This is a bitcoin forum, mate. So, 1 BTC = 1 BTC  There are going to be arguments like: Why in dollars? Why not Euro? Why not equivalent price in Gold? Why not an altcoin? Edit: May be a profile feature that will allow users to select the currency they want. |
|
|
|
|
Don't be fooled by the quiet and stable price. The next pump will bring it all the way up to at least $18000.
There simply is too much demand.
Put your buy orders now
|
|
|
|
I read the neutral rating. Running a "ponzi" type scheme, but has modified his site to give more accurate information to members. Which part do you disagree with? It is a valid trust feedback. Your trust score still reads 0, and I doubt whether it is going to affect what you do. |
|
|
|
I am a quite interested in this as it certainly seems like a much better site than the bit777 I was originally looking at, and at a lower price.
However the clouds over dadice's legitimacy give me pause. I'm trying to look for a reasonable explanation for why dadice would be willing to destroy its credibility both to serious players and a potential buyer if it truly did have the bankroll/solvency, but such an explanation eludes me. I don't think this is a fatal flaw, as with a new solvent management (who can prove solvency) this can be resolved), but it would be nice to hear the fully story, even if it was as simple as "We thought it was a white-lie to say we had 500 BTC bankroll, but then backed ourselves into a corner when people started demanding we prove it. However, we never missed a payment"
Regardless, what I'm most interested in is some actual data on the expenses to date, especially on knowing the ballpark of faucet costs. But the total spent away in jackpots, advertising and other operating costs would go a long way to establishing the sites value.
You have PMs waiting, mate.  |
|
|
|
Bump. |
|
|
|
Couldn't you have just replied to my PM and say it WAS related to QS?
Thanks for confirming you did, lol. I had no way of being sure.
There you go, twisting my words. You have severe reading comprehension issues. You remove a year old rating yesterday (or the day before. No idea), and post hours later in that thread. That was how I saw it, sorry, if it was just another coincidence.  No need it to add it back. I just wanted to know for sure.. Thanks |
|
|
|
I removed a trust that I left you. I am allowed to do that, I can change my mind about vouching for someone whenever I want to. I didn't remove any other trusts or add any new ones except to the two obvious scammers. Feel free to twist this around and use it to slander me, I don't care.
Couldn't you have just replied to my PM and say it WAS related to QS? You are allowed, but people don't usually remove feedbacks for something totally unrelated. I don't mind about my trust ratings much, but it tells where you stand. Thanks for confirming you did, lol. I had no way of being sure. No. Unfortunately trust ratings are in no way saved.
Yeah, I understand. |
|
|
|
|
Is there a way to see the past rating I had received but which got deleted a few days ago?
It is not possible to archive it, I think, since everything relating to trust feedbacks only get visible when you login.
|
|
|
|
I think why don't you agree on a reasonable price for the work? I value it at more than 0.035 BTC.  |
|
|
|
Username : ndnhc Edit: because of their giveaways.  |
|
|
|
|
PQ (alt of QR) agrees to sell something to xyz (a jr. member) using QR as escrow. xyz sents the payment to QR.
Both of them denies receiving the payment. What can xyz do?
Even if xyz starts a scam accusation, he is not likely to succeed arguing against PQ and QR, who will be seen as independent persons with at least one of them of good repute.
And as BadBear pointed out, escrow will very likely always be siding with PQ.
|
|
|
|
Funily enough, the person that just gave a negative rating to tspacepilot is only under tomatocage in default trust. What a biased rating too. Almost makes this look like a conspiracy. Seriously TC, trim your trust list. /jk you're free to do as you please TC has an exclusion against me, I am not in his trust list. I'm no fool and I'm not afraid to stand up when I see wrong. It's clear that turtlehurricane and tspacepilot have teamed up and attacked QS over various different things in order to get negative trust removed for things they did. at one point they even called out for others to join in and fire more accusations against him at once. They'll have to do the same thing against me to get me removed from DT. Hi, Just that you know, you already got into my list of suspicious alts two months ago. I noticed the removing and adding of trust feedbacks. I have zero evidence to support anything I said, but from the past 3 days, you are acting strange.  Edit: I don't think QS is TC. lol, that would be pretty difficult. |
|
|
|
Can someone explain what is exactly the purpose of this?
