Yeah you have to look it closer, the top 3 altcoins basically require the same type of wallet, as do the thousands of altcoins out there.
What if the question is like this: This is BTCitcointalk, admin shouldn't facilitate people talking about altcoins here. Btw, the place to talk about altcoins with more complete room is here https://www.reddit.com/r/altcoins/ or https://www.altcoinstalks.com

Again, bitcoin(satoshi) didn't need investors from the start, it needs Hal as a adopters/contributors/users. In conclusion, bitcoin needs more people like Hal Finney.
And that's what I said that users can't migrate completely from conventional systems because one of the reasons is long-standing dependency. Fiat is only a standard for assessing all entities and activities that have unconsciously become common practice.
Bitcoin can actually also value goods and work relatively, a simple example in a small scope (points for @n00ber also how to invest in bitcoin without fiat without a bank): Almost all campaigns run by @icopress in the service section give a standard flat value for each post is B0. 00008 ~ B0.0001 (ignoring fluctuations). Anyone who doesn't mind can take it. If all managers, sellers of goods and services on this forum implemented the same thing, then slowly the reference standard value on this forum specifically would become only bitcoin.


I accumulated my own bitcoins from the signature campaign and some past jobs. I didn't ever invest into bitcoin with even a cent), if regulations doesn't prohibit me from buying all my necessities with bitcoins and local shops accepted bitcoins, I'd do it as needed.

I think it's the opposite, bitcoin/crypto doesn't need a bank, users need a bank role simply because they can't immediately migrate the financial system for some reason.
Banks need crypto if global adoption rates gradually increase, or they will lose their business to competitors in the industry.

I have another conclusion from the excessive online shopping behavior of people in my environment. The marketplace platform has a clever trick to let their user "own" more money for shopping with its flagship feature "pay later", which is difficult to offer in physical stores. Of course it has a limit as a trial before the system increases the limit periodically if the user always pays on time. This is very effective in encouraging consumer behavior.

Your browser failed to recall your session, I think you have changed some of your browser's privacy and cookie settings, just try to restore to default settings or re-install your browser.

You should stake your address here just in case. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=996318.0

It depends on your wishes you should have a reason before doing it.
Both are good in their own use cases, for example you want to gain access to ETH "defi" ecosystem or something like that. Converting BTC to ETH/stable coins just to hold doesnt have many prominent advantages.

My understanding up to this point was that nuke won't be accompanied by a ban (only posts cleanup) because in the unofficial of forum rules thread both are mentioned separately and it can also be done by local staff which I know they can't ban users. It seems you're right after I checked the nuked accounts in this post. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4720640.msg51468544#msg51468544

It depends on your status at that time, for example you're just starting out with the exchange. One obvious risk is that every identity you send has been leaked whether you want to repeat it or not.
The consequences aren't yet clear, but I'm sure that at some point they'll be able to use your identity for other benefits, not just in the form of crime.

DCA results won't be optimal this way, you may miss out on some purchases in the bullish market that you should have made.
DCA is actually one way to minimize skepticism from any market conditions including green candles because your purchases are always small amounts. If the market is in the green, hope that you have started DCA long before that.
DCA's most important suggestion is consistency.

The evidence you presented isn't enough to lead to these accounts getting banned, you should find a plagiarized post of one of these accounts from somewhere else without a source. They clearly belong to one person so copy pasting posts between those accounts doesn't constitute plagiarism. The heaviest penalty that a mod might give is nuke.

No exception for you, I'm sure $50 is only a small amount that the average citizen of a poor country can afford. On the other hand, how rich would you be right now with $50? I saw your initiative in another post to set up a trading signals group.

Btw, did you bet $50 on this entry, it should have executed. May your group members not become poorer.

I have repeatedly had inaccurate predictions, but it doesn't cause me much stress. Reading your next reasons, I know what makes you so...
Let me guess, are your friends teasing you about your predictions? An important rule when discussing speculation with anyone is to always include some sort of disclaimer of accuracy instead of convincing them more strongly.

Bitmex is based in the Seychelles^[1], exchange licenses are generally usually issued by local financial services regulatory agencies. But, I think it doesn't help much, and is too complicated.
Your problem is the subject of a legal dispute that requires court resolution, it could be that bitmex has a valid reason why your account was terminated. The license won't be revoked that simply.
You're better off contacting a lawyer if your money is large enough.


1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BitMEX

For advertising companies, detailed data such as KYC is actually not that important. All they do is capture data/history of your interaction while connected to the internet via cookies. It doesn't violate any privacy rules at all

Maybe such detailed data is a bit expensive in different markets like the dark web.

People just use the background matching. While the name Nakamoto is quite common in Japan^[1], Dorian coincidentally has a computer engineering^[2] background which has led the community to suspect that he is Satoshi, a cryptography geek.

To end the confusion to identify the real Satoshi, the community has agreed on this https://x.com/i/status/1217114317054709762

1. https://forebears.io/surnames/nakamoto
2. https://cryptoslate.com/people/dorian-nakamoto

Bad try. If you want to convince people and make bullshit guarantee offers, make your site more responsive than this crappy one. I couldn't see anything loaded for 2 minutes.

What entity is it? I can't find the information on google.


Great, does that way only work on your platform?

If you convert in bnb, it is 0.000000000000000777 bnb (777 wei / 10^18). It's just a bscscan feature to save space and be easy for readers to recognize. wei is the smallest unit of BNB, as sat is the smallest unit of bitcoin.

A visible example, over the decades since the advent of ATM machines, the role of bank tellers has been replaced by those machines. But to this day I can still see tellers at nearby banks to serve me.
Banking will not be that simple to remove, I also believe that banks also provide a lot of income to the country. CBDC will be given limited characteristics where you'll need a role of the bank to solve those limits.

Explosive emotions that arent expressed can also have a bad effect on a person. Sometimes dirty words are also effective to drive away fake newbies, lol.
If your mood is such sensitive, there is a text space below your avatar that you can use to let people know about it.

Online or offline transactions won't help bitcoin reach that value. The only opportunity is if the amount of need and use of bitcoin increases greatly.
Let's say we have a scenario that something bad suddenly changes everyone's faith in the fiat of all countries which then shifts the entire volume of forex marketcap to the crypto market and bitcoin is the only viable hedge pair.