There you go again with your anger management issues, I am not going to reply to the same stuff again, there is enough evidence that you are trying to punish everyone who disagree with your political b.s, you just admitted it.
Since you are the one, who still replied here, according to your logic, you are the one having anger management issues, after that statement.  If everyone would open a new topic about trust list exclusions, we would have pages of drama every day. And if someone thinks, he is "punished", by getting opposition on an online forum, maybe this person is just mad as f*ck that their propaganda got exposed, like your crybaby respose shows here. Better invest in more valid arguments if the only thing left for you is to play the "victim card" (the victim card is usually the last resort of propaganda pushers, liars and trolls once their bullshittery is bused).
Of course they won't exclude him, after all why would anyone remove the butter from their bread?
You are completely delusional, if you think exclusions are something controversial. They happen all day. Of course you are just here for stirring shit now. Thanks for proving once again that you are a delusional, DT hating troll. Or are you begging for an additional negative trust? Since I have felt a few indirect accusations here, would you care to show my troll posts and lies deserving neg feed back? Unless you consider providing facts about people's behaviour as trolling. Otherwise you won't find it.
Do you read my posts (or even remember your own posts), where you have stirred shit repeatedly without any context in someone else's topic? Or are you not capable of noticing that because you are a habitual troll? You are just here to derail topics, called "trolling"! I guess you lost your credibility the moment you said if he was a political ally you woudn't care for his abusive behaviour. .
I've said that nowhere but its no surprise, that you are making things up. Thanks for proving once again, that you are a habitual liar! Nevertheless, abusers should remain isolated because they are indeed like a virus.
Yes, trolls should remain isolated, they contribute nothing to the forum (except a bit traffic). |
|
|
|
You made a multi quote but, as far as I can see, mikeywith isn't part of the duscusion you quoted! Why are you accusing mw of siding with digaran although he didn't even make a simple post to support digaran!
hmm, I don't think he meant that I was a part of the discussion between the two of them, he was just trying to "justify" why he left that feedback, which was a waste of time and effort because I did not contest the feedback itself, I only questioned the timing. The "arguments" of you both are so similar, where you try to silence me for simply saying the truth.  That you can't deal with it is not my problem but luckily, it's not your issue what I'm sending for feedbacks or which members I'm adding on my distrust list. That's how DT works, or did you miss it? feel free to distrust me.
Or, I could expose your incompetence and let everyone decide for themselves. Yes, let the people decide what's more shady: - that I've added you to my distrust list due to your disgusting, inappropriate islamist propaganda and the misleading accusations against me - that you are stirring shit here because you are butthurt that I've added you on my distrust list Also, I'm thinking your judgement is not something I would feel fine to support.
That's why I've distrusted you.
Ok so now you are gone from "trying to justify" to straight out "lie until they believe you", the only reason you did that was because I happened to disagree with you on a political subject, at least dare to admit it. I'm very outspoken about this, and I've already stated that way back, when we had our disagreement that I disapprove your behaviour but for whatever reason, you are just coming up with it right now. You can cry now, make mad accusations against me but you are the one who's stirring shit here because you can't get over it that I've added you on my distrust list. Thanks once again for proving me right that I made the right call to add you there. I was reconsidering my distrust entry but thanks to your accusation post, I dodged a bulled. How about backing your claims with some proof, that I would bring "untrustworthy members" into DT2?
Unproven speculations are exactly what we don't need on DT.
What a shady try from you to discredit me with things, where you don't have any proof. I said "could", which is something that has a high probability of happening, the fact that you exclude members because of their political views, tag members right after they disagree with you, and remove positive feedback, suggests that you could at one point start to include members based on the exact reasons you remove them. We all know how this is intended by bringing up some uproven speculations: people will read it, get a wrong impression and what will stick in the end is only the (unproven) accusation. This is just shady but that's totally something I've expected coming from you. I can come up with a similarly stupid example, accusing you of something, what "could" happen and that would just help no one. I'm changing my trust list quite frequently, so you've been in the mix that week. It's not controversial at all. it is very strange to remove someone you had in there since 2019, and then add them to your distrust list, just right after having a political disagreement. you still don't get it, it's not about me not being on your trust list anymore, it has exactly zero effect on my forum life, you want to make it sound like I am demanding your inclusion as if I created the same topic about everyone who distrusts me or doesn't include me in their list, you are smart enough to understand the basis of this topic but you keep pretending that you don't because you know very well that your political views reflect so hard on the way you use the trust system, you don't want to say it out loud despite actually practicing it, I've already said that I've distrusted you after your inappropriate reaction to my criticism of your islamist propaganda. Deal with it and get some more thick skin. you are just afraid of losing that power and then whenever someone disagree with you on any political subject you won't have any DT power to "punish them".
