|
Copy blockchain from AppData E:\Program Files\Blockchain. Right click Bitcoin-Qt and create a desktop shortcut. Do the same with Armory. Now, right click Bitcoin-Qt shortcut and in "Target" field, put "-datadir=E:\Program Files\Blockchain" at the end. Right click Armory shortcut, in "Target" field, put "-datadir=E:\Program Files\Blockchain" and "--satoshi-datadir=E:\Program Files\Blockchain" at the end(put space in between them). Hopefully, this works.
|
|
|
|
@redsn0w: I have no intention to offend BADecker or any other islamaphobia. They are spreading lies. However, when a lot of the words in the Quran and the Hadith actually SAY to do violence, and when it takes a lot of twisting of other words of the Quran and Hadith to make the violent words say "peace," who is it that is doing the lying? If you don't want to understand that words of violence are words of violence, but rather try to convert them to words of peace even though they are words of violence, what does that really say about yourself?  Actually it is other way. Psychos twists the part they want and take the part they like. Honestly, in that "twisting" and "taking" part, you are no different than them. You just took "keep mum" from my sentence and twisted. This is the same thing they are doing. Wow! Great discovery! Lie of the year! If you don't know what is right, then keep mum.  =snip= Trying to make someone else "keep mum" as you expressed it, suggests that you have something to hide, and you don't want other people bringing it out into the open. [ Except for the most important detail. This detail is that anybody can take a look and see that what I am saying is true. All they have to do is look and see what the Quran and Hadith say when they say words of violence. You are probably talking about verses and Hadiths at the time of war? What can we say when there is a war? "When they come with sword and kill you, don't raise your hands with intention of killing them, talk them peacefully" - This?  You mist be kidding! well everybody should just take popcorns, watch the links i just sent which you have still not commented about, and start learning a bit..
He won't comment on it. Why should he comment when he is an islamaphobia? He will wait for a moment to twist and spread FUD, when it comes, post here. If you check this thread, you can easily understand and/or see this behaviour. |
|
|
|
I depreciate using Blockchain.info for spending coins from a paper wallet especially if you are reusing. Either use Mycelium or import it to an Android wallet like Bither.
Can you tell what's the problem in using blockchain.info? I am really interested if you can explain it to me. There will be downtime and also they have a good history bugs and resulting in big loose. They cover it but that doesn't make a wallet good. Last time, because of reused R values, many BTC were lost. I am sure it would have been higher if the Bitcoins went to a wrong guy but they were lucky it went to a honest guy who sent Bitcoins to them. [1] Their explorer is corrupted sometimes and because of it, we can't spend coins from wallet. [2] [1] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=581411.0;all[2] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=123726.0;all |
|
|
|
|
Locking the thread now. Thank you all for taking the time to read OP.
|
|
|
|
@redsn0w: I have no intention to offend BADecker or any other islamaphobia. They are spreading lies. However, when a lot of the words in the Quran and the Hadith actually SAY to do violence, and when it takes a lot of twisting of other words of the Quran and Hadith to make the violent words say "peace," who is it that is doing the lying? If you don't want to understand that words of violence are words of violence, but rather try to convert them to words of peace even though they are words of violence, what does that really say about yourself? Actually it is other way. Psychos twists the part they want and take the part they like. Honestly, in that "twisting" and "taking" part, you are no different than them. You just took "keep mum" from my sentence and twisted. This is the same thing they are doing. Wow! Great discovery! Lie of the year! If you don't know what is right, then keep mum. =snip= Trying to make someone else "keep mum" as you expressed it, suggests that you have something to hide, and you don't want other people bringing it out into the open. [ |
|
|
|
This may help you. Use Armory Multisig* or Electrum Multisig or Bither Multisig.
Bither Multisig helps you to use your mobile as one of the device and signing and transmitting datas can be done via Qr code. So it is pretty much secure than using a USB stick or other CDs for transmitting datas from on computer to another for signing and broadcasting.
