Bitcoin Forum
May 26, 2024, 04:14:16 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 ... 189 »
61  Economy / Reputation / Re: Users like Poker Player must be stopped! on: May 15, 2024, 07:46:13 PM
I really don't understand what the point is in creating this thread, maybe it would be a case of you being clearer and in a few words saying what you really want. about your discussion with another user, I think that the other user has the right to give his opinion, he is not breaking the forum rules and I don't see a problem with his post. If you don't like the things he posts, you can respond to him using your arguments, there is no need to create a thread for a meaningless reason. Now if you want to suggest some change in the forum then you have to create a thread in the meta section, if you don't like the user who is simply expressing his opinion in a casino thread, then you can create a thread in the reputation section.

I'm with you in that I don't completely understand what the OP is saying but I'll take some guesses.

Some people bet big money so keeping money in poster escrow is a bad idea.

There are plenty of trustworthy books/casinos here at BCT. I would never play at a casino unless they've been in business for at least two years. Sports betting can be beaten and casino play is for entertainment. Taking bonuses lessens house edge.
62  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Sportsbet.one $1494 scam on: May 14, 2024, 05:22:19 PM
Umm... a tad bit curious and bemused, how exactly do you expect OP [or anyone else] to answer this?

The answer will most likely always a "no", even if someone actually did use bot. They fully aware that the usage of automated service is against the platform's rule, I don't think someone will admit such violation and dig their own grave.

Wouldn't it be easier and more transparent to analyze OP's betting history and rely on your analysis whether OP used bot or not instead of asking him that?
You are 100% right. He’s using Pinnacle and Bet365 so he’s probably just a value bettor. Sportsbet.one needs to prove he’s using a bot or pay him. The only thing that bothers me is that the OP is smarter than he’s portraying. He understands bot betting but I have no idea if he’s using a bot or not.


Couldn't his betting history tell us this? IIRC you said once about how certain pattern of bets [IIRC it was about a consecutive bets that's made on low market league, but my memory is very vague on it] can give us an idea whether a player manually placed their own bets or use automated service?
Betting history is always the first thing that I look at since it can easily clear a player. If a player is betting major markets at widely available lines, he’s not using a bot. It’s tougher to say a player is guilty when he’s value betting esports. This is an exact situation where bot players can live. We aren’t 100% sure if he’s finding the lines on his own or with a bot. If Sportsbet.one can’t prove bot use, then OP should be paid. Sports.one can then ban him if they don’t like his action.
63  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Sportsbet.one $1494 scam on: May 14, 2024, 04:45:03 PM
Do you mind to provide them to an arbitrator, though? They can keep those evidence related to your algorithm private, just for the arbitrator's eyes, which they'll use to verify and validate your counter-accusation.



OP, suppose the casino are willing to get it escalated to an arbitrator, please choose one and stick to that one only. If you both agreed to a mediator, their findings and ruling will be considered final and bindings to both parties and you two should honor their decision.
That is fine by me, I'm willing to go along with that.
To make it easy, do you use bots? In a case like this that is normally the claim, electronic means.

edit, I hope that the OP isn't using a bot.

Umm... a tad bit curious and bemused, how exactly do you expect OP [or anyone else] to answer this?

The answer will most likely always a "no", even if someone actually did use bot. They fully aware that the usage of automated service is against the platform's rule, I don't think someone will admit such violation and dig their own grave.

Wouldn't it be easier and more transparent to analyze OP's betting history and rely on your analysis whether OP used bot or not instead of asking him that?
You are 100% right. He’s using Pinnacle and Bet365 so he’s probably just a value bettor. Sportsbet.one needs to prove he’s using a bot or pay him. The only thing that bothers me is that the OP is smarter than he’s portraying. He understands bot betting but I have no idea if he’s using a bot or not.
64  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Sportsbet.one $1494 scam on: May 14, 2024, 04:08:09 PM
I know lots of cases where people have used bots. Bad line would be a line of 2.58 but they mistakenly put up 3.58. This type of bet should be voided. I forget what the normal percentage is that's used but normally they use what should be the no vig line and if it's off by a certain percentage then it's a bad line. I'm searching for an article that explains it much better than I'm doing here.
Okay like a stale line I see what you mean, no I didn't bet on any of those.
Their prematch sportsodds are just pinnacles lines and their live odds are the same as bet365.
Not sure if they use the same software or are scraping the odds, but it's all the same shit.

