I'm not going to interfere with your debate, but as byteball holder, I would like to see anything you can do to disrupt the mainnet. It would help to see weak sides of the coin and to build more resistant network.
If you know the devs you might help this to happen earlier by pointing them to my posts regarding API. I'm planning to spend 1000$ worth of byteballs on the first test. This is what witnesses would earn. |
|
|
|
"Mommy please hold my hand" "How do I even turn this on".
Wow such developer you are, cant even find things without asking for help.
Your fudding is ridiculous, as tony explained to you before like a professor to a daft kid, transaction thrughput increases with trx amount.
Anyway look in the github.com/byteball/headless-byteball folder play/create_* scripts thats all you need to waste your bytes.
Btw iota is retarded and iot with pow is oxymoronic, only asomeone with no experience in iot could concieve such idiotic concept.
I think you got everything wrong. Let me tell you how it really is: 1. You and me decided to do some testing to resolve our dispute. 2. I asked for API both here and via PM to tonych. 3. I got a link from another user to RPC calls which doesn't contain sending messages command. 4. I looked into the source code and spotted some places which may lead to performance degradation on machines of other users (btw, why is SQL so heavily used?). 5. I asked for assistance because Byteball is still being developed and I don't want to bring the network to knees just to prove my point to you. So now I'm on the crossroad: 1. Use RPC call and risk disrupting normal operation of Byteball mainnet (if you think I'm wrong I'm open for a bet on this). 2. Wait for someone to help me to send plain messages which don't require to trigger signatures verification and can only affect storage size. 3. Do nothing. I'm pretty sure most of Byteball community members are not happy you picked it as your favorite coin (so far nothing except disservice has been seen from you) and I don't want to make them less happy by interfering into normal Byteball network work. So I'll wait few days more hoping one of the devs will help me. |
|
|
|
Thank you. Unfortunately, there is no an API call for sending messages. Wasn't Byteball about storing data which determined the choice of its name?
As a continuation: I think I can generate high-entropy data by sending byteballs from 16 old to 16 new addresses repeatedly but I'm not sure how this will affect network performance. Is it possible to get any assistance from Byteball devs or I'm left alone with the source code? |
|
|
|
Thank you. Unfortunately, there is no an API call for sending messages. Wasn't Byteball about storing data which determined the choice of its name? |
|
|
|
Guys, could anyone help a newbie to find API docs? The opening post of this thread doesn't even contain word "API".
Sorry for the color, it's for better visibility. |
|
|
|
faebe [29.04.2017 3:25 PM] Can you tell estimated date for new version release? thnx
Chat-for-Ban [29.04.2017 3:26 PM] 2 weeks ... ... xtester [16.05.2017 11:29 PM]
Coming back to the tx problem. Been replaying tx all day long, but still unsuccessful. Is there anything else I can do? Mr Robot [16.05.2017 12:19 AM]
if a replay says it was successful why don't i have anything in my wallet?
faucet status says sent (press replay) but i've done so 3 times and every time it says successful but nothing happens vanbreuk [17.05.2017 2:16 AM]
Maybe I'm beating a dead horse, but once I've replayed a transaction a few dozen times after a week, running the network spammer afterwards for a couple hours, and trying with two different service nodes, what do I have left to do? Wait until topology is in order again? Просто ещё "Петловна" не поменяла тебе колготки.  |
|
|
|
Just seen nvo.io(Decentralized Exchange) today,might interest you
Thx, I'll check it later. |
|
|
|
You are so embarrassing, I actually feel slightly embarrassed for you.
Well, I took into account this: Here we are instead, my department developing a IoT products with Byteball.
...and thought you might give me the direct link. I'll better ask the others. Guys, could anyone help a newbie to find API docs? The opening post of this thread doesn't even contain word "API". |
|
|
|
But whatever, Ill take your bet, its a deal, I am waiting for your "high-entropy" data and many transactions.
Could you point me to Byteball API? https://github.com/byteball is not very helpful. |
|
|
|
You lost the last time you challenged me to a bet, and I didnt want your dirty scam money then and I dont want them now.