Once again, just empty lies. I don't care if someone distrusts or trusts me. If I would care about everyone's trust list inclusions, where I'm getting trusted / distrusted like you do here obviously, we would have endless drama here on the forum. It's really sad to see your reaction here now about our personal issue because I believed this was (mostly settled) If I wanted to discuss our personal issue I would have posted all the insults you pointed to me, or the PMs, or how bad I feel about losing someone who I considered a friend, but I am not here to discuss "our personal" issues, I am here to discuss your bad usage of the trust system since that affects the forum as a whole, not just you and I. Wow, crybaby, "a good friend", we are on the internet after all. Grow a thicker skin. I feel I'm way too often way too soft on trust issues. I agree, and that's the cause of all this, you have some anger management issues, and you unleash the beast inside of you when people disagree with you, this is something that DT members must not do. if you can't handle disagreements, don't get yourself involved in discussions, it's unrealistic to expect people to agree with you on everything, and when they don't -- try to punish them with every tool at your disposal. Yes, sure, I'm having some anger management issues, not the one who's creating a topic in reputation with several misleading false claims against me like you did when whe had our disagreement and that's why I've added you on my distrust list. But if you want to have a big drama here, I'll open a topic as well and we'll have a nice (but very unnecessary) shitshow. |
|
|
|
I am simply questioning your timing, according to the reference you used in your feedback, digaran should have been tagged since 2018, but you only remembered to tag him the moment he disagreed with your political views, had you not found other negative feedback on his profile, what would you do to punish him for disagreeing with you? add him to your distrust list?
Yes, he should have been tagged way sooner. My bad. Most of hist posts are Bitcointalk rule violations anyways for "trolling" but since it's not enforced, he thinks he can derail every topic. Well, looking at digaran's feedback, he's doing that for quite a while Correct, but it seems fine by you, until he disagrees with your political view, no? So, I should give out tags for every troll here on Bitcointalk even if we don't have any interaction at all? What a level headed opinion...  This would end up as a massive shitshow, where trolls will get food left and right. I'm usually only getting active with trust feedbacks, when I'm getting dragged into a confrontation. And I believe this is vital to avoid too much drama on the forum. it's clear that I am not objecting to that, but you are mixing political views and the trust system, just because I think you are brainwashed by certain media -- it does not mean I think you are untrustworthy.
Well, if you like to get some accusations going, I'll respond that you are brainwashed by islamist propaganda and you have a problem with it that I'm opposing that. You couldn't care less but as we know from islamist extremists, they'll force their believes on others at any price. 2. I'm allowed to change, or remove any of my trust feedbacks. This isn't controversial at all. 3. Wow, seems like we have to justify every change in our trust list 4. Same like 3 but for distrust list You are allowed to do all of that, but your behavior makes your feedback worthless,
It's a decentralized system.
That's how DT works. Also, I'm thinking your judgement is not something I would feel fine to support. That's why I've distrusted you. Get over it. you could very will bring to DT2 untrustworthy members who just happen to share your political points of you.
How about backing your claims with some proof, that I would bring "untrustworthy members" into DT2? Unproven speculations are exactly what we don't need on DT. What a shady try from you to discredit me with things, where you don't have any proof. I'm always trying to be fair on DT and giving the people the benefit of doubt and I was already considering to remove you from my distrust list, Unlike you, I am not obsessed with the trust system, your exclusion means exactly nothing to me in itself, it's your behavior, that I personally think will hurt the trust system. Once again a false claim, like I have seen them quite often from you now, which is disappointing. So, no, your assumptions are already completely fabricated, that your conclusion can't be accurate at all. Do you think you could throw with as much mud as possible and hope that something will stick? I'm not obsessed with being a DT member at all. I wouldn't care less if you or someone else distrusts me. You can do it, right away, if you feel so. Same like I have distrusted you.