Not really much 'abuse' I can do there, if I could beat pinnacle or 365 live using a bot I would move countries and become a millionaire.

If you are betting Pinnacle and Bet365 lines then they should pay you in full. Sportsbet.one probably uses their API.
65  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Sportsbet.one $1494 scam on: May 14, 2024, 09:16:45 AM
A lot of people do use bots. Doesn't seem you are doing anything wrong unless these lines are way off where you are betting into bad lines.
I have spoken to a lot of profitable bettors in the betting world and not one person has ever mentioned something like a betting bot that just wins you money.
How would this even work? I've been betting for a living for 6 years now and I can tell you this is not a real thing.
Unless you mean a betting model that runs data and gives projections, but I don't think this is what you mean either.

Also can you elaborate on betting into bad lines? For example in my cancelled bets Seattle Surge @ 2.58 I would say is a value bet.
Am I not allowed to bet this line on their site because I think they have priced an incorrect line?

I know lots of cases where people have used bots. Bad line would be a line of 2.58 but they mistakenly put up 3.58. This type of bet should be voided. I forget what the normal percentage is that's used but normally they use what should be the no vig line and if it's off by a certain percentage then it's a bad line. I'm searching for an article that explains it much better than I'm doing here.
66  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: BetCrypto.cr, won big now feeling scammed out of 26,000 Euros on: May 14, 2024, 08:58:21 AM
Do they have valid license from Hacksaw gaming? Its pretty clear that the casino doesnt have the funds to pay you. Stay away from BetCrypto.cr.

I hope the casino pay soon, its not good to have debts caused by gambling. Gambling can ruin your life.

They are in Costa Rica so they have a data processing license since there isn't a gaming license in Costa Rica. I agree with you in stay far away from this book if they don't pay.

BetCrypto,

Do you agree the purpose of not allowing multiaccounters is to prevent abuse?  such as bonus abuse,  limits abuse,  fraudulent behavior?


If you can agree with that,  please tell us which one of those this player is guilty of.   The world is not black and white, there is grey.  

If he did not defraud you in anyway,  or abuse any of your pormotions with his 2nd account,  then you should pay him.  Because if he has lost on this account, you certainly would not have canceled his losses and refunded him.  To say you would, would be a laughable lie.  


He told your support to disable his account.  He did not say permanently, nor did he say remove it from the system.  He wanted a cool down period which any respectable site would offer.  


You are hiding behind this rule because you cant afford to pay.  Simple as that

So far we discover him 1 extra account since we don't do KYC we have to be strict with this rule of no multiple accounts we have discovered players opening multiple accounts to try to favor the sports odds, collusion , trying to find ways to exploit our cashier software etc

Since we don't do KYC we don't know if at any time he has open more accounts and try to exploit the site on some form

We put the rules in place, it is even read and bold he as a player has to read them if he don't like it so don't deposit

Also look what he just put about gamdom he clearly isn't reading the terms and conditions of other sites.

There is absolutely no advantage to having two accounts unless you are circumventing limits or abusing bonuses. Show us an example if you think otherwise. The amount he bet on the second account would have to be more than the max bet of the first account to circumvent limits. The one other exception would be you having multiple lines where the accounts had different lines. Do you put up different lines for different people? He had one account since the other account was closed. How did you come to the conclusion that the OP is involved in the DDoS attack?
67  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Sportsbet.one $1494 scam on: May 14, 2024, 08:51:03 AM
To make it easy, do you use bots? In a case like this that is normally the claim, electronic means.

edit, I hope that the OP isn't using a bot.

I am not using a bot.
I don't even think there's such thing as a bot which can place value bets, how would that even work?
Sounds like something made up by betting sites

A lot of people do use bots. Doesn't seem you are doing anything wrong unless these lines are way off where you are betting into bad lines.
68  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Betcoin.AG Deleted my account after I TREID to make a withdrawal after winning. on: May 14, 2024, 05:39:49 AM
glad that you were able to see their verification link before it expires and have finally been allowed to withdraw your funds out of their gambling site.

