Attention, trade volume on Poloniex is wrong whatever the reason might be. I'm trading on that exchange for years and graphs were always correct but now with ETH there is a major problem with 1-day chart, it is showing much lower daily trade volume than listed on the right, at coins list. Do not asume that graph is wrong (it was never wrong before) but the oppossite (coins list value is wrong) and do not be fooled by big numbers shown elsewhere. Poloniex moderators were informed of problem multiple times but didn't reacted, it obviously suits Poloniex to continue luring the naive into buying based on inflated trade volume. If buying, keep in mind ETH costed just around 55k Satoshi not so long ago (at ICO). IMO the chance for a major dump is really high, the only question now is who will start dumping first (whales?).  |
|
|
|
First Video Preview of our Decentralized Applications Platform and Sia Decentralized StorageHello Community, We are very excited to show you the first preview of our forthcoming Decentralized Application (Dapp) platform. For this special moment we have prepared a YouTube video, which guides you through the necessary steps to deploy and launch your dapp onto Crypti's Dapp Store. Please note that the user interface is an early version and will go through several quality assurance cycles before we release it. Click here, to watch the video.Continue reading on our blog.. Are there any choices for app hosting other than Sia and GitHub? It is strange to me that we can not use Crypti blockchain for that purpose.  |
|
|
|
I've to say I respect a lot the huntercoin daemon developer, @domob, for his work on this project and his attitude, unlucky he's not a huntercoin player so he can't have a focused view on the problems, I would have liked to know his thoughts about these problems, I've a feels that he would have been more thoward the "more fair distribution"
Distribution is just fine given that marketcap is so low (roughly 80 BTC) that for very little money anyone can grab a sizable portion of already mined coins. I have no time to play so I buy coins and I have acquired like 1% of total number of mined coins for so little money it is laughable. Anyone having no time to play or not liking the game at all should do the same because Huntercoin potential is enormous. My suggestion is to stop wasting much time on fairness and making game enjoyable for everyone, it is mission impossible. Some people are natural born winners and some are natural born losers (gamewise), if you try to please second group it is not gonna end up well. Make it so losers enjoy game and winners will overrun them anyway, regardless of what sort of loser protection you put in place. People who suck with something should improve or move onto something else, in case of Huntercoin that would be trading or investing. The only real problem I see is that there are no uses for HUC beside game costs (create character and destruct) and trading. Add more uses somehow (3rd-party games?) and demand for coins will increase, with it price will go up and there will be more players thus better distribution but always keep in mind that rich and experienced trader or investor will acquire massive amount of coins one way or another. If determined, he will make players who acquired a lot of coins sell most if not all their coins. IMO focus here should be on lite client (mobile?), something that anyone could start using in minutes. Like with all other games, some people will love it and some won't but first we need to attract more players and only then eventualy change gameplay more. |
|
|
|
got another question, when someone says have 600 huchs hps and someone has 400 huchs when one destructs on the other does it do 200 damage or there total hucs hps damage?
Reason i am asking i downed 2 players upped my hps to 600 attacked 2 players both with 200 hps each(1 tile from each other).. and some how or another down 1 and the other player gained 200 hps and then attacked me lowering my hps down to 400 and his to 600 and then attack me again and i lost.. how is that even possible?
Icon
Edit.. unless it does use there total hps as damage humm...
Implement Life Steal Concept - If you hit with a destruct you will take their Hunters value and add it on your own. e.g. If your general costs 200 hucs and you hit someone worth 200 hucs, you will have a value of 400 hucs and they will die. Your Hunters value can be consider "Health". https://github.com/chronokings/huntercoin/blob/master/GameLogicChanges.txtHunters Value will be refunded upon Disaster. If I understood above two correctly, and the rest of game logic, all a player must do to completely dominate the map is to kill-kill-kill until his health points are so high no single player or no group can kill him. There is no need to bank ever because even if disaster strikes player will get all coins in his wallet. If everything written is correct, there should be a cap on total amount of coins player can have, with ability to use destruct disabled upon reaching that cap (else player can continue killing everyone and use his other characters to pick coins). |
|
|
|
|
This and that, where is the new updated Lite wallet for Windows? At least 2 weeks + 2 weeks have passed but no download, how I'm supposed to vote for new deletages and move coins around?
|
|
|
|
...but seriously look at the big picture...