I also don't know what was your ultimate goal by excluding me from your trust list
I'm changing my trust list quite frequently, so you've been in the mix that week. It's not controversial at all. Some DT1 members have a distrust list, where much more members (trolls) are on. Maybe it's more of a problem, that people feel offended by getting removed from DT? Maybe such people are the bigger issue? I don't know. It's really sad to see your misleading suggestions here, like the one I would be adding "untrustworthy members" to DT, which isn't true at all. It's really sad to see your reaction here now about our personal issue because I believed this was (mostly settled) and was reconsidering to remove you from my distrust list but thanks to this post, this might still be far away. I feel I'm way too often way too soft on trust issues, giving everyone too much benefit of doubt. But on the other hand, I don't want to cause too much unnecessary drama because it's just a waste of time. It's so simple, that everyone can create his own trust list and should have a thicker skin if someone distrusts anyone / doesn't trust anyone anymore. |
|
|
|
After OP edited the OP as well to add more context, I'll add more context here as well.
That's a good summary about the situation: First, many thanks for those, who tried to explain the situation on the German board, why I’ve left these neutral ratings. It happened quite frequently, that threads in the German board were derailed on purpose by those, who have caught a neutral trust back then. And these neutral trusts are very important for readers to get an impression before interacting with these people, that every reader can make up his own opinion. The abuses were quite severe because repeatedly, they’ve trolled with blunt lies even after the remaining members had debunked them. Anyone who dared to criticize the massive trolling was accused of "oppression", like these spammers are still calling it today but the reality is that our trolls can’t face any criticism without crying "oppression". They just want to spread their propaganda without getting exposed as lies and getting called out for doing that. That’s what they want and of course I will use my right for free speech to debunk that and call them out for spreading lies. It’s not my problem that they were not ready for criticism. So, our trolls are the ones who were always trying to prevent our spot-on criticism against their lies. Because it exposed their lies. And these abusers in question did that derailing, lying and trolling again, again and again, despite some warnings from the moderation in the early days. Quite a few members called out our trolls back then for their derailing, but unfortunately, some of these sane members have left the board, while a whole bunch of these abusers is still around. Annoyed from the drama and despite the obvious lies from our trolls, the trolls were successful to trick the German moderator into doing little to nothing, sometimes a few weak warnings, when the derailing was too much. But overally, the trolls always tried to push the boundaries to their benefit. Of course, we pushed back, with criticism, with exposing their lies and neutral trust if there was any documented abuse. We called for the moderator to sort out the issue and to do the moderation job. Even Nazi sympathizing gained traction or, legitimizing the war of Russia against Ukraine and spreading proven lies, of course. The trolls tried to derail our criticism by posting the same lies, re-phrased, again and again. But our feedback to take action against this was not heard. Even later, plagiarism was covered up and even clear rule violation posts were ignored. Of course, that emboldened the trolls. And they are now taking the chance to get rid of the consequences they got back then. If any troll is of the opinion, that the forum is a propaganda platform or should turn into one, fuck around and find out. I'm ready to oppose such abusers who are purposefully spreading the same lies again and again, using their perfidious tactics to derail discussions and damage our forum and society by sowing discord (on Bitcointalk and in real life). That’s part of free speech that disgusting, repeated lies and bullshit propaganda are met with opposition, that people are well allowed to distrust these people, call them out for their disgusting bullshit and oppose any such abuse of the forum. It’s not about "political opinion", what you are trying to make it look like, mikeywith, it’s about spreading proven lies and the entire process how to derail the discussion to spread all sorts of degenerate propaganda while these propaganda trolls are actively trying to play the victim role to delegitimize criticism. If you want to turn the forum into a propaganda platform, yes, that’s the way to go… At some point, we have to ask, if such misbehaviour is really beneficial for Bitcointalk or if the community should be able to push back and add a simple neutral trust for this mixture of lies, propaganda, trolling, derailing, shitposting and other things, where neutral trust is appropriate. I believe, yes, it’s possible. Neutral trust is completely fine for such things, it’s not negative, if there’s no abuse involved, where a negative trust is deserved. Neutral trust is “hey, before any interaction, you might be interested to read this, here’s a reference link”. That’s a very uncontroversial neutral trust in my opinion. And DT will approve or disapprove that. Of course, I will also PM certain abusers before opening a topic in Reputation to avoid more drama, if that drama can be avoided, like it happened in the case of positive trust abuse of our shitposter friends Unknown01 and MinoRaiola. Or should I slap them the topic directly in their face like mikeywith did here, without any effort to solve it via PM first? Therefore, your accusation against me that I’m “extorting members” is beyond ridiculous because it’s not even true, and this unfounded claim just shows your malicious intentions here. Trying to solve issues via PM first is the way to go, not slapping a reputation topic