They better win one of those cases. If they don't, Trump has a defamation of character and an election interference case against them all.
Fani Under Pressure: Judge In Trump-Georgia Case Orders DA To Explain Misconduct Allegations - http://www.freedomsphoenix.com/News/356872-2024-01-19-fani-under-pressure-judge-in-trump-georgia-case-orders-da.htm.
IT'S OVER! Trump Just KILLED The Legacy Media And They're FURIOUS - http://www.freedomsphoenix.com/News/356870-2024-01-18-its-over-trump-just-killed-the-legacy-media-and-theyre.htm./
Judge Threatens To Kick Trump Out Of Courtroom; Trump Says He Would 'Love It' - https://www.freedomsphoenix.com/News/356823-2024-01-18-judge-threatens-to-kick-trump-out-of-courtroom-trump-says.htm
Trump Massive Victory at Iowa Caucus, Vivek Endorses Him! - Nikki Haley Delusional - https://www.freedomsphoenix.com/News/356727-2024-01-16-trump-massive-victory-at-iowa-caucus-vivek-endorses-him-nikki.htm.
The Cases Against Trump Are COLLAPSING!!! - https://www.freedomsphoenix.com/News/356699-2024-01-16-the-cases-against-trump-are-collapsing.htm.

Now is now, not Trump's administration. Russia wasn't provoked to do their police action until Biden. Russia wasn't building their military up until Biden. Feeding more money to Ukraine will only continue the same - forcing Russia to prepare for war more and more. Trump knew how to make peace. Biden only knows how to kill off more Ukrainians.


Here is why Ukraine will be left in the dust, dead.

If Trump wins, he will stop Ukraine funding. He will convince Russia to go easy on Ukraine. Russia will start to help Ukraine.

If Trump loses, Texas and several other States will secede, and that will totally disrupt any funding to Ukraine. Ukraine is done. Help them by supporting Trump, and making peace with Russia... no matter what you personally think about Putin and Russia.

^^^ Or the warmongers in the US government could have let Trump win in 2020. Then no invasion of Ukraine would have happened.

But they couldn't do that. They WANTED the war. That's why they are warmongers. You can see by how much money and arms they sent to Ukraine just to kill off as many people over there as possible.

Except that Russia has been gearing up for big war for over a year. These other nations have been wasting their defenses trying to defend Ukraine. Even the US is at the mercy of Russia.

No invasion would have happened if Trump's presidency had not been stolen in 2020.

Oh quit crying now that even you can see that Ukraine is destroyed. If Ukraine had given up in the first 2 months of the war, think of all the soldiers that would still be alive. Think of how the lands and structures of Ukraine would never have been destroyed. But no. You want to keep the war going.

Good politics. And thank you for agreeing with me.

The question is, who is supposed to make the decisions about using US money to help out foreign countries? You are probably right that it is a job for Congress and the President. So, let's look at what happened and what would have happened in Ukraine.

If the US had not given money, etc., to Ukraine, the war would have been over in two months. There would have been deaths, but relatively few when compared with how many there have been. Additionally, the land of Ukraine would not have been destroyed; many of the architectural artifacts would still be standing.

I agree that the government of the US has the duty to keep the peace in the world, at least at times. So, why didn't they in Ukraine? Biden's blundering stupidity, and that of Congress, has totally wasted Ukraine far more than Russia ever would have if they were allowed to do their police action in 'peace'. I'd say that Biden and Congress totally knew what they were doing, and they purposely killed Ukraine.

Trump didn't do anything like that. But you think Trump's the bad guy... because he likes peace?

If you want to see misuse of the presidency, just look at all the lives that Biden took by funding Ukraine. Trump only brought about peace.

Of course, the President has limited powers if Congress wants to stop him. He's not a king, you know.

I'm rather happy for you, that you have finally settled it for yourself.

Left is socialism. It's government like many European countries, where you pay a lot of taxes, and government supports a lot of what you want in life - medical, dental, hospitalization, whatever.

Right is less socialism, where you get to keep a lot of your money - fewer taxes - but you buy a lot of your own 'stuff' - if you want it.

Lol. So, what do you think they will do when they find Epstein guilty? Lol. Throw him in prison? Lol.

Except for circumstantial evidence.

When a man (or woman) hires an attorney, what he has done is given his power over to the attorneys and the judge. That's part of the reason why circumstantial evidence holds so much weight.

When the accused goes to court, he needs to stand present, not represented by anyone, not even himself. Why does he need to have representation, since he is present to speak for himself?

If the court won't hear him without be represented, he needs to file a claim against the judge for not letting him go.

If the court hears him, he has the right to face his accuser... cross examine his accuser. Let the accuser take the oath or affirmation, and get on the stand to testify. If the accuser is the State or other governmental entity, it can't place it's hand on the Bible and take the oath, and then walk onto the stand to answer questions by the accused. No case.

