I'm going to bet that, in the future, people will be surprised at how much we current 'high standard of living' populations are 'contending' with various kinds of parasites.  Especially of those of the phyla protozoa (which Ivermectin can also be quite effective against.)

So far, in the areas I have some knowledge of, the directives have been all talk and no observable action (other than lamestream media propaganda.)  Seems like it's primarily undertaken to get people to throw up their hands and resign themselves to a pre-determined fate.  Alas, many people have done just that.  They will be missed.

The country was one of those specifically identified as being in the high priority national security interest of the U.S. and targeted for population density management for that reason.  Basically we (the U.S. at that time) wanted a reliable supply of cheap resources, and 'overpopulation' would complicate that.  I'm fairly convinced that they did undergo a round of covert female sterilization via the 'tetanus' operation.  To the nation's credit, it was a Filipina doctor who figured it out (when she herself got hit) and they took a decades long break before they tried it again in Kenya.  (Development of the 'platform' was done primarily in India.)  Anyway, my sense is that a noticeable number of people (at least rural living people in high-resource areas) are naturally suspicious of the 'vitamin shots' that the 'public health' authorities come around to administer to the kiddies, but not a one of them can put their finger on the specifics of why they have that spidy-sense.

Anyway, I do hope that given the sordid history of 'assistance' to The Philippines in particular, there will be somewhat more resistance to the de-pop shot and with some good luck there will be enough survivors to defend their homeland and keep control of some of their resources as we enter into the '4th industrial revolution' and 'great reset' and 'new normal'.  Fingers crossed.

Talmudic Judaism pre-dates 'Nazi' ideology in this respect by a few thousand years, and is vastly more widely distributed and powerful than a few seemingly mostly imaginary fringe groups in Idaho.

It's probably safe to say that 'Nazi ideology' is on life support complements of Jewish dominated media primarily as diversion so that people could get away with ignoring the proverbial elephant in the room.

'Anti-vaxxers' tend to entertain these hypotheses mainly because there are tons of scientism rag stories about it, tons of 'TED Talk' class presentations about how they are doing it and how much more they have planned, tons of patents on the foundations of the technology, etc.

As for referring to the jabs as 'gene therapy', part of the reason they do so is that the pharma companies who were developing the technology were all to glad to call them that up to and including the first part of the plandemic.  The marketing research people told them that it was contributing to concern on the part of the sheeple and it would be harder to justify legal indemnity which they could get automatically be calling the technology a 'vaccine' (even after they find some corrupt bureaucrat to sign them out of EUA.)  So they stopped.  Similarly, they tried as best they could to hide the fact that the genes inserted genes by the adenovirus-based gene therapies (AZ, J&J, Sputnik, etc) were in the form of DNA which made it's way into the cell nucleus.  Adenovirus-carried genes have been the staple 'platform' for gene therapy for decades.  The mRNA platforms are somewhat newer and have always had issues.

I'm an 'anti-vaxxer' and know the arguments of many of the personalities on both sides.  I've never heard anyone argue for 'drinking their own piss' as a treatment for 'covid-19', and I don't recognize any of the personalities mentioned in the story.  If such piss-drinking proponents exist at all in the real world, they would be pretty fringe.  Seems like the kind of thing that Big Pharma would stage for their propagandists to put on 'comedy' shows and such.  It's a pretty easy little operation and they do it all the time, and it works like a charm on the 30% mass-formation'ers who tend to be very low information.  So low they don't even realize they've been chumped.

A real scientist will not 'flip-flop' a lot because the 'flip' phase should be absent.  That is to say, they should not take a position which is stronger than the available evidence in the first place.

If a careless scientist has made a mistake and concluded something incorrectly, and new properly done SCIENCE demonstrates the error, then yes, the appropriate action is to 'flop' and document carefully and transparently why and how the mistake was made.  In doing so the whole field of science moves forward.

A person like Dr. Fausti flip-flops regularly, and it's as obvious as the nose on one's face that it is nearly 100% political and financial.  When I person claims that 'going against me is going against science', you can be certain that there are some pretty twisted things going on around him and within his mind.  That's what we have with Fausti and he is distinctly not the kind of person the peeps want as a line of protection in the health field.  That's what Kary Mullis said (before his untimely death a few month before the plandemic operation was kicked off) but I didn't need Mullis to see this obvious reality.

