Bitcoin Forum
May 04, 2024, 10:38:37 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 [65] 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 ... 238 »
1281  Economy / Securities / Re: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It on: October 24, 2014, 09:31:06 PM
I never said you were selling anything or working for SP. You made a comment regarding AM's chip efficiency, I made a comparison against the HW being sold by the vendor in you affiliate link (where i presume if you collect enough orders you get something, but that's none of my business), but you say you cannot comment...... okay  Roll Eyes

You can make any comparisons that you want. It will not change chip's efficiency!

And since you care so much about my affiliate link then you should know that I only get their standard affiliate rate which is 5%. Feel free to sign up too Smiley
1282  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s on: October 24, 2014, 09:18:57 PM
The superior GN1 chip has always been ready to push 700+ GH/s, given enough juice.

The incompetent subcontractor for the first board screwed up royally, and the next ones could only do 400+ GH/s until the Yoli and Habanero designs.

Converting that much clean power in such a small area is no small engineering challenge.

And this is where their failure is (but of course not provable in court). Trying to use so much power in such a small area lead them to the bankruptcy. No other chip manufacturer used this approach and nobody will attempt to try it because it leads to so many problems. Bitcoin mining doesn't need a simple "fastest chip". Bitcoin mining needs a more balanced approach of many things besides speed. In my view HF failed when they chose this approach and also when they never thought of any plan B in case the subcontractor/PCB design fails. The only thing HF was good was spending a shitload of money while not being able to fully deliver their first batch of miners. The other things like refunds and MPP don't matter when you can't even fully ship your first batch of miners. Good ASIC design skills, but very bad management/business decisions. HashFail!

Edit: SolarSilver types faster Smiley
1283  Economy / Speculation / Re: The negative impact of mining farms on: October 24, 2014, 08:00:34 PM
There are 3600 bitcoins created every day no matter what. What do the large farms have to do with it?
1284  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [ANN] Spondoolies-Tech - carrier grade, data center ready mining rigs on: October 24, 2014, 07:55:31 PM
Such good news! Congrats! I am glad to be part of the elite 20% Smiley

You mean the 20% that Spondoolies is not giving massively discounted bulk rates to?

Being part of the group getting ripped off is normally not something to be proud about.

I don't buy in bulk.
1285  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [ANN] Spondoolies-Tech - carrier grade, data center ready mining rigs on: October 24, 2014, 07:29:42 PM
hey, Guy, congrats on the $5 mil funding round. Pretty impressive.

Such good news! Congrats! I am glad to be part of the elite 20% Smiley
1286  Economy / Securities / Re: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It on: October 24, 2014, 11:15:00 AM
That's my thoughts too, but that makes it $49/month for a TH which I find too cheap. for a 0.7W/GH that would mean 700W for a TH and a power cost of just 0.03$/kWh. It's either that cheap or something is fishy here. And if AM can get so cheap power why didn't they self mined faster or stronger? That power cost is a miner's wet dream.

Can you clarify how you get to $0.03/kWh?
I get the following:
For 0.7 kWh for a TH and 0.1$/kWh, we get (about) 0.7*24*30*0.1 = $50.4 per month in electricty costs.
So these maintenance fees indicate that AM gets electricity for less than $0.1/kWh. It does not indicate they get electricity for less than $0.03/kWh.
That's much more reasonable (and not even particularly cheap if they indeed pay $0.1/kWh, but I would assume they pay somewhat less).

Ok I am bad at math.

@roadstress I see you posting but choosing not to acknowledge the post I made in reply to your comment yesterday.

I am not working at SP-Tech to be able to reply to you and I am not trying to sell anything. Can we focus on my posts, not on my signature?
1287  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s on: October 24, 2014, 04:17:32 AM
There is no need to "prove" the incompetence in court. How many rev boards were there? Why is HF in bankruptcy?

There is a need to prove incompetence in court if, like MinorMiner and pmorici, you want to put HF into Chapter 7 or appoint a trustee.

MM and PM tried to do that, and they failed. 

Your idiotic "bankruptcy proves incompetence" thesis was proposed by no less than the US Attorney, and literally LAUGHED OUT OF COURT.   Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin

If they had succeeded, I'm sure you would be crowing about it.  But since they failed, now you want to discount the issue.   Cheesy

It's hard to prove incompetence in court. If they went that way then it was a big mistake I think. Actually I didn't even thought this is possible. I think that it's much easier to prove bad intentions than incompetence. If we are still at it, can someone enlighten me how do you prove incompetence in court? What laws are there to punish you for being an idiot? I find it very easy to evade this by working with contractors. Was this the case?

I don't know all the court details, but what was the main point of failure? I remember that they promised delivery in Oct and they got chips in November and that they changed the MPP terms (not sure if this is legal or not after the customer paid the money).
1288  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s on: October 24, 2014, 02:59:02 AM
If the ASIC was so great they would have been able to turn it into a working product and they wouldn't be bankrupt. All they did was design a novelty chip.

Because that's what best chips do. Sit on shelves! Best company ever!
1289  Economy / Securities / Re: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It on: October 24, 2014, 02:14:12 AM
FC was talking about finding cheap electricity at the Salon back in August.  Let's not for about the DataTank partnership as well.

