if you read regulations. a custodian/bank/money service has to allow the funds to move unless they are court ordered to not.., they cant just freeze accounts and steal funds.. the most they can do is allow customer to remove/transer balance and close the account.

emphasis banks/custodial services cannot just steal funds as part of their business policy


so when something is just "suspect" but if it meets a certain suspicion threshold, the money still moves but the service sends a SAR to tax office of financial crimes office(depending on reason) where by if there is criminality then a court order is THEN done to request more information and to freeze account

so account funds are not seized for simply moving money(otherwise rich people would have banking headaches each day they buy a lambo)


now the separate situation you experience/heard:
many of the p2p transfers are not frozen due to amounts. otherwise businesses/rich people will have accounts closed all the time

what is actually found is that scammers wanting coin buy coin via p2p. then they call their bank and say that someone hacked their account and spent their money on something the (scammer) didnt want. and request that the transaction is fraudulent. thus red flagging the bitcoin seller as a fraud/thief.. even though it is the buyer being the scammer. where the scammer gets a fiat refund whilst also keeping the coin

this is a known thing called "chargeback scamming" it went rife in the days of localbitcoins which eventually made localbitcoiner sellers have to do their own due diligence by asking for KYC to prove the buyer at the keyboard was the account holder. to protect the seller.
this then made local bitcoin less popular and now people do it via De-fi to avoid kyc.. which is only at the beginning of people doing chargeback scamming. so expect many sellers to see bank problems when chargeback scamming becomes rife on de-fi

and yes many exchanges got red flagged by banks where even centralised exchanges were getting chargeback scammed. which means other innocent people using same cex had a warning to not use that service..

over the last 9 years banks were not anti-crypto as much as said. it was that the chargeback scamming was so rife that anything associated with crypto services that were victims of those scams became headaches. where some banks just said no rather than handling things
(said no to new business account applications where businesses were 'crypto' based)

if you use your real name from the start then yes its hard to disappear.

but if you use a fake name from the start and for just a couple years.. by simply stop using that fake name does the job

millennials/gen-z have issues disappearing because they grew up in the age of social media where they love presenting themselves.
where as those raised before millennials thus were mature when the internet got popular knew upfront how easy it is to make new usernames

back then email accounts did not ask for life history and phone numbers/location info, so the older generation were used to having different "identities"
(i see it more of a generational norm understanding of internet identity. rather than "being smart" )

these days trying to make multiple gmail accounts or outlook accounts comes with too many identity questions.. the younger generation dont know as much about identity protection by default

the older generation have the mindset to separate identities as the norm. the younger generation have no clue and think that using real life info is the norm and hiding identity requires "smarts"

my interpretation of events are this

many "start ups" have dumb CFO's who should have known upfront to not risk putting billions of dollars into one account because accounts have a $250k limit of protection.

in some cases some businesses done deals with the banks to invest the fractional reserve amounts(non daily spend flows) of the businesses reserves of its customers..  into government bonds and thus the business accounts held bonds instead of bank balance

those bonds were 1% due to the QE of 2020-2022

when certain stable coins failed over the last couple years the managers tried to get that money out. meaning the stable coin managers had to sell bonds to the bank and banks had to sell the bonds to get cash to cover withdrawals. however in 2022 due to better bonds being 3-5% no one on the bonds market wanted the 1% bonds at value. thus the bank could only sell bonds at a loss.

..
what is now being seen is that other banks are revealing they own alot of 1% bonds thus have a loss risk if certain things are triggered, and a few big account holders are getting nervous

and now people with over $250k in one bank are taking out the excess reserves over that limit to open up multiple different accounts in different banks to not "have all eggs in one basket" which for some banks is finding that they are having bank runs on their accounts whilst people are diversifying their accounts