to stop the abuse. What abuse? I have never seen this NSFW/gay porn pics anywhere yet.. (I am the Marketplace-Meta-Off-topic kind of user ) where are these threads that is abusing this privilege located? (Just curious) Can't the newbie simply post the images in the second post  no. they need to wait until they have reached 30 activity. I think you're confusing newbies for brand new members. Second post after OP, mate. You get what I am talking about? Edit: I think none of the images posted by newbies appear? or just the ones on the OP? |
|
|
|
Actually its you who lacks technical knowledge. you are using a block explorer which gives no info on double spends and if you research a bit you will find that blockcypher is very reliable block explorer.
secondly I guess you are the one who cant read properly as op himself is saying that he attempted double spend. seems you are more worried for his funds than himself. OP had done double spends earlier also.
And op instead of double spending you could have contacted here the support.
No point arguing with you. I have better use of my time. I hope site admin will handle things appropriately. Cheers ndnhc |
|
|
|
Can someone explain what is exactly the purpose of this? Edit: gay porn ?? Can't the newbie simply post the images in the second post The forum is getting weirder by the day lol. |
|
|
|
I have sent a PM to badbear, and he responded by ask me to send email, but until now no incoming mail to me You just have to wait. Admins have really a lot of stuff to do. |
|
|
|
Hi ndnhc, thanks 4 express your feelings about the ascii art. To be honest, i didnīt know that some people only see boxes. For the record, im using win7.
So, since 4 me everybody matters, i will be caution with that.
Feel free to manifest your concerns, when you have one. We are here, to learn and improve.
Best regards.
≧=ʘ‿ʘ=≦
Internet explorer? Doesn't show up in Chrome in Windows 10. Well, that one does ^^. You can use images too. Like image of the post instead of the post. No, it is fine. It could probably just me. I am fine with it, just curious, lol. |
|
|
|
@maarx you didn't read it properly. @sbankerdemon you lack technical knowledge AND didn't read properly. Please use any explorer that is NOT blockchain.info and that weird one. The correct blockchain only identifies the real transaction which is: http://btc.blockr.io/tx/info/e951ceae8b4360f141461d4929d6ef428ed287e91f3f3a775f6faa1098f2b0ffThe other transaction does not exist. In case you don't believe me and still trust blockchain. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=910134.msg12053554#msg12053554If pachiko was hacked it could be because: 1. They use blockchian API 2. They does not follow the industry practice of payout after 1 confirmation or does not have proper stuff in place like LB does. I am quite tired of advising sites to follow that 1 confirmation thing. No offence meant to admin. Admin can try linking or find any proof whether he is the hacker, lol. If the hacker wanted to try again he would try a smaller amount that is less than the max bet, and I thought this 1 confirmation thing was implemented? Cheers ndnhc P.S. Nice to see my promo board still online. |
|
|
|
|
I doubt whether Quickseller's "justification" holds. This kind of behavior is certainly unprofessional and not trustworthy to say the least.
Trusted members of the community are expected to hold some basic things and respect it.
I have no idea who is who's alt, but what if something happens like:
1. I make an agreement with X, and an escrow Y who is actually an alt of X, which no one is aware of (No one is aware of who is who's alt around here, so it is a completely possible speculation)
2. After I send say 1BTC to escrow, I get no reply.
3. Game over.
I start a scam accusation, I will be dealing with the escrow and the seller, both of them who are supposedly independent agrees that I have not paid 1BTC to anyone. If I am, say a jr. member (easy target), how many would be on my side arguing against say, Quickseller?
I doubt anyone is going to use escrow if this kind of behavior is taken as "fine" in the community
The concept of escrow lies in two principles:
1. The expected independence of the escrow from both buyer and seller.
2. Being a third-party.
IMO, fee charged (and the invalid trust feedback he shouldn't have received from the other party) is less important, but just that is significant enough.
|
|
|
|
QS ignored. Anyone can play at any dice site. You played at Da Dice too and participated in Da Dice campaign, I remember. Jumped ship coz someone else offered a better deal. Edit: I am not referring to rollin or anything which is currently in his sig. Don't get me wrong there. This ^^ is meant for QS only. @OP Waiting for today's game. A nice way of advertising da dice on this thread eh? Well Good luck on your daily game of dice. It was in Gambling board, I am pretty sure. Even thought mods deleted the thread, lol. Edit: OP changed images to links? Edit2: How is Service discussion the appropriate board? I don't think OP moved it. Probably mods. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
