Hmm, you're certainly right, that address was definitely used often before. It doesn't seem to be a shared wallet address either, unless someone with more experience wants to correct me on that...? I could be wrong, you never know. I know. Great pick of an address!  I have my list of possible suspects. PM'd you. Sorry for making it that long. |
|
|
|
Both addresses have not been used from 2014 Jan 5. I really want to know where he got that address from.. But, I don't have much hope hearing back from question2.  Edit: The address was edited from 1 to I? LOL. I am almost sure this is framed. I don't think anyone actually uses that address too.. Funny how far people go nowadays.. |
|
|
|
And this whole thing could be framed very easily..  |
|
|
|
The address does not belong to satoshi circle, and that link supports the claim that it does not belong to satoshi circle. According to their FAQ, you must send funds from a wallet of which you control the private keys. If this address shows up as an address that played on satoshi circle then someone thought that they controlled such private keys. While it is possible that someone incorrectly made this assumption, the fact that 4 bets were made with this address would make this scenario unlikely, plus there is exactly one other address spend-linked to that address which does not match what generally happens with a exchange/site address. That is what I said. I initially thought the address was PD's, but it couldn't be since I found the btcoracle link. But, it is weird. I know I am not question2. The proof should be wrong.. But, I should first get to know from where I got that address. I PM'd question2. It is too long back - 2013, I hope I remember soon.. My account was never bought or sold, so none of that complications. And, I don't blackmail people. and for 0.1 BTC? Really? |
|
|
|
Funny. I should be able to send and receive amounts with same address. So, it cannot be the deposit address of a gambling site  http://btcoracle.com/search.php?s=1GjMtZop3K6JZW7emBWXC11ZhdQ1xEJwpmTho, I don't remember playing there.. Couldn't be inputs since I was selling it.. I am going to PM this question guy to know where he got the address from. Hope he gets back online soon. Hope OP is not attacking me because, what? I supported tspacepilot |
|
|
|
LOL! Let me read the thread.. Welcome back ndnhc , you're surely need to explain this case to recover your trust. Sure. I got to find what is wrong with the proof OP submitted. This is not the first time someone comes up with txs falsely acusing me of being someone else. Second time.. What was the first time? Similar case. This time it was both SatoshiCircle's deposit address.. Many of this so called txid investigators ignore that the addresses people post here need not be their own. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=525975.msg9935220#msg9935220 |
|
|
|
I checked.
Both addresses does not belong to me.
Possibly it is the deposit address of some site, most probably a dice site. Could be PrimeDice or SatoshiDice, since I had it on 2013 December, No wonder it got linked.
|
|
|
|
LOL! Let me read the thread.. Welcome back ndnhc , you're surely need to explain this case to recover your trust. Sure. I got to find what is wrong with the proof OP submitted. This is not the first time someone comes up with txs falsely acusing me of being someone else. Second time.. |
|
|
|
LOL! Let me read the thread.. Edit: Seriously, it can't be. This post here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=996260.msg11467648#msg11467648 was made on 27yth May and edited on 28th. I didn't have access to internet on 28th, 29th, and 30th. On 27th however I logged in for a few minutes I got, and arranged for Carra23 and bf4btc to take over. Former by email, and latter by a single PM - the only thing I did that day. |
|
|
|
Really sorry about my unexpected absence. Something bad happened to my friend in RL, so had to leave urgently. Couldn't access the site too from there even after it got online. Please give me a few hours to fix things back.  Back on my PC now. |
|
|
|
Really sorry about my unexpected absence. Something bad happened to my friend in RL, so had to leave urgently. Couldn't access the site too from there even after it got online. Please give me a few hours to fix things back. |
|
|
|
Name:zuggu
Position:Sr.member
Bitcoin Address:1BXHogM5aCHDNLgVJAdYLDmWm7EwYhg6Sc
Link to Recent posts:https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile%3Bu%3D253960%3Bsa%3DshowPosts
Denied. |
|
|
|
dadice were caught that they dont have the funds that they claim.. end of story bra
Nope. They are unable to provide the so called proof of solvency. Doesn't mean they didn't have the funds they claim. I am aware of the marketing budget, and I am positive they have the funds they claim they have.. And I hope you know what kelly is right? They won't provide any proof of the cold wallet that makes all of your defence statements and also the newbie just a plain talkshit. Fine. I hope they will come up with some other way to prove solvency. |
|
|
|
dadice were caught that they dont have the funds that they claim.. end of story bra
Nope. They are unable to provide the so called proof of solvency. Doesn't mean they didn't have the funds they claim. I am aware of the marketing budget, and I am positive they have the funds they claim they have.. And I hope you know what kelly is right? A few answers here may be of interest in resolving the above queries and statements
Let us look at an example: A Bitcoin exchange typically offers an instant withdrawal feature, and might be a steward over hundreds of thousands of Bitcoins. To minimize the possibility that an intruder could steal the entire reserve in a security breach, the operator of the website follows a best practice by keeping the majority of the reserve in cold storage, or in other words, not present on the web server or any other computer. The only amount kept on the server is the amount needed to cover anticipated withdrawals.
