Nobody of any calibre is going to spend 2minutes of their time checking the work of a high-school level guy.

I told you back in February your Curl function is shit and not worthy more of my time, or the measly 10k usd bounty.

No matter what you produce, and what you sell it as, it will not be even be worth attacking it.

Also, the better professional, the more likely they would not feel ethical to attack and steal other peoples money.

Iota, and any other coins you are involved in, have the security of wordpress webpages.

Just do what you are good at, sell hot air and scam idiots.

What if the attack had succeeded?

https://twitter.com/iotatangle/status/907341564959174657

It was flawed and on a level of code that is often produced by high-school developers. MIT did the job for you: https://medium.com/@neha/cryptographic-vulnerabilities-in-iota-9a6a9ddc4367.  

You mean, the same way that you've produced your own *working* hash function?

What if he actually smokes metanfetamin and goes to desert at nights to produce more? Like Heisenberg.

WHAT IF THE DEV IS HEISENBERG HIMSELF? OMG BREAKING BAD IS REAL 

Тоже писал и не ответили. Но думаю, что всё будет нормально, всё пофиксят.

If you post a whitepaper in 2015, maybe its your point to prove or show a network without a Coordinator?

^ The guy who does not have the capacity to understand the point of this thread and has to resort the the old fav butt hurt comments of every other scammer caught with hands in the cookie jar.

Does anyone here have a take on the overall percentage of outstanding payments? judging by this thread I would assume it is a widespread issue?

Поделился бы рецептиком

Similar to stealing from old people but advanced and worse.

More broken promises

nxt3?

Iota = scam

Everytime i forget that youtube url I return here so that you can repost it. I am awaiting episode 2 that you promised.

What if IOTA Dev is actually having a heroin addiction?

China moves and the MIT Narula's Medium blog I think so.

Могу только предположить что ты сам удаляешь свои неудобные посты, а с помощью публичных обвинений других, создаешь себе алиби

The tech side of iota being poor is secondary to the fact it was a narrowly distributed.

You can not start with a distribution this narrow and expect to at some point present it as a trustless decentralised project.

You will never know the damage the manipulation and collusion will cause from the outset.

Better to stick with real POW projects like bitcoin and LTC.

Byteball is has a far wider initial distribution but I still don;t think it was done properly. Of course of the 2 I choose byteball over iota if you have to have a dag coin in your portfolio.

I find this thread to be the same few iota shills attacking one person over and over. This alone tells me the the iota initial distribution was a disgrace. There are the same 5 or 6 faces only here like on every iota thread.

"In 2017, leaving your crypto algorithm vulnerable to differential cryptanalysis is a rookie mistake. It says that no one of any calibre analyzed their system, and that the odds that their fix makes the system secure is low".