How could I lose the last time if you refused to accept the bet by using a childish excuse? ...I think we might start from your claim that Byteball DB can be compressed very well, we will also test if Byteball indeed suits IoT. I had several GBs somewhere, let's use them for testing and let the witnesses earn easy buck. Here is the scenario I propose: 1. I will generate a lot of transactions containing high-entropy data. 2. You will measure TPS. 3. You will compress the DB in the end. 4. You will report the average TPS and the DB size after the compression. What do you think of this? |
|
|
|
is there any way to get some free IOTA like as byteball ??
I don't know of such possibilities. |
|
|
|
well, bitsquare I think Ah, I thought something new has appeared. Well, when every penny matters bitsquare is worth a mention, I think... |
|
|
|
Battle between SatoNatomato and Come-from-Beyond begin again  Battle is when two guys of equal weight are fighting. Here it will be just me kicking SatoNatomato, as usual. :trollface: |
|
|
|
...traded on several exchanges both decentralized and normal exchanges? Byteball.
This bit is interesting... What decentralized exchange is Byteball traded on? |
|
|
|
Which one is in production, in use since 25h December 2016, traded on several exchanges both decentralized and normal exchanges? Byteball.
Iota is vaporware, big promises and very little delivery. Its not even a dag-coin as it doesnt have consensus algorithm, right now the consensus is made by developers deciding everyones balance in their own notebooks and posting "milestone" db releases.
For IoT - Iota doesnt make sense at all as it uses Proof-of-Work, IoT-devices are optimized to _not_ do any work, they must save energy. Iotas solution/suggestion/big-promise is to design a "jinn" hardware another micro-chip to place on your iot sensor to talk Iota. Lulz, there goes the "no fees" claim, the fees are just hidden in extra costs and integrations - and energy usage.
For someone who actually works with IoT, the whole iota thing is laughable. I chuckle every time I write about it.
Byteball is very suitable for IoT, most chips (look a few pages back I mentioned many and explained more in this, or look through my post history) which today can do TLS (which is https) encryption can also already do Byteball.
Not to mention, that your and others internet-of-things can transact with each others based on smart contracts - you can make trading rules when to sell sensor data and for how much, such logic, in the device, with its own addresses, not just "lets spew it transactions and let a centralized exchange decide who buys and who sells". Lol, I cant stop chuckling about iota, and their poor dev coming in here to shill and fud.
You are a well-known liar. I have links proving that, let's bet? |
|
|
|
Wait is this for real? They are selling the whitepaper.
WTF.
 |
|
|
|
Some of you, probably, don't know about YDX ( http://iotaexchange.com/#details). Despite of the domain name other coins are traded there too. Right now majority of YDX users favor IOTA over Byteball which creates a disbalance during trollparties thrown every weekend. I'd like to see more Byteball fans on YDX, so if you are willing to join - PM me with your email and I'll send you an invite to https://ydx.slack.com. PS: Here are the recent trades of blackbytes on YDX (more users join - more activity there will be): Timestamp | Type | Qty (Unit) | Price (microBTC/Unit) | Amount (microBTC)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2017-05-15 19:50:13 | Down | 48'500 | 6 | 291'000
2017-05-15 19:48:54 | Down | 1'000 | 6 | 6'000
2017-05-14 23:44:13 | Down | 20'483 | 6 | 122'898
2017-05-08 20:33:08 | Up | 346 | 6 | 2'076
2017-05-05 15:31:31 | Down | 3 | 6 | 18
2017-05-05 15:31:31 | Down | 1 | 6 | 6
2017-05-02 09:25:10 | Down | 2'692 | 5 | 13'460 |
|
|
|
Glad to find this project,looks great!
FrictionlessCoin is famous for running a lot of sockpuppet accounts ) |
|
|
|
Bitcoin is losing it's dominance as a direct result of the greed of the miners. There is no technical reason for keeping the blocksize so low, it's simply politics and human nature: miners are left to decide in their own short term interest and against the interest of the users. This is exactly how old banking behaved and it's sad to see a great dream killed by greed and pointless bickering.
Ever watched Animal Farm? |
|
|
|
Why?
Is this a scam?
Just dig thru his post history and Internet. One of his strongest qualities - he hasn't completed a single project yet. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