directly into someone’s face. That you are taking that whole thing here out of context, aided by our known (and unknown) trolls is one of your problems. That’s either malicious intent from you or you have failed your job, to check your sources properly or you simply parrot whatever our shitposting, propaganda spamming, NS apologia clowns will serve you, without checking twice what really happened and what they are trying to push. The other problem is that you are enabling and whitewashing also their abuses of positive trust to get their accounts more easily into a paid sig campaign aside from enabling far right trolls, other lies and abuses, hate and division and derailing of discussions in our local board. Shame! You are not in any position to dictate me what to do, mikeywith. Your demand is extremely ridiculous considering your limited knowledge about Germany's past and current ongoings and the fascist agenda of some trolls in the German section to bring us closer to Hitler 2.0 with the very same tactic getting applied from some radicalized Nazi trolls (luckily they have left the forum). You don't know anything about the far right propaganda they have shared on the forum. I'm not interested that Germany gets turned into 3rd Reich once again and I'll do my part to bust a bunch of radicalized trolls, gullible conspiracy theorists, whose abuses are blindly defended by you. Your whole compilation of accusations against me is a bunch of nothingburgers taken out of context by you and our local abusers that they can push their propaganda further, without any pushback. You are their gullible enabler. Considering that you have enabled radicalized islamism here as well, where antisemitism is very popular, it's no surprise that you are siding with far right forces heren blindly defending them and parrotting their lies. Playing the victim card is the only thing they are succesful in because their arguments are too weak and can be exposed easily. Enabling these unproven accusations is not only a very uneducated move from you, mikeywith, it's actively harmful for the forum and the whole society. Considering the situation as described above, it's easily recognizable that your empty accusations apprear in a completely different light now: that you fell for their victim card propaganda. Next one is that you are obviously trying to dictate me, how I have to spend my Bitcoin, when I'm doing giveaways? Do you think I'm going to give my valuable Bitcoin to idiots and trolls, propaganda pushers, shitposters and their friends? Instead of being thankful that I'm giving out valuable BTC you come up like a true dictator, dictating me how I have to do them. How about doing your own giveaway with your own Bitcoin? Your giveaway, your rules, my giveaway, my rules. Stop dictating others what they have to do! Because no, I'm not going to dictate the rules there because I believe everyone should be able to decide how they spend their Bitcoin. Thanks for showing your true face once again that you are an horrible person and totally deserve your spot on my distrust list. tl;dr No need for me to be on DT, I believe in a truly decentralized system, where no one is able to dictate anything, like which neutral trust ratings are acceptable or not. If other members are getting legitimized to interfere how other members are allowed to give out neutral trusts, our trolls will start new witch hunts again and again, terrorizing DT members. And mikeywith is clearly doing this, without backing down from his initial claims, that I would have to remove all past feedbacks of the sort explained above AND for new feedbacks (and if there are new feedbacks, there would be the same witch-hunt again). Let the whole community decide if they want to have these neutral feedbacks visible by default or not.
To address some of the abuses, where a legitimate neutral trust was given, without any doubt: MinoRaiolaMinoRaiola is a known plagiarizer, getting caught already in 3 cases (probably, there’s even more). MinoRaiola is a known shitposter, also defending his shitposter friends. MinoRaiola was caught to circle positive trust for no reason with his pal Unknown01 to bolster their accounts in signature campaigns. That’s why MinoRaiola deserves his neutral trust. Unknown01Unknown01 is an excessive shitposter in our local German section. He got even a reprimand: My reminders to apply a high posting quality have been met with aggressive name-calling, crybaby excuses and defamations (see the neutral feedbacks on his account). Unknown01 was caught to circle positive trust for no reason with his pal MinoRaiola to bolster their accounts in signature campaigns. That’s why Unknown01 deserved his neutral trust. It's no surprise, we can find even more, when we are digging. For everyone who wants to make his own opinion, you can read the trust feedbacks and click the reference link. That’s why I’ve always included a reference link for every reader to make DYOR. These liars and their enablers might show up here and tell you anything. All the feedbacks have a reference link, where everyone can read up the truth himself. The links above are a great start for the abuses, MinoRaiola and Unknown01 are involved in. Another issue is paid shitposting. Signature campaigns are somehow a problem causing this but I believe the real problem are greedy shitposters and I’ve been ready to call them out. Unfortunately, when there are too many of these, they will take revenge at some point. I’ve left them neutral trust ratings, that everyone can read up on the issue and make up his own opinion, so everyone will be aware of some of them. Now, that many abusers are seeing the witch hunt launched by mikeywith here, they will gladly join to score some cheap points. Like mikeywith, they are obsessed to throw with dirt because as we know they have no other arguments and the victim card will be out immediately. Just to address the last accusations. Luckily, the situation had calmed down on the German board over the last year a bit. I'm not so sure if that will stay like that after the recent discord. But let's hope so.