(advice for people:
if you have for instance $1m in one account with one bank. set up an account with 3 other banks and have $250k per account.. even if the government are saying "all account balance is guaranteed" this month. just hedge that risk. because slimy banks will find any means to not pay out full balance)

i feel this months statement of "all account balance is guaranteed" is to fool people into not diversifying their account balances(by pulling out large amounts from one bank to split it across many banks) but if they need to try to persuade people not to do something by saying certain promises.. then there is still a risk

many have tried but not so many have got passed the moderation gateways to even get anything close to a proper fix listed as a formal bip

its not as simple as just write a bip and have it listed in cores bip list sandbox. there is a hop, skip, jump routine required to do a 'long jump' of landing in the sandbox of core bips

do you not find it strange how god-mode achow is trying too hard to edit the moderation policies of not just this forum but also of the IRC, mailing list and github

and its not "consideration on github" its 'consideration by 6 hierarchy highly privileged  maintainer entitled devs of CORES github repo'..
whom consider things and reject ideas at the moderated discussion phase before it even gets to the BIP list stage.

you know the central point of failure guys that opened up the exploit but have not done a thing in months to undo it themselves and not allowing formal submissions of fixes.. because fixes go against their CORE roadmap. so they try to avoid fixes even at the discussion phase.


these exploits have been slowly opened up more and more layer by layer since the anyonecanspend debates of 2016 (opcode activation/utility issues)

but instead of fixing the issues. they find work around to allow the issues to persist while wasting more time moderating out discussions of issues

AEC (anonymity enhanced cryptocurrency), mixers, tumbler, hoppers are not par-Se illegal. but in all western countries, financial crime policies treat them as something to go on a watch list/suspect list

most regulated services have a rating system.. a points or percentage rating of each user. rating of suspicion, not just for crimes but also for tax evasion and other things..
(its actually worth a read of regulators guidance to VASPS, its enlightening to learn the traps(playing dumb and not knowing stuff wont help you stay safe))

in short using AEC/mixers will get you flagged and watched far more than just using currency normally. thus you are more likely to be pointed out due to the AEC/mixer usage than via other means.. so if you then do a crime and then try to hide it you are more likely to get spotted because you tried to hide it(the attempt to hide it gets you noticed)

many silly people think things like privacy and fungibility is a yes/no 2 option answer. its not... its a % scale or a points system.. where points dont win rewards. but warrants

just using things like monero, dash, lightning, or services like mixers/tumblers already raises a red flag even before they investigate a crime

you are literally added to a short list or given a % risk/suspect rating by regulated services. and if certain pieces of suspected puzzle pieces come together to a high % of risk then things start to get messy for that person

even if you are innocent of a crime.. being on the receiving end of a mixer/AEC where you are now handling criminally related funds can have your funds seized where the only chance to get it back is for you to come clean and admit all of your utility of your funds to explain your innocence. meaning trying to hide ends up having you being asked more questions just to get funds back..

..
its like taking cash across the border where by just taking $10k across the border is near certain to automatically get it seized and then have to go to court and publicly reveal your life to show innocence to get it back
im not saying its right/good.. but its how the system operates, so learn how the real world works to know how to avoid things.. even if things say they avoid regulated policy, read the policies itself to learn what to avoid

.com  = a company
.org = an organisation

bitcoin is not a company.. its that simple

they wanted to show its an organisation and not a company.

current fiats are "managed" mainly by the IMF which is a US company behind the curtains(follow the money(SDR))

CBDC however is building up and linking together via the BIS which is more of a euro/asia company behind the curtains

so its easy to see why some US politicians dont like the current CBDC layout
..

florida is a state with high social security usage, meaning most circulation of currency is based on the treasury incomes of tax/treasury profits. which if done via a CBDC would incur less profits at state level to hand out social security checks to pensioners and low income people

so i can see why a florida politician doesnt want to see his money pot dry up

i too see this many times in businesses and years ago i helped out (pre bitcoin life)

one example was that there was a local "burger van" (food truck) which was always busy and popular, never a dull moment. but it always had issues struggling to pay its employees wages.

the solution was not direct record keeping*. it was calculating a fair price to charge.
it was producing food too cheap that it did not cover costs. thus every customer was getting food for less then the cost to create it. and thats why it got soo popular but that popularity was harming the business

doing simple things like cost evaluations EG accounting for the cost of supply of goods(frozen) + labour plus energy usage of the cooking methods. and then coming to a fair retail price of the end food product.