* Correct name "lockbox".
You can also create using Bitcoin Core with command posted by amaclin. |
|
|
|
|
I said mum because it is better than lying. You can't prove it is violence just because some psychos are violent. You are islamaphobia. You spread lie to backup your claims and to make Christianity an ultimate religion. If you don't know what you are saying or what the truth is, keep mum.
* No offence to Christianity or Christians.
|
|
|
|
I think "timestamp too early" problem is PoS problem. So Bitcoin won't be affected due to this. From https://github.com/Earlz/coinreviews/blob/master/miraclecoin.txt: - double nCorTried = sqrt(nTried) * (100.0 - nUnkBias);
- double nCorNew = sqrt(nNew) * nUnkBias;
+ double nCorTried = sqrt(static_cast<double>(nTried)) * (100.0 - nUnkBias);
+ double nCorNew = sqrt(static_cast<double>(nNew)) * nUnkBias;
- loop
+ INFINITE_LOOP
this is unusual
+unsigned int nStakeMinAge = 0;
+unsigned int nStakeMaxAge = 60 * 60 * 24 * 90; //90d
...wat. Why are the names commented out like that. Sure, it's legal C++ and all.. but why!?
int64 CTransaction::GetMinFee(unsigned int /*nBlockSize*/, bool /*fAllowFree*/,
enum GetMinFee_mode mode, unsigned int /*nBytes*/) const
looks safe but weird that things are moved around. This is probably from being cloned from CLOAK which modified this stuff
@@ -2006,10 +1958,6 @@ bool CBlock::CheckBlock(bool fCheckPOW, bool fCheckMerkleRoot) const
if (fCheckPOW && IsProofOfWork() && !CheckProofOfWork(GetHash(), nBits))
return DoS(50, error("CheckBlock() : proof of work failed"));
- // Check timestamp
- if (GetBlockTime() > GetAdjustedTime() + nMaxClockDrift)
- return error("CheckBlock() : block timestamp too far in the future");
-
// First transaction must be coinbase, the rest must not be
if (vtx.empty() || !vtx[0].IsCoinBase())
return DoS(100, error("CheckBlock() : first tx is not coinbase"));
@@ -2026,14 +1974,6 @@ bool CBlock::CheckBlock(bool fCheckPOW, bool fCheckMerkleRoot) const
if (IsProofOfStake() && (vtx[0].vout.size() != 1 || !vtx[0].vout[0].IsEmpty()))
return error("CheckBlock() : coinbase output not empty for proof-of-stake block");
- // Check coinbase timestamp
- if (GetBlockTime() > (int64)vtx[0].nTime + nMaxClockDrift)
- return DoS(50, error("CheckBlock() : coinbase timestamp is too early"));
-
- // Check coinstake timestamp
- if (IsProofOfStake() && !CheckCoinStakeTimestamp(GetBlockTime(), (int64)vtx[1].nTime))
- return DoS(50, error("CheckBlock() : coinstake timestamp violation nTimeBlock=%"PRI64d" nTimeTx=%u", GetBlockTime(), vtx[1].nTime));
-
...
- // Check timestamp against prev
- if (GetBlockTime() <= pindexPrev->GetMedianTimePast() || GetBlockTime() + nMaxClockDrift < pindexPrev->GetBlockTime())
- return error("AcceptBlock() : block's timestamp is too early");
+ // Check timestamp
+ if (GetBlockTime() > GetAdjustedTime() + GetMaxClockDrift(nHeight))
+ return error("AcceptBlock() : block timestamp too far in the future");
+
+ // Check coinbase timestamp
+ if (GetBlockTime() > (int64)vtx[0].nTime + GetMaxClockDrift(nHeight))
+ return DoS(50, error("AcceptBlock() : coinbase timestamp is too early"));
This maybe different from yours but this might help you: Think that 15 min stake time tolerance might be breaking it (guess you changed the FutureDrift for this - can't verify because the source code does not reflect the most recent change yet).
