And that user name will be 'VE'? I don't think so. VE could have tendered the shares to himself on BF under any nickname or multiple names before tendering to AMC. Anyway VE had no shares to tender. He said he sold them all then disappeared for a while then suddenly had 50k tendered even though he hated the company??? Not exactly believable.

Good point but how did Ken know Ukyo held 232k shares? Either because he sold them to him personally at IPO price so he knew how many he sold to him or Ukyo told him how many he had bought. There is simply no way for Ken to know how many shares VE still held or how many ANY of us hold. Ken doesn't even have anyones email addresses from Bitfunder. That's why we needed to screen grab the time of tender.

VE gave several different versions of his holdings, from he sold them all to he sold most of them to he still held around 50k. I don't think he had any personally he just said that to have an excuse to keep posting. The real reason he posted was to get back at Ken. No way for Ken to withhold his shares unless he knows the exact amount and VE wouldn't tell him that.

Finally some solid news on the 55nm. Thanks dude.

lol. If someone had threatened to shoot you and then offered 9mm rounds for sale on this forum do you think you might get a bit upset about it? I don't know about this 'lose shares' business, sounds like a joke, if VE has his share-tender info from Bitfunder that is cast iron solid and can't be changed by anyone not even Ken. If the shares were denied him he would have a case based on his tender details and investigations could be made. But Ken couldn't do that anyway as the shares are sold anonymously. There is no way for Ken to know which shares belong to who.
You are defending a criminal who has made death threats. You should be careful what you say on here. We are being watched now.

Well it looks like the 1Mill of NRE paid for a 28nm eASIC project that has failed. End of, it failed. Ken has restructured that as a full custom chip and is getting quotes from different suppliers for the tape out and production of that 28nm custom chip. It seems eASIC are able to offer the best price out of either responsibility to a previous customer or because some the the cost of this custom chip they will off-set againt the previous projects payment (1Mill). I think that's right.

No documentation on the (55nm) tape out - well there should be some for of agreement or contract between ACtM and UMC. I can't see how there would be no paperwork.

VE hasn't acted rationally on here as we have seen for months. He's always been off the  handle - a real Volcanic Eruptor. He began by threatening to shoot Ken, then he was selling 9mm ammo on this forum (an extention of the threat), and it's ended with this.

I'm not angry atall. The shareholders who wanted out should be. They should consider launching a legal suit against him for damaging the company out of malice. There is not a genuine bone in that mans body. He resents Ken somehow for the closure of BTC-TC where he lost money. Hardly Ken's fault. But VE is not a rational being.

So VE by launching this complaint with the MO SEC may have set back trading for another month, or two. Doesn't bother me as I'm in this for the divs. If you wanted to trade Asap well don't forget to thank VE for his fine efforts. lol such a nice guy.

Ken if that's the case and we are now looking at alternatives to eASIC do we consider the NRE advance we paid them as spent? Or is there any of that engineering useable in the future? Or can we get a partial refund? It was a big big contract, central to the company before the 55nm chip, but now it could be abandoned to history?

This bozo has paid out 630 BTC to shareholders.

And created a 'strong proposal' for a 25TH/s mining rig with eASIC - according to eASIC.

What with you quoting prices 75% below what people were buying at? You don't say!

Again DTS there is no point having your shares back if no-one is going to buy them. You have repeatedly talked the company down so what 'idiot' would want to buy these shares now?

The one thing that will increase the value of your shares (we are trading now) is hard evidence from Ken about his UMC order. I suggest you focus on getting that rather than endlessly slagging this company down. Your company.

No. There is no evidence this is a scam. Nothing.

There is little evidence that Ken has orders with UMC and has paid eASIC so I suggest we try to get that now. Neither eASIC or UMC have denied Ken's claims which at the moment is all the corroborative evidence we have.

On the topic of VE reporting ACtM to the Missouri Fiscal Authority  (or whatever they are called) have to say this is great news. They must have all of VE's details, I don't think they would act on an annonymous complaint. So when I send them all the info on the threats VE has made to Ken's life, the threat to shoot him, the mention and selling by VE of 9mm ammo on this forum well they will just hand it all to the local FBI office or local Police. Maybe even the Moon embassy.

So thanks VE, you may have put the final nail in the coffin of this company through sheer selfishness and resentment but atleast you will be investigated too.

104 wafers. That's good, can anyone work out how many chips that will be in total.

A few other things to process there. I guess an info request from regulators is a good thing. Ken can you show them sufficient paper work for your orders and work in progress?

I worked it out once, MO is six hours behind where I am and it's about midnight here so that makes it about 6pm local time when Ken puts his update up. So the end of the working day for him.


World timezone map:

http://www.timeanddate.com/time/map/

No it's later today, should be within the next hour or so. (Updates on a Wednesday)

If this can be modded by a few major shareholders - or longterm contributors who we can trust - then I'm all for a new thread.

We need ground rules and they need to be stuck to. We can't have genuine posters getting deleted just because they have an argument with a mod for example. But it's pretty obvious what a Troll is and so banning them would be the easy bit. In terms of getting Ken onboard I don't think that is a big issue if we treat this as the shareholders thread. He's obviously too busy to Mod the official thread properly so we need to do something.

No it's not me. I suggested the idea earlier today and I left the option open and was expecting maybe Bargraphics to get involved as he's done this secure IRC channel.

I think it's a good idea but it's pointless unless it gets everyone onboard and is actually modded everyday. The official thread is also supposed to be modded but that lasted about 3days.

Again it's not me, I have enough on my hands with my Basic Facts thread, but if it works....bye bye Trolls.

Remember these Trolls are paid to disrupt here so they will do anything to keep this thread alive and completely useless as it is.

EDIT - all Ukyo shares appear to have been sold.

Sounds good. How many Mods can we have? How many is best?

So you refuse to say why you think I'm wrong or to tackle the points about the business developments initiated by Ken after IPO funds were all raised.

(By posting that link you are trying to steer this away from you and onto another Troll 'crumbs'. But you made the blackmail threats, no-one else will take the consequences of that. Only you.)