*this too requires keeping records of stock/labour/ sales to then evaluate the cost:profit ratio..
so record keeping is important

..
as for doing a seminar. which can be a web seminar of a pre-recorded video followed by a Question and Answer section. can be hosted online.

so dont worry about being an introvert, you can easily make a video that does not even require showing your face or having to speak loudly live. you can have 90% of the seminar. pre-recorded/edited on your own, where you can use images of businesses and charts and records as the on-screen view instead of your face.

and when it comes to the Q&A section that can be in text response or using a text to speech tool to turn your keyboard words into vocal.

web seminars can be set up as free to view or using a subscription setup for access.

once you gain confidence to be seen and heard. you can choose to then do an in-person conference where you stand on stage with a audience attending

dont worry so much about your confidence. worry about the contents of your webinar, seminar, conference

attendee's/viewers dont care or demand speakers presence. as long as they get meaningful/helpful content

imagine if instead of bitcoin being measured against dollar. it was measured against "minimum wage units"

where by 1btc was 2300 units

meaning with UK min wage it was ~£23k  (~£10 min wage)
meaning with US min wage it was ~$34k (~$15 min wage)
meaning with africa min wage it was ~$690 (~$0.30 min wage)

imagine the disturbance on the forex market of americans buying african currency to then deposit into african exchanges to buy bitcoin for 50x cheaper. to sell on american exchanges.
(repeat repeat repeat)

the selling of USD in favour of buying african currency/handing currency to africans, would cause the forex rates to change. thus changing the economic powers of america:africa to shift

it would cause forex DISRUPTION far bigger then what biden would understand as "disturbance"

if biden really wants to see what real disruption could be caused to fiat economy. he has not seen even a pinch of salts worth of whats possible if we as a crypto community would really try

there is no direct correlation between FED news vs bitcoin
its just schemers trying to cause social led pumps and dumps by trying to make peoples sentiments get affected by things of no effect.. and in 98% of times these social pump and dump games dont work

what actually happens is bitcoin whales make "futures" bets on the futures market that the price wont go above X for 1-8 weeks. and to ensure their futures bets flourish. those whales then use a stash of coin to arbitrage the spot markets to cause a resistance wall to keep prices within a certain region

its almost as bad as....
..
'so i was driving down the road and passed a parked car. i stopped to enquire. i ask the driver whats wrong... he replied' ... 'i am sat on my tooshi in my nackered motor'

seems the comedy club has moved to meta

whether its a service or a whole crypto currency or sub network that has privacy enhanced features.. regulated services and regulators are on the look out and flagging services cryptos or subnetworks that have those features

monero is a red flag that gets users WATCHED CLOSELY
lightning is a red flag that gets users WATCHED CLOSELY
mixers/hoppers are a red flag that gets users WATCHED CLOSELY

mixers/hoppers/privacy tools do not hide people, it gets them spotted and monitored more closely

months ago i hinted(seems too subtly) that people can create services or subnetworks that do not loudly advertise themselves as laundering services

there are many ways to have privacy as a (subtle hint) side effect of offering a different service as advertised

but here is the funny part.
most who claim to want privacy are not private people. they are too loud they are too forthcoming of information about themselves whereby they hope some technology can scrub their stupidness for them

if you want privacy be smarter, start with the info you freely give out in the first place to a system.

if you cant get any hints from what i have said you are not interested in privacy you are just interested in a argument about privacy to promote some scheme you want to promote that pretends it will give privacy. but actually ends up highlighting and following people more closely

"they"?
CORE (center of the network)
THEY chose the name on purpose THEY admit THEY are the reference client all should follow

THEY coded the new opcodes that allowed the bloat exploit
dont go trying to blame it on random users. THEY also didnt require random users to upgrade before THEIR exploit upgrade