So with regards to new testers, we might have to include a temporary condition to skip this check for blocks older than a certain threshold. I can play around with this tomorrow when I've got a fresh head and time on my hands.
---
Yep, thats a good catch, I changed the future drift and past drift back to the original 15 mins, when I thought that the kernal coinstake calculation was either empty or invalid, and also the drift seems to affect the mins left to next stake. So that ended up breaking clients who already accepted drifted blocks. Im going to add the grandfather up to 5000 first before I ask everyone to reset the chain and we'll see how this goes...
I did erase my local chain and choked on the same block.... Testing...
NB: I am a newb to these things. |
|
|
|
Actually, the phrase "allah akbar" has already been hijacked to refer to gibberish spouted by a maniac in a pseudo-Islamic killing frenzy.
That's over and done. That's what the phrase means.
Even I think you are letting your own bias and hatred color things too much now. You take something you have a one-dimensional view of and declare it to be a universal truth? Get over yourself a bit. Universal truth? I am only referring to the way the phrase is being perverted which is well understood. Of course, the extremists might be the ones with the correct views of Islam. The ignorant peaceful masses are probably simply ignorant to the truth of their professed religion, Islam. The studied clerics and others only want peace so that they can rape the ignorant masses. So, they lie about the fact that Islam is violent. The extremists probably are using Islam in the correct way. Wow! Great discovery! Lie of the year! If you don't know what is right, then keep mum. |
|
|
|
You guys missed the point entirely, I find all of you spamming about this shit very annoying, the least you can do is keep it contained to one thread and make a list of people you don't like or something.
If you think we missed something, you haven't told correctly or haven't looked our posts correctly. Either post correctly or look what we said carefully. I don't even understand why we should ban scam accusers? |
|
|
|
Loan Amount : 0.1 btc
Reason : don't want to pay for high fees when buying btc
Btc Address. : 1FNDraEXhAJxStjJE1X4WuiHbxPQNNUeGc
Term Length : April 29
I just want to have it avaiable if ever my customer needs it
Denied. |
|
|
|
-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Date: 15/04/2015, Wednesday!
I, gkv9 is taking a 0.96 BTC loan from Muhammed Zakir. 0.5 will be send to me and 0.46 to Marco to pay off first loan.
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
13CZj5mHbrh3mAyjBZ3yCfKKeFUsfsrDC9
H65AUJXOJa5HqyQBgF9Am1p9x6bUkkN9sTMlGEYbY/RFIiEMrjKRQtHgCigLDMjs/eKnONMhlUEFPih2osQTUeU=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Please give me repayment address. Edit: 0.46 BTC sent to 12hYBWiPqfwdveGzpbRdGxeqnoMcNvGNSq. Remaining: 0.6 BTC. TXID: https://www.blocktrail.com/BTC/tx/0019a2b4774d11d8ac518d28c1cb23cb9c8bade5cb905c92de60efc463247ea3 |
|
|
|
|
When you import private keys, it will be stored in root folder. I don't know if they removed private key from it. Can you tell me what exactly is your problem? Is there any other doubts?
|
|
|
|
|
I depreciate using Blockchain.info for spending coins from a paper wallet especially if you are reusing. Either use Mycelium or import it to an Android wallet like Bither.
|
|
|
|
|
They create new users and put a link in profile. Advertising and probably increasing Alexa rank as this may work as backlinks.(?)
|
|
|
|
Ahhh I was wrong on what I did...
I send BTC to a paper wallet then imported it to my phone and recorded the paper wallet's address as my phone address by mistake :S....
The wallets don't keep the private keys they have swept in memory eh..?
I didn't actually understand what exactly is the problem. Can you answer these? 1) Which wallet are you using? 2) After you imported, you saved the public key in wallet and deleted private key? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
