Well, ultimately the need for jihad dates back to the pagans in Mecca rejecting Muhammed's message. If no one had ever rejected Muhammed's perfect message, then the world would be at peace. (I'm trying to decide if this requires an /s tag.)
I would understand that you were sarcastic just because I've seen your posts and know your beliefs about the topic (your image/sig/description help too). But hey, If somehow I thought that you were a Muslim, what you said would sound pretty realistic. [ img]https://i.imgur.com/B4oEjlj.png?1[/img] http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/quran/023-violence.htmI know that some Muslims call their religion the religion of peace, but haven't heard of them doing anything to prevent violence within the religion. That site is created for sole intention of making Islam bad. It has many, better to say almost all, biased and disinformation*. That site avoid grammars to conclude Islam is violence. It also has false stories. * Not misinformation. |
|
|
|
Islam doesn't hate people. It hates religion. Religion is imbedded in everyone. It has to do with the life that a person lives. That's his religion. It is religion that Islam is going after. It seeks to make itself the dominant religion in the hearts, minds, and eyes of all people. Islam loves people it can draw into itself. Why? Because it can teach them a false way of gaining Heaven, and thereby destroy them. But it isn't really them that Islam hates and wants to destroy. It is their religion. Possibly more than any other religion, Islam hates atheism, which won't even capitalize its main church word, "atheism," because atheism is trying to deny even itself.  It is obvious you are doing #1. Tells Islam is bad. #2. Spread hatred. #3. Islam draws people into false heave. #4. Essentially conclude, Christianity draws people to actual heaven. #5. Come to Christianity. * I have no problem with Christians or Christianity. |
|
|
|
Why do medias show "sex-for-food" scandal when peacekeepers rape but not "child rape scandal"? Wronging Rights?! Courtesy: Wronging Rights and Vox.The media has apparently decided to designate this children-rape as a “sex for food scandal”! The idea seems to be that when peacekeepers rape children who are desperate for food, for some reason it does not actually count as rape, but rather is an exchange of food for sex. Worse, the wording suggests that by dispensing food to their victims, the rapists were merely causing a "scandal," not committing a crime. And this isn't the first time this has happened. Cronin-Furman rounds up other examples of peacekeepers sexually abusing children that were also covered as "sex-for-food" stories in 2002 (West Africa), 2004 (DRC), 2006 (Liberia), and 2011 (Côte d’Ivoire). This needs to stop. When child rape occurs, the media should call it what it is. Describing such incidents as "sex for food" minimizes the gravity of the crimes, by implying that the soldiers were compensating locals for transactional sex, rather than acknowledging what they were truly doing to vulnerable children. It's not "sex." It's rape. Courtesy: Wronging Rights and Vox.
|
|
|
|
Hmm... it can happen. Look at Lebanon. A few decades ago, some 70% of the population there was Christian (mostly Maronite, with Greeks and Armenians forming the rest) and 25% was Muslim. Now the population is like 70% Muslim and 25% Christian, achieved as a result of years of civil war, in which the Christians were deliberately targeted.
This is plausible. Why you are including regions such as the Philippines, Sichuan, Cambodia, Laos, and Myanmar (colored in yellow) in your Akhand Bharat? These places have nothing in common with India.
And talking about an India - Pakistan - Bangladesh merger, it will be a disaster for the Indian Hindus. Muslims will form around 35% of the total population, and they will quickly capture power with the help of "secular" Indian parties such as the Indian National Congress.