YOU dont want the network of random users to prevent core from throwing in trojan exploits.. when there is a bug. you want the bug to remain because it harms most users utility to help aid your scheme of pushing people away from using bitcoin

as you say you want CORE to have the freedom and not the users

what you love is core having GOD-MODE because you idolise core devs as gods.. much like the cultish other schemes your promote and make your buddies recite

if another dev team came up and tried to do things against CORES roadmap you would treat another dev team as opposition/threat.
so where would this other teams freedoms be.. oh wait all of a sudden you will stop spouting freedom and start spouting conservatism and your other rhetoric to defend core devs.. rather than caring about the actual utility of a decentralised network

its another network.. using another unit  of balance as payments requiring middle men to co-sign .. so nothing like bitcoin in form or function..

the proposal plan WAS where you lock btc up because bitcoin only exists on the bitcoin blockchain and you cant take it off the blockchain or out of the network.. as thats the whole point of blockchain monetary policy and security

and instead you use  the lock as a reference to then play 'pass the parcel' games around the sub network with IOU's of units called msats which are represented very weakly with a peg of supposed 1:1000. however they now have units even smaller because the lightning network has no fixed network wide rules of accountability to hold onto/stick to.. oh and due to lack of network wide cohesion/accountability/rule. when things go bad the lightning fans and devs will blame it on user error..

so just be careful. and dont lock your whole btc wealth up to use lightning. just play with coffee or pizza spend amounts

oh and be warned the weak peg thing.. others can crate msat balance and make promises to pay you with inbound balance.. thats not referenced to any locked btc.. so be very risk aware

heres a thought..
human: what can make bitcoins price rise (no time frame)
chatAI: lists possible scenarios

human, edits chat AI response to then make it look like all possibilities can occur in 90 days, even though thats not the request human posts edited response with clickbait title of 90 days


things to note.
when chat AI talks about ETF institutional pension money. thats not a within 90 days scenario

when chat AI talks about fiat inflation. thats not a within 90 days scenario

when chat AI talks about the halving in over 390 days. thats not a within 90 days scenario

what chat AI talks about  global shift of economic order.. thats not a within 90 days scenario

i think some asked AI what things can make the price rise (no time scale) .. AI gave some answers and then someone added a 90day subject line onto his media conversations and posts to pretend its going to happen in 90 days even though common sense shows some of those scenarios all take longer to occur and some are unlikely to occur at all

drama queen doomad has no argument so has to resort to meme creations
boring

how about spend 5 years learning bitcoin instead of promoting the crappy schemes you get paid to promote..
.. and not paid very well/not promoting successfully by the looks of it, if after 5 years you are still  having to stoop so low to even be doing sig spam adverts and selling scammy memes just to get by

but hey you like to waste other peoples time and tell them to wait forever for dreams and advertise crap to people instead of learning bitcoin.. so i expect in 2028 you will still be saying the same crap while scratching for pennys

dumbass sorry i mean doomad you think people need to be in charge. you cant understand a concept that does not require people being in charge. you pretend in some narratives that things are decentralised yet you adore core centralised control, where you think the only option for people to not follow core is to use a different network if they want differing rules to cores roadmap.. you hate any one with an opinion that differs from the core roadmap
anyone that even tries to propose things that are not part of cores plan you treat as a threat/opponent/opposition..
you love censorship, heck you love getting posts deleted, people banned from certain area's and you try to shut people up if they say anything different to your idealised roadmap cult


you are too recited speech heavy with your narratives.. so much so that you forget what a real opinion sounds like

oh and as for mixers. knowing that just using a mixer flags users funds as risk potential. no i would not promote mixers and never have.. they are stupid. there are other means to obfuscate identity linkages without having to use such obvious techniques that cause such obvious tagging of being watched more closely for something thats promoted to pretend to hide you.

yep using a mixer gets you highlighted more.. not hidden more

funny part is
in all the topics there are alot of people talking about not liking ordinals
but you are franky obsessed.