Initial reply: Interesting that you are siding with digaran, our troll in our recent case, where digaran stirred shit, repeatedly out of nowhere. Let me quote this here: @Vod, are you trolling this trust abuser nazi? I have first hand experience, if he fails to continue an argument he will immediately resort to finding something on you just to tag you, be careful.
But you are the one who is poking 1miau and want to fuel it. LOL
Exactly this and this hasn't been the first time, digaran engaged in excessive trolling: 1miau This is because these users are examples, indeed. They are also Merit Sources and (with few exceptions) DT1 users. And they act fair and decent. Thanks for the joke OP. Don't tell me, you and your nazi friend will give them neutral or even negative, right? Because who really cares if 2 nazis run around the forum and individually harass forum members with threats, trust feedbacks, am I right or am I right?
The way I see some of you weasel nazis operate, soon it will be you and your alts all alone left here with nothing to do but circle fingering each other.😅
(And that's only what I've detected in the threads I've read.) Looks like I'm living in his mind rent-free. And if there was any doubt if these feedbacks on digaran's account were justified, at least now we know that they are 100% deserved. Well, looking at digaran's feedback, he's doing that for quite a while now:  And earned his negative trusts. Regarding your other accusations: 1. I'm allowed to made any requests, if you don't like them, ignore them or report my PMs to the moderation if you think it's a "unsolicited PM". I'm allowed to address your false claims against me and your false claims and your islamist propaganda on P&S board, of course. You don't even have to agree. 2. I'm allowed to change, or remove any of my trust feedbacks. This isn't controversial at all. 3. Wow, seems like we have to justify every change in our trust list or we'll get bombarded with a thread in Reputation... 4. Same like 3 but for distrust list 5. I'm allowed to tag any troll and I already gave digaran a pass way back in 2022 when I came over him but didn't bother to "poke" the troll digaran. I'm always trying to be fair on DT and giving the people the benefit of doubt and I was already considering to remove you from my distrust list, after I even merited one of your posts in our German local board. Looks like this topic is your "thankful" response... So after you are slapping here right in my face, I don't feel anymore to reconsider my distrust list entry. Thanks for confirming that I did the right thing by adding you to my distrust list and you'll stay there. There's a simple solution how DT will solve such issues: if you don't like my tags, if you don't like my trust list entries, you can simply distrust me.
It's a decentralited system.
As simple as that.
Can you add links to the topics that lead to the "conflict"?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5470732.msg63017139#msg63017139
|
|
|
|
Track seems to be similar like Monza, where Ferrari has been very strong as well. Long straights and a few chicanes seem to be profitable for Ferrari and also cold temperatures, where Ferrari can heat up tires very quickly. It remains to be seen how Ferrari will do in tire degradation, of course. Sain was quick as well and probably he can even get on podium, should he be able to get past the cars in front of him quickly.
Biggest negative surprise was McLaren. Both cars were stuck in Q1 and I'm not sure if McLaren is really competitive here in the race because qualifying was awful.
As you predicted, Norris bombed, struggling McLaren only caught the final points spot -- didn't watch so don't know how Piastri actually managed fastest lap and end up so badly... Surprisingly, McLaren did very well in the race. Piastri was in 4th or 5th spot with 7 laps left, when he had to pit because he still needed to have a stint on Medium tyres (two tyre componds are mandatory, as usual) and McLaren screwed up the strategy / got caught by a bad timed Safety Car. Otherwise, Piastri would have scored nice points. And that's also why Piastri did fastest lap: he had fresh Medium tyres in the end. Lando crashed out in the early laps and could have scored some good points in my opinion as well. |
|
|
|
It's not allowed to update it after you have shown for everyone once again, that you are just an obsessed troll who's repeatedly stirring shit out of nowhere and without any reason? Here are some of your off-topic troll posts: 1miau This is because these users are examples, indeed. They are also Merit Sources and (with few exceptions) DT1 users. And they act fair and decent. Thanks for the joke OP. Don't tell me, you and your nazi friend will give them neutral or even negative, right? Because who really cares if 2 nazis run around the forum and individually harass forum members with threats, trust feedbacks, am I right or am I right?