Fausti IS exactly the kind of bureaucrat that the financial powers want in his position for a major democide operation, and that's why his is there.  He proved his metal in many minor ones previously and developed a warehouse sized closet full of skeletons in doing so.  He's also something like 80 years old so he can be flushed when he's become to much of a liability.  My guess is that that point is fast approaching, but I'm surprised he's still there quite frankly.

The so-called 'paper' is fairly obviously a joke.  Even if it was not, I put a lot more stock in papers done back when we still had science.  That is to say, pre-2020.  There are plenty showing that masks of any sort are questionable at best against most viruses, and cloth masks are flat out dangerous to one's health and serve no purpose.  Obviously Dr. Fausti was well aware of this and he said so early on.  Later, in a desperate attempt to make people sick with bacterial pneumonia (which would be quietly counted as 'covid-19'), he flip-flopped (the flopped again to go double mask!)  The reason for trying to bump the 'covid-19' count was to further up the panic attack against the 'tard class.  Worked.

They somehow got the sheeple to believe that surgeons wear masks so they don't catch the flu from the person they are operating on.  Back then I wouldn't have thought this level of retardation to be possible.  Now I'll not be shocked at anything along these lines.

Scientifically it comes down to a matter of sterility, but I wouldn't really expect you to understand much about that.  It's a bit over your pay-grade so it would seem.  If a person is healthy and absent various kinds of urinary tract infections, fresh urine should be quite free of microbes.  Exhaled breath vastly less so.

I know people do sometimes drink fresh urine for assumed health reasons, but it isn't my thing and I've not put in any research into it.  (Which, parenthetically, means that I'm not going to spout off about it that much...I'm not a paid propagandist targeting the lowest common denominator of sheep with supposedly funny and largely bogus 'information' either.)  If someone does a proper study demonstrating positive effects of urine drinking, and if a demonstrably independent entity finds the results to be reproducible, I'll accept it.  I still wouldn't do it because my concern about the 'dangerous menace' of 'covid-19' is pegged at right about zero.  Right where it's been since mid 2020 when enough was scientifically understood to realize that the whole thing is a hoax and a fraud.

Edit:  BTW, I don't think that anyone suggests to let the piss sit around at room temp all day before drinking it.  From what little I've seen, those who are into it consume the urine right away.  Conversely, the law and rules in many places is that masks should be worn at all times through the work day.

I wouldn't be one bit surprised of the propagandist who wrote the tripe for Forbes went to some sex club and enjoyed a golden shower session (with his CNN friends) the day after he penned the piece.  Seems like being a creepy perv is pretty much a requirement for work in some of these propaganda rags.  Maybe even more important than being Jewish!

The funny thing is that if the mainsteam media reported that 'scientists say' drinking your own piss will stop the dreaded 'covid-19', every one of you idiots would do it without a second thought.  I cannot think of a single instance where any position supported by Dr. Fausti has not been treated as the word of God by you mass formation zombies (at the time when he happened to express said position...he flip-flops a fair bit.)

Wearing multiple masks is more absurd scientifically than drinking one's own piss, and it's even more disgusting to people who know a little bit about metabolism and how different organs (kidneys/bladder, gut, lungs, skin) excrete different waste products.

I would like to know if a public servant who lives off my taxes is using stock options issued by Pfizer as curtains.

There is a really really simple solution to your concerns:  There is no law making someone have to be a public servant.  If they want privacy, pick a different occupation.  Pick it from the get-go too because anyone who has the cycle-time through the revolving door should be 25 years or so.  Best to pick public service as a career path early and stay with it.

And best to bid on contracts which are a LONG way from public use consumption because the long tenticles of the surveillance apparatus developed (highly) to keep the plebs under control, and in broad use against us right now, will crawl right up your ass in a hurry and be difficult to dis-lodge if you get to close.

It's obviously a kid or a bot trying to build a posting history.  Seen a lot of if on this forum  lately.  Don't worry about him/it.

It's interesting to note that infection of most things does not make you 'sick' as most people consider it.  Fever, aches, tiredness, mucus, etc.  These effect are largely due to your body mounting an immune response and fighting off the infection.  Ergo, lack of 'being sick' could mean that one's natural defenses are not being activated in the manner than one would hope for long-term immunological health and limiting of the damage associated with infection.