If they merge then the Muslims would form 40-50% of the total population within a few years cuz they are reproducing 4-5 times faster than a normal Hindu. If this happens then I am sure we'll see something similar to what happened in middle east happening in India. *that will be the time to leave the earth*. Wow you speak like a real bigot you know that ? You're speaking of human beings not dogs in a kennel club. 'Reproduction rate' ? Seriously ?? What a disgusting mentality bro. Its not the kid's faulty if he is born into a muslim family where his father has 5 wives. Its their culture, its their right. Deal with it and grow a pair. Its high time you kids are given a proper secular neutral teachings in schools, else forget about united India we wont even have an united Banking system. How many Pakistani friends do you have if any ? Have you ever met a muslim and not looked at him in a conspicuous way ? Well I've had many Muslim friends and most of them had 3-4 brothers and sisters. If you think that terms like "reproduction rate" can only be used for dogs and animals ,then your mentality is disgusting, not mine. I used that term with utter respect  . Also i never said its the kids fault if he is born into a family where his father has 5 wives(you are reading too much between the lines), but it will be his fault if he further marries 5 more women and keeps on producing kids until all his women become infertile. It would be more appropriate if schools start teaching Muslims to reproduce less, than teaching people like me to become 'secular'. Another islamaphobic. A muslims is only allowed to marry upto 4 women. Why Muslims birth rate is higher than Hindus* is because we have strict rules which prevent us from unnecessary sex and unnecessary abortions but Hindus don't follow these and most women don't have children and/or will be aborted. It should be more appropriate if school start teaching moral values and self respect to Hindus. * I said Hindu as you compare Muslims with Hindus. Legendster took an example of a man having 5 wives. Thanks for correcting it though. "strict rules which prevent us from unnecessary sex " ? Huh? Really? Just check out this video http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=x5_aj3iio0I . You guys haven't even left animals and you claim to have strict rules preventing you from unnecessary sex. And prevention is better than cure, so who the hell stopped you guys from taking precautions while having sex? And "most" Hindu women don't have children? Where have you been lately? Mars? They do have children but ofc less than what you guys have. Ok. I thought you know about it. How many of that videos are true? Do you think that video is true? There are many such videos in internet and the titles are "sister and brother", "son and mom", "mom and daughter", "father and daughter" etc... How many of these are true? You can't rely on such uploaded videos. We can hardly tell which is real and which is act. Hindu abortions are high and it makes Hindu population less because of less birth rate and because of unsafe abortions, deaths are increasing too. There are many reasons for abortions including human trafficking, teen age love, unsafe sex, gender bias etc. Because of this, illegal abortion centres are mushrooming in almost every city. When a woman gets pregnant out of social permissions or wedlocks she turns to these illegal centres for abortions. Abortions not only harms her body but also affects her psychologically. And this mental stress lead her to many other diseases. * The above reasons also apply to Muslims and other women. So what do you want? You want a prostitute to have kids? Or a teen girl who cannot even care for herself to have a child? Or do you want a couple who are not ready for a child to have one? Abortion in these cases is still better than having children. And this video was shot by a drone flying over some area of Levite, and this video is real(AFAIK U.S army have themselves confirmed it) , and lol this is way too different from "mother son" and "brother sister" porn clips. I am not trying to force kids to have kids. I told about "unnecessary sex" which leads to many problems. If you check description, you can see "Published on Nov 21, 2013US drone captured this disturbing video about Wahhabi terrorist gang-rape a goat!". They don't even follow Islam, then how can they be Muslims? |
|
|
|
What's the problem with it?
I just write my opinion and let know to as much people as possible that sites like cloud mining, hyip, online investment, are like gambling and MUST be taken as that. I just like to advise people to not invest too much, and to consider all online businness gambling.
I'm not a believer, but for you "ponzi" is just like devil. There are a lot of "ponzi" schemes in real life, that you maybe can't see.
Do you even fucking know what a 'Ponzi' scheme is or are you just going to keep shrugging your shoulders and making hand-wavy statements about how it doesn't really matter if it is a scam? It does matter and anyone who says it doesn't is either a complete moron or a shill for the scam itself. Gambling is the process of placing a wager on the outcome of an event based on evaluating the constants and variables which form the basis for the 'odds' a particular outcome will occur. Investing in a scheme which is pretending to be a legitimate business is not gambling, it is investing in a scheme you believe to be legitimate because you are fraudulently being told it is legitimate by the promoters of the scheme. That is a criminal act. Investing in a ponzi is gambling as you are investing into something in which the outcome/result is unknown. |
|
|
|
This has been discussed before. People that create those accounts are likely using very expensive software that's really good at captcha solving. There's a high chance that there are even humans solving those captchas through a service like anti-captcha. I'll have to agree that the current captcha is not the best, but other captcha's certainly wouldn't help mutch since they can still be solved by softare or some sort of semi-automation.
I found AreYouAHuman captcha is not easy to solve by a bot like other captchas, so adding it will be useful. I also tried using bots to solve Solvemedia captcha, the difficulty increased when I did but I guess it is still easier than AreYouAHuman. I know there are human captcha-solvers but all people won't spend money for this. It will certainly helps to reduce spambots. We should look at why those accounts actually get created. Bitcointalk is a PR 6 website, this makes it realy good for websites that want to receive backlinks around the web. Those websites that get advertised here certainly aren't looking for targeted advertising but for better website ranking. I'd suggest dissalowing newbies to link to any sorf of website through their profiles. Maybe some restrictions when posting links too. Linking to your website through a PR6 forum is a priviledge, it's so easily abused at the moment.
People that create an account should be forced wait to get some activity before they can take advantage of bitcointalk's page rank for SEO. IMO this would reduce acount creation abuse for blackhat SEO purpuses dramatially.
