Hello. You ran off with my feelings, can I have them back?
But you took mine! |
|
|
|
Did he get banned? He hasn't posted or logged in since the 15th, though maybe he doesn't log in every day.
No. His account is currently being investigated by the mods for this recent PM blackmail activity.
No. Hello TF aka $username,
I just got your PM and have agreed to remove my signature until dicebitco.in can get things figured out and prove they did not scam.
Can you please remove the trust that you left me? I tried to send a PM but it said it was blocked. Thank you.
Done, thanks. |
|
|
|
Why would anyone deposit their money to this... obviously a huge risk and the returns in this case are no better than a fixed rate Bank/government guaranteed investment...
The interest rates are better than what you'd get elsewhere for your BTC, assuming a legitimate enterprise and not some other scam or ponzi scheme. Of course, this is not a legitimate enterprise and is just a scam. Yeah lol. |
|
|
|
Yes, but TF (if that is actually you) said he was guaranteeing all CL investors with his personal worth.
That was only during the early stages - that guarantee has not existed for the history of this thread. |
|
|
|
|
Apparently I won the 9th place (Teef) >.<
Nice contest, that was fun!
|
|
|
|
Username: teef Thanks  |
|
|
|
|
There are currently no known SHA256 hash collisions. If there are, we're in serious shit.
|
|
|
|
|
[quote author=Quickseller link=topic=741302.msg8812270#msg8812270 date=1410674601Like I said above the most likely explanation is that you did not have your account hacked, but rather sold the account to me at below market value with the intention of stealing it back from me later.
[/quote]
Only a hacker would want to sell an account below market value to complete the transaction fast. If bayou intended to scam you and claim it was hacked, he has time to spare. The hacker doesn't.
|
|
|
|
Sorry, I meant " I don't think it would become a real problem."
However, if someone with massive hashing power could push it over the boundary, then blocks would stop, and stop forever. The next difficulty adjustment will happen after 2160 blocks are found, which will never happen.
That's under this assumption of yours: Let say due to defect in SHA256 it is impossible to find a block if more than 160 leading 0-bits are required. I don't see any basis for the assumption? Why might there be a certain threshold? |
|
|
|
The Inputs.io hack was not due to any fault in the code or design, but rather through password resets of the server admin emails.
You had a crap ton in the hot wallet though. Way, way too much. Which was precisely how this happened, if there was only a small amount of bitcoins in the hot wallet like there should have been (and like you were assuring us was the case), well - it might still have gotten stolen, but "it" would have been a pretty small amount of bitcoins, not pretty much all of the ones you had in Inputs / CL. Yeah. It still wasn't a technical issue however, or anything to do with the code. Free / discounted web dev offer is still open  |
|
|
|
I was told to take down my campaign by the mods.
No, you wasn't. |
|
|
|
You requested an email from me.
I sent the requested email.
I never received a response.
Did you receive my email?
Hi, yes, sorry. The other party says it will take them a few days to purchase the BTC. I'll email you when the other party is ready. Sorry for not responding earlier. |
|
|
|
i really want my 0.4 back .. if you can send them back would be appreciated thnk x
Seriously? You registered months after the campaign. Please reply from an account that joined the signature campaign, or I'll consider this a scam attempt. |
|
|
|
I did keep the signature for the full duration. Could you please compensate me in the same way as Kluge? Thank you! Would you accept 0.1 BTC? First of all, best username on this forum. Kudos.
Hey TF - don't know if you remember our debate over PMB's, but Deprived/twentyseventy's derivative model solves the perpetually-yield-less issue by adding a shorting mechanism. Of course, before ASICs came along, PMB's were actually not the worst investment out there.
I've seen DMS As always, how good an investment (like a PMB) is depends on the price. Prior to DMS-like mining derivatives, asset issuers created PMBs at pricepoints where it is extremely unrealistic for buyers to make a profit. The price is what made those PMBs bad investments. |
|
|
|
Based on your post history, it sounds like this is actually a Full Member account.
Yep, it's an 'almost senior' account. |
|
|
|
|
Altcoins belong in the Altcoin section.
|
|
|
|
|
Smooth experience with NiceHash. If you're having issues.. just set up your pool properly.
|
|
|
|
And you, your signature greedy fuck ! (sorry for language)
Leave negative feedback for him |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
