Bitcoin Forum
May 24, 2024, 12:01:07 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 [17] 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 »
321  Other / Meta / Re: Self-made Legendary Observer - first legendaries after the merit system. on: November 11, 2019, 04:01:36 PM
So just to be clear what this thread is about...

You want to present another meaningless thread regarding the meaningless accumulation of meaningless merits, but the twist with this one is you are creating rules like first to earn 990 rather than earn 1000 to become a RULZ champ so that you have a great chance to be the first??

Ha ha, meta board. hehe..

0 - 1000 is the only RULZ champ that will be acceptable. Starting with 10?? first to earn 990? hehehe


What about first legend to have iasenko in their username?? is the only real champ?

The 0 - 1000 that does not lose 70% + of the merits if you take their top 20 cycling fans and meta board merits  away is the only RULZ legend that can be the champ of that pretty meaningless heap with any shred of credibility.  

Come on guys this is getting beyond silly.

RULZ champs ONLY

say NO to fake RULZ champs. haha

Any one claiming false RULZ should be shunned.





322  Other / Meta / Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - The-Ass-Above-All got rekt on: November 11, 2019, 03:26:03 PM

We suspected the same. However it may be that we need to examine dsylexia and see how that could throw some light on the matter.

https://i.imgur.com/eEaujom.png


Perhaps a good one for the irony thread.

Shit ..REKT yet again... this is too easy for you guys to prove undeniable instances of scamming are simply to be ignored or even perhaps rewarded if they are your pals?

I think if you also included all of the other 20 spelling/grammatical errors in that post and most other huge posts we make, and coupled with the fact we copied and pasted the correct spelling right underneath it would add to the super irony of it all. Or you could refer to the explanation given already here on this thread that we thrash them out and don't correct the highlighted errors because it would be very time consuming and besides the effort reward ratio would be very low.]

There really was no need to take a little pic, we were not going to do a nutildah on it ffs. lol

Anyway, just to get back on to slightly more important issues. Are you going to investigate the initial post and the observable instances of undeniable scamming and do as you would with any other member, give red trust and exclude them from DT?

Let's be sensible, you know these observable behaviors step WAY OVER the threshold of what most people would consider financially high risk and scamming.

Let's forget the bitchy hair pulling and tit for tat comments. Let's just be sensible and agree that deliberate deception for direct financial gain is scamming , requires red trust and exclusion from DT.

Would you not agree that deliberately defending undeniable scamming even where the scammer does not deny his scamming could certainly be seen as financially high risk behavior? 

Get on the right side of this, why put all this effort hunting minor scammers who will likely just pop up again when you can be clearly observed here to be defending scammers in positions of TRUST (due in part to your enabling them) that can leverage that to do a lot more damage.

Be sensible and start acting like a person that members can trust to be doing all they can to stop financially high risk people endangering the rest of the honest members here.
323  Other / Meta / Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - The-Ass-Above-All got rekt on: November 10, 2019, 03:43:08 PM
Haha,

I think you missed this part

When I compared your writing of "suspected as same person":


It means that it is is far more likely than not that it was written by the same person.

So:

Is Cryptohunter an account that you or "we" ever had or have the password for ? Yes / No

Failing to answer the question shows you are morally corrupt and intent to deceive.

rekt.

Seems to me like he's trying to facilitate the scam of wasting our time.



Can you confirm ( by asking your mother to confirm) that you are intending to be called xtraelv?  is your name trev? by any chance? or lex? hang on alex?? hmmm I thought this self debunking tactic was familiar..



Good try. Not even warm. Is this a pathetic attempt to DOX cause you got rekt ?

xtraelv is a gamer moniker - I think some of my rankings are still available.

Yep, asking if someone jumbled their username letters and clearly demonstrating they don't know what your name is a failed attempt to doxxx them haha
Then xldiv says: when you have forced me to clearly demonstrate that I xtraelv :

1. am undeniably a supporter of undeniable scammers
2. I reward undeniable scammers
3. I will present hilarious excuses to protect my undeniable scamming pals and place at high financial risk the rest of the forum
4. I am therefore undeniably financially high risk myself.
5. I will seek to derial, divert and side track to off topic garbage to attempt to discredit observable instance that can not be discredited
6. I will make ludicrous statements regarding other members that are perhaps among the observably most net positive in terms of fighting scams, giving tips that made more millionaires, and fighting for transparent rules/standards that ensure the fair treatment of all members, who have zero instances of financially motivated wrong doing in their entire history.

7.will claim that my speculations on non financially high risk issues are facts but then claim others undeniable observable instances demonstrating undeniable scamming are ......well I will just make excuses and in public refuse to answer yes or no. Looking extremely shady in light of the scammers themselves do not even deny it.

8. Will claim that identifying something you have already said you clearly intend to do is clear evidence you really did intend to do it.

then this means you are REKT.


This may seem by the scammers themselves as if you are trying to assist us in punishing them via dragging them and causing us to examine their undeniable scamming actions over and over. The hilarious excuses and crazy accusations are an attempt to demonstrate the scamming is impossible to defend and even attempting to do so is humiliating to the excuse provider and insulting to the reader.

We suspected the same. However it may be that we need to examine dsylexia and see how that could throw some light on the matter.

We decided to try and understand you and though thought process a little more.

https://www.understood.org/en/learning-thinking-differences/child-learning-disabilities/dyslexia/skills-that-can-be-affected-by-dyslexia

Dyslexia doesn’t only affect reading. It can make a lot of things hard for kids and adults. Here are some of the other skills and behaviors dyslexia can affect—some of which may surprise you.

Understand and follow directions

Repeat something in the right order

Remember words, phrases, names, and directions

Find the right word to say

Pronounce words the right way

Tell the difference between words that sound similar

Learn and use new words

Spell and use grammar the right way

Rhyme

Stay on topic

Understand jokes, puns, and sarcasm

Speak or read out loud with confidence

“Sound out” and pronounce words while reading

Get and stay interested in stories and books

Understand what’s read

Understand word problems in math

Write letters, numbers, and symbols in the right order

Express ideas in an organized way

Listen and take notes

Interpret body language and other social cues

Make and keep friends

Express feelings appropriately

Tell left from right

Build self-esteem

I mean these ( the red ones) certainly could be having a serious effect on your ability to hold a sensible and credible debate.

This is not something that we should really be capitalizing on even if it is punishing the scammers you are seeking  to defend and reward or perhaps you are not intending on doing that at all( i mean you may  not be deliberately high risk you may just be very befuddled and being used unfairly as a useful idiot by both sides)

You need to think it all over again, and perhaps even ask someone else to go through it all with you to make sure you are presenting yourself as you really wish to be seen.

No need to rush. We are not going to abandon you at this stage, don't worry.

You need to seriously consider this is all being documented and will remain here in history perhaps for quite a while.  

It is never too late to repent and do the right thing.  If you quit defending scammers at this point I see no further need for us to be working against each other. I do see you have put some work into finding other REAL scammers. I do not say you are entirely rotten like some members here. HOWEVER you can not support UNDENIABLE SCAMMERS.  Please do not reply and DO NOT RUSH into keeping this going unless you really believe that defending undeniable scammers is the correct thing to do.

We are ready to be civil and fair (well we have always been fair) with you BUT you need to be sensible and accept that this is auction scamming and that anyone else would have red and not be on DT, especially when you couple this will ALL the other evidence of supporting other undeniable scammers and trust abuse.

Get on the correct side of this because this is all public and on record. You can not present any credible case to explain his deliberate deception for clear and direct financial gain in any other terms other than scamming. That is exactly what scamming is.

Let's just agree it observably meets the universally accepted definition of scamming and is clear scamming for financial gain. Even alone this is NOT the acceptable behavior of a default trust member.



324  Other / Meta / Re: Irony on bitcointalk on: November 09, 2019, 02:51:22 AM
So then are we saying that Tradefortress is not UNDENIABLY a scammer? it is speculation that he scammed and was not hacked?  was he not refunding people also in recent years?  If so what exactly do you mean that is is "good" that the trust system has evolved?

What does this instance here demonstrate is the  "good" part about the evolution? I just want to understand what you mean?

