Bitcoin Forum
May 24, 2024, 02:49:43 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 [28] 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 ... 291 »
541  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Pywallet 2.1.7: manage your wallet on: August 31, 2014, 12:48:11 PM
With the web interface you can import them all at once
If you really can't use the WUI then wait a few hours until I release a new version of the new pywallet (I'll post here when it's done)
542  Other / Off-topic / Re: Scientific proof that God exists? on: August 31, 2014, 07:43:38 AM
First of all, there are 400,000,000,000 stars in our galaxy and there are 200,000,000,000 galaxies in the universe, totaling a septiillion stars.
One of these stars is our sun with planet earth orbiting around it, that is one in a septillion stars.
And a lot of these stars have planets orbiting around them.

Secondly, the modern human is at most 50,000 years old, while the universe filled with stars and planets is 13,800,000,000 years old.

Thirdly; the whole god concept did not exist before modern man evolved from the apes.
Or do/did apes also have a god concept???

Are we really this special that we have a god who 'just recently', on this tiny young planet earth, created us as a reflection of himself?

It is pretentious and ridiculous...











That's the point of religions

543  Other / Off-topic / Re: List of absolutely crazy people. on: August 31, 2014, 07:10:14 AM
Replace code tag with quote so that we can click links
544  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: Developer with Design skill needed as Project Partner on: August 31, 2014, 06:47:02 AM
I don't really get what justifies your 40%
What work did/will you do?
545  Other / Off-topic / Re: Scientific proof that God exists? on: August 31, 2014, 06:37:06 AM
And they are now being challenged

You do realise that the discussion going on in this thread has been discussed over and over and over for thousands of years?
No closer to any scrap of evidence or proof than we was 1000 years ago, and no further from any scrap of evidence or proof than we will be 1000 years from now.

This applies to both sides of the argument.

You do realise that don't you?

Wrong!

The machine nature of our universe has been recognized for thousands of years, even though it hasn't been said like this very often. Everyone knows that machines have makers. Cars and televisions don't simply jump into existence by themselves. Everyone has recognized God through the evidence of nature and the universe. Modern science has proven more than ever the machine quality of our universe.

Some people, for whatever stupid reason, decide that they are going to set aside the overwhelming evidence of the machine quality of nature, so that they can make a level field to let the stupidity of what they call evolution theory enter.

What this boils down to is politics. It is political propaganda, just like organized religion is political propaganda to a great extent in some areas. Political propaganda exists for one basic reason. It is a tool used by the few to take control of the many.

Smiley

Again, when two hydrogen atoms fuse together to give one atom of helium (+ other stuff), do you think it's god that makes them do that? Surely because the helium atom is a machine and must have a machine maker, right?
546  Other / Off-topic / Re: Scientific proof that God exists? on: August 30, 2014, 07:02:05 PM
Oh, this is so funny. Not the serious points. Rather the fact that people want to believe certain things that seem to be impossible to others, yet they are unwilling to recognize that some of the things that they believe are considered to be impossible by those same others.

For example, one person says, it is impossible for there to be a living angel inside the sun. Another says that it is impossible for evolution to have happened.

If we want to start to reconcile our "beliefs," all of us first need to recognize that there is only ONE reason why life and the earth is possible. That reason is, simply, that we exist. We are here. At least it feels like it and looks like it.

One of the most important things that we need to realize if we want to move on to an understanding of ourselves and the universe is, it is utterly impossible for life, and nature on the earth, and even the whole universe, to exist, according to anything that we know or understand, except that we do exist, and it all exists. Without recognizing this, all the rest of scientific investigation is meaningless, except that it moves us in the direction of understanding how impossible this universe is. That's the start towards understanding.

Smiley

Except there is ZERO evidence for angels living in the sun.  And 100% evidence for evolution.  Evolution isn't an opinion, I am so tired of people treating it as such.  It is a fact.  But even with the FACT of evolution, there is still room for your gods existence, one does not disprove the other, so stop refuting known facts and wasting everyone's time.

