Are these accounts still in DT  |
|
|
|
There's possibility for the witch to be burnt at the stake finally and you can already hear the Hyenas howl. Maybe now is the right time to open parole procedure for Satoshi's forum.
They got what they wanted, sadly a lot of senior members are also playing into their games unknowingly. There are truths of which they are not aware of luckily. It would be a waste of time to discuss with them, trying something obviously malicious such as to equate forgetting events of 1 or 2 years ago and 5 to 6 years ago for example and more. Here's to another year of being the main topic of discussion. What year in a row is this?  I am sorry for those who collaterally suffer because of my past.
Because the definition of plagiarism is copying and pasting stuff (without attribution).
This is not necessarily the case, but it was evident the account did this out of vengeful reasons and not by mistake or due to advanced definitions of plagiarism. |
|
|
|
You should create plagiarism bingo card and put all you reason there
I would but I have yet to state an actual reason for this, or figure out what the reason was. Read my post again. These events are too far into the past for me to know much more than the outside viewer. |
|
|
|
I was just stopping by, and something interests me. I hate to say this but it is plagiarism, and if rules were consistently applied - Lauda should be temp-and-sig-banned.
But she said, she already received the punishment: You may not be aware of this, but I was banned several times for the infractions made during my earlier time on the forum.
What do you think? Get punished again for the same reason? *assumed she is telling the truth. It's like getting released from jail and then getting arrested again for the same crime. I am not sure when all of these posts were made exactly in relation to the bans. It may be that all were made before or that none were. There is no way for me to verify the exact dates sadly, I have tried. Furthermore, even if they were made before the account was banned there is no way to verify that they were seen and partially responsible for the bans. Coincidentally, many users have resurfaced since or around this report (in addition to a flag being created the same day) just not the one who could answer my questions about this. BadBear has been inactive for 2 years. |
|
|
|
Stuff like putting the ö in Schrödinger’s is fairly uncommon unless you are copy and pasting, as not many people know how to type a ö.
Think again. Quite the common letter depending on where I am from.  example 4 is full of the signs of plagiarism that sort of sticks out in people's coursework.
I do not know what happened there. The only difference that I could find was 'he' vs. 'He' in the source, the topic or the source do not sound like something I would read. Thank you for reporting these. I must have unknowingly repeated and paraphrased text that I had previously read and remembered. It was not intentional. I am making explicitly marked corrections, with appropriate citation of sources, and links to the earliest available archived versions of my edited posts. I will not remove any posts, or try to hide anything.
Not that I have a cat in this fight, but at least a few of those examples don't seem to fit the bill for paraphrasing. Its a little iffy but somewhat reasonable if an uncommon phrase sticks in your head, but it'd appear to me that the likelihood of of it being a simple memorable phrase decrease when your sentence structure is the same and there are sort of uncommon bits of stylization Remembering events of 5 - 6 years ago with this post count is rather difficult. I've already spent a lot of time looking into what happened there and I am missing some key historical dates that I can not access. |
|
|
|
Awaiting response for Lauda.
For or from? I have responded in the other thread. I do not think I need to respond twice to the same thing.  |
|
|
|
Cross posting: Now that you have agreed to receive the payment to the original address you were scheduled to receive payment to, I believe it would be inappropriate to continue to withhold/delay releasing the bitcoin held in escrow.
Not if the account is compromised and the current user is not the same as the one who made the loan. Quick and dirty wait to clean the account would be doing the above. A signed message from either addresses is required before doing anything.