I'm being generous here with my speculation. He didn't refund everything that he lost/scammed. I'm not even sure if he himself knows how much he still owes.

It's good that the Trust system has evolved so that hopefully never again a single anonymous person will be allowed to scam so much money from so many people. People have placed way too much trust in him than they should have for their own good.

I hear what you are saying, but I do not understand how the trust system now would prevent an anonymous person doing this again? Actually if theymos removed him directly when this went down, then it seems to me the trust system is far weaker now. Does theymos now do kyc on all DT1?
325  Other / Meta / Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ??????????? on: November 09, 2019, 02:15:41 AM
Haha,

I think you missed this part

When I compared your writing of "suspected as same person":


It means that it is is far more likely than not that it was written by the same person.

So:

Is Cryptohunter an account that you or "we" ever had or have the password for ? Yes / No

Failing to answer the question shows you are morally corrupt and intent to deceive.

rekt.

Seems to me like he's trying to facilitate the scam of wasting our time.

Can someone help nutildah to the part where this was addressed and clearly demonstrated to be meaningless. I mean when someone intends to be seen clearly as cryptohunter and clearly says they intend to use his style then it would only come a surprise to you that that is what we do. Besides he probably means 0.29 or pasted the wrong emails. The entire thing is funny. I could claim I posted your recent posts and ones before the account sale and only got a 0.00 match hahaha, that bozo probably posted something of cryptohunters we quoted in one of our posts..lol next 1.0 match and calls that proof...haha who knows what he will pull on you guys next. Don't fall for it so easily nutildah, he is out to get you next I think haha. Wait until he starts making his excuses for you , then you will feel tmans pain..hahah... He likely has set that irony thread up just for you guys after realizing it is perfect to slap the ironic undeniable scammers come scamhunters on.

Besides even if true ( which it is not) wasting the time of a dangerous undeniable scammers or self confessed willing scam facilitator for pay WHOM tries to cover their tracks when caught, can certainly be viewed as helping the honest members of the community by distracting your evil attention in our direction. I would say that could certainly be considered net positive.

What if you had free time to give out trading tips ANTI MIDAS... imagine the damage to honest investors you could do??  NEM STAKE HOLDER To begging for 0.02 btc loans and having to move to a turd world shit hole to survive on his scampaign sig spamming  WHICH HE WAS NEVER INTERESTED IN... well that's what the original sales pitch claimed...haha

http://web.archive.org/web/20190704162438/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1622642.0

Come on xtraevl nuttildah is getting impatient, he wants his turn in the xtraelv meat grinder .............let's just get TMAN confirmed by you ( i mean it is undeniable anyway) but in your own words that Tman was scamming in his that auction we have been discussing. Then on to our  EVIL friend here nutildah.

I mean imagine being here years and years, and still having to beg for 0.02btc loans nutildah.... that really is sad (for you anyway). Imagine is you really were a NEM stake holder hahaha you must be crying being given 6 MILLION dollars or nearly 300 BTC and now begging for 0.02btc loans in public...the shame is too much. I can't even talk about it , I almost imagined that happening to me and I felt ...... well like you would when you wake up next to tmans wife in the morning having dreamed you pulled, well something female anyway,..... anyway you know exactly what I am talking about in both cases..hahahah
326  Other / Meta / Re: Irony on bitcointalk on: November 09, 2019, 01:45:05 AM


Speaking of irony and TradeFortress, he used to be one of the most trustworthy users here, theymos even added him to DT1 back when it had only a handful of manually added forum members. He was also very vocal when it came to security and scammers himself later either becoming a victim to a hack or exit scamming (probably a mixture of both). Good that the Trust system has evolved since those times.

So then are we saying that Tradefortress is not UNDENIABLY a scammer? it is speculation that he scammed and was not hacked?  was he not refunding people also in recent years?  If so what exactly do you mean that is is "good" that the trust system has evolved?

What does this instance here demonstrate is the  "good" part about the evolution? I just want to understand what you mean?
327  Other / Meta / Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ??????????? on: November 09, 2019, 01:38:13 AM
Haha,

I think you missed this part

Was tmans auction deception for direct financial gain SCAMMING  - YES OR NO??

Now don't be extra silly and go and say, well you have not answered the cryptohunter password question, because it is easy for the reader to look back and observe clearly you are refusing to answer our question THAT IS ON TOPIC and relevant since it relates to a DT member/ Dirty turd, and we are not going to indulge your off topic and irrelevant question (concerning a non DT member) until you have done so.

Now get on with answering our question before the scammers catch on to what we are really doing here.

Was tmans auction deception for direct financial gain SCAMMING  - YES OR NO??




We should not really indulge you since you are Undeniably a  SCAMMER SUPPORTER and refuse to answer a simple question.

Although you may deny it,  I have sought others opinions and they agree. There can be no doubt that you are "more likely than not " friendly and must be attempting to help us draw attention to the undeniable scamming actions of at least TMAN. Although I am sure you will help to drag the other scammers through the mill with us at great length too. I want to just thank you for that opportunity to bring another 1200 plus views and several extra pages thrashing out their undeniable scamming ways.

Thanks for providing more easy to debunk assumptions and the very poor " more likely than not"  lsm score.  I mean since we immediately came to meta, immediately continued where cryptohunter left off, and immediately addressed everyone with the same pet names he gave them, and stated we fully intending to match or as best we could replicate the style he had adopted. Since that is all pretty much public domain stuff then that score is very upsetting. Me must do better.

That kind of puts your other statements/fantasies firmly in the realm of speculation and wishful thinking.

Of course spouting undeniable madness regarding the true legend cryptohunters net negative "effect" on the forum in all those years is a brilliant master stroke. I mean knowing full well he is arguably the largest scam hunter ( in terms of effectiveness) in the entire forums history. Not just for forcing a $ 2 000 000 000 (20 000 000 back then) compensation airdrop offer to the entire board, but actually for making their project synonymous with instamine/scamming. Their community has accused him of preventing them knocking bitcoin from the top spot on coinmarketcap. That is reasonable since even though a huge proportion of the entire board was screaming it was a scam, the project was at number 2 spot for some time.  That is not even consider all the other HUGE projects that he met head on in battle and often alone against hoards of " investors/insiders" over the years and was first to break many huge scams to the main board.

That is not even considering that it was demonstrated he picked ...I think it was 6 of the top 12 largest rising projects in the last bull run way before the bull took place, giving freely his advice and making many millionaires from nothing.  

There is FAR more - pushing and helping the fair launch protocol for all members to have a fair chance to mine at the start of launch, being a community holder for a project when at one point he was holding huge dollar values of coins and no problems with him scamming. Pushing for a fair initial distribution for many many projects against greedy scum when he could have gained far more advantage himself by accepting their methods. Defending against bullying of other members.


You on the other hand are supporting and protecting SCAMMERS in fact some of the very scammers that the real legend cryptohunter has fought before, scammers that lied and scammed and tried to prevent the $ 2 000 000 000 usd air drop compensation offer to the entire board. Who then went accuse cryptohunter of being a liar years later, when he asked for evidence they just repeated the false claim. When cryptohunter told these undeniable scammers that he would point others to their history they trust abused his account haha and theymos sits there and does nothing, but more or less tells cryptohunter to shut up moaning he is boring...hahaha


You can't expect anyone who knows the past to take you as a noob fool, thinking playing whack a mole with the odd 2 bit scammers, whilst protect and supporting HUGE past time scammers and undeniable auction scammers is to be taken seriously and is net positive. You are our useful idiot that is your only net positive in any meaningful way.

Now as to your other false accusations...

Theymos warned CH of a ban based on the gamed and weaponized metric of deleted posts. Since we have clearly demonstrated moderators have incentive and clearly do delete posts that are on topic and relevant at the whim of their DT scamming pals who control their sigs then that metric is bogus.  To make it even more LAUGHABLE ...some useful idiot about 10 mins or so after theymos said that reported every single one of his 2 word posts from 6 years of history. So about 22 more deletes in a few mins. haha

Theymos was observably incorrect, cryptohunter did not get angry and start throwing lies around. We challenged theymos to present the lies on a different thread and the entire thread vanished.