Q. Is it possible to run away with coins in cold storage?
A. You generate a wallet on the offline computer the same way that you do on an online computer. This makes sure your Bitcoin private keys are in cold storage. You then make a “watching-only” copy of that wallet to be used imported on the online computer. Using this watching-only wallet, you can generate addresses and monitor payments exactly the same as any other wallet. In order to send money, you will be doing the following:
Create unsigned transaction (online).
Sign it (offline).
Broadcast it (online).
Q. Why other dice sites provide cold storage addresses?
A. Main purpose of cold storage is to ensure protection of coins against hackers, there is NO guarantee of any sort that admin (such as Dean of PocketRocketCasino) won't SCAM you eventually. All the funds in any cold wallet (for instances PocketRocketCasino's one) are as fragile as any ordinary wallet as private key holder can RUN with your coins at any time, there is nothing stopping them from doing so.
Note to the technical sites that should be considered as well.
Let's assume we have only one investor who has invested 100 btc at kelly 10
That's all
So we would have a bankroll of 1000 btc, shown to everyone who would wish to check.
However, the cold wallet would only show 100 btc.
Now, with more and more investors and different kelly selections, the picture is even more bizarre
Like ours:
Bankroll is currently 924
Actually available 546
This means that we still have not reached the 10% originally stipulated
We have another issue as well. Our largest investor in the site does not wish to have this publicly known.
We have the most advanced stats site of any dice site and strive to be as transparent as possible, but we cannot act against the wishes of our members, particularly our largest investor.
As a matter of fact the investor came to our public chat to discuss his concerns and that it was witnessed by many other members. The reason behind the investors statements: Privacy concerns
In addition we have decided to provide each investor who has invested a minimum of 1 BTC their own private cold storage address.
|
|
|
|
Many are talking as if Da Dice is a scam. Find me a single scam accusation, lol. How are you even comparing? Edit: People are unaware of the facts. There is no withdrawal that did not get honored. Nor are there any complaints regarding loss of funds, or anything related. This is pure speculation. Da Dice hasn't yet provided a Proof of Solvency. But, that doesn't make it a scam... A competitor just made random hits, and he got lucky at one.. Did you know , A ponzi is not a scam unless it defaults on the payouts ? All the while it runs, its just like this claiming to have money, but shows no proof of it. Thanks to bitcoin , we can have that proof, and not showing it, just means one thing. The big investor excuse is stupid isn't it ? And now that trusted people are ready to verify solvency, refusing that means you know what. Then you cannot trust any site whatsoever. A ponzi is a scam from the beginning. They either lie about their earning rates or tell you it is a ponzi in the first place. If you apply the same principles, you cannot trust any outsider except yourself.. The big investor excuse makes sense, if you really think about it. There are always workarounds. All you need is a proof that Da Dice has control over such amount of funds as it shows, right? They have also spent a lot in development of their site, as well as marketing. They can't spend it unless they had it in the first place.. |
|
|
|
Re: Every topic in this section is pure crap. Like this one? You should have put 'except this one' somewhere... Dear Noobs and Semi-Noobs, It isn't addresses to me? Sorry.  btw, you are partly right. I am glad they created a seperate child-board for ponzis.  |
|
|
|
Many are talking as if Da Dice is a scam. Find me a single scam accusation, lol. How are you even comparing? Edit: People are unaware of the facts. There is no withdrawal that did not get honored. Nor are there any complaints regarding loss of funds, or anything related. This is pure speculation. Da Dice hasn't yet provided a Proof of Solvency. But, that doesn't make it a scam... A competitor just made random hits, and he got lucky at one.. |
|
|
|
No body contacted me about this,no body said anything to me about this,this is totaly unfair to me,this has been happening for the last 2 weeks,no body sended me a private message saying that my posts wont count in my thread that only 40% willl count,so why dont you now remove other members the post from my thread,because you clearly dont give a damn ,this is totaly unfair!