If there is a man or woman in the accuser group, let the man or woman get on the stand and show the harm or damage that the accused supposedly did. Then, let there be evidence and at least one witness.

If people did it this way, a lot of things would straighten up... including drug cases where the accused didn't harm anyone.

Peer reviewing of a theory only validates the theory as a theory. We want facts. Not just the fact that the theory is a theory.

Religion tests and validates all the time. Whatever the religion, people have reasons for being part of that religion. However, often it's fear of the alternative. If they didn't test and validate it - at least as the best option for them in their life - they would leave it.

It DOES make Harry Potter real for each of them to some extent. ALL HP readers know that HP isn't real as written. Or at least they know he isn't real in their life as they live it. So, reading HP makes him real for them in the ways that they can believe and validate... in the humanness of HP and the people. If the author hadn't made HP believable, nobody would even bother with him and the books.

Your suggestion that I am attempting to say that science isn't real is as flawed as your faith in science. After all, science - the knowledge of the physics interactions in the universe - is way beyond what anybody can understand. We don't even know that programming all known scientific info into an AI computer will give us the answers.

If you want to see the big flaw in scientific consensus, look up The Highwire here - https://www.bitchute.com/channel/okiFK5CwQrZS/ - and here - https://thehighwire.com/. Then watch the weekly videos for the last 3 years. What you will find is that there are loads of scientists who have good factual understanding and knowledge that the scientific consensus regarding Covid and the Covid vaxx is pure baloney.

What will you really be watching in these videos? The politicization of science. Science has become a religion just like any other religion. If it doesn't straighten up people will stop believing it.

Sneaky scientist. Want a job with prestige? Become a scientist. Test and continually retest theories. But never prove them or disprove them. Simply come close enough that the theories remain viable theories. That way you always have a job as a theory tester. Easier than digging a ditch for a living.

The fact that so extremely many people believe in religion, shows that there is something spiritual to it. So, religion is not theory... at least not the right religion. But if science hadn't made a few physical inventions that worked, it would have never gotten the strength to start in the first place.

Is that a picture of the joker who attacked the judge? Lol. He couldn't attack a mosquito trussed up as he is. However...

I am not speaking against you or anything you said. I totally agree that people who do bad things should be punished for the bad things that they do... and be shown mercy when they sincerely repent.

My point is that the judicial system is just as bad as the crooks, such as the bad guy in the picture. They are simply way more shrewd about it. And, they have a totally different way of going about it.

You stated well, regarding random. Just about the same thing that I had said. To carry it a bit further, since random is so complex that we can't tell which or what, how do we know that random even has anything to do with it? So, the evolution religion is simply another religion, with the religious leaders (scientists and those who control them) trying to make money and make a name for themselves. Sure, they don't call themselves priests. That word is for other religions. The evolution religion is better. Call them scientists.

People live in caves all over the world. You can find people who look like the evolution kind of cave people, today, if you look for it. Genetics is complex. People who live in caves don't usually go around trying to predict what is happening with their environment and genetics. And certainly scientists can't do that. Mostly what they have is talk.

Nobody is saying that mutations don't happen. What is being said is that Evolution Theory essentially states that the kind of evolution theorized by it, is something that doesn't have any basis in fact... based on the idea of random mutations. All it is, is a form of religion for certain groups of people (scientists) who don't want to accept other religions.

We could state all kinds of facts of science till the sun goes down. But when you consider two things:
1. epigenetics;
2. placebo effect;
... you see that all of genetics and so-called evolution is in the hands of anybody who wants to develop his ability to use them. Things that exist are things that God set in place, to give peple the opportunity to develop themselves into whatever they want.

God did this through Jesus - the death and resurrection of Jesus - so that now we can be children of God... or not, through unbelief. It's personal epigenetics. This is why we can find mutations doing things... because people (mostly evolution scientists) use epigenetics and placebo effect to make mutations to be real. But look at how difficult it is for them. Thousands of years of the idea of evolution, and all they have so far is a few random mutations, without any evolution fact. Without this kind of stupidity, people would be perfect, because in nature there isn't any evolution of the kind proposed in Evolution Theory. In nature without stupid people stupidly using epigenetics and placebo effect, there is only perfection.

On the other hand, anybody who makes loads of transactions is going to make a mistake or two somewhere along the line. If Trump has been adjudicated by a court of law, to have made mistakes, let him pay. If he hasn't, what you are saying is all hearsay or slander.

Same with Epstein. So you can see the news.

What's the difference. It simply shows that John was a guy who lived a long and brain-healthy life... assuming that you are right about this. Assuming you are right, I would call it 80 years minus 3 days since Jesus arose from the dead.

---

Anybody who accepts evolution hasn't looked at evolution theory very deeply.

All evolution theory is based on the idea of random mutations. This idea completely contradicts the law of cause-and-effect. Cause and effect says that there is no random.

The point is that 'random mutations' in evolution are simply mutations that we don't know about. But since we don't know about them, how can we know that evolution happened this way, or that it even happened?