so lets make this clear

no i do not want to join your cult
no i dont want to marry you
no i dont want you to kiss my ass
no i wont kiss your ass

i know you dont understand consent. but you are also a stalker who thinks the world is core vs franky

sorry i wont be your mistress. so stop being obsessed to think your only choice of mistresses is core incest family or franky

i know maybe there is a bit of love lost where some of your family are moving away from your charade and your upset that they are not following your orders as much as they used to. but dont blame me. blame yourself for not having the facts

imagine you eat fast food that costs 20units of currency. or you can make your own food at home for 5 units of currency

knowing your able to happily spend 20units on a luxury which just becomes a toilet flush/bowel movement tomorrow. means that you have wasted 15 units of currency.. and not cared about it

if you save up those 15 units of spare currency per time (you would usually want to waste it and not care). and instead invested it. you are then able to invest with money you are not afraid to lose

so think about all things you normally waste money on. fast food, vacations, entertainment. things that do not last beyond the time you consume/enjoy it. things you wont see again.

save that money by not spending on such temporary things and instead invest it

.. its not the best english but it is understandable. that is what is so great about english there are so many dialects

firstly i dont compare choice to rape
it is you that does not believe in consent.
its YOUR desires of lack of consent that causes rape...

dang YOU cant even understand that basic common sense real world usage of consent.. you cant even get that right.. which says alot about you.. you really are missing a few common sense morals in your mindset..

the blockchain is a list(dataset) of everyone agreeing on hotdogs

those that want burgers use monero.
those that want salad are litecoin

heck even you were saying just a couple months ago and also repeatedly for years if i didnt like hotdogs go fork off and start a new menu and see who follows

bitcoin unites people that want a certain protein. called bitcoin(your analogy of hotdogs)

if you tried to put litecoin(salad) on the table people will reject the (salad) litecoin transaction becasue its not bitcoin(hotdog)

do you understand consensus.. i do not think you do
you prefer networks without rules because you want to pretend your some wild west outlaw cowboy.. who likes jerky where you want to pretend your jerky is a hotdog just so you can scam people to give you their hotdog and you hand them your stale and cheap jerky

all you are trying to do is make everyone at the table hate hotdogs or find hotdogs to expensive so you can advertise your silly jerky plate of fat (lightning)

you want it to have a huge line of people waiting for hotdogs because you want less people doing hotdog payments thus causing a queue and then raising the price of hotdogs..


you would rather have some bloaty fat guy pay $20 for a hotdog than 100 lean fit people pay 10cent a hotdog .. even it it makes the same total income for the chef

i and many others want hotdogs without having to pay too much or waiting days in a queue.. and no we dont want your alternative jerky made on a greasy grill in another street cart... even if you hold up a fake hotdog sign.. there are too many bad things happening in your jerk wagon

your jerk wagon concept is to make people pay more for hotdogs and wait days to get it in their hand.. and then not keep it enjoy it for themselves but instead put it into your favoured jerk wagon so that you can then hand out jerky for them to consume for months with a fake advert that jerky is hotdogs and weak and easy to break promise(even jerky devs have lost hotdogs) by pretending they will get their hotdog back next year.. yet you know that once they consume the jerky they cant then cough the jerky back up to get the hotdog.
the only reason people close off the jerk contract is when they ran out of jerky and have none left to jerk around with.. thus nothing left to claim a hotdog back..

you obviously have an idea of the type of industry you wish to work in, in the future

so research your dream job as if your ready to apply for the job. look at the requirements
does it ask for experience. or qualifications

phone up a few potential employers and ask them what is the best way to succeed in getting atleast an interview and to impress them to get the job. is it working knowledge or educated knowledge

some employers will allow interviews/applications from people that learned independantly even via googling courses and learning from the internet who can prove they know it by showing a portfolio of work or examples of knowledge... other employers only recruit people with formal education qualifications

so ensure your plans match what your prefered future jobs requires