The censorship issue is laughable,  but since you feel that those kinds of posts are acceptable and okay look forward to those on your threads.

Now thanks for allowing us to pull you apart and humiliate you again in public whilst boasting about a real legend. Come on scammer supporter, dyslexia can only answer for so much of your retardation.  As if you noob trash bumbling scam supporting dreg, have any business even mentioning cryptohunter.

You are an UNDENIABLE scammer supporter. Those scammers are guilty of multiple counts of financially high risk behaviors, and arguable some of the most financially dangerous members here.

Why are you so TERRIFIED of answering the question we keep asking you.??  It makes you looks super foolish and also super financially high risk to the rest of the board that even TMAN does not deny he was scamming there but you claim it is not scamming but " ONLY COMMENTS"

Don't go full retard, you will be of no use to us at all.

I think you missed this part

Was tmans auction deception for direct financial gain SCAMMING  - YES OR NO??

Now don't be extra silly and go and say, well you have not answered the cryptohunter password question, because it is easy for the reader to look back and observe clearly you are refusing to answer our question THAT IS ON TOPIC and relevant since it relates to a DT member/ Dirty turd, and we are not going to indulge your off topic and irrelevant question (concerning a non DT member) until you have done so.

Now get on with answering our question before the scammers catch on to what we are really doing here.

Was tmans auction deception for direct financial gain SCAMMING  - YES OR NO??


BTW don't reply too quickly,  start waiting till this goes near the bottom of page or at least half way down 1, this is not a sprint, this is a pressure over time tactic which will be far more effective to keep the spotlight on those scammers you are pretending to support. (We will keep deriding and humiliating you to keep them guessing. We will attack from both sides.) If it stays at the very top constantly that is going to start to annoy the other attention seekers as we have already noticed. However if you have more brilliant ideas to make us look good and the scammers look like scammers and you look like a fucktard then don't hold back because you may forget or get muddled up.

Can you confirm ( by asking your mother to confirm) that you are intending to be called xtraelv?  is your name trev? by any chance? or lex? hang on alex?? hmmm I thought this self debunking tactic was familiar..

Good bump on the irony thread, will add some more soon there to keep that current for you.


328  Other / Meta / Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ??????????? on: November 08, 2019, 08:36:27 PM
Observable instances of cryptopajeet being a dumb, insane cunt:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5170789

Need more be said? The thrust of my argument: not really.

Just TRY to COUNTER us with your INANE LOGIC and YOU WILL BE DESTROYED.

xtraelv Huh just pretending to have run away??... to keep our ruse going a little longer??  got to time your reentry, I'll taunt you a bit more, then you burst back in  all fueled up, full of equally funny excuses and comparisons. I'm not expecting you to actually TOP the " only comments" defense but even so, do your uttermost.

Nutildah, we had speculated Tmans variant of mutated tourettes could have been contagious, those " protein" injections him and lauda give you from both ends together was never going to end well. How's living out there going? 0.02btc out there must go a bit further. Plus you have your writing talents to fall back on and dazzle the natives with.

Enjoying this poll and the new irony thread. Ha thought so. I think actually you have more claim to being entertaining than tman. I like how you at least try to present your low functioning garbage in a nicer format. Well, you did.  Or are you aiming for  your own nutildah poetry thread now too?

This poll
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1622642.5 is a little more difficult to follow, it seems to be about cryptohunter but then on further reading it looks like your scam facilitating for 0.3 BTC account selling thread, that you have sneakily edited to try to excuse your evil ways?

Hmm chud or chode...

Default trust member nutildah  ....has quite a ring to it....a very hollow ring now that I hear it. Oh, hold on,   I was just striking a piece of 2 by 4 across tmans skull repeatedly  that was what that sound was... haha  donk donk...haha

Just a small request... could you present the specific example of inane logic you are mistakenly referring to? I think you should stick around (until xlidiv thinks up some more piss taking excuses), if anyone can demonstrate our central points can be debunked it won't be you.
329  Other / Meta / Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ??????????? on: November 08, 2019, 02:35:43 PM
so bring me observable proof of your usefulness here.

bring it or without it by association you are admitting that you suck off donkeys for fun

so without any OBSERVEABLE proof of your usefulness here you have admitted that you suck donkey dick for entertainment.

/thread.

yet again you are running away from my direct challenge, I require OBSERVEABLE proof of your usefulness here on the forum.

you are running like the scared beaten dog you are.

stop running from me

bring me OBSERVEABLE proof of you being useful

PAJEET

The fact you are here crying and bleating like a little girl because I am presenting undeniable observable instances of your observable and undeniable auction scamming is all the proof one needs.

You likely missed the rules of the thread ... this is for the discussion ONLY regarding default trust members so you are again off topic trying to goad me into boasting about my undeniable usefulness.

I mean we are only starting off with low hanging fruit like you Tman because you are an easy target. You don't have the capacity to defend your actions ( well nobody really can from the position you have placed yourself in with such overt scamming, extorting, and self confessed trust abuse of whistle blowers) ..

Just getting warmed up. Although just triggering your tourettes and the outpouring of you broken and diseased mind is also something one can develop an aquired taste for if they can suppress their conscience in relation to the suffering and squirming of undeniable scammers.

Again tman let me ask you to look back and notice that you have failed to answer our ontopic and relevant question FIRST.

Were you scamming on that auction yes or no. If not explain why you feel you were not scamming??

Failure to answer looks ...........well ...........even you can see how it looks surely??  come on auction scammer just fess up and the pain will be over (temporarily)

Take your time tman, don't rush. Give your post some thought.

I was not scamming, I was..err

I was pretending the coin was not my coin and that I would by it if I did not have so many, so I could talk up the price and shout down and threaten other members giving fair appraisal so ..............input your reasons.

or just adopt the " only comments" defense that xtraelv your scammer supporting friend concocted to make your position look .....well rather bad to be fair.

Happy to give you a little more attention until our new helper returns, he can't run away because we have between us sneakily boxed ourselves into a last word scenario that looks like we are in a never ending battle, whilst really as you see he hands me more and more opportunities to recite their undeniable scamming observable instances and also provide hilarious excuses that demonstrate just how silly it would be to attempt excusing them...haha

So come on tmaN ... another cathartic expulsion of all that pent up scamming frustration rolled into a mass of tourettes laden swearing and sexually deviant fantasies to project over this forum like a never ending fountain of pajeet jizz , window lickers slobber , rancid vaginal fluids and anal excretions... hahaha

Go tourettes poet, some of your finest work is yet to come we feel. Just the correct amount of pressure must be applied though, don't want you to put quantity above quality. Pace yourself.

I mean one could argue that since much of your finest poetry is inspired by our good selves, then since that is so valuable that ALONE could be proof enough of our value here??

A lot to get through ( for you) so take your time. Really want to see a good effort this time auction scammer.
330  Other / Meta / Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll -The-One-Above-All is a gay wrestler. on: November 08, 2019, 01:24:12 PM
I'm sure you are disappointed with getting your posts torn to piece and made to look like you have far greater cognitive issues than dyslexia ...haha looks more like serious mental damage driven by the need to feltch the ass holes of your scamming pals whilst virtue signalling for some kind of validation to your pathetic existence.

I highlighted some mistakes. I'm Dyslexic. What is your excuse ?

I had to look up what "feltch" meant and to learn about your alternative lifestyle.


1. vouching for own alt point = No proof since that would be impossible as it is not true, presenting observable instances that are independently verifiable can be done by any person. You seem to want to discount undeniable observable instances of scamming where the scammer does not deny it (because again that would be impossible) but then grasp to theories that are equally as impossible to prove.  That is both funny and desperate ... as are most of your pathetic and retarded excuses and accusations.

Easy to prove.

Is Cryptohunter an account that you or "we" ever had or have the password for ? Yes / No

2. claiming accusing mods for non existent rules in attempt to censor people.... again this is a moronic statement that we will be debunking when we get around to that low priority thread. However since you have just gone and given merit to this post.

