|
1461
|
Other / Meta / Re: DefaultTrust changes
|
on: January 09, 2019, 06:52:29 PM
|
|
Interesting changes, my main account is off DT2, my trust rating went up, and amazingly Lauda went from being excluded on DT2 to being DT1!
I'll have to start thinking about who to include now, this really forces people to stop using only the default list.
Question about #3: say someone is included by 12 but excluded by 5: is he eligible?
|
|
|
|
|
1465
|
Economy / Reputation / Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
|
on: January 09, 2019, 07:25:14 AM
|
WTF? Why is LoyceV an absolute imbecile and I'm only a total imbecile? I feel like you're discriminating against me due to my lower merit score. That's it, I'm trowing my toys out of this thread and not talking to you until you start calling me "legendary imbecile sir" That is strange indeed, cause although you have slightly less Merit, you're a much bigger circle jerk gang member who distributed much more Merit than I ever did! And as for calling names when you're out of arguments: what are you, 12? |
|
|
|
|
1466
|
Economy / Reputation / Re: [self-moderated] Report unmerited good posts to Merit Source
|
on: January 08, 2019, 02:48:34 PM
|
Just ran out of smerits and saw this thread (I have bookmarked it). But I have one question, I'm mostly active on the Beginners & Help board and sometimes Politics & Society board so I'm inquiring if there's any restrictions to some boards because most post I come across are not of that high quality but deserve meriting & right now I don't have smerit to send.
Also I'll love to appeal to merit source since I can get their attention here. Please when meriting our posts please increase the allocation. I'm not complaining of not receiving merit (I do receive so thanks) but please try increasing the amount you send. I get an average of 1 smerit from normal user I just feel it isn't fair receiving the same amount from you guys with exception to few. Thanks. I hope you understand where I'm coming from.
Post the links, good or decent quality is enough. As for the amount per post: I make it a point to empty my source, the amount I send depends on the post quality and how much I have left. Sending more per post means meriting less posts, but thanks to doubling my source I can send more. |
|
|
|
|
1467
|
Other / Meta / Re: Is the Default trust system still working/active?
|
on: January 08, 2019, 02:39:51 PM
|
One solution, the one I mentioned in that quote, is to dilute DT list heavily. Also the sole purpose of it should be defined strictly. If such a default list structure exists, it should solely be a list of people unlikely to scam others, it should be nothing more, nothing less.
I disagree: I want people with good judgement on DT. Not being a scammer isn't enough. Example: I don't think cryptohunter is a scammer, but he has terrible judgement. |
|
|
|
|
1469
|
Economy / Gambling / Re: BetKing.io Is it a blatant scam?
|
on: January 05, 2019, 03:25:58 AM
|
Bounty participants received only 1% of all tokens, not 5%.
When I log in, my tokens are there indeed. But what good does that do me without buy backs?
I hold about $700 worth of tokens. I didn't sell them earlier as it was supposed to be a hedge against Bitcoin price drops, given their stable dollar value.
Please tell me how I can sell them at the advertised dollar value.
I guess you can sell them on the on-site exchange, but the best offer is currently: 0.0000008 BTC which is only 3% (?!!) of the supposed face value. It's kind of funny how he can try pretend that investors haven't been screwed. When btc prices were higher than the "buy back price", he was more than happy to make a (personal) profit. And literally the minute things turned against him, he renegs. Make that 0.3%. |
|
|
|
|
1470
|
Economy / Gambling / Re: BetKing.io Is it a blatant scam?
|
on: January 04, 2019, 11:21:35 PM
|
First off, investors have had 600 Bitcoin returned to them, from the initial ICO funds.
I own 85% of all tokens now. There are likely 5% held by bounty participants who will never log in to BetKing ever again, but if they do their tokens are there
Bounty participants received only 1% of all tokens, not 5%. When I log in, my tokens are there indeed. But what good does that do me without buy backs? I hold about $700 worth of tokens. I didn't sell them earlier as it was supposed to be a hedge against Bitcoin price drops, given their stable dollar value. Please tell me how I can sell them at the advertised dollar value. |
|
|
|
|
1472
|
Economy / Services / Re: Looking for [ESCROW] service for an anonymous crypto project
|
on: January 03, 2019, 08:25:53 PM
|
Consider the ⅔ multiSig wallet. A and B and Me hold each key. What about A and B plan to move fund without my knowledge. I lose my investors fund and the project is dead.
If "you and your trusted guy" are needed to control funds, your investors lose everything in case you disappear. Wasn't escrow supposed to eliminate that risk? |
|
|
|
|
1473
|
Economy / Currency exchange / Re: Need 5 BTC can pay you in ETH
|
on: December 31, 2018, 01:20:53 PM
|
Hi all I am in need for a exchange of 5btc, can pay in Ethereum.
I am willing to pay over the price as I have been given quiet a lot of ETH by an investor and also bought a lot before it's hike, make me an offer bellow!
(I have made a few deals and require the btc to allow pinkstarcoin to grow)
You can contact me on discord @PinkstarcoinDEV#6382
Please see the wallet for proof of funds 0xf4cedaCbB1FC22b8087924917F0c9E4aA8B0e0ef
Quoted for reference. Please sign a message from that address to avoid a red tag from LoyceV. |
|
|
|
|
1474
|
Other / Meta / Re: Planing to translate whole topics to local board> need permission.
|
on: December 31, 2018, 12:16:03 AM
|
|
Large scale translations will take a lot of time, so asking for permission shouldn't be a problem.
I've had a few of my topics translated to Russian and other languages. Some asked for permission, some I just received a notification for through Piggy's bot when they mentioned me for credits.
I'm fine with both, but asking permission puts you on the safe side.
Note that automated translations aren't allowed on local boards.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