So, the basic premise for evolution is a lie.

One other point is, science is finally recognizing that the so-called random mutations were not random, after all. But they still haven't been able to figure out what the exact mutation process was, to say nothing about proving it. If they do, will they be able to produce the next generation in the line of evolution of people? Probably it will take way too long, and Jesus will return first, and show them about God.

How deep this goes. Epstein might have been just another pawn, albeit a big one.


EXCLUSIVE: ‘Jeffrey Epstein was the bagman for the Deep State’

---

https://humanevents.com/2024/01/05/exclusive-why-did-the-us-state-department-lease-a-nyc-apartment-to-jeffrey-epstein
On Friday's episode of Human Events Daily with Jack Posobiec, guest Mike Benz revealed that Jeffrey Epstein had strong ties to the deep state and was even leased an upscale apartment by the US State Department. The two then discussed the strange overlap that seems to be recurring between government agencies and "seedy" parties.

"There's the strange broker role that Epstein seemed to play in commercial transactions and in the affairs of the billionaire class," Benz stated.

He drew comparisons to Hunter Biden, in that he had "relationships with large corporations and with very powerful nation-state governments" and both lived a "sort of rock and roll lifestyle, high profile, high net worth, deep, deep connections, constantly surrounded by drugs, and prostitutes and firearms."

"The bagman for the Deep State was Jeffrey Epstein," Posobiec stated, "one of them."

Benz asked Posobiec: "Has the US State Department ever given you property to live in overlooking Central Park, New York?"

He went on to explain that in 1996, the State Department rented out a property that was formerly seized by an "Iranian tycoon" to none other than Jeffrey Epstein.
...

---

Lots of things sound stupid and ineffective to you. Remember that you have said several times that you are not a US citizen, and therefore don't know about how the US works... or words to that effect.

Declarations about being a sovereign citizen are stupid. Why? If you are a citizen, you are not sovereign. If you are sovereign, you aren't a citizen. If someone uses that term, he needs to add explanation about it so that it's not contradictory on its face.

There are people in the US who have used the idea of 'no contract' with the government to contract out of problems with government. As I have explained in other posts, writing the words "non-assumpsit" on the signature line ahead of your signature means "no-contract" regarding what you are signing. Depending on the info that you write in the contract, it can mean exactly that, no contract. However, if you show that you are contracting by the words within the body of the contract, you are contradicting yourself by using "non-assumpsit," and your word and signature are deemed not trustworthy. A wise person won't do business with you in this case.

Consider "Fraud upon the Court," and "Fraud upon the Court by the Court." Those are legal terms that have been used by many people regarding their case for over a hundred years... where the judge has made a mistake and will not correct it. All it is, is contracting out of a judicial decision where the decision seems to be wrong. Also, if you are really interested, check out https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Fraud+upon+the+Court+by+the+Court%2C+cornell&ia=web. This will start to show you both the simplicity and the complexity of the US legal system.

Also, you miss the whole point of contracting into the US legal systems. As I said, if the joker contracts out of being heard or being under the judicial system, the people who have been harmed by him, have no other recourse. They might simply, covertly, hire a hit man to take the joker out, simply because he owes them something for his wrongdoing, and the Constitution and laws failed them. So, the point is to remain contracted in, so that you fall under "due process of law" where you have the chance of being set free legally.

As far as what Trump is doing, he probably realizes this^^ stuff, even if he hasn't put it into simple words like this. You need to remember that Trump is acknowledging the Constitution and laws, because he is running for President. Until we become much more knowledgeable about law, and advised about the details of Trump's case, there is no way to determine what is the best course for him to take.

^^^ Cute campfire stories you have there. BTW, our thinking and emotions and consciousness are made of electrical and other waves, right?, most of which are in the human body and brain. So the fact of all kinds of energy waves in the aether, simply proves that God is Great, and exists with those waves. The greatest thinker scientists among us hasn't come close to being able to examine those aether waves because of their complexity. The greatest thinker scientist will tell you that we only know a tiny amount of what is there to be discovered.

Few scientists prove any piece of science that exists. Rather, they often simply listen to the consensus of those who have said that they have proven it. But no scientist has enough scientific proof for your campfire stories. The proof for the Bible, however, is the consensus of millions of people, several millions of whom witnessed the miracles of Moses, others who witnessed miracles of the prophets, and still others who witness the miracles of Jesus and His apostles.

The proof of the strength and truth of the Bible lies in the fact of how many Bibles are in print. When this is compared to other books, in addition to the statistical science that exists around the Nation of Ancient Israel, proof exists in statistical science. But if you don't accept the consensus, and don't work the statistical proofs yourself, you won't ever see the science.

Furthermore, look at what Jesus said when Jewish people were arguing about who Jesus was, John 6:41-59:
The important part is, “Stop grumbling among yourselves. No one can come to me unless the Father who sent me draws them, and I will raise them up at the last day."

In his younger days, on his motorcycle.