I have no idea why Betcoin make it this difficult for people. Most sites dont have a deadline for how quick the kyc has to be done like this. at least not within 2-5 hours after a sent email that you as a customer may or may not see in time..  This together with the disabled account without any notice + that they make you unable to contact their live support makes me very concerned for how Betcoin treats its customers, and i think there is much that can be improved here to make this experience WAY less stressfull for us.
I am not justifying them but there could have been some misunderstanding, miscommunication or technical difficulties which led you to your issue with them. anyway, all in all at least everything went in your favor and got the issue resolved. perhaps you should also update the title of the thread as "resolved"

I talked to a mate of mine who experienced the same shit because he won as well. Im curuous if you or anyone here thinks its ok to just get your account disabled without telling you why when you have around 3.5k in that account? that is a lot of money to me and to many people, it freaked me out, because I know how sites have fucked me and other people before.  Also the  "here make your kyc within 180 minutes"  and if you dont, you have to contact us again and wait another 24 hours for a another mail. Is just awful, there is no need for it when 99% of other sites dont jerk you around like this, Anyways im happy i did get what was mine.
People are waiting months to get paid from other sites. Sportsbooks are now asking for source of funds and bank accounts. The KYC is becoming more prevalent and intrusive. Check scam accusations. One person has waited 9 months. There are a lot here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=83.0

I assume that you play at a lot of crypto books. Feel free to post positive or negative experiences as it will help all https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=717790.4280
69  Economy / Gambling / Re: Impossible KYC Requirements - Stake.com - Withholding $6000 USD on: May 14, 2024, 12:01:52 AM
Btw - Does anyone have suggestions on arbiters that could help me in this situation? I.e powers that be above stake that i could speak to?
Hopefully, Stake will accept your documents this time for the address verification. You should prepare yourself for the next step (source of funds verification) now. There is no option to create pressure on Stake team by any method to make this process easier for you. All you can do is to prepare the documents which they are requesting from you. I would like to suggest you to submit a complaint on CasinoGuru for having a better communication for the process. Another user had created a scam accusation here who was struggling with level 3 and level 4 verification of Stake. He was able to verify after trying for almost ~6 months. The user got good help from CasinoGuru team. You may follow his case here: Stake Casino - Player’s withdrawal delayed due to KYC process.
Great ideas here. AskGamblers would be another place to go. Asking for source of funds for $6000 is insane. People lose $250,000 with no KYC at Stake but then Stake wants source of funds for $6,000 win.
70  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Sportsbet.one $1494 scam on: May 13, 2024, 05:19:06 PM
Do you mind to provide them to an arbitrator, though? They can keep those evidence related to your algorithm private, just for the arbitrator's eyes, which they'll use to verify and validate your counter-accusation.



OP, suppose the casino are willing to get it escalated to an arbitrator, please choose one and stick to that one only. If you both agreed to a mediator, their findings and ruling will be considered final and bindings to both parties and you two should honor their decision.
That is fine by me, I'm willing to go along with that.
To make it easy, do you use bots? In a case like this that is normally the claim, electronic means.

edit, I hope that the OP isn't using a bot.
71  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Sportsbet.io - A Case of Selective Withdrawal Approval and Dubious Practices on: May 13, 2024, 09:37:05 AM
[...]
This section here at BCT has been good at getting deposits back, unlike other places. Because of the success, I asked Theymos if it were ok to start a binding arbitration section. Theymos had no problem with it but there didn’t seem to be much interest here so I let it go.

As far as pointing out old cases and lectures, I think the past should be left in the past.

If I am not mistaken, and unless I understand things wrongly, what you asked theymos was if he's okay with people [specifically, me, though I did not say I am interested to offer that specific model you proposed to him] opening a service of binding arbitration, of which theymos replied that he doesn't mind, and that people does not need his permission to start such service.

The question [and answer] was not about a binding arbitration section, it's about offering an independent service, of which I can understand that [the way I understand it] theymos seems surprised that you said I am interested to offer, because I think he knows I solve things here without looking for anything in return, other than contributing to the forum and help others, that'll be quite likely a direct opposite of offering an independent binding arbitration service, since the service-provider might wish something in return.