My full response that has been there since 5 November

Q: Someone insulted me. Why aren't you deleting his post/thread?
A: Possible (since we don't have the time or resources to check) insults are also allowed as long as they contain any kind of constructive opinion, info or something else substantial and aren't off-topic. For example, posting something like "you are dumb" will be deleted as it contains no meaningful content. However, if the post is somewhere along the lines of "You are dumb. This is wrong because this website/thread/etc. has explained it's not right", it's in most cases accepted.

3. Yes, bitcointalk is entertaining because imbeciles and low functioning dregs with no capacity for reason and debate make fools of themselves over and over when you simply put their posts under scrutiny. The FACT it is amusing they troll themselves whilst not even realizing it, is certainly NOT proof that I am trolling them. Well to a complete fool like you it may be proof of course.

I see you are starting to get some self awareness.

4. Not sure about the dirty turds and clean turds... I guess as the saying goes you can not polish a turd. Hence we have no idea why you spell check your posts to prevent your dyslexia confusing people. I mean your posts are so convoluted and retarded, I think the only real value  could be the challenge of rearranging the letters in the correct order to form the words.  The rest of the mess you shart out ( need to get my shit quota in) I guess does have comedy value but since most here are too low functioning to appreciate how funny you are then only we would benefit. It is good that we lack empathy for scammer supporters else it would be sad rather than funny.

Perhaps you can learn about the use of a double negative and redundancy.

Quote from: The-Ass-Above-All
I don't need no education.

Describing a "dirty turd" implies that there is such thing as a "clean turd". Because if turds are dirty by definition you would not need to use the word dirty in the sentence.

5. merit-less ( i think we debunked the validity of merit several thousand times already). But cling to that if it helps you feel you have to.

Even unpopular characters in the forum get merit. Just shit posters don't get it. If you made one decent post with a well constructed argument, without expletives or personal attacks - it would most likely get merit.

Tag - some other dirty turd can talk to the TOAD "in the ring" so he can have homo-erotic fantasies about doing physical things to you. Just watch out for his hands - he likes balls and faecies.



This is a great ploy trevlax, but don't do it with every post. Tman will never catch on but some of the others may.

This asking questions that were just explained a few posts ago is certainly a nice touch to add to your useful idiot repertoire, but not straight after your other  obvious bungles.  Spread your mistakes out make it seem more believable.

Ah the old feltching... yes now you have the correct term for what you are undeniably performing in public to you scammer masters.

Again with the accusing people of not answering your queries , then when they do and post their own direct questions you immediately and ironically avoid answering

Was tmans auction deception for direct financial gain SCAMMING  - YES OR NO??

Now don't be extra silly and go and say, well you have not answered the cryptohunter password question, because it is easy for the reader to look back and observe clearly you are refusing to answer our question THAT IS ON TOPIC and relevant since it relates to a DT member/ Dirty turd, and we are not going to indulge your off topic and irrelevant question (concerning a non DT member) until you have done so.

Now get on with answering our question before the scammers catch on to what we are really doing here.

Was tmans auction deception for direct financial gain SCAMMING  - YES OR NO??




@mant

Sorry to be giving you less attention than usual - well except to use you as a great example of an undeniable scammer.
However, whilst we have xldiv here with free unlimited bumps and WHOM provides far more helpful openings then you are just going to get the odd derisory put down when and where we feel like it. Since really your random tourettes infested baseless and random slobbering is not even that satisfying to poke fun at then, you see that until we require your bumps you can't expect any more than these crumbs for now. Hope you understand. haha


331  Other / Meta / Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll -The-One-Above-All has clean turds. on: November 07, 2019, 11:58:02 PM
No more double standards allowed. Troll poll is fine here, DT dirty turds poll is fine here. Simple as that. This is far more valuable and indeed does demonstrate to theymos that default trust and merit is entirely broken and indeed dangerous.

No more double standards. Except when it comes to self vouching for his own alt.

Or accusing moderators for not enforcing (non existent) rules in an attempt to censor people whose opinions he doesn't like.



Bitcointalk is the BEST... you can NOT get entertainment like this for free elsewhere. Nowhere else do these dummies exist that will gladly take the piss out of themselves 24/7 on command for free ( well to us) others may have to  pay them dearly with their life savings...hahaha


Proof this troll is just here for the Lulz

Never wrestle with pigs. You both get covered in shit.  The difference being - the pig loves it.

TOAA loves the shit (Just look at all the references he makes to faeces, sexual body fluids) and fantasies about handling wrestling men.



Let me save you the hassle of the word wall. I've turned the scratched record on again.

Quote from: The-One-Above-All
Undeniable proof, click. Undeniable proof, click.... Let me look at your balls while little bears chant, click...dirty turds, click...I win and you are dirty turds,click. Undeniable proof, click. Undeniable proof, click

Do you notice how he refers to "dirty turds" - as opposed to his own "clean turds" that he bathes in.

It is not "free speech" it is merit-less word walls that takes up paid server space.

Sorry - I forgot. TOAA always has to have the last word without responding to anything that was said.

Quote from: The-One-Above-All
Undeniable proof, click. Undeniable proof, click.... dirty turds, click.


Look, I know you are possibly trying to help us bust these scammers by bumping and dragging them through the mud over and over. Forcing us to keep slapping you around with their observable and undeniable scamming deeds that you WILL not agree are scamming yes or no. The fact you keep side tracking is a good ploy in making it worse for them because you want them to seem guilty right (that's why you don't just say no) but saying yes won't have the same impact because it will no longer require us to keep presenting the observable instances of his undeniable scamming over and over. That "only comments " defense was a classic, i mean how do you think up these totally retarded defenses for scammers that would render all scamming null and void since they are just using comments too. That was a master stroke of course. That is the kind of super stupid defense that makes the entire premise that a defense is even possible in such an undeniable auction scam is ridiculous and insulting to the reader.

It's great, but when you start opening other threads that make it too obvious you are setting them up like that they will eventually start catching on. Keep it down a bit and only bump once it gets nearer the bottom of page 1. That way our shared goal of forcing the description of their scamming over and over and over does not lose its bite and become too familiar. Also can you please start opening more threads that give us an ontopic and relevant open to inject this into on other board.

That meriting of one liner insults with no supporting argument and zero real value is another good tactic, and allows us to use you as a useful idiot who become offended at getting humiliated and degraded by pure reason and logic and then uses the merit system on political grounds and will stretch to giving merit to ANY thing at all to get some small form of cathartic release. Excellent work.

haha

Now thanks again for now opening yourself up to allow me to both debunk all of your points and also humiliate you all over again, although the value of doing so it kind of diminishing since it happens to your every post right... try to make some neutral or sensible points that are not overly easy to make a laughing stock out of.

Too many immediate self debunkings and ironic (well those will be useful now we have a thread for them) fuck ups is a bit of a give away hehe

You points have been debunked but I know you want to give us another opportunity to degrade you further in public.

1. vouching for own alt point = No proof since that would be impossible as it is not true, presenting observable instances that are independently verifiable can be done by any person. You seem to want to discount undeniable observable instances of scamming where the scammer does not deny it (because again that would be impossible) but then grasp to theories that are equally as impossible to prove.  That is both funny and desperate ... as are most of your pathetic and retarded excuses and accusations.

2. claiming accusing mods for non existent rules in attempt to censor people.... again this is a moronic statement that we will be debunking when we get around to that low priority thread. However since you have just gone and given merit to this post.

Here she goes again, who put a dollar in the cunt?

Then again you will be our useful idiot for further demonstrating the clear double standards in moderation. Thanks but again don't make it too obvious.

3. Yes, bitcointalk is entertaining because imbeciles and low functioning dregs with no capacity for reason and debate make fools of themselves over and over when you simply put their posts under scrutiny. The FACT it is amusing they troll themselves whilst not even realizing it, is certainly NOT proof that I am trolling them. Well to a complete fool like you it may be proof of course.

4. Not sure about the dirty turds and clean turds... I guess as the saying goes you can not polish a turd. Hence we have no idea why you spell check your posts to prevent your dyslexia confusing people. I mean your posts are so convoluted and retarded, I think the only real value  could be the challenge of rearranging the letters in the correct order to form the words.  The rest of the mess you shart out ( need to get my shit quota in) I guess does have comedy value but since most here are too low functioning to appreciate how funny you are then only we would benefit. It is good that we lack empathy for scammer supporters else it would be sad rather than funny.

