Every media outlet is someone's propaganda machine. The point is illustration of who really controls money in a bank, the money you believe is yours but it's an illusion.
"The money you believe is money"... also an illusion, really. I believe the problem is that most people can't define money to start with. Money is naturally worthless - no mater what you use for it -, just an abstract representation of goods and resources, so the problem starts when people "want money" instead of goods and resources and its management. |
|
|
|
|
I don't think Serbia is exactly a choice.
Being a non-EU country they need to pass on their way from Greece to Germany and with the outstanding wall building abilities of the Hungarian, they're like cornered there and can't move.
|
|
|
|
All migrants arriving in Italy by boat are blacks.
This statement is fallacy. All!!! are you sure what all really mean, because I watch tv and I can see
Someone to think he is informed by watching TV these days...  Unfortunately the "impartial press" is something we don't see anymore, TV turned to become propaganda. You even see women and children in TV, obviously in close plans so you can't see the surroundings. TV has evolved in a way that the filming techniques make every news coverage a Hollywood movie; a protest with millions can turn into a protest with a few or the opposite, a crowd of blacks with one white can become a crowd a whites with some blacks, and so on... all depends on the propaganda agenda suiting the news agency. |
|
|
|
Sun is hot at Syria these days... |
|
|
|
|
I don't see them to be of any use or conspiracy puppets. Their actions usually do more harm than good for the causes they pretend to defend.
They're just reflex of a spoiled society that roams the West these days; living for too long under their parents being over spoiled brats, causes them to handle the existential questions this way.
|
|
|
|
It's a term used by right winged trolls to try and criticize anybody who dare point out the flaws in the capitalist white supremacist imperialist hetero patriarchy
No, it's a term to define idiots who think they've "a cause" and go for it in such an idiotically and fanatical way that makes even ISIS to look like a moderate thing. ISIS is on the same side as the people who coined the term "SJW" See? When you think on such way it clearly shows my point. Fanatics doesn't need to be on the same side to be fanatics, but they all live in an "us vs them" world. Rather be a warrior than a fascist fear mongerer. SJWs are fascists... They intend to shove their narrow view down others throats. |
|
|
|
It's a term used by right winged trolls to try and criticize anybody who dare point out the flaws in the capitalist white supremacist imperialist hetero patriarchy
No, it's a term to define idiots who think they've "a cause" and go for it in such an idiotically and fanatical way that makes even ISIS to look like a moderate thing. ISIS is on the same side as the people who coined the term "SJW" See? When you think on such way it clearly shows my point. Fanatics doesn't need to be on the same side to be fanatics, but they all live in an "us vs them" world. |
|
|
|
It's a term used by right winged trolls to try and criticize anybody who dare point out the flaws in the capitalist white supremacist imperialist hetero patriarchy
No, it's a term to define idiots who think they've "a cause" and go for it in such an idiotically and fanatical way that makes even ISIS to look like a moderate thing. |
|
|
|
|
@eddie13
It should be illegal to buy used iPhones! The only reason to buy such device is for status and you don't buy "used status". Besides, Apple needs your money!
|
|
|
|
Just cracked my ass laughing about that! One of their "fan boys" thinks connecting by the lighting cable will provide "digital sound".  |
|
|
|
|
Guerrilla fighters or resistance, despite being called terrorists by its opposing faction are a different subject. Unless when they resource terrorism itself, such as ETA or IRA. And here comes the point; those two waged nothing out of terrorism other than be wiped out.
|
|
|
|
Something got me wonder: Why are there terrorists?!
If we go through history, we see they never achieved anything at all.
I guess you've been reading history books a bit quickly. Nelson Mandela has spent 27 years of his life in jail because of his conspiracy to overthrow the state. He was a terrorist. The American settlers who revolted against british rule in the 1770's were seen as terrorists before they created a new country called the US. The french resistants between 1940 and 1944 were labeled as terrorists by the German rulers. The people who created Taiwan were terrorists in China. Nasser was seen as a terrorist by the french and the british... And those are just a few examples which came to my mind, there are countless others. By terrorists and terrorism I mean plain terrorism of blowing the crap out of innocent civilians. Not exactly those "the opposite force calls terrorists", usually due to convenience as those opposing forces are hard to distinguish from those they call terrorists. The founding fathers weren't blowing up US or UK citizens, if they started their campaign by bombing Boston citizens there wouldn't be any independent USA as public support would be 0 afterwards. So they were striking military facilities, same for the French resistance or Taiwan... Mandela not quite, that was a case when propaganda and time in the "shade" made people forget and turn things around. |
|
|
|
|
Guerrilla is a strategy of the weak, terrorism is plain stupid. All it does it empower the opposite faction.