This is a good suggestion. So • Change captcha. • 'Website URL' should be disabled for newbies. Can anybody comment on which captcha to use and whether there should be a limit for number of registrations per IP and browser fingerprint* per period? Also on how much time should that period be. * If it is being saved. |
|
|
|
Let me give you an example: at BitcoinMixers.com you can find Helix light mixer that does not just clean your bitcoins it gives you brand new freshly mined uncirculated bitcoins. The Helix's system is more than a simple bitcoin tumbler, it is privacy and security wrapped in one. Where did you get newly minted coins? |
|
|
|
|
Trusted positive feedback couldn't be removed but I managed to remove user who left trust feedback to be removed from default trust list.
|
|
|
|
mh, I wonder if you could make a living with sig campaigns... I made around 0.08 last week. assuming you could at least sustain 10 accounts that would make BTC0.80/week, BTC3.2/month. around $700, not bad.
That was what I was wondering too...if it is possible to make a decent income through signature campaigns. You can earn good amounts of money but definitely not enough for a living, sustaining 10 accounts is unreal and impossible, it would require 1000 posts per week around 142 posts per day, assuming that each post would take around 5 minutes to find what to say and post, you would need to spend around 12 hours each day to be able to reach your goal. Your calculation and Tabata11's calculations are different. If you can make 80 posts with a paid sig at the rate 0.001 BTC/post, you can earn 0.32 BTC/month. If you can do the same with 9 more accounts, you can earn 3.2 BTC/month. This is enough for "a living". But you can't continue this, your post quality cretainly decreases over time. |
|
|
|
|
You can delete it yourself. Click "Delete" which you can see on top-right side of your post,
|
|
|
|
-snip-
Think for a moment, the site operator doesn't want to overload his server by having so many people visiting to check out photos he could post of the 'miners', the one thing he has been asked to do repeatedly since Feb of last year. So he won't post pictures of the 'miners'. Anywhere.
Seems legit.
One of the funniest thing I heard. Admins could post here, in this forum or atleast show mining address. That isn't a reason for not showing. I have been @ scrypt.cc since february last year, followed some reflink from cex.io chat, after talking some with the admin i moved everything from cex into scrypt and i dont regret doing that, made my ROI several times over while increasing my profits each month. It is over 1 year, how many ponzies out there have you seen that lasted this long ? Admin has never given me or anyone else reason to doubt his words or actions, I am not forcing people into getting their coins in there. I merely am trying to point people towards the mining site where they actually can make ROI and after that make some nice additional source of income. You choose whether you want to do it or not, but if you do, now is probably the best time since prices are this low because of panic selling.
Exactly He doesn't even doubt himself that it's a ponzi and therefore a scam because they don't promote as ponzi game. Btw PBmining lasted and was a ponzi, ltcgear also was.. People, even if "mining" comes back, don't buy this shit because you'll get robbed once more! Exactly. They promote ponzi in the name "cloud mining". |
|
|
|
In OP, "coming soon" is not updated. So PayPal deposit isn't integrated yet? |
|
|
|
You shouldnt trust coin mixers, be very careful with them since they can steal your bitcoins and never send them back to you while they are "mixing them"
that's true.. and that's why , when you want to use a mixer service, you should always choose a trusted and reliable service.. be extremely careful when using these kind of services.. The problem is the type of people who set up mixers. Most I don't think are in it to help people remain unknown. They are in it to make money. If a government shows up asking for IP logs you know they will be turning it over very very quick hoping to not spend a ton in lawyers. Also biggest concern is they just stop sending out. Lets say business is slow, they get a big amount to mix. They run away with it and any smaller ones that were sent before people realized it. Just a lot of possible bad things. About IP and Goverment. There is 2 sites at BitcoinMixers.com that need no registrations. Using VPN/proxy you get your adress for sending BTC and using TOR send them and got your new bitcoins. Simple, yeah? What makes you a expert in this field can I ask? Tor has had more holes and exploits then I have counted. As long as there is exit nodes it remains open to possible attacks. Tor is good for anonimoty if you configured it well. Almost everything has both pros and cons. It's nearly impossible to get a thing without pros or cons. But why do all this with mixers when mining to a new address is more anonymous?
If you don't/can't mine, buy newly minted coins with your coins. |
|
|
|
In term of investor I will blatantly said that there is a chance to make some money although the chance to lose is higher than what you will earn. Since you mentioned that you are sticking with cloudminr.io then your chance to lose is higher than what you will get since that cloud has been operating for quite some time and might stop their operation soon
P.S : all cloud mining wont stay for such long time, if they wish to stay they will need new investor to support their ponzis, otherwise they will just cease operation and get away with investor's money
Are you concluding all cloud mining services are ponzis? |
|
|
|
-snip-
Electrum can sign/verify bitcoin keys.
-snip-
+ Encrypt and decrypt. |
|
|
|
I remember seeing a post saying Beta will be available in early 2015. Now, it is about June.. I wonder when will Beta be released. Or maybe the administrators and some others is having closed beta.
It's a general purpose forum that's intended to compete with others. Once the theme engine is in place, we'll be able to get more involvement from the public. For now, you can check out the source. On top of that a beta is being evaluated with the staff at this point so please sit tight.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
;
with Trezor your Bitcoins are safe. 