We have reached new terms. Sorry for any inconvenience. I will check how popular your thread is tho soon. -----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
This is shorena from bitcointalk.org and today is May 20th 2015.
I hereby resign from the dadice.com signature campaign.
Due to the recent events regarding the site I can no longer advertise
for it with a good conscience. This has nothing to do with ndnhc, bf4btc
or Carra23. They have done a fantastic job managing the campaign.
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
1L7eTaT7MQmKuTQRQMDmcxzKJ5HZHC52Q9
H3WxbpnYS+6vVAEPVt1ugFmbg4yEr/24FZcO1VBSlnpoFa89sgF4Pty7p+EdZjUiK9IR7KNSBNQ3n0tE9IjX0U4=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Sad to see you leave.  Hope you get back soon, after this thing gets fixed. I had suggested an alternative to Da Dice. It is a more practical solution to them. Also req. them to re enable investments or something, else you (plural noun ) will take that simply as an excuse.
Wow.
Shocked at this, surprised you're almost bowing down to peer pressure here shorena just because a few rival sites seem intent to shit talk da dice.
You're probably the best poster on the sig campaign.
Shame to see you go mate.
It's a happy thing, quickseller and shorena are the best posters, so I will get more bonus per weeks, haha IMO, dadice never scammed anyone, why those people attack them, lol. LOL. But we might reduce the reward if everyone gets lousy at posting. (Not likely tho ) Yeah, they always honored every withdrawals till now, investments, plus they are paying bug bounties, development, fixing bugs, campaigns,.. I am positive their intent is to become no. 1 as fast as they can. Haven't found any reason to distrust them yet.. -snip-
Wow.
Shocked at this, surprised you're almost bowing down to peer pressure here shorena just because a few rival sites seem intent to shit talk da dice.
You're probably the best poster on the sig campaign.
Shame to see you go mate.
Other dice sites have nothing to do with this, besides maybe other sites that have scammed in the past. This was the best signature campaign I every participated in. I hope Im wrong and there will all be a happy end next month. You're a loss to the Da Dice community here on bitcointalk mate. I have to respect your decision though, sorry for bothering you. He isn't leaving forever, is he. I will try to get him back as soon as this proof of solvency thing gets fixed. |
|
|
|
The new month will start from 25th May* to 25th June*. The enrollment will begin from 24th May* 00:01 GMT. Yeah, you will have to enroll again. *Conditions apply. Subject to change. |
|
|
|
Plus they are having a scammer represent them and paying a scammer to advertise for them. This only strengthens concerns that DaDice is in fact a scam. Why else would they hire a scammer to advertise for them if they were not planning on scamming themselves?
Sorry mate, if you don't mind can you shed some light on what this is all about - since I have no idea what you are talking about. Thanks! Scammer's profile link - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=138744They are being allowed to participate in your signature campaign even though he received negative trust and is a scammer. Refrence thread1 shows where the scammer had scammed. Refrence post1 shows how it is impossible for the scammer to make the conclusion that he did not in fact scam. Refrence thread2 is where the scammer attempted to bully me into removing the negative rating. Additionally he has been trolling me for well over a month now because of the negative rating that I left him. As long as he is a paid representative/advertiser of your site I would personally consider your site to be untrustworthy. We have already investigated into it. And I don't really think he should be removed from the campaign because of that singular issue you have mentioned. The trust is not valid as per the current rules. And I don't think I am not the only one (nor dadice or other representatives/moderators of Da Dice) that say he shouldn't be allowed to participate in the campaign. Dunno what that has to do with you trusting the site Anyway, lol, not feeling like arguing here.. Edit: I get the impression that you are taking your personal opinion to such extent |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