|
|
|
|
Cross-posting my deleted reply from the other thread. It seems that I am being attacked on multiple fronts in multiple ways at around the same time, precisely when I am unable to do much about it. Thank you for this.  Since I do not oppose the flag, I do not need to explain according to OP. |
|
|
|
DT1 please consider excluding the users mentioned in the OP, and the users who are seeking to exact revenge via the creation and support of a frivolous flag. bonesjonesreturns alleges: Due largely to the factors mentioned in this topic, I believe that anyone dealing with Lauda is at a high risk of losing money, and guests would be well-advised to avoid doing so. This determination is based on concrete red flags which any knowledgeable & reasonable forum user should agree with, and it is not based on the user's opinions. Support: mhanbostanci, muslol67, hacker1001101001, bonesjonesreturnsOpposition: Vod, Foxpup, suchmoon, examplens, TheUltraElite, shasan, TalkStar, GazetaBitcoin, Jawhead999 Insufficient support. Support | Oppose @Lauda
Sorry for the off topic
I am sorry too, I will not let peloso post anymore. |
|
|
|
Thank you for reporting these. I must have unknowingly repeated and paraphrased text that I had previously read and remembered. It was not intentional. I am making explicitly marked corrections, with appropriate citation of sources, and links to the earliest available archived versions of my edited posts. I will not remove any posts, or try to hide anything.
Some of the sources provided by bitcoinchan were not correct. On researching my own posts, I found that: Source of text from Post 3 is actually Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fear,_uncertainty,_and_doubt&oldid=621176634FUD is generally a strategic attempt to influence perception by disseminating negative and dubious or false information. Source of text from Post 4 is somebody named Darren Wilson (whose work I have not read). This is quoted within the page linked by bitcoinchan: https://web.archive.org/web/20150423094426/http://www.charismanews.com/opinion/behind-the-lens/48176-atheists-are-right-that-christianity-sounds-absurd-but-i-believe-in-itFrom an outside observer's standpoint, Christianity is kind of absurd.
Think about it. We believe in an invisible man who lived over 2,000 years ago in a series of backwater towns in the Middle East, was killed by some religious zealots, and then was magically raised from the dead three days later, after which he floated up into the sky and disappeared, thus becoming the invisible man we now believe in and pin all our hopes to. Oh, and on top of that, we believe in other invisible beings: angels and demons—who are all around us, helping and influencing us. Meanwhile, another invisible Spirit (the Holy Spirit) is constantly at work behind the scenes around the earth, keeping the whole thing straight and intervening whenever He can. For Post 5, bitcoinchan cited a post on another forum that apparently plagiarised this: https://web.archive.org/web/20060421081519/http://godisimaginary.com/i1.htmIf you would like, gather a million faithful believers together into a prayer circle. Have them all pray together that God cures every case of cancer on the planet tomorrow. Pray sincerely, knowing that when God answers this completely heartfelt, unselfish, non-materialistic prayer, it will glorify God and help millions of people in remarkable ways.
Will it happen? Of course not. Your prayer will go unanswered, in direct defiance to Jesus' promises in the Bible. That is because God is imaginary. I have not yet been able to verify the original authorship of this quote. It is the earliest example I can find. Text from Post 6 was published in a book that I have not read: Greta Christina, Why Are You Atheists So Angry?: 99 Things That Piss Off the Godless ( Pitchstone Publishing, 2012). Bitcoinchan cited something that appears to be her earlier blog, but I cannot verify this. The same text seems to be copied and pasted all over the Internet, often without attribution. I don't know where I saw it (or some of the other items here). In no case did I knowingly copy anything.
You may not be aware of this, but I was banned several times for the infractions made during my earlier time on the forum. It was only through extensive private conversations with BadBear during or around my ban, who taught me the right way to behave on the forum, did things started to change. BadBear was one of the strictest mods on the forum (with many complaints from idiots to prove it). I appreciated BadBear's guidance that helped make me a good contributor to the community; and I have continually tried to improve since then. These posts made in 2014-2015 were all long before theymos made me a moderator. The archives linked by bitcoinchan show me as "Staff", but Archive.org made those snapshots much later. I despise plagiarism, but appreciate your effort in helping me correct those posts.
