It was peer to peer, what are you Savastan0 talking about? It just was not decentralized, but it never claimed to be. I also used LocalBitcoins before they introduced KYC. How was it peer to peer if even the addresses you would deposit the Bitcoins to were owned by them and not you and, worst of it, they would even charge a deposit fee? ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) You can't claim to be a peer to peer service, yet you are centralized. If Localbitcoins is not p2p then absolutely none of the platforms offering p2p trading, p2p marketplace, p2p sharing etc are not p2p. Have ever tried using bisq.network or just checking it out? You are buying and selling directly to another peer. Yes, you use the platform to escrow funds, And they could decide to make off with your money or block it from both of you accessing it. Is this still peer to peer ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) 99% of DEX are non custodial but they are so centralized now THEY are not p2p, you don't even know who you're trading with a bot, or some companies' bots, or just a few guys with all the liquidity.
Those are not Dexs. It's all a lie.
|
|
|
They are trying to prove if you are the real owner of the account. Imagine a stranger claims that they lost a phone and therefore 2FA should be disabled, and then he starts claiming to be the owner of your account. If mexc's security check is weak, they may end up handing over the account to the wrong person thereby, leading to loss of funds?
What would you do in this case. I am pretty sure you would be made as hell and would still call them scammers.
|
|
|
Just trying to understand. How did the token end up in your exchange's account. Did you just deposit it there, or you made the purchase under the impression that it was CCN token?
I have noticed that the exchange is even labeling the token wrongly CCN (Chia Network). The token is actually called Computecoin . Chia network is completely different and goes by the ticker XCH. Looks like there is a big problem with the exchange.
|
|
|
I'm confused as to why AI spammers haven't at least started trying to hide their AI posts a little to make them sound more human. example; replacing "you" to "u" and not having proper grammar. This probably wouldn't entirely fool an AI detection test but at least they would look a little more realistically written by a human than AI.
If they are too lazy to just think about what they are going to type, then how do you expect them to go through all that trouble of replacing words. Now you have talked about it, how many users do you often see should short forms of words such as "u" or "bt"? Seeing a user try to spin the text abbreviate normal words, which is unusual behavior here in the forum, is a number one red flag for me.
|
|
|
Thanks for reporting it, I think I fixed it now.
Unless I am missing something, the problem hasn't been solved yet. I searched for the posts that have been made by myself and contain the word "bitcoin". Before the fix, the forum search engine gave me only 1 post. Now, it's gives me 4 posts, but there should be still many more posts. This could be one of the reasons ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Ftalkimg.com%2Fimages%2F2024%2F03%2F08%2FyLsr1.png&t=663&c=8Qv2hPm6hn8leQ) Also, after the space where you are to fill what you are searching for, there is a box which gives you two options "match any words" and "Mark all words". When I selected match any words. It brought up more results ![Shocked](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/shocked.gif)
|
|
|
That was quite an amount to be lost to a scammer ![Cry](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cry.gif) Please, if you love your money so much, next time, do not just trust random strangers with no reputation with it. If the person has not good reputation, at least use an escrow service to carry out the deal smoothly without having a chance of getting scammed. I am going to tag and create a flag. Please support it. Type 1 flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3289
|
|
|
Yeah, issues come up once in a while. One has to be careful with these centralized exchanges when depositing money to them.
There's nothing fishy about a temporary zero-trading fee promotion in line with the platform's 5 th anniversary. Here's the official announcement. This is the fourth month of this anniversary promo. Although there is no specific end time of this zero-trading fee offer, I don't think this will be permanent. This is simply some kind of gift or a show of gratitude to their users. Now that someone bumped this thread. The " temporary zero-trading fee promotion in line with the platform's 5 th anniversary" is now almost a year since it was announced on April 1 st 2023 ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) Shall we have another 1 year long promo for the 6 th Anniversary?
|
|
|
Yes, I made a contract with a witch who gave me future tennis match results.
Would you mind elaborating? Are the tennis matches you are betting on fixed(I mean, are they fixed matches) or the match results you get are just estimate? anyway, reading this post of yours makes, it sound like they really have valid grounds for closing your account and freezing funds and I am not sure if there is anything that can be done about it. Sounds like a troll. I wouldn't even bother taking him or his allegations seriously. Some of them even know what terms of service they breached, but will come here anyway with hope of getting some support from members.
|
|
|
Artificial Intelligence or AI has really been misused even in situations where there is nothing to do with it. I get it, all this projects and trading tools want to jump on into the hype, but is it worth it advertising a tool for something it is not? Nothing new here except the usual empty promises.
|
|
|
LocalBitcoins had to close because of government rules and not many people using it anymore. But it wasn't really peer-to-peer or decentralized like it claimed to be. You had to give your personal info before using it, and it held onto your bitcoins for you.