Bottomline: the topic you raised and he addressed was about a service that's separate from and is nowhere part of the forum and/or supervised by the forum. Thus, not a section.

1. Theymos has given you the OK to start binding arbitration although Theymos himself won't force the arbitration or be involved. I don't post private emails without permission but I think this section here is ok
Quote
If holydarkness wants to offer a binding arbitration service, then that has always been allowed, and my permission is not required.
. Theymos said no sub-forum but could be proposed in meta if you would like.

[...]

I'll repeat and change part of my earliest sentence in this post into a question: unless I understand things wrongly?
my thoughts were non-profit binding arbitration section where you made the final decision with input from all. I was thinking that other players with problems outside of BCT would come here too. Since posters here at BCT didn’t jump in the conversation, it seems that others weren’t interested and feel as though this section here is fine as is so I scrapped the idea. I think you and others do great as is and there’s no need for another section because of the lack in interest.
72  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Sportsbet.one $1494 scam on: May 13, 2024, 08:46:22 AM
they then accused me on live support of various vague things:
- bets are made by a group of clients acting in a coalition to bypass the restrictions established by the betting company;
- the client is suspected of using any software that automates the process of setting bets;
- the client uses the game account to play in arbitration situations;
- the client abuses the loyalty programs.
You can not prove that you have not done any of it too. In the case of group betting, sportsbook have tools to detect abusers but for legal reason they can not share evidence.

Hi guys. The OP has clarified everything by himself. Nothing to add... We can't disclose how our fraud detection algorithm works.

It’s nice that you jumped in the thread but you have to give us more than this if we are to agree with you. He’s making limit bets in esports. This means if he’s cheating he’s almost always using a bot. Is bot use what you are accusing him of? If not he’s innocent.

Of course there are other things that can go in conjunction with bot betting such as multi-accounting making the exact same limit wagers but it really comes down to bot use or proof or multi-accounting.

No one needs to know your algorithm but we need the exact allegation instead of a blanket accusation. The OP can’t defend himself if he doesn’t know the exact allegation.

@OP and logfiles, thanks for the clarification.





73  Economy / Gambling / Re: #1 RATINGS of BITCOIN SPORTSBOOKS since 2014 : KYC Rankings, Bonuses, Scam Accus on: May 12, 2024, 09:51:31 PM
Update

SportsBooks |
Rating
|
Year
|
Country
|
KYC
|
MISC
|
Promos
|
Support
|
ANN thread
|
---------------------|--------|--------|----------|------|-----------------------------------|------------|----------------------|------------|
"A" rated books
Betcoin|
A+
|
2013
|
Curacao
|
1
|
Racebook, Poker, Two Books
||||
Nitrobetting|
A-
|
2021
|
Costa Rica
|
1
|
Racebook and Poker
||||
"B" rated books
Fortune Jack|
B+
|
2019
|
Curacao
|
2
|
opened as casino 2014
         
||||
Bitsler|
B
|
2015
 
|
Curacao
|
2
|
-
||||
Cloudbet|
B-
|
2013
 
|
Curacao
|
3
|
||||
"C" rated books
Betfury|
C+
|
2020
|
Curacao
|
3
|
-
||||
Maverickgames|
C+
|
2020
|
 Isle of Man   
|
5
|
-
         
||||
Roobet|
C+
|
2019
|
Curacao
|
5
|
-
         
||||
Trustdice|
C+
|
2019
|
Curacao
|
-
|
-
         
||||
Wolf|
C+
|
2019
|
Curacao
|
-
|
-
         
||||
Duelbits|
C
|
2020
|
Curacao
|
-
|
-
         
||||
Owl|
C
|
2021
|
Curacao
|
-
         
|
-
||||
500.casino|
C-
|
2016
|
Curacao
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
MBet|
C-
|
2017
|
Cyprus
|
2
|
Racebook
     
||||
coinroyale.com|
C-
|
2016
 
|
Curacao
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
mint.io|
C-
|
2021
|
Curacao
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Parlayplus|
C-
|
2019
|
-
|
2
|
-
         