One of the shittiest terrorist attack in history, the attack on North Ossetia's school, was the reason why Russian army could wipe cities of Chechnya without much hassle from the rest of the world... honestly after your faction attacks school kids nobody gives a fuck for what will happen to you and yours.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, the Western media is "western centered", a terrorist kills 2 guys at German you get a week of full coverage, a set of them blow 500, including women and children, at Iraq and all you get is a small note in a corner of a newspaper.
Terrorists then aren't doing it for "Muslims to not feel comfortable at Europe", specially because most of their attacks target other Muslims at their own countries.
Another curiosity is that Daesh/ISIS thing. They just don't care on assume anything! I guess their dialog after Nice's attack should go like:
- Who was that wacko with the truck?
- No idea man, but we will assume it anyway!
They sound like someone trying to sell a product by putting to evidence how shitty that product is...
|
|
|
|
|
Not exactly the point, but the only place where it can have some strategic value.
Because it still makes me confused on where it came from and what for as I believe many actually believe it "does something" for their "cause". Not that I'm afraid that the world will run out of retards, but we don't need such a vast stock of it as we have!
And, well, people that follows a religion that came from a guy who claim to be listening to angels... they surely add to that stock!
|
|
|
|
|
Something got me wonder: Why are there terrorists?!
If we go through history, we see they never achieved anything at all. Terrorist attacks are pointless, suicidal and, ultimately, stupid.
Starting by that Catholic prick, which was used in a movie and became anonymous' mask. Well, UK didn't turn one inch Catholic due to his attack attempt.
Later on late XIX you get the anarchist attacks... no country got anything near anarchist due to it. Same for Spartacus League on Germany.
ETA and IRA did zero on make the territories independent from Spain or UK.
Palestinian terrorism just made it worse for themselves, the more the terrorism the more Israel grows on power.
Eventually the US-supported Talibans got to power on Afghanistan, but not because their terrorism "was so good that scared the Russians", it just happened the wall came down, the soviets collapsed and it was left alone. So they got there by chance.
Now we come to today's terrorists. «Uh! I'm so bad! I killed 100 parisian peasants!»... Dude! I don't mean to disappoint you, but there are about 20 million people in Paris, even if by any miracle you could do it everyday, about 300 years later you would be half-way from depleting Paris of its population!
To not mention you step on the toes of someone who just doesn't make a parking lot out of the rat hole you came from if it doesn't want to or may set a drone so deep in your arse that your friends would need to scrape your pieces out of the asphalt.
Who actually wins with terrorism are those who are "opposing the terrorists". Strategically then the only place for terrorism is to perform false flag attacks, shake the crowd and empower the viper that made it, such as nationalists, fascists, communists and all sort of scum that feeds on fear and false hope. Anything other than this is plain stupid and pointless.
This said, what to think about things like ISIS, al-Nusra, Hezbollah and all that crap? Are they a false flag? Or a gathering of retards?
|
|
|
|
Yesterday while watching ESC's second semi-final, during the sketch of "Finding Abba's replacement", the actor at some point says: - So we spent 4 billion dollars, which today is about 500,000 bitcoins! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F-or2LKrAHM( at about 1h40m ) |
|
|
|
He doesn't need to move any coins. Bitcoin is a private key and it's "address" is a public key.
Having this private and public key pair, an address can be used to sign a message.
Now... wouldn't it be strange enough that the supposedly creator of Bitcoin doesn't even know how it works?
This is not the point behind the thread. We know he can sign a message, but what will he do with his coins once he decides to use them. I know I would make some bold statement if I was Satoshi. Burning some of them, to prove a point will satisfy a lot of investors and speculators needs. But, I will still keep about 50% for a rainy day. ^smile^ That wasn't what he said! His excuse for not moving the coins is that would violate some shady trust agreement. Well... he doesn't need to move coins to prove ownership of an address. |
|
|
|
|
Why would Craig be arrested under "anti-terror" laws?!
Get real!!!
I guess who made that story is someone who joined the initial panic sale, lost a few bucks and have his feelings hurt...
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