Actually, there is scientific evidence. Then, there are interpretations of that evidence. Some of the interpretations suggest that the universe is billions of years old and that evolution is where people came from. Some of the interpretations of the same evidence suggests a short universal age - as short as 6,000 years - and that people simply "popped" into existence without any real evidence of where they came from. And there are other interpretations of that same evidence, as well.

Smiley

So present that evidence. This thred is 18 pages long now and so far i havent seen a single one.
This God you clame excist also poped into existence without anny real evidence from where he came from.
One can pop up but not the other one? Science know where people came from. Its called the evolution theory. Where is your evidence

This

A thousand times
547  Local / Hors-sujet / Re: LA PETITE NOUVELLE! (blockchain.btc) on: August 30, 2014, 02:11:20 PM
548  Local / Hors-sujet / Re: Paris sur le cours du bitcoin 1 Octobre on: August 30, 2014, 02:06:49 PM
Bon puisque personne ce lance .
Je lance le jeux.

Les règles que j'ai fixé sont simple .
  • Limite pour parier: Transaction presente dans les blocs avant le 10 Septembre 00:05  ( date de https://blockchain.info/fr faisant foi )
  • Limite du nombre de paris Total: Tous les paris après le 100eme ne seront pas pris en compte et restitué (je ne suis pas un opérateur de jeux )
  • Limite du nombre de paris par personne: Il est de 1, je ne peut pas verifié mais on va tous joué le jeux
  • Cours a trouvé:Le 01/10/2014 a 00:00
  • Fixing du prix: https://bitcoinwisdom.com/markets/kraken/btceur
    On prend la valeur ouverture de la bougie qui commence a 01/10/2014 00:00
  • Montant du paris: 0.01 BTC
  • Utilisation d'un vrai client bitcoin: Pas un exchange vu que le payement sera envoyé a la première adresse utilisé en source. vous devez avoir le plein control sur les addresse effectuant le payement
  • La valeur parié sera fixer dans le montant de la transaction :
    Il suffit d'ajouter le paris en euro et ajouter en satoshi avec les centimes

    Pari BTC a envoyer
    500.00€ 0.01050000BTC
    500.15€ 0.01050015BTC
    3000.15€ 0.01300015BTC
    30000.15€0.04000015BTC
    300000.15€0.31000015BTC
    3000000.15€3.01000015BTC

    Les BTC en trops pour marquer le montant seront restitué a la fin du paris.
  • Date de payement::7 Octobre
  • Contestation::Je posterai la transaction de payement entre le 1 Octobre et 3 Octobre toute contestation après le 6 Octobre ne seront pas prise en compte
  • Remboursement::Il n'y aura aucun remboursement possible, les paris sont ferme et définitif
  • Frais:Aucun frais sauf celui du réseau Bitcoin
    Les frais pour la transaction final seront a ma charge
  • Addresse bitcoin ou faire la transaction:1octE21wzrfBKbHVD9sdts8UvUA3CKYUm
549  Other / Off-topic / Re: Scientific proof that God exists? on: August 30, 2014, 12:40:50 PM
God is a fantasy. There's no one person controlling everything. The cosmos is everything in existence and it functions all on it's own. I bow to no god and no man. I simply exist in reality.

God is not a person.  God is all people.  You're thinking in terms of humanly logic.  God is not a being, god is everything that exists.  The totality of existence, that which is the universe.


To ignore the existence of something, you must first acknowledge it's existence.

I agree that God is existent in all people. But He also is an identity of His own, much broader that the combined entities that people are. 

Smiley

I'm just saying that god is not one singular personified being.  The highest state of god is an infinitely bright singular point of white light and infinite love, as all frequencies together create a white light.  I know this because I have seen it, I have felt it and I have became it.

This is the point we might have disagreement on, if we took the time to nail it down. I am saying that God IS a personified being, separate from people, while at the same time being existent, as TRUE God, inside of and as all people. How can this be? I don't have a clue. Sounds almost impossible. Yet this is, if explained and understood correctly, what I believe.

Smiley

The universe is infinite, there is not one humanoid being that is the only god.  We are all gods, all is god.  The highest form of god is a singular point of conscious light and love energy, this is universal to all of existence.

In regards to other posters, aliens are gods, just as humans are.  The universe is infinite, it always has been and always will.  It may be hard to wrap your head around the concept of infinity, but when you see it for yourself, it all makes sense.  Existence never had to be created, it just had to be.

The universe is not infinite
550  Local / Échanges / Re: Acheter des bitcoins : les sites à recommander on: August 30, 2014, 12:30:44 PM
Bonne idée
Mais je voudrais bien avoir accès au résultat sans avoir à voter
551  Other / Meta / Re: Locking the "Hal" account on: August 30, 2014, 07:58:35 AM
In probably that he would have to sign a known Satoshi address before the account was 'unlocked'.
He will have to sign a message with his GPG key to gain access to his account again
552  Other / Off-topic / Re: Scientific proof that God exists? on: August 30, 2014, 06:49:39 AM
Over 99% of the idea that we are overpopulated is BS propaganda, designed to herd the people into the cities where they can be controlled by big government.

People herd to cities because that's where the jobs are.

You wanna try getting on the London tube during rush hour, you'll understand what overcrowding is.

Fine and dandy. The point is, there is no overpopulation.  Smiley

LOL, what are you talking about? You cannot just stack people 4 high, squeeze them in and then that's it.

You need infrastructure in place to support them. Our roads here in UK are at breaking point, NHS at breaking point, schools over subscribed. Plus all these extra people use more electricity, water, gas, sewers, the list is endless.

We can't keep concreting over farmland. This provides our food.

The problem isn't lack of land for the population. The problem is that people let their governments run them so that they can't work together to spread out to the available land.

People are all worried about global warming. The truth of it is more like, if the polar caps melted, there would be a little bit of coastal land that would be lost to rising oceans. But Northern Canada, Greenland, Siberia, and Antarctica would open up to easy, fertile habitation. In addition, with extra moisture in the air, places like the Sahara Desert might become a moist, lush jungle.

The problems with global warming aren't the problems. Governments are stating that they are because government people want control.

Several hundred years ago people left Britain to get away from oppression. Today, the oppression is still of the same kind, but it is heightened because of the population problem THERE.

Governments are doing to the people like they always did, because governments are made up of people who want to remain in control, so they can leach off the people.

Smiley

Wow
Linking science and proven facts to the UK willingness of control over its population is really a smart way of debating

In short it means that if you are convinced by real facts, then you're just an oppressor
On the other hand if you deeply trust in fairy tales, then you are in the right and you are oppressed by "scientists"/"totalitarians"
http://logicalfallacies.com
553  Other / Off-topic / Re: Scientific proof that God exists? on: August 29, 2014, 10:24:02 PM
This thread is diamonds
554  Local / Économie et spéculation / Re: Alors ... vous a-t-on dit que le bitcoin était un mauvais "placement" ? on: August 29, 2014, 09:07:50 PM
Ils sont tout aussi hautains et présomptueux que n'importe qui en fait.

ils vivent dans un doux rêve fait de normes qu'ils ne suivent pas (mais qu'ils documentent âprement) ... c'est exactement ce que font les industries du logiciel.

les logiciels libres, c'est d'abord et surtout un programmeur qui a développé une appli. pour une machine.
le jour où toutes les machines auront un même coeur de traitement, ça sera surement plus facile à ... utiliser, les choses "libres".

et donc, pour le moment, à part LibreOffice et Mozilla ...

Il faut t'inclure dedans . Le bitcoin est 100% opensource et libre .
Arf, le troll a failli être ignoré
555  Other / Off-topic / Re: Scientific proof that God exists? on: August 29, 2014, 08:35:42 PM

 do you think that when the Sun creates one deuterium atom from two hydrogen atoms, then god is the explanation?

I don't know that the sun does that, but if the sun does it, the process was originally created by God.

If you mean, does God involve Himself directly with each conversion, I don't know how much He has set the process on automatic where He doesn't have to involve Himself with it directly.

If you mean that deuterium can be made from hydrogen that ISN'T heavy hydrogen, I have never heard of that happening. Simply don't know.

Why do you want to know what I think about this? Or were you talking to someone else, and I answered out of turn?

We don't know as much about the sun as we think we do. The Revelation talks about an angel who is powerful enough that he/she/it is standing in the sun.

Smiley


Okay wait wait wait...please tell me you are trolling...PLEASEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE just fess up.  There is no way any human on earth believes a god damned angel lives in sun? Belief in god, that's one thing, belief in an angel in the sun!? That must mean that ever star in our universe has an angel just sitting around doing jackshit inside of stars.   Do you even realize that our sun is just another star? And not even a very special one at that, it's below average.

OH GOD PLEASE BE A TROLL!

Nah man, people actually believe there's 300000000000000000000000 angels in the universe (that's the actual number of stars we've estimated in the observable universe). People are absolutely insane.

Anyway, you're all going to BlahVonShorgonNieHa (my religion's version of hell, because you worship a false god). Here's my proof of the religion:



Stop spreading propaganda



556  Local / Hors-sujet / Re: Question sur les détecteurs de faux billets. on: August 29, 2014, 09:06:52 AM
mais je comprends pas cette case à remplir :   Numéro de TVA Intracommunautaire

et cette phrase bizarre aussi : ¿La dirección de envío es la misma que la de facturación?
1. J'imagine que c'est dans le cas où tu es une entreprise
2. Est-ce que l'adresse de livraison est la même que celle de facturation?
557  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Pywallet 2.1.7: manage your wallet on: August 29, 2014, 08:55:16 AM
For future reference the final version is this:
Code:
#!/usr/bin/env python

import json,sys

if len(sys.argv)!=2:
print 'usage: '+sys.argv[0]+' wallet_dump.json'
exit()

f=open(sys.argv[1],'r')
c=f.read()
f.close()

d=json.loads(c)
print d
r=''
for k in d['keys']:
label=''
addr=k['addr']
if addr in d['names'].keys():
label=d['names'][addr]
r+=k['sec']+';'+label+'\n'

f=open(sys.argv[1]+'.pywalletexport','w')
f.write(r)
f.close()
558  Other / Meta / Re: Locking the "Hal" account on: August 29, 2014, 07:45:53 AM
It is sad news and ALS is a terrible thing, but what's the point of locking an account? Is someone going to access it fraudulently?


In memory: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=155054.0
I thought about that because the satoshi account was locked too, and I think Hal has roughly the same credit here
559  Other / Meta / Locking the "Hal" account on: August 29, 2014, 07:30:39 AM
Now that we learnt the sad news, don't you think his account should be locked?
560  Local / Actualité et News / Décès de Hal Finney on: August 29, 2014, 07:23:42 AM
Hal Finney est mort hier soir, 5 ans après avoir appris qu'il était atteint de SLA (sclérose latérale amyotrophique, ce dont est atteint le scientifique Stephen Hawking).
En deux mots: on lui doit PGP (avec Zimmerman), il a créé le premier système proof-of-work, il est un des candidats potentiels pour la personne de Satoshi et en tout cas il est le bénéficiaire de la première transaction Bitcoin (envoyé par ce dernier).
Bref, un tas de contributions à nos vies.

Annonce
Le thread "Bitcoin and me (Hal Finney)"
Pour plus de détails, Google.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 [28] 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 ... 291 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!