Ok - bitcoin is up about 100x from ~3 years ago. And at a market-cap of ~$4B, it is still a *tiny* asset-class with much room to grow. Many of us have been looking at the big picture for years. To put it into perspective, total budget for NYC police force in 2013 was 4.6 billion USD. Anyone who thinks tech like Bitcoin will not be worth more than what a bunch of stupid cops are wasting in just one year should really leave this forum. Just go away finaly, stupid bears. We're going back up to 400 pretty soon here
100k+ in the long run
Lol u noobs
The only way BTC will go to 100k is if the dollar becomes so devalued it's virtually worthless and I seriously doubt this will happen. You are a fully indoctrinated member of the cult  Facts, moron, facts or fuck off. No one here is interested in your wishful thinking.  |
|
|
|
What is the fairest fee?
Just add 0.001 BTC free to your transaction and you'll be fine. |
|
|
|
#1 problem of Bitcoin is probably lack of adoption.
No, it is whales. People who obtained insane amount of bitcoins one way or another and then removed them from economy, reducing exchange liquidity and causing price to swing wildly. There won't be mass adoption unless liquidity improves big time. But you tell that to someone who sits on 10,000+ BTC and does not have to sell any of those coins unless price suits him (1 million dollars or so). |
|
|
|
I thought most people here support BTC rather than altcoin? So now people are suggesting to ignore micropayment and ask them to shift into altcoin instead? lol
That is beside my point but in any case if you support just Bitcoin you are not really smart, like people supporting just gold or silver or Facebook stock or whatever other single-point-of-failure stuff. If BTC were to fall to dirt cheap some day, it means people are losing faith with cryptocurrency and there is no denying that the other cryptocurrency will follow the same path as well. The altcoins are merely nothing without BTC anyway Wrong. There is not a single older tech that has not been replaced by advanced and better tech. For example, Netscape Navigator to MS IE to Firefox to now Chrome, with Internet web-browsers. Right now you can start using altcoins as a way to move BTC from exchange to exchange faster than using Bitcoin network or you can continue bitching and whinning here all you want, your choice. Nothing more to add to this debate. |
|
|
|
If you must move low amounts of BTC exchange to exchange just use altcoins.
I thought most people here support BTC rather than altcoin? So know people are suggesting to ignore micropayment and ask them to shift into altcoin instead? lol That is beside my point but in any case if you support just Bitcoin you are not really smart, like people supporting just gold or silver or Facebook stock or whatever other single-point-of-failure stuff. |
|
|
|
1) Ban / not recognize transactions under BTC0.001
+1 If you must move low amounts of BTC exchange to exchange just use altcoins. There are many of them with high enough liquidity that converting BTC to altcoin, sending altcoin to destination exchange and converting altcoin back to BTC should not be an issue in terms of losing much money (you might actualy make money, e.g. exchange arbitrage). Depending on altcoin, the whole deal can be completed in under few minutes which is mostly not the case with sending BTC. |
|
|
|
I dunno man, it just seems that going to Australia to wander around several thousands of square mile looking for gold with a metal detector is no efficient way to either find gold OR sell metal detectors.
It also would not be the first time a tiny exchange sold a worthless interest in itself.
Well, if everything would make perfect sense with this offering and high profit is guaranteed then share price would be much higher than 0.0035 BTC. This is low investment but high risk offering, a penny stock stuff. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MJXLV_DMKa0 |
|
|
|
Moronic chinese mining pools are not only using SPV clients but generating blocks that contain no transactions beside 25BTC rewarded to miner. https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/July_2015_Forks#Invalid_Block_HashesOn Crypti matters, blockchain explorer and other functionalities at http://live.crypti.me/ are lagging or not working for me, can't check how much coins are still on Bter but it would be nice if you people stop trading there and move to Poloniex. Bter is problematic and similary to MtGox, Vircurex and many other cryptocoin exchanges it is a question of when they will go bust, not if. Given current situation, it would be much better to have very good liquidity at one exchange than low liquidity on three exchanges. |
|
|
|
Are you part of this project? I ask because it seems like you're speaking in some capacity for the OP.
I'm not part of this project, I just bought some shares. Stuff I posted is info already available on this and other thread, nothing new, just saying it differently to maybe clear others' confusion.  This metal detector guy may be on the level, but I still remain sceptical. Why does he need to go to Australia to test it? Why can't he secure private funding? He's offering too much pay outs...
Why not go to Australia if he already obtained paperworks? Why not go with crypto-crowdfunding when he already owns cryptocoin exchange? As for "much payouts" that part remains to be seen. |
|
|
|
So what popped the bubble? The turning point where everyone cashed out and others doing the same to avoid the profit loss and selling too? Do you think the price hitting 78000 once the month is over could be somehow legit? Usually the price won't pass any resistance levels outside constant news, until it's heavily dumped. The current price is pretty fishy.