DataTank doesn't make the electricity cheaper.

Even if they have super cheap electricity why not use if for more self mining?
1290  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s on: October 24, 2014, 01:50:42 AM
No "incompetence" has been "proven."  That claim has already been heard and rejected by the bankruptcy court.

There is no need to "prove" the incompetence in court. How many rev boards were there? Why is HF in bankruptcy?
1291  Economy / Securities / Re: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It on: October 24, 2014, 01:28:16 AM
im still kinda confused on the fees, each day each GH maint fee is what....

First I understood that it's $1.63/day for each GH, but now I think it's $1.63/day for each TH. Taken from their picture with maintenance being $587 for 1 year for AMHash1 that costs 1.25 BTC. But I find it weird cheap.

$1.63/day for each TH makes it much more reasonable.  That price for each GH is terrible.  That would be on par with each gen1 chip with 10W/ GH

That's my thoughts too, but that makes it $49/month for a TH which I find too cheap. for a 0.7W/GH that would mean 700W for a TH and a power cost of just 0.03$/kWh. It's either that cheap or something is fishy here. And if AM can get so cheap power why didn't they self mined faster or stronger? That power cost is a miner's wet dream.
1292  Economy / Securities / Re: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It on: October 24, 2014, 12:27:47 AM
im still kinda confused on the fees, each day each GH maint fee is what....

First I understood that it's $1.63/day for each GH, but now I think it's $1.63/day for each TH. Taken from their picture with maintenance being $587 for 1 year for AMHash1 that costs 1.25 BTC. But I find it weird cheap.
1293  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [ANN] Spondoolies-Tech - carrier grade, data center ready mining rigs on: October 23, 2014, 11:50:56 PM
It's also very discouraging to see people trying to figure out their units months after they've been shipped.  I've never seen such a clusterfuck of a support thread.


What do you mean? This thread was always a good support thread.

My apologies, but the fact that people are still trying to tune hardware months later is very discouraging.  The thread itself is fine, although it's missing a major component...INFORMATION FROM SPONDOOLIES.


I am not aware of anyone still trying to tune hardware. What we discussed a few pages back is how to downclock miners in order to achieve the maximum efficiency settings, but everyone seems to be hashing without any problems and zvisha (main SW developer) was pretty active when it was needed so your statement isn't really accurate.
1294  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [ANN] Spondoolies-Tech - carrier grade, data center ready mining rigs on: October 23, 2014, 11:41:31 PM
It's also very discouraging to see people trying to figure out their units months after they've been shipped.  I've never seen such a clusterfuck of a support thread.


What do you mean? This thread was always a good support thread.
1295  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [12000 TH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees+NMC, Stratum, VarDiff, Private Servers on: October 23, 2014, 10:44:35 PM

Not sure on any context of it, I don't didn't even know who the Austin Hill is until googling 'Austin Hill Bitcoin' in response to your post.  I don't do deals with anybody when it comes to BTC Guild for integration of another service or promotion of another service.  The closest was selling ASICMINER gear, but that was purely a retailer<->distributor relationship with no impact on the pool itself.

EDIT:  I get people trying to pitch things to me by email regularly.  I generally delete any email without even opening it if the subject line indicates that is what it's about.

Thank you!
1296  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [10000Th] Eligius: 0% Fee BTC, 105% PPS NMC, No registration, CPPSRB on: October 23, 2014, 10:43:56 PM
Peter Todd seems to have an axe to grind with Blockstream, so I'd take it with a grain of salt.
I'm not aware of any pool deals Austin is making, though it would make sense for him to be talking to pools about supporting merged-mined sidechains.
AFAIK he's not been in touch with wizkid057 on this topic, nor tried to negotiate any pool "deals" through me.

Disclosure: While I only represent myself, not the company as a whole, I am personally working with Blockstream.

Thank you!
1297  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [10000Th] Eligius: 0% Fee BTC, 105% PPS NMC, No registration, CPPSRB on: October 23, 2014, 09:48:34 PM
https://twitter.com/petertoddbtc/status/524949510347165696

Any comment?
1298  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [12000 TH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees+NMC, Stratum, VarDiff, Private Servers on: October 23, 2014, 09:48:29 PM
https://twitter.com/petertoddbtc/status/524949510347165696

Any comment?
1299  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Swedish ASIC miner company kncminer.com on: October 23, 2014, 08:55:27 PM
If you want a refund you can front 1.5k usd and pay this swedish lawyer:

https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/magnus-daar-esq-knc-miner-hurts-swedens-reputation-business/


SO QUIT COMPLAINING ON HERE. YOU CAN GET YOUR REFUND. now stop

What else do you want people to talk about? The great quality of the products?
1300  Economy / Securities / Re: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It on: October 23, 2014, 08:09:31 PM
They sell because they are low price...not because they are great chips.

Isn't a low price + good efficiency the definition of a good chip?

Good efficiency on the BE200 chips! Good one Smiley
Pages: « 1 ... 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 [65] 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 ... 238 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!