Mind sharing why you deleted the first time you have posted this, and then replaced it with exactly the same post? The original post was #54465528, this is #54469714. |
|
|
|
Donated $~1000: 24a7dcea4afd635a44b4f9ab25e7eaf347fd05c712e25066d5bbd909cb74f810
1. Challenge sent to owlcatz, minerjones and Mitchell. 2.   
Please support the project and join the challenge. Stay home and stay safe. Thank you! |
|
|
|
A member who deletes some messages in 2014 2015 2016 2017. While he is writing Russian, he is a member whose writing style has changed. Now he is collecting Funds with Lauda. Why are all suspicious accounts linked in some way to Lauda? Holy cow! Is that a coinsidence? All this is a huge power war. I'm calling out to real fair users. The best solution: Disttrust and Ignore. Royse777 explicitly excludes me because he does not trust my trust-related actions. That has nothing to do with actual trustworthiness, but with how you handle trust (and what political leaning you have - this of course being truth we like to hide, especially leftists which are not willing to admit that this is the case). I am proven that I can be trusted with more than all you monkeys combined. Wake up and stop lying you Turkish degenerate. |
|
|
|
I'm sure he didn't expect you to take the money for yourself.
I will not permit accusations of theft against zazarb like this. Thread closed with your post deleted and used as a reference post for your negative ratings.
Now that you have agreed to receive the payment to the original address you were scheduled to receive payment to, I believe it would be inappropriate to continue to withhold/delay releasing the bitcoin held in escrow.
Not if the account is compromised and the current user is not the same as the one who made the loan. Quick and dirty wait to clean the account would be doing the above. Conclusion: Nothing more than an attempt of a stolen account to wipe itself clean. |
|
|
|
I have no dog in this pissing match, but @zazarb, this is king of disturbing. It's the same address that Watoshi-Dimobuto wanted his repayment sent to 4 years ago, why is that not enough?
Now that you have agreed to receive the payment to the original address you were scheduled to receive payment to, I believe it would be inappropriate to continue to withhold/delay releasing the bitcoin held in escrow.
Not if the account is compromised and the current user is not the same as the one who made the loan. Quick and dirty wait to clean the account would be doing the above. This is the problem. Either a signed message from the original address or the repayment address is needed. For all you and I know I could be the current owner of Watoshi-Dimobuto. |
|
|
|
@Bthd stated an idea contrary to you.
This guy showed himself to be an idiot without morals ready to support turkish baboons such as yourself in any kind of abuse. Don't blame me when you expose your own evil nature scumbag. I do not even know what campaign the user is/was in, they are of no importance to me or this place. There are more important things than money in this life.
If you only understood that for more than 1 second, we would not be here. |
|
|
|
LoyceV brought up a point regarding collectibles that is both accurate and something I feel I can comment on.
I am not sure exactly when, but somewhere around 2016 the way we leave trust feedback in the Collectibles section changed. Prior you only left trust if you actually trusted the other party in the deal. For example, if you sent first. If you bought something from me and paid prior to me shipping I would not leave you trust as I did not have to trust you in the trade. Now, positive trust is left for a positive trade. If the trade is successful both parties generally leave a positive.
I preferred the old way as it was actually a trust system.
This is also known as trust farming when done for notorious purposes, and increases the risk for everyone here when done for whatever purpose. Make some small trades here and some small trades there and you are done. |
|
|
|
I am the owner of this account. I did not create the account. It is the truth. At present this account has nothing to do with the defaulter or anyone else. I don't see how the fact that I did not create this account offends you.
You are not the original owner of the account. There is nothing to discuss with that fact. Mind sharing with us why in particular you have come back now? What are the plans? I haven't. I will leave for another long period of inactivity soon. Why are you wasting my time then? Go away. |
|
|
|
False. I've generally stopped following forum drama and was not aware of the "affair" until now. They claim you did it because of that, therefore it started because of that. Good clarification. You should be on point about these matters, but assuming you don't employ neg. rated or controversial members who shitpost only when paid (Kalemdar and Vispilio being prime examples) then you will be fine without knowing anything. |
|
|
|
I'm not trying to be an asshole here but I think it is best to change the title even though when reading the content of your post it is a refutation of that statement
For once, something I agree with. OP, this title is clickbait and doesn't have much to do with the subject of r/btc and Roger Ver. I think you should change it to something more on-point. When I read the title in the section view my first react was that another tag will be needed. Please change the title.
There is a good reason why Ver must remain neg. rated and flagged. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