||||
Sportsbet|
C-
|
2016
|
Curacao
|
3
|
Racebook
         
||||
Stake|
C-
|
2019
|
Curacao
|
4
|
opened as casino 2014
||||
Rollbit|
D+
|
2021
|
Curacao
|
-
         
|
-
||||
74  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Sportsbet.io - A Case of Selective Withdrawal Approval and Dubious Practices on: May 12, 2024, 09:12:50 PM
First, I cannot prove or disprove guilt or innocence but the burden of proof has to lay with the one alleging there was wrongdoing. If I post an allegation about you stealing $2400 I have to provide some evidence to support my claim. Plucking allegations out of thin air or making them on weak foundations is not the way forward and never has been.

Second, if the OP has not even explained the full story and does not provide screenshots of transaction, account area etc then there is no compulsion on any member to waste their time speculating about what might (or might not) have happened?

I start off pro player with all cases, the book must prove guilt, but don't come to any conclusions until facts are produced. At the same time I would ask that you do the same thing.

I don't think that any of us came to a conclusion that the player was innocent, but we are looking at things backwards. The $2400 was in the player's account. The book took the player's $2400. The onus is on the book to prove guilt. Otherwise you are prejudiced against the player. No where in the world are you guilty until proved innocent. The book should make a claim on why they confiscated the money, then the player refutes the allegations. This should be for the future, not the current case.
75  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Sportsbet.one $1494 scam on: May 12, 2024, 08:35:20 PM
I bet at sportsbet.one for a week from apr25, deposited 0.92 eth and withdrew 1.52 eth sucessfully.

Then had 3 pending bets left when they cut my account limits, they didn't settle them after 2 days of the result and after speaking with live support they told me they were having some issues. and would settle everything within 10 days..

another week after that conversation, they have now cancelled all 3 of my won bets, not returned the stake to my balance. basically just stolen the money, here's the cancelled bets:
https://prnt.sc/S5WGelBDSgEN

they then accused me on live support of various vague things:
- bets are made by a group of clients acting in a coalition to bypass the restrictions established by the betting company;
- the client is suspected of using any software that automates the process of setting bets;
- the client uses the game account to play in arbitration situations;
- the client abuses the loyalty programs.

I have done none of these things, more than happy for them to come to this thread and provide what 'proof' they have of me breaking their terms and conditions, I will post my entire bet history below:
https://imgur.com/a/FhkmvcI

Looking at their recent trustpilot it's spammed by people having the same issue, stay away.


Is this your second complaint against Sportsbet.one? Looking at your bet slips I've seen this one before. Do you know what their limits are for esports?
76  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Sportsbet.io - A Case of Selective Withdrawal Approval and Dubious Practices on: May 12, 2024, 08:01:55 PM
The OP is not posting here and for that reason there is no way to understand what the full allegation against Sportsbet actually was. It is not fair for others to speculate when the OP can write walls of text but not even explain what he claimed happened.

I have decided to unwatch this thread because quite clearly it has been derailed to the point the OP has become obsolete and everything that remains has become off-topic.

I start off pro player with all cases, the book must prove guilt, but don't come to any conclusions until facts are produced. At the same time I would ask that you do the same thing. While Sportsbet may not take $2400, the amount of deposit may have still be in question at the time of your post. Players are not going to come here for help if you start off posting a side before hearing anything. They know that they will berated. New people will come to BCT for help if treated fairly. That said, 95% of the time the player will be a scammer but we can help the 5%. If wanted I can point people here to BCT that currently aren't at BCT since I read forums world wide.

Quote
Before reading your post I was about to ask the OP to at least provide some element of evidence to support his allegation because it really does sound ludicrous to believe that Sportsbet would selective scam their customers especially for a miniscule amount as a $2400 win.
77  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Sportsbet.io - A Case of Selective Withdrawal Approval and Dubious Practices on: May 11, 2024, 03:57:33 PM
I’m not looking to continue petty arguments but will reply to this. With this case I'm not sure how people can take Sportsbet's side if it's a jurisdiction infraction. If the OP is from the UK and deposits $50,000, makes one bet and wins $3000, can Sportsbet take $53,000. They should take the $3000 winnings and return the $50,000 deposit. I have no problems with these cases if winnings were voided and the balance returned.
Can you provide a link for this alleged incident if has been reported in this forum as an alleged scam. It is important to stay on topic but if for the sake of reference another case is being mentioned members cannot take the word of another member at face value. As long as you can provide some sort of link that explains the alleged scam, it can be looked at.