The way I see some of you weasel nazis operate, soon it will be you and your alts all alone left here with nothing to do but circle fingering each other.😅
Looks like I'm living in your mind-rent free. So, if there was any doubt if these feedbacks on your account were justified, at least now we know that they are 100% deserved. Just in case he decides to change anything.
Trust updated again.  Feel free to make a screenshot again, if you feel satisfied doing this. |
|
|
|
The problem is the design of this track which in theory tomorrow during the race both Redbull should be advantaged because of the big straights,maybe Ferrari is great a single lap but I am sure that during the race of tomorrow their tire degradation will ruin their race as always and drivers with conservative driving skills regarding tires will surely be doing better here.
Track seems to be similar like Monza, where Ferrari has been very strong as well. Long straights and a few chicanes seem to be profitable for Ferrari and also cold temperatures, where Ferrari can heat up tires very quickly. It remains to be seen how Ferrari will do in tire degradation, of course. Sain was quick as well and probably he can even get on podium, should he be able to get past the cars in front of him quickly. Biggest negative surprise was McLaren. Both cars were stuck in Q1 and I'm not sure if McLaren is really competitive here in the race because qualifying was awful. |
|
|
|
1miau, a lot of non-english speakers want to be on this forum and pretend to be english speakers.  They can generate intelligent text in their language, edit and translate. I know and I totally agree to you that it's important to combat this.  It's a lot of work for campaign managers, so community reviews are always welcome. I'm not saying in any way that is what happened here - I'm just pointing out it is a possibility that shouldn't be dismissed as easily as you did.
My replies weren't meant to "dismiss" it or to downplay this sort of issue, sorry if my joke with "You know, I'm something of AI myself" wasn't that funny as I've expected. Sometimes, bad jokes can cause confusion.
@Vod, are you trolling this trust abuser nazi? I have first hand experience, if he fails to continue an argument he will immediately resort to finding something on you just to tag you, be careful.
But you are the one who is poking 1miau and want to fuel it. LOL
Exactly this and this hasn't been the first time, digaran engaged in excessive trolling: 1miau This is because these users are examples, indeed. They are also Merit Sources and (with few exceptions) DT1 users. And they act fair and decent. Thanks for the joke OP. Don't tell me, you and your nazi friend will give them neutral or even negative, right? Because who really cares if 2 nazis run around the forum and individually harass forum members with threats, trust feedbacks, am I right or am I right?
The way I see some of you weasel nazis operate, soon it will be you and your alts all alone left here with nothing to do but circle fingering each other.😅
(And that's only what I've detected in the threads I've read.) Looks like I'm living in his mind rent-free. And if there was any doubt if these feedbacks on digaran's account were justified, at least now we know that they are 100% deserved. |
|
|
|
It seems that human wrote the text after all I did mention editing... Does it make any sense for me - to ask Chat GPT a simple question to create the text by AI - to edit it a little bit - finally post it here ? Doesn't make sense at all. How much time would be saved? Little to nothing... |
|
|
|
das ist der grund. und nun sieht es besser aus  Sollte genau die Formatierung Tabelle so einen Umstand nicht ausbessern/korrigieren, oder ist da die Board-software dann doch zu alt? Aber danke für den Hinweis mit dem langen Namen, habe es jetzt so korrigiert. Ja, das ist ein bekanntes Problem bei Tabellen und hängt mit der veralteten Forensoftware zusammen. Offenbar kann (?) man das daher nicht forenseitig beheben oder ausbessern, wie auch immer. Unter anderem aus diesem Grund nehme ich bei Tabellen immer die Formatierung mit den Unterstrichen: ____ Das sieht dann so aus: | September | Oktober | | ________________ | ________________ |  |  |
Die Unterstriche ersetzen die langen Worte. Mehr Informationen dazu auch hier: Tipps / Vorlagen, wenn ihr Tabellen verwenden wollt |
|
|
|
When it comes to what car is fastest on straights I can say it is Red Bull now.