Exactly and this is the same lie Binance, Bybit, Kucoin and all this other centralized exchanges are selling to users claiming that they have p2p service, yet the fact is that for you to use the service; 1. You have to pass KYC verification 2. You let them be the custodians of the funds Hardly peer to peer in my opinion.
|
|
|
Agree, because the EPL is the most competitive league in the world, What metrics are you using to conclude that it's the "most competitive league" in the word? Is South America in space for you? Having a lot of media coverage and publicity does not mean that the league is the Most competitive in the world. so all players really want to join one of the elite clubs in the EPL. Until Real Madrid comes knocking ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif)
|
|
|
City is a massive favourite to win the Champions League. Odds are as follows:
It has been so in the Last 3 or 4 years, and they managed to lift it only once. I personally think Manchester City are not going top win it back to back. I predicted an easy win for Real Madrid against the Red Bull team in the 2nd leg in Santiago Bernabeu. Real Madrid are the top team in La Liga while Leipzig is struggling in Bundesliga but the game between them were completely different from what I expected. It's not a 1-1 draw because of a lucky or counter offensive goal, Leipzig was playing better than Real Madrid in most of it. Real Madrid did win the knockout due to lead in Red Bull Arena. They were thought to favourite team for the Champions league title but now they seem to be defeatable. .
But that's how they play most of their games. It's like you have not watched them play in the seasons where they won the Champions leagues. They don't need beautiful football or possession to go into the next round. They just know how to win when it matters most. I would write off Real Madrid just like that.
|
|
|
Recently i explorer quite a number of shitcoins on Solana blockchain and only one turned out to be satisfactorily legit and profitable over the past few days. The project is called SolChat. The rest of them that i checked turned out to be mostly rug pulls. People prefer fewer risks rather playing with unknown shitcoins.
|
|
|
Thanks for the announcement, restored my wallet using Exodus, no problems. Everything works exactly the same as in Jaxx Liberty
I wouldn't recommend you using Exodus as well. It's not open source, just like Jaxx Liberty, so there's nothing much you have changed in terms of safe for your funds. Try out coinspace or Unstoppable crypto wallet if you are looking for a multicurrency crypto wallet.
|
|
|
I don't see any reason for Barcelona not to think about this formula either. But please make me informed if I'm missing a point about the Barcelona - Xabi Alonso relationship. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) This is the point you are missing. It's like Real Madrid lining up for Guardiola or Valverde to coach their team or Barcelona expecting Zidane/Carlo Ancelotti/José Mourinho to coach their youngsters ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) It just doesn't look possible.
|
|
|
Now to my question. If you "vouch" for someone that they are trustworthy and they take a loan, is the person who vouched putting their reputation on the line? If you didn't trust a person to repay, why would you "vouch" for them? I wouldn't vouch for any service I haven't used in the past or haven't grown to trust over time, otherwise I would look at it as shilling. I don't see any point of vouching for them if I don't trust them at all, unless if there is some hidden deal/interest I am not talking about. By vouching for them, yet I have never used their service or loaned them any money, should anything go wrong, my reputation should be under fire as well.
|
|
|
Hello logfiles,
Thank you for your questions. Allow me to provide a more concise explanation of the principles that guide my platform:
Regarding the depositary or non-depository nature, the platform aligns with the Bitcoin philosophy, operating as a fully non-depository and decentralized service. Although being a platform for connecting buyers and sellers. my commitment is to adhere to Bitcoin's founding principles, avoiding unnecessary regulation, centralization and preserving user privacy.
This means you might have to adopt a system where individual traders have to download some open source software, run their individual nodes, connect to other peers creating a true decentralized peer to peer network and exchange (look at bisq.network)... right? Because that's what Bitcoin's philosophy is partly. The absence of KYC is intentional, reflecting the desire for a more private and decentralized financial system. The platform is designed to uphold the values of financial freedom and user autonomy that bitcoin represents. I understand, but your platform remains centralized in a way that you or Law Enforcement can stop it at any time they want. Probably seize even the servers. Maybe you could consider creating a tor mirror as well in a mean time.
|
|
|
Girona seems to have lost its momentum after appearing impressive for so long, now approaching the end of the season, Michel squad has suffered another defeat against Mallorca. It is recorded that in the last five matches, Girona was only able to achieve one victory.
It was bound to happen. I have seen this kind of thing before. Not only in la Liga, but also in the like of the English Premier League. Girona were very impressive in the first half of the season, but they have or had two problems 1. Very thin squad 2. Inexperience to with stand pressure from the Big teams. Personally, I can't blame them. They did their best.
|
|
|
|