5. merit-less ( i think we debunked the validity of merit several thousand times already). But cling to that if it helps you feel you have to.

6. "Sorry - I forgot. TOAA always has to have the last word without responding to anything that was said"  

seems like you need to read our interactions back, we have responded to every moronic thing you have slobbered over this thread.

Watch this...

Why do you reply to this with a simple YES or NO. I mean what are you afraid of.... (fun playing this one is it not xtrahelper they will catch on soon though then you will be in trouble..haha those dumb scammers)

Remember just yes or no

Was tmans deliberate deception for direct financial gain scamming  YES OR NO.  

Please do not demonstrate you will reply without responding to that simple question because that would be ironic in view of your above claims.

or are you thinking ahead so we can put this on your irony of bitcointalk thread?  well do what you feel punishes these scammers the most.

thanks xtrauseful idiot. haha

also just give a quick update to the irony thread, we have tons more ready but don't want to double post, please update with your own find some of ours so you look extra bitchy and pathetic I know they will be difficult if not impossible to find. Do you best keep searching day and night. Your service is appreciated you are our fav useful idiot so far...well..perhaps.

The most important thing to remember though is... you xtraelv MUST have the last word on this thread. Whatever we say do NOT let us look like we bested you. Well obviously we always do on every post... but make is seem like you don't notice (like you are doing now) and keep coming back no matter what.


332  Other / Meta / Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ??????????? on: November 07, 2019, 08:58:14 PM
The OP needs to start discussing other topics. His opinion has been made known to everyone and he should move on.

The OP is unable to move on. He cannot even construct a reply that responds directly to the conversation. He is a scratched record permanently on repeat that occasionally moves to the next scratch.

Undeniable proof, click. Undeniable proof, click.  
If he cannot move on, then it may be time to lock this thread and any future similar threads.

I would invite the OP to discuss various debates in the P&S sub.

There are no grounds on which to lock this thread. This is an open discussion of who is the most OBSERVABLY AND UNDENIABLY financially dangerous individual on Default trust.

ANY ATTEMPT to lock this thread would immediately be investigated and the person locking it should be viewed as fully complicit.

I will then be calling a rep thread on theymos and the mods for observable double standards. They had no issue letting the troll poll proceed and there was NO evidence for their claims which we actual debunked when calling ANY of them to present the the false or incorrect information we had presented. NOBODY presented any.

This poll is fully validated with undeniable observable instances.

Yes let it go, let scammers get away with it, let them abuse you account.

What on earth is wrong with you ? what a pussy attitude everyone has around here.

You can allow yourself to be given red trust if you like by scammers and let them get away with it.

Sadly that is not going to be happening with us. We are not interested in sucking up to them to regain favor like you. We will be crushing each and everyone of them.

Lock threads with vital and  important information that can prevent scamming you say??  sorry , no thanks.

We're starting to think you're rather slimy actually. If you have an alt in that poll then tough shit, it is either a scammer or scammer supporter.

Let's censor only non scammers that present observable instances that undeniably demonstrate we have scammers on DT?  is that what you are saying QS??

Now stay the fuck away from derailing our threads with your pussy slimy cowardly suggestions. Slimy little snake..

Marooned out on politics .....no thanks. This is their fav board for getting in theymos's ear with their  ....

pssst  I'll be a merit source theymos..

psssst  don't you think we should raise it to 250 merits theymos

pssst  how about we turn the volume down on people that dont get x merits per week

psttt  let's lock threads with any undeniable evidence of us scamming other members theymos

psssst  whistle blowing is worthy of red trust isn't theymos

Fuck off you snake, we had believed you were not as scammy as the others here but don't make us review that position.  We are concerned you want to HIDE observable instances of scamming from view.

Explain yourself now, else fuck off and stop derailing our thread with your stupid ideas.

Don't attempt to use us to worm your way back on to DT or into theymos's favor.  

Theymos made this fucked up mess and allowed these undeniable scammers in entrenched positions of trust. He must fix it or else must be reminded frequently that that is exactly what has happened here.

Man you you fucking snake, you like those kids at school who get slapped around then try to side with the bullies when they try to pick on the next kid .. hoping to become their bitch who get some small scraps of favor.

That's not going to happen with us. You will be viewed as a fucking coward and as hostile if you keep presenting your dumb fuck suggestions.

Now explain WHY this should be locked clearly or fuck off.

You go make some threads in the politics forum ... we may join you there but we are not locking this thread.  

What purpose would locking it serve? if you don't want to read this thread then don't enter it.

I note you're one of the biggest and most pathetic ass kissers when it come to theymos. Surely even he does not respect total and utter servile and pathetic slobbering does he?

Better he hears the truth for his own good and the good of this movement.

@xtraWIMP  wanting it locked because he is now revealed as a scammer supporter. This would not have been CLEAR and UNDENIABLE had the thread been locked.

META is bursting with scammers and scammer supporters. Haha the entire thing should be isolated from the rest of the community.

Bunches of nobodies that I never heard of been here for years and years and zero achievements except a long rap sheet of scamming. hahah

Yep lock all future threads presenting observable scamming taking place with in DT .. great idea QS.

No more double standards allowed. Troll poll is fine here, DT dirty turds poll is fine here. Simple as that. This is far more valuable and indeed does demonstrate to theymos that default trust and merit is entirely broken and indeed dangerous.
333  Other / Meta / Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ??????????? on: November 07, 2019, 06:21:32 PM
TAA I shit on you like the whores who shat on Jogn McAfee on his hammock, just move on and accept defeat.

I am a greater opponent than you will ever be. I have friends and colleagues - even QS thinks you are a small time Pajeet.

when will theymos just hurry up and ban you?
The OP needs to start discussing other topics. His opinion has been made known to everyone and he should move on.

There is no OPINION where observable instances are concerned and there are clearly defined universally accepted definitions the criteria of which have been clearly met.

Tman was claiming you are a scammer and that your words can not be trusted (not that we share that view) must be getting desperate to reference (err something you did not actually say) something you have apparently said.

I mean it is clear he is telling me NOT to accept your words are true though previously....so hmmmm tricky one...haha

I will just do what the fuck I want and keep applying pressure over time and keeping max exposure on the scammers that have infested DT and their supporters. Where of course it is on topic and relevant and provides value to the reader that does not want to get scammed.

I am certainly branching out to other topics of interest that I stumble across. I particularly like the new thread provided by xtraelv under the guise of IRONY ON BITCOINTALK. He is a sneaky one..haha  what have you scammers done to this guy to upset him so?? haha

I have no idea why Tman is calling upon another person who has PROVEN  that tman was involved in a serious extortion attempt with fellow scammer Lauda. Desperate times call for desperate measure though I guess.

Haha I tman call my first witness to defend against my auction scamming.....I call the guy...errr ...the  guy who proved I'm an extortionist and fellow scammer supporter....hhahahaah  weeeee out of the frying pan into ......

Ok tman ...err is that though not only the guy that proven you are an extortionist but the same guy you said is a scammer and you can not trust a word he says Huh

Bitcointalk is the BEST... you can NOT get entertainment like this for free elsewhere. Nowhere else do these dummies exist that will gladly take the piss out of themselves 24/7 on command for free ( well to us) others may have to  pay them dearly with their life savings...hahaha



334  Other / Meta / Re: Irony on bitcointalk on: November 07, 2019, 05:11:21 PM
This is going to be a FANTASTIC THREAD...

Let's get started with the super ironic...hehe  I hope this thread is not just ironic posts "some" members made right??


CONTEXT SELLING ACCOUNTS... here we go..

The build up hehe

Wow, lotta mass propaganda supporters in here.

The truth is, there's no good argument as to why this should be allowed. Just a bunch of greedy ones.


Fixed. I've still yet to see any proof of accounts being sold to be used for 'mass propganda'.