Yes, I've expected RedBull to be ahead, in front of Ferrari here a bit as well but turned out that RedBull really struggled today and Ferrari had a great FP2. I got Ferrari winning the qualification at 4.40 before free practice but unfortunately, Verstappen ruined it, when he only got 4th place in FP1, where practice was cancelled after Sainz had an accident due to a badly prepared track.  Still, Ferrari is looking fast and Leclerc could take pole later, so maybe we'll get a Leclerc pole and a Verstappen win again. Sainz will get a grid penalty but Ferrari is looking fast, so I believe this seems to be a great value bet: 
And only 2 rounds to go, so make sure to enter your predictions on Superbru. It's still very close. |
|
|
|
I would say that this new evidence is of extraordinary importance to find out, if there are archives about it. As always, we should investigate all the details to get the full picture here. I believe it's very important for the community to investigate these cases in full detail that the community can have the full picture and decide according to that. The best decision can be made, when all the details are on the table.
Is this an edited AI text? It sounds very familiar.  Seriously? And I thought my English is bad. 
talking like a street thug etc.
Wouldn't surprise me because as usual, everyone needs to practice somewhere. |
|
|
|
Hier habe ich ein paar Berechnungen aufgestellt (bei Interesse kann ich sie übersetzen und eventuell einen Faden dazu auf Deutsch starten, auch wenn es gerade ja eigentlich nicht so bärisch aussieht, vielleicht also eher im nächsten Bärenmarkt ). Also, wenn du viel Zeit hast, wäre eine Übersetzung bestimmt eine interessante Sache. Wie du allerdings auch sagst, würde das nicht eilen, aktuell beginnt ja sowieso (hoffentlich) der Bullenmarkt. Wie es bei dir passt und das wäre bestimmt ein interessantes Thema für den Bereich "Trading und Spekulation". |
|
|
|
Yeah, that would be nice if these posts like from Wapfika won't receive any reward of any sort. Unfortunately, spotting and rejecting such posts would mean additional work for campaign managers, so maybe a community based topic to collect such stuff can be helpful, indeed. Three strikes could result in a round of missed weekly signature campaign rewards. Campaign managers checking OP's topic would also be very effective. Or some sort of blacklist for signature campaigns if OP is willing to make a table of all names and posts of abusers: | Account | Date | Post link | | __________________ | ___________________ | ____________ | | Wapfika | November 16, 2023 | Link |
There can be many strategies how to discourage this. Reduced rewards seem to be the only language these shitposters will understand. |
|
|
|
Auch von mir herzlichen Glückwunsch @Turbartuluk, tolle Leistung und hast du dir definitiv verdient!
Rein aus Interesse @1miau ... du warst damals ja auch recht zügig auf den 1k Merits, oder? Weißt du noch wie lange das bei dir gedauert hat?
Die genauen Zahlen hätte ich tatsächlich nicht mehr im Kopf gehabt aber dank Turbartuluk wissen wir ja jetzt die Zahl. Dass es 394 Tage nach Anmeldung waren, hätte ich jetzt auch nicht vermutet, da es mir doch sehr lang vorkommt. Nun ja, es dauert halt einige Zeit, bis man sich im Forum zurechtfindet. Die ersten tausend Merits sind die schwersten und bei Turbartuluk würde ich auch vermuten, dass er die nächsten 1.000 Merits (bis 2.000 Merit) deutlich schneller zusammen bekommt. Und interessant, wozu es alles Statistiken gibt. Früher musste man das alles in einem eigenen Faden in Reputation anfragen. Die entsprechende Seite im Merit Dashboard habe ich noch gar nicht gekannt. |
|
|
|
Wer Bitcoin mehr als fünf Jahre (und einen Monat) gehalten hat, war bisher immer im Plus!
Danke dafür, knüpft ja an die Bärenmarkt-Durchhalteparole von Turbartuluk an und ist nun ebenfalls in der Tabelle. Erklärung: @womanderful aus dem spanischen Forum hat einmal eine schöne Tabelle erstellt, in der sie die Tage/Wochen gezählt hat, die man mindestens hodlen musste, bis man im Plus war. Interessante Statistik. am längsten dauerte es zwischen Dezember 2017 und Januar 2023, also ziemlich genau 5 Jahre und einen Monat - das war die bisher ungünstigste Kauf/Verkaufs-Kombination.
Aber selbst, wenn man im Hoch 2017 gekauft hätte, wäre man bereits im Dezember 2020 wieder im Plus gewesen, also nur 3 Jahre. Dafür könnte der aktuelle Zeitraum, der beim damaligen Hoch im November 2021 begonnen hat, länger sein. Aktuell wären wir bei 2 Jahren.
Geist über Materie, Bitcoin über Papiergeld.