The common case for healthy people is that they are not 'sick' more than a few times per year because their immune systems work well enough to kill off most invaders before they even has a chance to get going.  Hopefully (and likely) that is what is going on with you.

In modern times here in the West, there is a lot of autoimmune disease where the immune system gets confused and attacks the tissues of the body itself.  In that case one is totally fucked because the better the immune function, the sicker one is and the more damaged the tissues of their body become.  Somehow 'medical science' cannot figure out what could possibly be causing such a thing.  It's a real mystery <snicker>.

I was pretty hard-core 'left' even within the lifetime of this message board.  That is default for a West Coaster, and I was in the 'hippy culture' as a kid.  Honestly, much of what I believed back then I still do, but the whole 'Overton window' shifted into utter la-la land when the real problems were significantly resolved (pollution, equal rights, etc.)  We who saw and spoke about the structural weaknesses inherent in capitalism were certainly not ipso-facto 'communist' back in the old days, and definitions of things such as 'socialism' have changed a lot since then.  We just wanted to fairly address some of the inevitable issues that would arise with, say, capitalism (and specifically cronyism and corruption in this case.)

Obviously (to me) a very nasty element of the 0.001% saw an opportunity to take over the 'left' and use it to their also very nasty ends.  This they did, and I stepped off the train before the velocities got too high.  Anyway, yeah, most of my friends and family were on that train and never did get off.  It would be semi-fair to say I have no friends at all really.  I work with people and like people, but in terms of flesh-n-blood humans to toss ideas and observations around with, there are basically none.  Partly because I expatriated to the 'developing world.'  Thankfully I've always been pretty independent in this respect anyway.


I know plenty of 'red-necks' as well, and I have a pretty good gauge of the respective mentalities.  I'm not too worried about the 'lefties' doing atrocities in person, but I can pretty much guarantee that they would be in full support of their gov/god/protector doing so and would lend a hand if it is not to much trouble.  Snitching on their neighbors, trying to get them fired ('canceled'), lying for their truth, etc.  They are most of the way to fully support of autrocities already.  I should say that the 30% that are under the plandemic spell because most of the real 'lefties' stepped off the train when I did.  The people you think are the 'Trump fanboi set' are very no where near as likely to support atrocities (though perhaps somewhat more likely to commit them in person if/when pushed hard enough by the so-called 'left'.)

Edit:  Here's a couple of fellow 'gen-Xers' who are in a similar boat, and who've seen/felt the same sort of shifts that I have:  https://www.bitchute.com/video/YIgNhGioCmVt/

Good for them, but it's not like they are going to win anything real in court.  The main positive benefit will be that it will lessen the time between now and when people finally catch on that we are under a new government where all the crap we learned in school about the 'three branches of govt' and 'constitution' and all that is an obsolete charade.

My own contention is that this postulated 'new government' has actually been in place for quite a number of years, the existence of and shift to a new form of govt has been a 'state secret', and the strategy to make things go more smoothly has been to 'fake it' to a degree.  You could still 'lose in court' on a FOIA case and be 'forced to' caught up e-mails, for instance, if you are staging a psy-op designed to mollify a population who hopes that voting harder will overcome what they see as problems.  One of the reasons I say this is the mute response to questions about blatant violations of the 'old laws' when sufficiently high level authority figures are asked about them.  Similarly, the latitude that officials such as Clapper have to bold-faced lie in congressional testimony with nothing done about it.  It's a hypothesis which best explains many many such observations.

As for when such a shift might have occurred, the 9/11 timeframe is a good candidate.  Not many people recognize the significance of 'declarations' of emergency and stuff like that because the details will have been buried in arcane bureaucratic documents in the years or decades preceding.  Likely such a governance shift would have been ratcheted in in phases, and the abandonment of Bretton-Woods under Nixon/Kissinger might have itself been one of the early shifts.  Almost all of this stuff is based on economics actually.  That's one of the reasons why Bitcoin has itself been of interest to me since the early days.

Yeah, sure you do.


To some of my lefty friends and family, have a 'choice' between getting the govt mandated jab or getting a govt assigned bullet to the head is still a 'choice' and one has 'freedom' to make that 'decision.'  All for the 'greater good' of course.