Who cares what the person is gonna do with the account? Whatever it is, it is BULLSHIT because they are pretending to be a different person. This makes them a liar, an impostor, a bullshitter.

And here you are a staff member defending this behavior.

You guys are greedy beyond belief. What would Satoshi say if he read about this? I can't help but think he would say you destroyed the original intention of his forum and turned it into a breeding ground for scum and villainy.


I think the main rationale and reasoning for allowing accounts to be sold is because allowing them lets others know that the practice can and does go on and banning them may give people a false sense of security, not to mention banning their sale will not stop the behaviour from happening and only push it further underground and into obscurity.

This forum also doesn't moderate or ban scammers, but that doesn't mean we allow or encourage them nor do we profit from it in any way from it.


Still, you are impersonating somebody unless you disclaim that you bought their account, which never happens. So buying accounts is a 100% dishonest manuver. Its never been used for an honest purpose because pretending to be somebody you are not is lying.

I dunno, while I appreciate your explanation, it still just seems that you are sticking up for criminals at the end of the day. I really don't understand how you guys can live with yourselves knowing how many crimes are committed here on a daily basis. I certainly hope you don't actually believe you are contributing to some benevolent force in the world because you are not.

You're just telling thieves and scammers its OK to be a thief and scammer here. In the end it will decrease your revenue, not mine.

Maybe, but you need to include people from all countries, backgrounds, religions, political persuasions, etc. After taking all that into account and extracting a common denominator I bet that you'd have a pretty sparse definition of what "good" is.

The fact of the matter is account buying has never been used for anything decent. The basic, underlying value of the account is the identity attached to it, which the purchaser is now assuming as his own, which is a crime in most countries.

http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/impersonation

So morally from a global standpoint pretending to be somebody you are not is a bad thing because people don't like being fooled. Its a universal desire to not be fooled, aka lied to, and country or background has nothing to do with it.

I'm going to start a thread listing all the bought accounts I see trying to scam people and encourage others to add to the list since you guys don't seem the slightest bit interested in stopping this problem from happening.

I will start by monitoring the accounts currently for sale and follow what purposes they are used for and get back to you.

Monitoring is underway.

I'm collecting two lists, one of account sellers and the other of account buyers. I will be sure to post this information, links and dates so everybody can see who to avoid from now on.


It is commonly known that people buy and sell accounts. It is illogical to assume this.  

Wrong. It is NOT commonly known, especially among noobs. I didn't know about it until a month ago or so, and then I couldn't believe that it was actively being endorsed by the mods.


Regardless of if this is true or not, it is very immature to give something more weight just because a certain person said it; you should listen to specific arguments and facts not who is making the statement.

Huh? Do you understand that people trade based on the rep of the username alone all the time? Regardless of your feelings on the subject, people do this every day all the time. If Satoshi came on here and said something I sure as hell would give it a lot more weight than when you say something. Even if I disagreed with what he was saying.


In order to impersonate an identity, you would need to not own that identity in the first place. When you use the term impersonate you are implying that the identity does not belong to the poster, but in fact it does.

But this is obfuscated by the fact that most people don't know that they are reading the words of a bought account. There is no honesty or redeemable qualities in your arguments, you're simply trying to defend borderline evil behavior for your own selfish financial reasons.





THEN WHAT HAPPENS....


WAIT FOR IT GUYS...... WAIT...... YOU WILL NEVER GUESS....

OH GO ON THEN..haha


http://web.archive.org/web/20190704162438/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1622642.0

or as it has been SNEAKILY altered too now..  apparently a poll because it is someone elses fault he will facilitate scamming and turn evil for about $300 bucks or perhaps less at the time..


https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1622642.0


****More tasty irony about Not being interested in SIG CAMPAIGNS...

Seems to be some POLL about someone else because it is their fault he got busted.


More undeniable irony of bitcointalk coming soon...
335  Other / Meta / Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ??????????? on: November 07, 2019, 04:13:15 PM
when will theymos just hurry up and ban you?

I really don't understand what's holding theymos back here... CH contributes nothing but a verbal AIDS to the forum.

At least Anonymint presented some high-minded, lofty, existential ideas that were at least 0.1% interesting by the end of his endless meanderings. CH presents a ruptured rectum at the end of his.

Yeah I'm disappointed with his drivel. I had hoped that he had more skill. What a let down.

I'm sure you are disappointed with getting your posts torn to piece and made to look like you have far greater cognitive issues than dyslexia ...haha looks more like serious mental damage driven by the need to feltch the ass holes of your scamming pals whilst virtue signalling for some kind of validation to your pathetic existence.

What a fucking idiot.

You were just humiliated ...your excuses crushed, your arguments pulled to pieces, your comparison demonstrated as laughable, YOUR TERROR TO ANSWER YES OR NO to the undeniable scamming of you scumbag pals. Your achievements put in their correct context and demonstrated as PATHETIC and you have made ZERO real difference to this movement and are clearly net negative.

If you disagree then present it. Now do not run away, you are my useful idiot...well you all are really but you are the new favorite.

Nutildah is pretending to have understood the technical points that anonymint produced, yet  nutildah will have us believe he has gone from NEM STAKE holder and early DASH adopter to begging for 0.02BTC loans hahahaahaha

What happened ANTI MIDAS.. tell us how did you manage to be given 300BTC and early dash adoption and now have ZERO...hahah lend him 0.02btc someone so he can stfu and stop spamming his gambling sig and posting his begging and crying everywhere haha

WELL perhaps you need to have listened a little more closely because we followed some of his advice and made fortunes hahahhahhahahh

Nutildah the ANTI_MIDAS  ....hahah


~

would ali have to prove anything to a challenger? no - you are the jumped up pajeet - I am on DT, I have more merits than you can wank over and I have many many successful trades on this forum oh.. and the biggest kisser - I actually have no mates here.

so bring me observable proof of your usefulness here.

bring it or without it by association you are admitting that you allowed my ugly daughters to suck you off

once again lauda as adjudicator, should you fail to my challenge then by default you are asking Theymos for a permaban and you are personally requesting that suchmoon shits through your letterbox



BUT WAIT - before we entertain your laughable claims and fantasies

were you scamming on that auction or not?

YES OR NO

If NO then how so?  Please give details and explain in public so we can analyse it.


The fact we are highlighting UNDENIABLE SCAMMERS (you and your dirty skanky scamming pals) that are infesting positions of TRUST and taking all the best REV STREAMS and trying to CRUSH FREE SPEECH...

That is undeniable evidence of our Undeniable value here.  

I think we just debunked clearly the credibility of merit scores and validation of REAL VALUE.  I mean you having any merits of course did that job already hahahaha
336  Other / Meta / Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ??????????? on: November 07, 2019, 03:53:41 PM
TAA I shit on you like the whores who shat on Jogn McAfee on his hammock, just move on and accept defeat.

I am a greater opponent than you will ever be. I have friends and colleagues - even QS thinks you are a small time Pajeet.

when will theymos just hurry up and ban you?

Ah, the tourettes is coming back, that's good.

Err no Tman you are a low functioning scammer, who can not even deny it.

Were you scamming on that auction Tman or not??  because it seems impossible to deny.

I want your explanation of the entire auction scam as it unfolded.

Tman it is a simple question:  Were you scamming on that auction or not?

YES OR NO

see if you say NO we need your explanation. Hurry up you pathetic low functioning miscreant.  Stop lying you have any friends, you're laudas bitch.

Even theymos has to EXCLUDE you because just ignoring your placement on DT would look terrible.

You have no ability to debate or argue, that is why you just start screaming your childish pathetic spew all over the place.

Tman, take a look at yourself and be realistic.

1. you can not present any kind of sensible argument that stands up to scrutiny can you?
2. You are undeniably a scammer ( your own confirmation)
3. You are undeniably a trust abuser ( your own admission)
4. You can not present ANY post as an example of some original thought provoking contribution
5. You can not present even 1 achievement that really made any difference here ( except scamming and supporting scammers above you)
6.  You are undeniably net negative and worthless
7. The points above demonstrate clearly you are low functioning


You have NEVER won an arguement or debate against us and never could hope to. It would be like putting a mentally and physically disabled infant against a world champion undefeated fighter.

Even funnier, you who claim QS is a scammer, and claimed what he said is to be trusted.... now bring some apparent claim from the person you insist we can not trust.

This is the standard of morons on DT.  Honestly Tman you are not our main priority because you do not have the capacity to cause much damage , you are simply far too stupid hence why although you have done less that lauda and others, the strongest and most undeniable example of scamming is against you. Lauda and nutildah have also by their own words boxed themselves in to undeniable scamming, but you are the easiest one to crush. Lauda is slightly more slimey and nutildah is on observably and undeniably guilty of willing scam facilitating for pay , although one could argue if you claim by your own words you are willing to do what you consider is EVIL for pay then you would be KINDA getting up to laudas level.

Now try to digest some of that before you start fantasizing about where you take your next " shat" because I suspect it is in your over sized nappy that your bulgarian hag has to change far more than once per day.

The very notion that a total imbecile like yourself is even worthy of ANYTHING other than being used as an example of how fucking stupid theymos's design is to allow someone as low function and devoid of all reasoning to be a merit source and DT .... is ridiculous.

Come on fool.... present 5 of your best original thought provoking posts..... hurry up you drooling imbecile. We are always open to degrading scammer FOR real in public.

Come on AUCTION SCAMMER, produce you best 5 original thought provoking posts for some analysis.... or 5 of your best achievements here that made any REAL Difference.


@lauda you dirty croatian dog

Time to bring a little more focus to you soon as well, seeping back in I see.

Why are you not banned? theymos only semi flushed you with a blacklisting from DT1. Everyone knows you are the most financially dangerous croatian filthy piece of shit on this board. You turd world euro trash skank.

Look at them crying for the ban hammer..... Yes please ban him now that is is actually demonstrating our scamming is undeniable and that he is calling us out on our own scams.... we dare not even answer yes or no..

haha

Lauda says, of course you can ban him. ANYONE that presents observable instances of our scamming is simply going to need a ban because they are CH or TOAA.

When they have run out of excuses to be torn to shreds then they come with the BEGGING AND CRYING for the truth to be silence via a BAN.

Imagine if you could really ban the truth. Sadly that will never happen.


haha at nutildah https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5190369.20 crying for help from daddy theymos, please shelter us scammers MORE than you already are he begs. Prevent the truth being told about us 100% please. hahah
337  Other / Meta / Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ??????????? on: November 07, 2019, 03:18:40 PM




Isn't vouching for yourself using an alt kinda like commenting on your own auction that is run by someone else ?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5139179.msg50890361#msg50890361
Quote from: The-One-Above-All
Who would transact with cryptohunter?? Well since he  purchased nxt the day after launch, was an original nem stake holder, a launch day miner for the majority of wave 1 alts, picked 6 of the top 10 rising coins in the last wave and has threads started by others thanking him for his tips that turned them from nothing to millionaires. Then I guess that is not going to be much of a scam risk since he never bothered to buy or sell anything here and is already wealthy. Can you show even 1 instance of anywhere where cryptohunter has any financially motivated dirt on him?? NO because he always fights for others to have a fair shot at things.

Kinda only to a fucking moron like you who thinks having

Observable instances of undeniable scamming  is KINDA the same as having no evidence that some ever kidnapped a giraffe

hahaha

Of course it seems the same to a scammer supporting piece of retarded moron you., that issue you have with your mind jumbling up all the letters and numbers ....well, I think although spell checker and all that has helped, there is no " REASONING CHECKER" yet built into this board... 1/ there is no undeniable proof AT ALL that we are cryptohunter and is IMPOSSIBLE TO PROVE because we are not. and ANYONE can voice observable instances of independently verifiable information without deceiving anyone they simply verify it for themselves, 3. there is no direct financial gain, to our knowledge he has never traded on this forum except that nxt trade years ago and is not a trader.

I mean the fact your comparison falls splat on its face a 1/ and there are other huge hurdles to allow any kind of fair comparison then look like a complete fucking retard all over again. Your excuses get more funny with each new attempt.

Remember we are dealing here with

UNDENIABLE independently verifiable  observable instances of scamming.

MORE EXCUSES FOR SCAMMING EVERYONE.

Keep them coming you filthy scammer supporting piece of shit.

xtra elv  ....LOL besides the old " JUST COMMENTS" defense is always there for real scammers now.  

xtraelv was tman scamming on that auction or not? YES OR NO
338  Other / Meta / Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ??????????? on: November 07, 2019, 12:43:04 PM

ZERO achievements and have made no REAL lasting difference to this movement, still supporting high level scammers whilst selectively choosing to pick on lower level scammers , playing whack a mole whilst virtue signalling for merits

pushing a control system that is undeniably damaging for this movement

net negative low functioning dreg



so to recap

Compiling other peoples history for merits

Playing whack a mole with small fry 2 bit scammers that can't fight back ( high profile like who? which projects do they run?)

The scammers you guys focus on (rather than yourselves or the largest scammers that are responsible for taking 99.99% of innocent members money) are only taking scraps from the most greedy and most stupid. This is largely pointless and a waste of fucking time. Of you all only suchmoon has really ever tried to take on a reasonably large project head on that has any real support behind it, but she has since taken to supporting undeniable scammers and punishing whistle blowers, so that negates any prior good work on her part . The rest of you scamming scum have been supporting scams and profiting from them since you got here and fighting AGAINST real scam hunters until you and your projects were branded scams/scammers they will remain so in the minds of many members here. Yes, laudaM, nutildah, pharmacist, and the other scum bags that had your noses in the scam troughs for profit, supporting the LARGEST scams whilst virtue signalling by going after 2 bit scammers and con men that will just pop up again or be replaced as soon as they are temp taken out.

Mega threads of pointless garbage taking the piss out of people that the divs posting there believe are slightly dumber than they are, I mean your posts from this thread should be there ... the  immediate self debunking and other excuses, the entire pattern of jumping from one dumb debunked argument to the next. Most peoples posts in your MEGA THREAD are poverty stricken uneducated kids trying to get some scraps from the shitty sig campaigns where the bunch of low functioning SCAMMER pals of yours who have self elected themselves to take all the LIONS share of best slots whilst colluding to crush free speech.

Working on ways to help people not get scammed by exchanges with LAFU did  you say?  okay well good luck with that one, perhaps not using the exchanges lafu works for and is pushing people towards could be in the guide near the start.

"you are surrounded by legends; phenomenal successes and catastrophic failures"  

"your speech and actions to be controlled by undeniable scammers and catastrophic failures"  that would be more of a fair warning and more useful when signing up now.

" You will be surrounded by catastrophic failures trying to prevent you having phenomenal success"

Lol at spell checking and adjusting 5 x ----------- hammer it out and let these dregs have it dirty and think themselves fortunate to have it at all.


The morons here have not noticed their self awarded basis of value has been crushed

The reader should note, that they are claiming it is surprising that the people who give out all the majority merits who are the same scamming scum and scammer supporters that I am calling out correctly as scammers and scammers supporters have not given us much merit for our posts about THEM.... I wonder why we do not have many merits LOL LOL LOL
Also the scammers and scammer supporters giving out all the merits ....GET THEIR MERITS FROM EACH OTHER MOSTLY hahahhaha



Theymos you say? well yes he managed to not destroy the forum for many years, but has now set in place his OWN IMPROVEMENTS over what he was left with.  

Which undeniably enables scammers to reward themselves with :

1. being able to scam without punishment
2. be rewarded for scamming
3. be rewarded for crushing free speech
4. make sure only they are eligible for the highest paid sigs and other rev streams
5. control now the volume of your posts and the amount of attention your words receive
6. entrench them with these powers that only they can choose to relinquish
7. removes all accountability for their actions except to each other who have a vested interest in never punishing each other.


I mean he himself feels it fine for undeniable scammers to silence their whistle blowers and broker some back room deals to have these scammers red trusts removed.


So it's good that he managed not to destroy the forum for a number of years, and his " stated" views seem in line with the movement we all want to see flourish. But are they really? actions speak louder than words as they say.

We have moved from pro theymos to neutral in light of the fact that rather than rolling back the influence of the scammy merit cancer he has simply provides more and more rewards to undeniable scammers and scum that he must be fully aware control merit/dt.

Speaking with satoshi then using anti satoshi principles in his governance structures is not something to entirely boast about. I am sure satoshi would agree. If it was not deliberate then that does not essential alter the final result does it.

Our achievements are clear, fighting for transparent rules that ensure all members are given equal opportunities. I mean I don't believe cryptohunter has been shy of mentioning "some" of his achievements, I don't think the scammers and scam pushers have been silent about how they feel about that .  Let me know when any of you start a war with a HUGE entrenched scam with 100's if not 1000s of supporters, and then with a few people that are willing to help, crush and crush and crush their lies and bullshit in public, LIES pushed by laudaM and his band of scum bags more than any others, until a project that was arguably about to push BITCOIN from top spot ( and still reached number 2 in light of the fact of half the board now screaming it was a scam)  had to offer a  2 000 000 000 dollar air drop as compensation and become synonymous with scamming and lying about their insta/premine.  

 That was just 1 massive entrenched corrupt scam surrounded by an army of scam supporting scum like laudaM ( who later said he was sorry and he was new for supporting such a turd before again going rogue).  There have been many he was first to crush in public.  Never noticed his central points were debunked either crushing that paid of scum bag spoetnik (prior good scam hunter) to a point he squeaked and ran off. Nobody here can stand against The True Legend  once you have been identified as a scammer , you will all be known as scammers and scammer supporters in the end. The systems of control and meta board can not protect you from the truth being known, although MERIT is certainly a very powerful tool for scammers to garner (fake) support, that is not to be underestimated at all.  n  Hence we will do all that is possible to destroy it's credibility until it is fixed. Now that theymos has given the volume control over to merit also then that is just another critical mistake in his legacy.

There is no greater achievement than crushing scammers and scams at the highest levels whilst pushing for transparent rules that ensure fair treatment of all members.

You dare not even tackle the biggest scams, you simply virtue signal going after tiny 2 bit lone scammers, to justify your own positions from which you scam from and support fellow scamming pals...

Good luck though because now they have the " ONLY COMMENTS" defense you are going to be fucked...hahah


Keep posting your low functioning spew merit cyclers and we will just keep pulling you to pieces in public.


tourettes poet,  haha keep screaming " merit score" then running away from answering if you are were scamming in that auction nor presenting any posts of great value for us to laugh at ,you poor miscreant.

It seems though pointing out your tourettes in public has certainly helped you control your symptoms a little better haha but your poetry is suffering of course.

LOL at all those that ignore, don't respond, not interested, don't read any of it ..... who know every fucking thing we post and are always there to bump our valuable threads,and instantly appear when mentioned. Well done morons.
339  Other / Meta / Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ??????????? on: November 07, 2019, 12:08:18 AM

Some lame excuses for his strange sexual perversions that he managed to extract from our innocent and highly accurate fighting scene as an analogy of him undeniable getting beaten up by us in debate to the degree we felt some pitty.

However the best bit is ...


Quote from "People" with ZERO achievements here with almost no merits desperate to get some.

At least merits show that some people value their contribution. Zero or low merit scores just shows you are wasting your time on here.

Here comes something funny.

ERR XLDIV can you present your greatest achievements since being a member here for years?  I mean surely all those merits must mean you have some major achievements, you know like how would this movement be any different if you had not been here supporting scammers, and making us laugh with your funny excuses.  

Merits show that merits are cycled between a handful of scum bags that use them to control trust and many other aspects of control here. They also show just in this thread how morons like you who DARE not even answer yes or no if TMANS actions constitute scamming or present other specious arguments we crush get merits. Your net negative shit = merits.

Merits are garbage. As you can see we pulled you apart here over and over. How can your posts be valuable?? when our posts have destroyed you over and over. I mean look at this post it demonstrates you are a total and utter moron who "trys" to sound smart. Some are impressed with those that have a nice command of the English language, yours is Okay, I know plenty of girls like you who have a nice way of presenting their thoughts. However, the cake they can bake with the limited ingredients they have is always a little disappointing once you start to scrutinize their critical reasoning capabilities especially in a debate. They are like that nice looking car with a shitty weak engine, that is you also.  Pathetic and low functioning. Your arguments and excuses just fall apart under mild scrutiny before your lurch to the next more desperate and pathetic attempt to mask your stupidity.

The reader should note, that they are claiming it is surprising that the people who give out all the majority merits who are the same scamming scum and scammer supporters that I am calling out correctly as scammers and scammers supporters have not given us much merit for our posts about THEM.... I wonder why we do not have many merits LOL LOL LOL
Also the scammers and scammer supporters giving out all the merits ....GET THEIR MERITS FROM EACH OTHER MOSTLY hahahhaha

Then they said.... we get more merit off each other than we give to you.... so that proves our posts are more valuable hahahahahhahahahhahahaha

This post https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5170789.msg53001936#msg53001936  can you not see how we crushed you over and over until your mind was spewing pure garbage?? JUST DON'T EVER RUN AWAY... keep coming back until you can take no more... if that is years all the better for us and our dirty turds thread. If we are busy from time to time, never worry we will return we will never abandon you xtraelv you scammer supporting moronic slobbering dirty bag.

I mean pick one of our central points here on tmans auction scamming debate and show how you debunked it??

or even man up and answer

Was tman guilty of scamming on the auction yes or no? I will call a full open debate with theymos on it soon in a new thread in meta, because if deliberately deceiving people for financial gain whilst also trying silencing those that may be giving their honest "comments" all on the same thread is not financially dangerous behavior/ scamming then he should explain what the fuck a scam is.... because it does not fit with the universally accepted definition of scamming does it?

Is deliberate scammer supporting and defending worse than scammers who do not deny it themselves?  this is also an interesting debate... who is more dangerous??

The " just commenting" defense of undeniable scamming ... this should certainly be debated and theymos should give guidance.

340  Other / Meta / Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ??????????? on: November 06, 2019, 10:46:58 PM
boring - same shit different post.

have you ever looked up the definition of insanity?

Yes, it says

People with undeniable instances of scamming that are independently verifiable claiming they are fit for default trust and not scammers at all.

or

People like suchmoon who claim the terms " good post" or "bad post" are meaningless terms without strict definition and criteria to match against.  Then coming here quoting the merit cycled metric as "proof" of being a good poster.

or

People that when challenged to bring their best original thought provoking posts running away or admitting they have not made any then quoting their high merit score proving they are valuable posters.

or

People with ZERO achievements here in many years again quoting their high merits scores as evidence of their high value posts"

or

The warden the of main bitcoinforum on the internets  enabling, sanctioning and rewarding undeniable scammers and empowering them to " take good care" of it by giving them power to silence whistle blowers and crush free speech whilst taking all the best rev streams LOL... then just compounding the issue after being explicitly warned about merging merit and trust, then compounding it by constantly heaping incentive to game the core metric he is building every thing on top of whistle making sure it is so wide open to gaming it is impossible to demonstrate abuse hahah... although that was under possible insanity, or experimenting with things beyond your understanding or just fully complicit.  We will see how long it is allowed to go.


those were just some examples of insanity


LOL at the non achieving dregs here quoting their merit to post ratio or merit to word ratio (whilst controlling merits) BUT HAVING NO ACHIEVEMENTS after years here and all still needing to spam sigs because they are such broke down bums LOL'

@TMAN and XLPERV  -- you both forgot to explain how TMANS undeniable auction scamming  is not really scamming?  what is the story we keep waiting but there is no forth coming under cover agents story yet??



@Lafu who? - LOL I mean only since the cryptopia (EXIT SCAMMING EXCHANGE) you were pushing people on to for pay and working for....have we even heard of you?  what alt projects were you part of mr scammer supporter, by part of we don't mean how many different alts do you suddenly have lately haha

I love how this fucking piece of dirt claims presenting observable instances of his pals scamming is " blah blah"  what a trust worthy exit scamming pusher you are.

Can you tell me about your major achievements ( except pushing people towards exit scams)??  Oh wait you have none....haha

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 [17] 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!