Bitcoin Forum
May 25, 2024, 02:23:43 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 [21] 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 ... 238 »
401  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s on: June 03, 2015, 09:03:43 AM
Quick, sell all your Bitcoin because I'm associated with it!

 Kiss

Laugh all you want, but scammers like HF who attracted a lot Bitcoins to fund their hype-product-preorder-scam-dump-the-bitcoins-and-run have not done any good for Bitcoin as a whole.

The fact that you took significant part in this and still consider yourself to be right all the time means you have absolutely no remorse or moral code.

Just the right person to hang out with lowlifes like Edwardo and Co.

Sshh. It was a hype-FAILED-product!
402  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s on: June 03, 2015, 08:14:41 AM
Quick, sell all your Bitcoin because I'm associated with it!

 Kiss

Admit it that you are jealous on cypherdoc for siphoning more coins than you.
403  Other / Off-topic / Re: Cult of personality concerning Gavin on: June 02, 2015, 08:50:25 PM
MIRCEA POPESCU sockpuppets account are going full retard. Thanks MP for showing us that you are THIS desperate! It means that fork is going along on the right path.

Thank you for the show MP!
404  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: The idea that big companies determine the outcome of the fork is false on: June 02, 2015, 08:44:58 PM
Stop spreading FUD Mircea Popescu!

I'm not MP you piece of shit

I thought we established that you are on his payroll in the 20MB Fork thread. You can deny it, but you can't prove it wrong.

China btw holds 50% of hashpower and they have low bandwidth so they are not going to mine Gavincoin.
...
Yes, bigger blocks means less fees, what else are the bigger blocks good for?  

So we shouldn't raise the block size in order to protect the miners that are on the floating line with their profits? What will we do when the block reward is halved? We will decrease the block size in order to help the miners? This is a non-argument. China can mine on their own fork if they will not afford/accept the lower fees. The rest of the world will mine on the 8MB Fork. I am sure that Bitpay, Coinbaise and Bitstamp will not care about the chinese miners and their abject and scamming "cultural differences"!
405  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Swedish ASIC miner company kncminer.com on: June 02, 2015, 05:39:53 PM
Just post this here

https://twitter.com/kncminer/status/605651201141690368

I hope they have "good" yield on their chips....

No specs=fail.
406  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: The idea that big companies determine the outcome of the fork is false on: June 01, 2015, 09:57:57 PM
Stop spreading FUD Mircea Popescu!
407  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Gavin Threatens to Quit Bitcoin Development and Join Hearn's Fork on: June 01, 2015, 07:33:46 PM
Your defamation campaign against me is going nowhere.  Try harder.

Oh wait, aren't you supposed to be spamming the hardware sub for Spamdoolies?

I am doing my best!

Hardware sub is hibernating. The fun is here where we have MP sock puppet accounts and scammers like you and cypherdoc.
408  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Gregory Maxwell threatens to sell his bitcoins and find other things to work on on: June 01, 2015, 06:11:01 PM
I also sold a large chunk of my btc holdings because i won't be bullied around by this asshat 'Gavin'.
I won't be using his fork ever. It's going to die one death or another anyways. I don't see it survive longterm.

I think this whole drama is one epic mistake caused by Gavin alone.

Thank you for leaving Bitcoin Mircea Popescu!
409  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Is Blockstream the reason why 4 core developer won´t increase the blocksize? on: June 01, 2015, 06:08:06 PM
This thread is just more propaganda and ad hominem by Gavin fanboys.

No rethorical trick is spared.

We always welcome your insight Mircea Popescu!

You should really stop wasting your time Mircea, as nobody cares about your consent. Protest all you want, your opinion does not and will not matter.

Amen to that!
410  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Is Blockstream the reason why 4 core developer won´t increase the blocksize? on: June 01, 2015, 02:37:19 PM
Maxwell's fear is ridiculous. Let the economy dictates if we will reach 20mb or not.

I dont see that in near future because with current infrastructure, miners wont fill 20mb block.

