I was curious where you disappeared, I usually worry about all trolls I meet.

Hahaha, good one!

Pity margin trading not enabled, would make it more spectacular...

...but we can guess - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1964917.0 )

Cast your votes (to spend time while waiting for the opening)

It's obvious that logic is not the strongest of your qualities, but I'll try to explain it once again:

1. I questioned validity of some whitepaper points.
2. You referred to one of the points claiming it's a "proof".

Think of this, take all the time you need. I hope you'll see where your "logic" failed.

Judging by general tone of your message you are about to agree with my assumption that once Byteball gets world-wide adoption and GB price rises we'll see most of people caring about fees and hence publishing mostly high-entropy data. Which in turn will lead to very low copression ratio of Byteball DB. I think we can omit this testing scenario if you post that you agree.



I believe I could find it, just wanted to save my time, this is why I asked you for help.



This is a valid point, but it can be solved easily. All we need is the devs to come here and say what max TPS Byteball can process without "breaking". I will either agree on that number or test it in practice. Let's wait for the dev's reply. If they don't give it then I'll be gradually increasing TPS and reporting progress here and on the slack. I'll stop when I run out of GBs.

You probably overlooked that post, I quote it specially for you:

I created #3rd_party_testing channel on Slack. Join it if you are willing to help. First I'm going to issue a lot of transactions at once to see how the DAG will look. Taking into account that Byteball is still WIP I need helpers to report on that channel if something goes wrong. In that case we'll stop the test and resume after the devs fix the issue.

Наоборот, теперь любая публисити хороша. Народ знает, что если что-то ругают, то это надо брать за обе щеки. 

ПутанИчка

I will, don't worry. Does Byteball have a slack? I'd like to be invited there to coordinate my mainnet test in realtime. Could you send me an invite to come-from-beyond@mail.ru, please?

Several people claimed to be scammed by FXO. While he did raise several red flags (like being offered by one verified scammer to be used as an escrow agent or offering non-escrowed deals) I don't have solid proof of him being a scammer. Just use a good escrow agent dealing with him and you'll be fine.

Pay up for what? Lost bet? Firstly, you refused to accept the bet. Secondly, a quote from the whitepaper can't be treated as a proof, because it's the validity of the whitepaper which was questioned. So, while you keep lying, the others see the real state of things.

So now you play denial of reality card, I see. Well, we'll do that testing soon, I'll be doing it on the mainnet so you won't get even a slightest chance to backpedal.

Let's recall how it was:













So what do we all see here? That SatoNatomato lies by deliberately misinterpreting quotes.

PS: I suggest everyone not partnering with SatoNatomato, you will never recover your reputation after that.

BTW, this reminded me one of the unanswered questions: Was the whitepaper peer-reviewed?

Excuse my stupidity, but the leap from me selling 8 GB to your claiming it was a bet is too large to me. Could you split your chain of thoughts into more logical steps?

Provide the link to your post then, I couldn't erase it.

Nothing. I just like to expose SatoNatomato's lies. I hope noone partners with him, his bad reputation would taint the others.