Erklärung: Solange man Fiat noch für Bitcoin tauschen kann, ist der Bitcoin-Preis komplett unwichtig. Ich bin absolut zuversichtlich, dass Fiat in Zukunft nicht mehr existieren wird und es sich eher lohnt, sich jetzt schon mal für die Zukunft abzusichern. Während des Bärenmarkts lohnt sich der Bitcoin-Kauf am meisten.
Danke dafür, habe die Bärenmarkt-Durchhalteparole noch entsprechend zu "Solange man Fiat noch für Bitcoin tauschen kann, ist der Preis immer noch sehr niedrig." geändert, dann passt das auch gut in die Tabelle. |
|
|
|
Kingf1sher if this is true, I insist on finding those archives. Can you search them, please?
At same time, if you can, please share this topic in Russian local board as well. And, of course, add Ratimov to your distrust list.
I think let's not continue to this case anymore. Ratimov has been exposed very well. I would say that this new evidence is of extraordinary importance to find out, if there are archives about it. As always, we should investigate all the details to get the full picture here. I believe it's very important for the community to investigate these cases in full detail that the community can have the full picture and decide according to that. The best decision can be made, when all the details are on the table. |
|
|
|
Turbartuluk (glaube ich zumindest, dass er es war) hatte sogar einmal ein interaktives Rendite-Dreieck hier verlinkt, welches ich aber leider nicht mehr finde. Vielleicht sieht Turbartuluk diesen Beitrag und kann es schnell verlinken. Woran du dich alles erinnerst. Naja, wie die Seite hieß hatte ich leider nicht mehr in Erinnerung, daher umso besser, dass du den Kommentar gesehen hast und die Seite nachschauen konntest. Wo ich das damals abgespeichert habe, weiß ich auch nicht mehr. Und danke für die Seite hodl.camp, habe ich mir direkt mal abgespeichert.
Ich selbst hatte das schon wieder vergessen und dachte mir dann muss es ja ganz am Anfang gewesen sein. Und Tatsache war das gerade mal mein 20. Beitrag hier im Forum. Um Aussagen möglichst unabhängig vom market Timing (bei Ein-/Ausstieg) zu treffen wäre denke ich ein rendite dreieck wo alle möglichen zeitreihen abgebildet sind am besten: https://hodl.camp/Danke dafür, hoffentlich vergesse ich es nicht wieder aber sollte ich es vergessen, weiß ich ja, in welchem Faden in nachsehen muss, um das wieder in Erinnerung zu bringen, nämlich bei den Bärenmarkt-Durchhalteparolen. Finde die Seite einfach zu genial und somit muss sie einfach hin und wieder empfohlen werden, wenn die Gelegenheit einer Empfehlung passend ist. |
|
|
|
Es kann aber nicht allein nur am Trainer liegen, auch die Spieler müssen bestimmt teilweise ausgetauscht werden, wenn man noch um den Verbleib in der Bundesliga kämpfen möchte.
Naja, ein Großteil dieser Spieler hat Union in der Vorsaison die Teilnahme an der Champions League gesichert. So schlecht, dass sie ausgetauscht werden müssen, sind die also nicht. Und Union hat sich seitdem sogar punktuell verstärkt, z.B. mit Goosens und Bonucci. Wenn auch Bonucci in manchen Spielen sehr unglücklich aussah. Möglich ist auch, dass einfach an der Strategie gefeilt werden muss. Die Schuld auf den Trainer schieben würde ich allerdings auch nicht, denn manchmal passt Trainer und Team einfach nicht mehr zusammen und die Negativserie belastet das Verhältnis insgesamt. Sollte Urs Fischer irgendwann bei einem anderen Verein unterkommen, wird er da bestimmt wieder sehr anständige Arbeit machen. |
|
|
|
Ein Bild sagt mehr als tausend Worte. Selbst wenn die Kurse fallen, zeigt das Bitcoin-Rendite-Dreieck, dass Geduld belohnt werden kann. Guter Punkt! Das Rendite-Dreieck zeigt wunderbar, wie sehr es sich lohnt, auch im Bärenmarkt auf HODL zu setzen, anstatt zu verkaufen und den nächsten Preisanstieg zu verpassen. Ist mit in die Liste aufgenommen. Turbartuluk (glaube ich zumindest, dass er es war) hatte sogar einmal ein interaktives Rendite-Dreieck hier verlinkt, welches ich aber leider nicht mehr finde. Vielleicht sieht Turbartuluk diesen Beitrag und kann es schnell verlinken. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
