criticism which is leveled at the Development team is a huge turn-off for investors. Start pulling your own weight - and this applies to all the whiners on here as well. There is a dire need for developers to step up the pace on the current projects - why not try searching for any potentially interested guys instead of complaining on here? Why not spread the word positively instead of harming your own investment and spreading FUD? I understand that some of you might be 17-year olds with a bit of money made off Doge or some other crapcoin - but it's high time you realised what the world of investment is like and what it entails. Never, ever harm your own investment.
I also +1 this post. It's not the ASICs. It's not the mulitpools (when the hell have multipools ever been a problem for this coin?). It's a lack of confidence in the coin, which includes the community, the dev team, the whole ecosystem. And yeah, part of that is due to the developers. I appreciate all the work foodies has done for this coin, and I think he's an awesome dev overall, but the profanity-filled rants are a huge turn off for investors. It really makes it look like this project is run by an idiot kid. |
|
|
|
This is what happens to me as well, using the 7-9 binary on Windows 7 x64 and an AMD Llano processory. Also, no matter how many threads I set it to use, it maxes out all my cores. |
|
|
|
WE NEED INVESTORS = NOT MINERS . INVESTORS WILL BUY MYRIADCOIN AND HOLD (wants to make profit)>> so myriadcoin price will skyrocket and medias will talk about it , MINERS WILL SELL MYRIAD WHATEVER THE PRICE IS (then when total coins are mined or difficulting growing too much = they will go to another coin , so please focus on investors = bring new people to invest in myriad , and focus on daily applications for real life  I think that's a good point. There's currently no reason for an investor to invest anything into this coin. However, this is a long term coin, meaning it has a high chance of succeeding wildly or failing in the long term. Most "investors" are only interested in making short term profit, and can do so quite easily with the latest pump and dump POS coins. Will having those kinds of people onboard help? Maybe. Blackcoin's hype train was largely fueled by zealous speculators. But I really don't think a coin with such a high inflation rate and slow progress as MYR will attract those kinds of people. I think zetacoin is a better model for the progress we'll follow (and should emulate). |
|
|
|
[19:48:43] Building binary marucoin-modHawaiiglg2tc12800nf10w256l8.bin
[19:48:43] Error -11: Building Program (clBuildProgram)
[19:48:43] "/tmp/OCL13381T8.cl", line 883: error: identifier "buf" is undefined
INPUT_BIG;
marucoin works perfectly, but marucoin-mod gives me this. I've tried deleting all the .bin files.
Edit: It was a simple solution (it usually is). I just had to clear my tmp folder. There must've been a bunch of old junk in there screwing things up. So to any linux newbs having problems try:
cd /tmp/
sudo rm -r *
you call other linux newbs and you delete everything in /tmp including your unix sockets you NEED (or you have to restart you wm)?! For a dedicated mining rig, it's almost certainly going to be safe, as it was on mine. |
|
|
|
|
[19:48:43] Building binary marucoin-modHawaiiglg2tc12800nf10w256l8.bin
[19:48:43] Error -11: Building Program (clBuildProgram)
[19:48:43] "/tmp/OCL13381T8.cl", line 883: error: identifier "buf" is undefined
INPUT_BIG;
marucoin works perfectly, but marucoin-mod gives me this. I've tried deleting all the .bin files.
Edit: It was a simple solution (it usually is). I just had to clear my tmp folder. There must've been a bunch of old junk in there screwing things up. So to any linux newbs having problems try:
cd /tmp/
sudo rm -r *
|
|
|
|
Error: clSetKernelArg of all params failed.
Can anyone help with this?
Are you using legacy AMD drivers (old graphic cards...)? Nope. R9 290s with catalyst 13.12. Should I try upgrading drivers? |
|
|
|
|
Error: clSetKernelArg of all params failed.
Can anyone help with this?
|
|
|
|
|
I'm trying to use PHM's sph-sgminer. I'm trying to mine X11 coins using my R9 290s and I keep ending up with "Error: clSetKernelArg of all params failed."
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