Actually, a 'bullet to the head' is fairly radical and most don't support it yet, but it's not hard to predict where the spell will take their minds within a month or two.  They certainly have no problem depriving 'non-compliant' of a means of livelihood and the ability to feed their family already, and seem genuinely get off on putting 'the other' into a position where they have to make that 'choice'.

The Hippocratic Oath is fundamentally at odds with any practical form of socialized medicine since socialized medicine will always be based around the theory of 'greater good.'  Something has to give, and that something is/was the Hippocratic Oath.

The dynamics are basically 'Some people must die so that others can live'.  Under individual doctor/patient models it is not practicable that a doctor operates 'efficiently' except when he/she is a genuine sociopath.  Only a socialized system where medical decisions are made within the administrative chain, and where the decision maker is isolated from the patient, can systematic policy be implemented and resources used 'efficiently'.

The bothersome aspect to me is that most people under 30-ish have accepted or could easily accept that 'the greater good' means saving Mother Gaia from the human infestation which opens up a whole new stage upon which to design and implement medical policy (or program computers to do it.)  I suspect that those 30% who are genuinely hypnotized enough to really buy into the scamdemic and can never change could be convinced to willingly sacrifice themselves on this alter.  And very well may be.  If so; 'bye-bye'.

What could possibly be more healthy than sequestering oneself into one's 300^2' studio apartment within spitting distance hundreds of smart-meters, wi-fi routers, and cell phones watching TV for another two weeks years to 'flatten the curve'?  To enhance the health effects, one should slather themselves in isopropyl alcohol 50 times per day and routinely spray every surface with bleach.

This public service message brought to you by public health officials of every Western government.

---

In my 'developing world' country where people live like humans the only way they can get enough people sick to satisfy the U.N, IMF, and World Bank overlords is to simply invent them out of thin air and write about 'the problems' in the clownishly corrupt mainstream media.

This is the precise phenomenon I predicted in early 2020 after looking into the science behind the technology platform.  And I recall describing it on this board at least once over the years.  Honestly, I don't know how it could be any other way.  It is inconceivable that this was an accident, and the relatively obvious reason for designing the plandemic to fast-track things and avoid testing.


We're likely to see more and more of this as the genetically re-programmed immune system slowly eats the GMO'd persons body.  Sometimes it will effect the brain more as seems to be the case with this unfortunate victim.

The bio-weapon seems to focus on the female reproductive system so it's a good bet that the eggs of all 'vaxxed' women have been re-seeded and if they can have a kid at all it will be effected by the genetic engineering.  (Females have, at the time of birth, only enough eggs for one per month and the genetics are not supposed to change making that the natural target for transhumanist 'singularity' engineering.)  The offspring will probably patentable under current intellectual property law.

'School for Dictators'?  More like 'School for Scapegoats.'

I'll bet that most of these twats (who don't get fed to the masses to be torn limb-for-limb) won't even get a cot in the underground bunkers.

It's fairly clear to me that what they really want is for a central authority to control other people's lives.  They probably would vaguely prefer to control their own lives themselves but are pretty ambivalent about it and it's worth their own loss of freedom to experience the joy of seeing others be 'controlled'.

I know a lot of these people, and it's a universal characteristic that they cannot envision a situation where the authority is not 'on their side' and 'has their back.'  The reason Trump was so destabilizing to them emotionally is because logically it shook their world, but emotionally they were able to remain in denial and write it off as a one-time accident of fate than cannot (and cannot be allowed to) ever happen again.  Funny enough, Trump might as well been 'one of them' because he was actually quite supportive of most of their priorities, not the least of which was shoving through the corp/gov gene therapy in time for Biden.  They are just to dense and shell-shocked to realize it.  In Prof. Desmet terms Trump might as well been named 'Donald Free-Floating-Anxiety Trump', and that was possibly the main reason he was inserted for a few years.  Worked stunningly.

Anyway, there are 10,000 religious sects who will be more than happy to micro-manage peoples lives and dictate their behaviors.  These collectivist/communitarian creepers should go join one of them, and leave us more individually minded people alone, and be happy.  Best done before they turn an annoying and depressing world into a truly frightful one with massive internecine struggle.  Or I should say, before they are successfully used as tools to do so since it is what their controllers dream about.