No. His fear is that some bad intended group will artificially create 20MB blocks and that the numbers of the total nodes will fall below 5k.
411  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Is Blockstream the reason why 4 core developer won´t increase the blocksize? on: June 01, 2015, 02:19:44 PM
I've also learned this just recently: It should be 8MB (with corrected calculations), and DDoS isn't really possible at that block size. If I'm correct Luke (?) and Maxwell said that because of the increase they would not be able to run nodes anymore due to their internet. They've concluded from this that the majority won't be able to run nodes either. This is also wrong. There are plenty of places that offer sufficient internet speeds for 8MB blocks. Although their argument is also invalid due to the progressing block size. We might hit 8(originally 20)MB blocks in 2016, or in 2026/2xxx. Nobody can really know when.
...
However I do not see much wrong in increasing the block size to let's say 4MB. That would be some sort of compromise for Gavin and the other developers which would also give the whole network more time for better solutions.  

Finally some common sense! Gavin needs to admit and push the 8MB blocks and Maxwell must let go of the centralization fear and accept that Bitcoin can run ok for now with less than 5k nodes. Consensus achieved! I hope the involved parties are reading this or they are notified somehow. I would like to hear their opinion on this.
412  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin Core or XT, you dont have to choose NOW. Dont bother with the poll.... on: June 01, 2015, 02:13:34 PM
I think this is a brilliant idea. Everyone (bitcoiners) will learn about this and start voting. Look at how many confused members on here, i think it works already.

+1. Very good idea. I hope that the bitseed/bitnodes will support and make it easy to change the client.
413  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Is Blockstream the reason why 4 core developer won´t increase the blocksize? on: June 01, 2015, 01:07:59 PM
Let's seriously think about this for a moment. Gavin, in his infinite weirdness, is afraid for Bitcoin's future success. He's running around like chicken little screaming that the sky is falling if we don't increase the blocksize but isn't concerned at all that one guy with a vendetta or possibly a gun to his head could destroy Bitcoin overnight. If this fork is that important then let's make it even more so - invalidate Satoshi's coins in the process and secure Bitcoin's future permanently.

Where was the consensus to lower the blocks from 32MB to 1MB?
414  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: A bitcoin miner in every hand on: June 01, 2015, 01:01:41 PM
Still no information about the hashpower and consumption of the 21.co chips?

Usually, when a company hides "strategic" data, it is because the data is disappointing, or worse...

Since they are not selling miners to the public why should they make public their chips tech data? Their plan is to sell appliances, not mining chips.
415  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Looking for evidence to support theory of Gavin successor to Satoshi on: June 01, 2015, 12:59:40 PM
Everyone repeats over and over again Gavin would be the successor of Satoshi but is there actually any evidence for that?

Can someone please show where Satoshi determined goofy Gavin as his successor?
Thanks in advance for providing that evidence!

Hey Mircea Popescu! Where was the consensus to lower the limit from 32MB to 1MB?
416  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] Official Shareholder Discussion Thread [Moderated] on: June 01, 2015, 09:03:16 AM
Jesus Christ, I need to stop getting pissed and posting in this thread!

The kslaughter pm is legit.  Either his account has been hacked or someone he knows is having a laugh.  Either way it's almost certain that those words are not Ken's.

You need to go full retard and shove a cup in your a$$.
417  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Gavin Threatens to Quit Bitcoin Development and Join Hearn's Fork on: May 31, 2015, 07:21:51 AM
I think it's good Gavin finally understood he needs to make an altcoin.
I just hope he'll leave Bitcoin alone then.

Hello MP puppet! How are you today?
418  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Bitfury - Mining Lighbulb on: May 29, 2015, 09:49:47 AM
You guys realize this is a joke right? Bitfury is obviously taking a stab at 21 inc and their absurd "miner in everything connected to a wall outlet" plan.
Unfortunately, it's not a joke.
Well, it is, but it's not about 21

jimmothy = always being wrong  Grin
419  Economy / Computer hardware / Re: i need a cheap effective rig on: May 29, 2015, 09:48:55 AM
i know jack shit dude. i know nothing of doing this im new.

You will need to know these numbers.   We can tell you not much without them.   Electricity cost you should get a bill once a month and can use it to find it.  And vat/import should be easy to know as it's based on country normally......

Again I ask what is your electricity cost?  And do you have a import tax or vat?


hell i dont know what the electricty bill is cause i dont even pay it so how am i supposed to know? and no i dont cause i am NEW to all this like i have been saying!

Are you usually this helpless or only when it comes to bitcoin mining?
420  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Selling KnC-Neptune (BTC Bitcoin ASIC) Miners ..! on: May 29, 2015, 09:48:13 AM
Over here   https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=75.0

Good Luck!!  Wink

Edit:you beat me to it  Cheesy

Snail!
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 [21] 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 ... 238 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!