Your Bitcointalk account isn't worth anything, without valid collateral all you're doing to get is red trust.

You enabled 2FA, and your first transaction pays 0.001 for that.

This happens a lot, and there are some topics explaining how to get rid of it.

If politicians could ban Bitcoin, they would have done it by now.
They can't ban it.

Then you can delete any post instantly, except for your own

This restriction stopped the bump spam: bots that posted every few minutes, then deleted their post again.

Self moderation is meant to stop spam, it wouldn't make sense if you can't delete spam for 24 hours.

You should double-check it before creating a flag.

The bank won't know who sent it, they'll only know who's bank account was abused by a hacker.

You may have more customers if you post this on the Collectibles board. At first impression it looks good and safe.

Summoning LoyceV to merit OP.

From what I've seen, Freewallet conveniently ignore critical questions.

Voting against freedom of speech? I sure hope theymos will never implement that, even for the users I completely disagree with.

Money laundering or tax reasons I guess, claiming capital gains that happened to someone else.

You do have red trust. If you click Trust, it tells you why.

Also, this doesn't belong in Meta, move it to Reputation.

It's the net number of inclusions from other DT1 members, as shown on https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;dtview.
This number can be negative when someone has more exclusions than inclusions.
Vod's BPIP calls it "DT1 Strength".

---

Autocorrect turns Vod into God!

I find it hard to believe anyone goes there for work without having 50 euro with them.

Ask your boss for 3 hours pay.

Lauda had (2) net-inclusions on DT1.
Lauda now has 6 net-inclusions on DT2.
Lauda got blacklisted from DT1.

I have 2 scenarios
1: suppose Lauda wasn't blacklisted, but got 3 more exclusions from other DT1 members. That would mean Lauda was removed from DefaultTrust entirely.

2: the current state (Lauda blacklisted from DT1). Now suppose Lauda gets the same 3 exclusions from DT1. That would mean Lauda still has 3 net-inclusions on DT2 and remains on DefaultTrust.

This means it is possible that a DT1-exclusion leads to a member being on DT which wouldn't happen without blacklisting. This is probably caused by the fact that excluded DT1-members can vote against other DT1-members, but they can't vote against DT2-members.
Is that the intended behaviour of the DefaultTrust system?

I can't, it says permanently disabled, but by email they keep telling me they'll open it again.

It's a good list of mainly interesting topics, some of which I hadn't seen yet.
You could consider moving it back and forth to the Beginners board once in a while (that's what I do with my Guides topic).

Summoning LoyceV to merit OP.

Quoting myself here with more statistics on this thread: