Narrated 'Aisha:
that the Prophet married her when she was six years old and he consummated his marriage when she was nine years old, and then she remained with him for nine years (i.e., till his death).
Looks like by her own report, she was 9 (or even 8 taken the Lunar Calendar is shorter)... not much of an adult, eh?  (he was 54) |
|
|
|
If you take your time to fill the gaps on any religion, you'll become one.  If you don't know or just listen to some apologists... then your code is half-baked and will run as so. |
|
|
|
|
We are heading to troublesome times, mainly due to excess of population.
Won't be easy and some "social security" preachers/believers are pushing natality even further, all of them refuses to acknowledge a simple truth; social security isn't but a Ponzi scam, at some point there won't be people enough to feed the monster and increasing in numbers will cause some major hazards as resources and food becomes scarce.
|
|
|
|
|
A coder may not know/interest in an ideology, so like the computer it's impossible to compute what we don't know.
Like when I started to study Islam back on late 90's, I had absolutely no negative view of it, was just interested on its culture.
Furthermore, morals are relative and one can be a coder and a psychopath. Our job training can be useful to have a clear view on what an ideology is, but some are perfectly ok with whatever hazard it brings within.
|
|
|
|
|
No, I don't deny it.
As I don't deny the genius behind previous alike projects.
I don't say every coder or even a genius coder is an activist. Still I believe some may be giving second thoughts about what they are doing.
Computers are precise machines, they don't spit the data "we want", they can be bend to ignore much of related data and provide false results. Not the computer's fault.
|
|
|
|
|
Not all coders care, know or examine ideologies. Whatever vars they're ignorant of they will not sum, making their code incomplete. By definition we aren't activists, but our job makes us better on analyzing data and when we become activists you get things like 3DES, AES, SHA, PGP, Bitcoin...
About your picture, those guys are playing some CS-like game, if you notice they've their hands on the mouse, a thing we avoid to do, it's unpractical to code.
|
|
|
|
They don't seam to be coding. Coding != using the computer for something. |
|
|
|
Because of the failure to understand the philosophy of the issue of Jihad, and its reality,...
And there you go again. A proponent of Islam, lecturing on the Internet about Jihad. That's about all we need to read of your post.... Let me as an atheist, compare your behavior with that of Christians. They talk about peace, and about turning the other cheek. They talk about who they can help. They do not talk about why stoning women to death is okay, and why cutting off limbs is okay, and why one meaning of jihad is good, and another is bad, blah blah blah. Answer me this. Was Yassir Arafat a good Muslim? My respectable friend, you know why I defend Islam, just because today some Muslims forget the real teachings of Islam, and thats why I strongly condemnd them. Islam never teachs or preach TO KILL ANY PERSON, but people today killed innocent persons on the name of ISLAM. I just wants to tell you in very respectable manner that please do not think that these type of techings are true Islam. Muslims forget the real teachings of Muhammad (peace be upon him) same as some Christans forget the true teachings of Jesus (peace be upon him). I respect all the religions because no one preach the bad things. I just want that if you talk about any group (indivisual) like ISIS or Taliban, never think that is the Islam. please You defend Islam because you're ignorant about it... that's all. |
|
|
|
Islam is such a religion, which does not need the support of sword for its propagation.
Without sword there won't be Islam at all, it never spread on any other way. STOP LYING AND DECEIVE YOURSELF! |
|
|
|
As a coder, my brain developed in a way that when I read a piece of code I can compile it on-the-fly at my own memory and run it. This allows me to know what the computer will do with it when I put the machine to it. I believe many or most of other coders share this very same ability. This ability makes us logical, and here we often come to a clash with some general population, due to their laisser-faire of cherry picking. Sorry folks: WE CAN'T DO IT! In the very same way your computer will not jump blocks of code based on illogical momentary convenience, we can't ignore some instructions that are there. The logical operators are AND, OR, NAND, NOR, XOR, NOT and XNOR, there's no such thing a CPICKING! So your common religious, philosophical or political views that "are good if you ignore a bunch of inconvenient entries", otherwise are just suitable for psychopaths and with extremely dangerous and violent outcomes, are, for us, just suitable for psychopaths and with extremely dangerous and violent outcomes. If you want us to ignore rules, make sure they aren't there in the first place! We're also used to keep in memory loads of variables, objects, arrays... we can easily compute their interactions to peek the final result. Hope you understand and, if you come across an ideology you're unsure about; ask a coder to analyze it.  |
|
|
|
Every time a new thing comes around to the web, its abuse seams unavoidable! Happened with Java, with loads of ugly marquee animations at late 90's, happened with Macromedia's DreamWeaver, with all site suddenly looking the very same, happened with Flash, with loads of useless painful applications, sometimes even with (bad) music, and it's happening now with Javascript, more precisely with jQuery. jQuery framework sure makes it easier to create scripts, but PLEASE, don't overdo it! It's amazing that everyone now adds jQuery sometimes just for a simple $("#id") call - JS already supports getElementById('id') folks, no need to load a framework for that! And then animations and useless or shortly timed ajax/DOM calls, making a simple site to fire up to over 200Mb of RAM per page, if not crashing the browser, as a late crappy "snowflakes" animation does. Bottom line, it's OK to use JS, but not OK to abuse it! When you concept a website keep in mind your visitors' hardware and if your site really should require an i7 CPU and 1 Tb of RAM to visit. |
|
|
|
|
No sir, they are still theories.
The only thing above theory is a law.
The correct term is "that's just an hypothesis ".
|
|
|
|
|
You are reading this using;
The theory of computing,
The digital theory,
The RF theory,
The electronics theory,
The electrical theory,
The theory of general relativity,
The theory of special relativity (satellites)
Amongst many others... But hey they are "just theories ". Happens that if a single one in the stack is wrong you will not read this...
|
|
|
|
And the fact that Islam brings nothing positive to the world for anyone that isn't muslim.
Neither does it for someone who is, just a handful of void promises and false hopes. In truth no other religion, or all others combined, ever caused more death and misery to Muslims than Islam itself. |
|
|
|
That's the thing about Sunnis; they've two tongues like snakes. Keep distorting the meanings of words and lie like no other. If you get the Islamic History they're followers of an usurper, Abu Bakr father-in-law of Muhammad and father of his baby bride Aisha, which ran over the legit heir pointed by Mo himself, Ali, son-in-law of Muhammad and married to his daughter Fatimah. Ali had to run to Persia, forming the Shia Islam, and Fatimah was killed by Abu Bakr's partner, Ummar. You can get the picture on how torn and wicked that religion started! |
|
|
|
|
About Russia/USSR, sorry to disagree.
Arabs have no particular friendship with them, just do business due to be in the neighborhood. Let's not forget the Ottoman Empire fell mostly due to Russia, the Afghanistan war in the 80's, the religious ban imposed on all the Soviet Union and their satellites, such as Albania.
Up to not long ago, leftists couldn't see Muslims, it just started to change post-Israel due to leftists being lured into believe Palestinians were socialists (yeah, right...) and later with the US' "big Satan" as a common enemy.
|
|
|
|
Some people with a limited knowledge (and understanding) of history see muslims as victims of colonialism, American imperialism or more globally, the almighty white man who wants to rule the world. I guess they should learn more, but they don't want to.
They are not that wrong, Muslims are indeed victims of a con white man: Narrated Anas bin Malik: While we were sitting with the Prophet in the mosque, a man came riding on a camel. He made his camel kneel down in the mosque, tied its foreleg and then said: "Who amongst you is Muhammad?" At that time the Prophet was sitting amongst us (his companions) leaning on his arm. We replied, "This white man reclining on his arm." The an then addressed him, "O Son of 'Abdul Muttalib."... Maybe if we show them this Hadith they will turn around... More on his whiteness: http://wikiislam.net/wiki/Qur'an,_Hadith_and_Scholars:Muhammad's_White_Complexion |
|
|
|
Due to a small technical issue, like not being a citizen of USA, I can't vote for or against Trump or whoever runs for whatever position there... This said, it's not my business. But if you're experiencing the same technical issue as me, keep posting your opinion, maybe someone who is will give a rat's ass about it... or not. |
|
|
|
Non true scotsman, level 5... Let's put this way, Muhammad himself killed many people or ordered them dead. So your arguments are, unfortunately, false, you're just make an attempt to fool Muslims on their own religion... Inner Taqyya. I would support you, but that simply doesn't work. And you acknowledge Abu Bakr, that means you're Sunni... That just adds to the problem. |
|
|
|
|
Islam is far from success, as you may know there are lots of factions and sects. Just like in socialism, btw.
It seams to be a common feature of "appealing to greed" based ideologies. Because they are but scams mounted over dozens of fallacies, and everyday a new scammer tries to pull the same scam believing "this time it will work".
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
