Should? Yes. People should be doing so many things, but are they doing to do them? No. People are keen on being lazy, they're ready to do as little as possible and that's how the world works. So people aren't going to end up encrypting their drives, gosh they barely remember their passwords for their bitcoin private keys -- you think they're going to end up remembering more for their drives.

So I guess we're going to start again on the 27th? As on the spreadsheet, it makes sense as it seems to be that people are going to be checked on the 3rd for their 30 posts.

Is that right Lauda?

Yay! Been a wonderful campaign and I'm really hoping to continue it for a long time to come!'


Thanks again Lauda.

The price may be volatile, but that's not going to stop anyone from using an online portfolio (connected up with the exchange that you buy and sell on) to be able to fetch the data from the site where you have your coins. This would, painlessly, tell you the EXACT value of your portfolio with ease.

I don't see this being such a big issue.

If Bitcoin was to collapse I think a good portion of the market cap of crypto (in the hundreds of billions) would have to shift into the market cap of more traditional stock, bonds, etc. This is due to people being scared that if they leave their money in risky investments, then they're going to lose money -- causing them to shift back to things that have traditionally worked in order to make themselves feel safer.

Probably a good lesson for the new generation that they can lose money at any time if they risk too much.

A skill that only few have, I'll even say that I personally can't even do this. It's tough to just forgot about all of the money that you've thrown at something and let time do it's course, but if you want to make it in the world of crypto (or any investment) you're going to have to let time to just that.

Don't let FUD and news stories sway you, just let it ride folks. Plus, you shouldn't be investing with any money that you can't lose. So whatever you put into crypto should be accounted as being lost already.

I wouldn't waste your time, nor your money on something which has been fully debunked as useless and a scam. Technical analysis isn't going to help as much as your own research, your own gut, and your own will for looking for something which is a good investment for you. TA is a way for people to try to trick you, or for you to feel like you've got a sure bet because the 'chart says so'

Don't do it.  

As there are a good amount of people who are trading crypto, trading bitcoin, and so on and so forth. Do you think there is a lot of money to be made in doing accounting / tax work for people who need it in the bitcoin space? As I would think a lot of people who are involved in trading, exchanges, etc aren't complying with IRS / their tax authroity rules which they have to be complying too.

Plus, how many of you actually do your taxes for bitcoin anyway?

Use a service in the middle, like bitpay or coinbases merchant solution. This makes it so you don't have to worry about the volatility of bitcoin when you're accepting payments and if the price does crash it won't affect you at all. All of your money would be instantly converted into Fiat USD and then sent to a bank account. This is a much better (and safer) way for bitcoin to be accepted by people when it comes to the bottom line.

Wish ya luck!

No, and it won't at all. This is because Putin was going to have a very easy victory, it's not like everyone thought he was going to lose due to him supporting crypto (this isn't true, I'm just making something crazy up) Putin was the favorite to win, and it would've had to be a crazy coup in Russia for him to have to lose his election.

Something that isn't a shocker isn't going to affect the price of any commodity.

While I do like the new news coming in, I don't think the best source of unbiased news is going to be a website called 'DailyHodl' That in and of itself isn't going to be a reliable source of news in any way as they're (of course) going to be biased towards the people that own bitcoin, and are going to continue to hold it. What we really need is a crusade for non-biased journalism. Journalism that can't be bought by people for the sake of them making themselves a few bucks.


We need to bring transparency back into the newsroom.

None of them are good, all of these chats are filled with people that are trying to get people to buy coins at certain prices, sell at certain prices, and so on and so forth. There's no need to be in a chat that is going to try to screw you for themselves as TA has been found to be relatively bullshit. It makes people feel good in times of the bull, though people run from it when the floor falls out.

Don't get involved with TA scum, it's a waste.

Yeah I don't think one G20 meeting by a nonbinding body of people should really sway the market, though the market could simply shift the other way (start going bullish) and we could all say it's due to the fact that this occurred though I don't think that this random meeting is really going to change the minds, the hearts, and most importantly, the pockets of investors.

Who knows, I guess we'll see.

I'd have to agree with you even though I'm a trader myself. As the value of Bitcoin continues to rise and rise, people are going to think that it's a way to get rich. This is something that we saw in the runup in December, and we're going to see again if the Bitcoin price is able to recover. So people do stop using it (or the people that used it drift into the minority) when the traders come into Bitcoin as a way to make money.

So yes, with a price increase comes an intrinsic value decrease.

It'll go back to the person at some point, so it's not like it's going to be lost in oblivion if the transaction isn't confirmed. Though this does depend highly on the wallet that you're using, as some wallets know that they're able to reuse that money if it isn't confirmed after a set amount of time (given this is all for the sender, this isn't something the receiver would do without)

So yeah, not lost.

It depends on the way in which you use it. If you use it like a currency, then no it isn't even close to digital gold. But if you are to use it as an investment, it could be digital gold -- as you're just sitting around and waiting for it to be worth more (which is what a lot of people do with bitcoin and gold)

So yes and no, depending on the way in which you use / see bitcoin.

G20 has no legislative power, only the governments (Congress and the executive) of each individual control would be able to place regulation, legislation, and so on and so forth about bitcoin. So this isn't a victory, this is what should happen anyway.

G20 just offers recommendations,nothing of what they say is legally binding.

If you still know your wallet address, then you'd be able to see if it has any funds in it. If you've lost the wallet altogether the coins could still be there but you wouldn't be able to access them. So the only way it would have value is if you had the private key / password if it's an online wallet.

Got it?

If you're going to make such a large claim like this on a public forum, you're going to have to toss up some evidence to support that claim. As no one is going to blindly trust you on such a serious allegation.

So yeah, toss up some evidence and then we'll reassess this.

Yes, without a doubt. As a good amount of people are going to complain that they're getting scammed from 'crypto' ads, which are pretty much all scams on social media (as they're targetting the easiest people to scam and the most vulnerable)

So yes, they're going to ban crypto if they have't done it already.