|
Trust farming is much easier in Collectibles than in lending.
|
|
|
|
Hi, what's the state of ETH addresses dump? Is it uploaded already? I have it, updated until June only, but not online yet. And I'm currently sailing so can't access it. The data I meant is the full Ethereum transaction data, about 800 GB. That will take my home internet a while to upload. Do you want to talk about doing it in DB? I'm still a total noob, but would be good to learn. |
|
|
|
|
Out of curiosity: why not use an instant exchange instead? Fixedfloat would have given you 0.0015 Bitcoin for 520 Doge. Then, 2 days from now, you can swap 0.002 Bitcoin back for about 650 Doge. Unless you expect Doge to drop more than 20% in 2 days, that would have been a better deal.
|
|
|
|
At least five of your twenty-one UID's that you currently trust have been inactive for over one to two years and about ten or eleven of those you currently distrust (including three who are now banned) have been inactive for over one year to upwards of 1,200 days. Being inactive doesn't make their feedback less valid. And excluded users should remain excluded, even when they're banned I don't want to see their feedback. |
|
|
|
|
I've always liked the seagulls from Finding Nemo: mine mine mine! You can add it as a mascot with the slogan.
|
|
|
|
|
Failed transactions aren't registered on the Blockchain.
|
|
|
|
|
If it's overwritten, it's gone. The longer you use the PC, the less likely to find it back. Turn off the PC and continue your file recovery after making a disk image.
|
|
|
|
So you want physical money? Great, go to printedfiatforum.gov. If it is real, where is it? Have you seen the internet? |
|
|
|
I've been using passwordsgenerator.DUMB and RISKY.net for ages, but had been offline for a few months. Today I found it's back online at https://password-gen.DUMB and RISKY.com IMO it's the most complete tool out there and it's also safe since all passwords are generated client-side. Why would you ever trust a website if you can run a local password generator? Even if it's client-side, that can be changed any moment so why risk it? Warning: I wouldn't just believe it's the same site on a different domain. |
|
|
|
|
How about Service Discussion?
|
|
|
|
Protocol > ethics, can become a slippery slope imo. Hand in hand, if there's mechanisms in place where one supports the other then we can have super resistant and 'safe' networks (read: ones that are not-so-scary for the public). I think it was theymos who mentioned that there could be a second layer with all kinds of protections and refund options. But on-chain, Bitcoin shouldn't change in that direction. Don't forget that one person's refund is someone else's disappearing payment. |
|
|
|
Law in Australia suggests I can be charged with 'theft by finding' if I don't make a reasonable attempt to identify the owner.
Wow, that's one hell of a law--in a silly, brainless way I mean. I'm not dissing Australia, mind you, because there are just too many laws worldwide and way too many that don't make sense. We have similar laws: it just means that when you find something, it's not automatically yours. I think there's a 1 year time limit here for the owner to show up. |
|
|
|
And that's not how I or fillippone see it; it's the way the protocol sees it. If you have a private key, you can sign messages with it. You're, therefore, the signer and, ultimately, the legitimate owner of that key. I would have expected nullius to understand this. The protocol is much more important than anything else including ethics. Ethics can't be enforced. If someone knows my private keys, I totally assume I lose my funds. |
|
|
|
One hundred and seventy-fourth week paid. Thanks again for your flawless timing! I'm late, but at least I have a different excuse this time: MehMeh and I were enjoying the slightly less hot evening, but she fell and had some blood. That lead to loud crying, which I had to take care of. She's okay again, and almost ready for bed. Lol, I quoted the wrong week on mobile. |
|
|
|
|
That's a good moment to try Bitcoin LN: on my favorite instant exchange the minimum amount on LN is much lower than on-chain.
|
|
|
|
|
Germany screwed up. They closed nuclear power plants because of the disaster in Japan, coal fired power plants because of the climate, and now natural gas is scarce and very expensive. Their green plans don't meet demand, and short term that leads to very high prices.
Natural gas is now 10-15 times more expensive than it used to be. But recently, when I washed my hands after visiting as toilet at a gas station, the water was hot instead of cold. They're now limiting airco usage, but still waste energy elsewhere.
|
|
|
|
Guys, I'll tell you in confidence that your chances will increase if you have your own custom trust list. Lol, just my luck, I don't want a custom Trust list on mobile. |
|
|
|
What on earth did that user do to get blacklisted? He asked nicely, just like most other blacklisted users. |
|
|
|
Question: Do you, babo, believe that if you had a script that could find people’s private keys, it would be quote-unquote “legitimate” to transfer their bitcoins to your wallet?
The general futility of such an exercise is irrelevant: What matters here is the intent. See the topic title: the intent is to show how secure Bitcoin is. That's why I Merited the post. If I had a script to find people's private keys, Bitcoin would be worthless. I'm glad I can just tell people to try and find a funded private key, so they can prove to themselves that it won't work. |
|
|
|
2. Only 2% of addresses have 1 or more Bitcoins Wrong. 99.999999999999999999999999999% of all Bitcoin addresses are empty (and I probably missed a few nines). |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