What bubble, and what pop? Did you read the news? Oh my, nope, i didn't. Honestly, i won't read any news. You can open the market page, drag your scrollbar over timeline, and then get back and tell me again it's not a bubble. It may be a bubble, but it has not popped yet, and you will not know if it was a bubble before it has popped. I really doubt it will sink lower than 50K whatever happens. It's not every day a coin get a $20 mill hedge fund supporting it.  Problem is that you and most here do not understand that there is no support by hedge fund or anyone with over 100 BTC ready to invest. Check lack of liquidity at buy side again. Few pages back someone quoted Carl Gray saying something like "I feel like buying BTC under 1 USD" or something like that which is complete and utter bullshit. If Carl and alikes really belive START could be in top 3 they would put 1,000 BTC buy wall at some price, even at 1 Satoshi, if only to prove there is nice money backing their claims. "Put your money where your mouth is", a known trader expression. No such thing here. There are just bullshits by people who own multiple millions of USD and whatnot more and who will own even more because you noob traders will give them more money. 50% of total coin supply is in the hands of some of the biggest financial market scumbags and at the same time there is no buy support from them anywhere so yes, go buy more START, stupid.
So what popped the bubble? The turning point where everyone cashed out and others doing the same to avoid the profit loss and selling too? Do you think the price hitting 78000 once the month is over could be somehow legit? Usually the price won't pass any resistance levels outside constant news, until it's heavily dumped. The current price is pretty fishy.
What bubble, and what pop? Did you read the news? Oh my, nope, i didn't. Honestly, i won't read any news. You can open the market page, drag your scrollbar over timeline, and then get back and tell me again it's not a bubble. don't waste your time with them, ducky. they are pretending to be people who don't own startcoin and are just here to save people that they do not know because it's a better motive than their real motives. the statement 'honestly, i won't read any news' was a little too honest and revealing. You may think anyone posting contra your belowed coin of choice here is a FUDster wishing to buy more cheaper but that is not the case. After almost 4 years on this forum I'm really irritated by shitards and scammers of all sorts, people who are ruining cryptocoin scene for their own instant benefit. It was proven countless times that noob traders who come here and fall for sale pitches and other pump and dump shits are the ones who after losing all money go and rage about cryptocoins everywhere. As someone who has more wealth in cryptocoins than possibly all of you posting at this thread combined it is not in my interest to just watch ripping-off of unsuspecting and noob traders. 4 Years and 42 posts you have been quite active then It is not smart to use the same (online) identity at all times, especially if one is dealing with game-changing stuff like cryptocoins. Game can change in direction you might not like at all, you know? |
|
|
|
so this is like a really simplified mining discovery project? i lost money on kenilworth, which promised similar things (real world gold mining offering btc profits) they vanished into thin air.
i would be extremely cautious about this offering. it seems too much like a weird idea designed to distract investors from doing proper research. proper research will tell you mining discovery is rarely profitable, and looking for gold with a metal detector almost profitless altogether. metal detectors only read down about 4 inches. actual gold discovery teams utilize a LOT more tech and knowledge than some guy wandering around the outback with a solar powered metal detector.
I remember Kenilworth, it was really risky deal given they needed like 500,000 USD just for terrain deep scan or something like that. It all looked way too pricey and complicated for me so I stayed out. But it seems you are missing the point of this whole offering. It is not similar to Kenilworth at all. No one here will go super-expensive on detecting or mining metals. Guy sells 50% shares in private company that will be selling metal detectors, that is the main sale pitch here. Trip to Australia is just to test experimental metal detector device on terrain suitable for metal detection due to large mineral and metal deposits. Any gold found on that trip will be sold and profits distributed to shareholders but that part is secondary to development and sales of metal detector, once finished. Put simply, metal detector startup sells 50% shares for 35 BTC total where "The shares' purpose is to spread startup costs and to continuously offer 50% of all profits to the share holders" where profits come from metal detectors sold, any gold found and possibly more stuff. There is also another thread at altcoin announcements section: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1089604.0 |
|
|
|
Is it normal at Tumblr that one must login to check anything? dont know. first time i use it. When I click on link you provided I end up redirected to https://www.tumblr.com/login?redirect_to=%2Fblog%2Fgoldetector that contains no user data, it is just a main Tumblr page. Maybe you must activate your blog there or post something to it for it to become visible? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