It’s not my intent to rock the boat and I admitted my mistake but I don’t need lectures from anyone on how and what to post. Normally I'm respectful to all posters that don't attack.
Who lectured you?

The $50,000 was a fictitious case being used as an example to say that the deposits should also be returned for first time infractions. If there are multiple infractions then I can see confiscating deposits as a deterrent.

This section here at BCT has been good at getting deposits back, unlike other places. Because of the success, I asked Theymos if it were ok to start a binding arbitration section. Theymos had no problem with it but there didn’t seem to be much interest here so I let it go.

As far as pointing out old cases and lectures, I think the past should be left in the past.

78  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Sportsbet.io - A Case of Selective Withdrawal Approval and Dubious Practices on: May 11, 2024, 07:33:27 AM
I stated earlier that the case should be marked as resolved since the player went to Steve.
Resolved or Unsolved? Only the player can inform the community about the nature of the case. All we can do is speculate. The player last posted on 6 May. They were online 2 days ago, but didn't post anything. Unless they break silence soon, it's pretty self-explanatory that this is finished.
my opinion is resolved unless OP comes back and then open up again but I have no complaints on however it’s labeled.
79  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: BetCrypto.cr, won big now feeling scammed out of 26,000 Euros on: May 11, 2024, 07:26:04 AM
Apologies for double post, but interesting update.

Been pursuing a complaint through Casino Guru, who place emphasis on casinos being fair when it comes to disputes. Seems like BetCrypto has realised they're not coming across well as they've done an about face and are now saying I'm holding them ransom with DDOS  Huh

https://p.eax.re/Z8OV75hkGocS.jpg[/img]
https://p.eax.re/FiyDrOnb9q55.jpg[/img]

Unbelievable.

Funny how we are getting threads emails, first just asking to pay that account, and today we got this one threatening a Ddos attack if we didn't pay, btw they were successful for a couple of hours



Also

1) You broke the rules by opening multiple accounts
2) Now you are sending thread emails
You are right that almost every book has the no multiple account rule. The rule is so as to not abuse bonuses or circumvent limits. The player did neither. He disabled one account and then played with another with no intent to defraud. The player should be paid unless he is truly the one that started the DDoS attack.
80  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Sportsbet.io - A Case of Selective Withdrawal Approval and Dubious Practices on: May 11, 2024, 06:53:00 AM
I’m not looking to continue petty arguments but will reply to this. With this case I'm not sure how people can take Sportsbet's side if it's a jurisdiction infraction. If the OP is from the UK and deposits $50,000, makes one bet and wins $3000, can Sportsbet take $53,000. They should take the $3000 winnings and return the $50,000 deposit. I have no problems with these cases if winnings were voided and the balance returned.
But that's just the thing, we have no idea what happened. The OP didn't tell us. What we know from the posts they made is that they won some money and had their withdrawal request denied. From that point on, we are completely in the dark. I think the player was asked to conduct KYC, but they didn't want to. We know they spoke to Steve and acknowledged his efforts in trying to fix the situation, but that apparently didn't fix things in the player's favor.

We still don't know what the casino asks of the player and what it is that the player can't provide. It's got to be something related to identity verification and their place of residence, otherwise the player wouldn't have posted those reviews and warnings they copied from somewhere on the internet.

Don't you find it unusual that the player hasn't said what is wrong with their account and their withdrawal request? Besides thanking Steve, there are no further accusations or more information about the situation from the player's mouth. Maybe I am wrong, but to me, that sounds like the player has realized that they are in the wrong and this case is finished. If not, I'd love to hear what the player has to say and why they have been quiet ever since speaking to Steve.  
I stated earlier that the case should be marked as resolved since the player went to Steve.
Pages: « 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 ... 189 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!