would assume you're one of the dev team of this project? Do you mind informing us the reason behind the self proclaimed negativity on your project like "boring" or "we have nothing"? At first I thought it was the thread designer's glitch, but I realized it is also on your website.

Translated as: we don't have any answer for you yet, because we didn't realize when we built the poject that such problem is very likely to happen, so we will delay answering while hoping you'll forget. Do bear in mind that these questions I asked are also read by other people and being point of considerarions for investors. How do you suggest people start to believe investing on your MN when you don't even know possible bad scenarios on the corner or can't give good details?

Ok, let's get easy, where is details about your team?

Three things happen here, patiently waiting for you to "realize" that you missed my post that's literally sandwiched between your posts, marveled at how tiring this is to keep pushing you to reply to my inquiries, and trying to ignore the implications of what inquiry-evasions usually lead to

A bit unclear here, so if it is forbidden to use crypto as means of payment in Indonesia, and if Anterin app is a delivery app that powered by your currency, which is a cryptocurrency, doesn't that mean the app utilize crypto as means of payment, thus forbidden?

It's been a while since the thread updated, I've followed both this accusation thread as well as the accusee thread updates. Just now, I think they posted something worth mentioning as a good evidence of scam attempt or rather phising.

On their updated (28/05/19) opening post as well as post number #31 and #32, they attempted to fool community by duplicating MEW original site, thus risking clueless members into giving access to their wallet (link redirect to archive).

Screenshots:

And in case the user is a, let's say, Chinese non-english speaker and the specialists existed for inquiry are only available on Russian, English, and French, you wil do what exactly? Indicating the language they speak doesn't really mean breaking the language barrier at all. And for instance of every users happen to speak English, it's the univeral language afterall, you still failed to explain how will you break accent barrier. What's your solution for people with thick and heavy accents, again? Like maybe a French user was on line with a Japanese specialist, that happen to both speak English, but each with their own accents? Of course, we are assuming the translatlantic connection or the internet speed on both sides, as well as your server are not making problems, because we'll entirely speak whole new cases if that happen.

Again, you have an unanswered question from me on previous page

LOL, you decide to "miss" my post because you don't know how to answer that?

Right... you don't need outside fund, that's why you raised a crowdfunding. Make sense. I must be very dumb for failing to see the connection.


Funny. Do you mind telling us on what sector you're working? Because as far as I know, unless you do your trade on working hour (which pretty much violate any company's rule, which also means you don't have enough processing unit on your intetnal hardware called "brain" if you do that) and unless it is stated on the contract to never have a freelance/side/part time job, any employees have rights to do anything they pleased on their freetime, and trading can be considered as side job.


and why would they do that? I don't see why bitMEX would suspend any account unless the said account violate terms and agreement. Which... we can either assume your activities do violate it --which means the project is not worth investing-- or your reason is invalid --which means you could share your trading history as a proof of your report.


Kinda sure you said that you don't need funding few paragraphs above

Again, you serve your "performance report" without adequate info and data of which the report formulated from. Anybody can just pull a random number from their mind and said "hey look, I made this percentage of profit!" Unless you can provide the repeatedly requested data, your report is not credible and can be considered as misleading, thus when combined with the ponzi scheme, lead to a possible scam attempt.

I would assume your earlier post was to reply the first paragraph of my question, and the latter for the second. Let's begin with clarifying the first one,

"We are working on this issue. We have a long and difficult way", so you're working on the issue, which translates as you currently don't have one working method to check credibility of certification worldwide, or you have a long and difficult way, which translates as you already have one that's working in a long and difficult way?

Into the second paragraph, yes I may have a possible solution, but I'd like to hold that for a moment as I find it surprising that developer team failed to foresee such crucial aspect when they initially build the project. Let me ask you another thing, still related to your so called proposal of phone-call-paid-knowledge-sharing, how do you overcome language barrier? And following right behind that question, accent and dialect barrier?

Well, that's interesting, worldwide? If we can hold into your words, how do you plan on performing such? Contacting by emails? How about if they don't have emails? Phone numbers? World wide? Thousands of thousands of entities? How about the informal ones? The one that don't have formal organization structure? Or ones that, formal or informal, were out of business prior to the specialist's enlisting on you?

"We will find a way to prevent" right, how? That's the point we're currently discussing. Previously you just give an argument that merely due to their "certification", they won't cheat, and now you give an even more baseless answer.

If they'll only focus on Indonesian market, due to numerous reasons they might propose, wouldn't it mean the thread should be moved to their local thread?

I'm also curios on how popular this project in Indonesia. As far as I know, Indonesia is one of the countries that restrict cryptocurrency transaction as payment method.

Awesome!!! 12% profits!!! You must be very good on what you do... namely typing numbers and letters. Is there any way to back up this "report"? Some trading history, perhaps?

I also believe everyone here still like to see the faces behind team, or proofs of partnership with said entities.

Is that translated as a "yes, we'll confirm the legality of certification of each of our specialist up to the issuing agency/institution/organization"?

By the way, I still don't get a good and reasonable answer for your way to keep your specialist from stalling. Arguing that just because they're certified specialist would ensure they'll cease from cheating or doing anything frowned upon --while the method itself is still being in discussion-- is rather naive.

Tell me, this requirement to upload education documents, you possess a way to confirm that the docs are legit and real, right? Since the uploaded file will be on digital form, there's this handy app named Adobe Photoshop that could really do things... And if you do have a way to check the originality, how? You'll contact the issuing organization? One by one? Worldwide?

That answer part of my question. There still the second question about preventing your specialist to elongate their session by stuffing unimportant trivia and meaningless details inside the call duration. The sessions are not supervised afterall, so it'll kind of hard to ensure no specialist trick their clients.

Again, skipping my previous question. Twice already. I don't think accidentally missing post is sill reasonable. I still have other questions about your project's detail, but given that you keep missing this one, I don't see why I should asking details instead of rising suspicion.

You have an unanswered question from mine on previous page