Update: The farm suppression thread's original list of members was consolidated with the new members, forming a list of just under 300 members. All of these members have at least 50 good reports against them and the cumulative count is 30098 good reports, which makes it an average of 105 reports (which can be effectively considered deleted posts) per user. Full list below from "best" to worst: 50 | barota
50 | biangkerok
50 | ice18
50 | sirminesalot
50 | tungaqhd
51 | clint25n
51 | cryptoknightt
51 | Dijital Para
51 | Krislaw
51 | mirawantirinjana
51 | mitchr4
51 | pelumi20
51 | rathaha10
51 | reality18
52 | Bosx1ne
52 | Duzter
52 | localcrypto
52 | Vit83
53 | automaticmoney
53 | kateycoin
53 | Maamejane
53 | Negotiation
53 | riso2015
53 | SanZoldyck
54 | perla
54 | secretgirl
54 | strunberg
54 | tetyulfania
55 | acdc
55 | Ejanend
55 | Garrygold
55 | pandanaran
55 | sentoy
55 | silverleafy
56 | bitcoinst
56 | JRoa
56 | Lexurdania
57 | haidil
57 | Obito
58 | TheClownSong
59 | FlamingFingers
59 | fortunecrypto
59 | gwdf1
59 | JCviggen
59 | John Kreese
60 | ajqjjj
60 | bison
60 | CryptoLogo
60 | fauzan Ichsan
60 | islafilipina
60 | iyah adrian
60 | leatutz
60 | meldrio1
60 | Peashooter
60 | Psychee
60 | RondoAnyar
61 | AjithBtc
61 | alian17
61 | ansarose1
61 | Burogh
61 | jackblacksparrow
61 | jhonjhon
61 | Jpti
61 | mnporter2001
61 | Phantomberry
61 | r_delossa
62 | bitcoinisbest
62 | jigzaheedcoin
62 | Oceat
62 | Pffrt
62 | rich93
62 | romanij
62 | udidrone
63 | alisonwonder
63 | amonymous
63 | Iykecollins
63 | ongkok87
63 | sempak
63 | xmonkeyx
64 | 2Kool4Skewl
64 | alrose
64 | arimamib
64 | hahay
64 | MisterLangley
64 | pilosopotasyo
64 | TrevorS
65 | arifteguhr
65 | duuuuude
65 | Mr. Ar_Mongi
65 | seramania
65 | Starfranko
66 | cahbagus555
66 | kkaroul4
66 | Seeker#9
67 | bitbunnny
67 | djselery
68 | awakpane
68 | DainSLane
68 | DarkIT
69 | bering
69 | BigBos
69 | bobyhodob
69 | cunguks
69 | jake zyrus
69 | miningguru
70 | flyer88
70 | H1N1
70 | toast
71 | Falconer
72 | playboy654
72 | rmhuntley
72 | Wellyan
72 | wildey
74 | bleachX
74 | Irviyandi
75 | HK88
75 | ringgo96
76 | calandra78
76 | Muzika
77 | Crypto5060
77 | DeadCoin
77 | dobolspeed3
77 | emberbekas
78 | Cianix
78 | DonFacundo
78 | sangjoewara
79 | Bustart
79 | mamahdedeh
79 | saaayyyeeel
79 | znation
80 | cergfalcone
80 | IvugeoEvolutionCoin
80 | moynul2050
81 | carter34
81 | HabiebRiziq
81 | Jocuserious
81 | krayzie32
82 | Btc_1856
82 | Dewi Aries
82 | FlamingFingers
82 | Kocret02
82 | m0Ray
82 | SaRmY
83 | Becky666
83 | kodtycoon
83 | Thanasis
84 | auchit
84 | celot
84 | Congyang
84 | Pom_bensin
85 | aliceHortrex
85 | micalith
85 | Pithaxz
85 | trickyriky
85 | White Christmas
86 | BitcoinPanther
86 | DeathProxy
86 | Subbir
87 | Darktongue
87 | EastSound
87 | GreenStox
88 | onrise
89 | farlack
90 | IParn
91 | blockchainwriters
91 | nreal
91 | OrangeII
92 | Babylon
93 | andrearz
94 | Farma
94 | gantez
94 | GatotKaca
94 | judeafante
94 | Oneandpure
94 | poldanmig
95 | akmal1984
95 | luckyflop
95 | mdzahed134
95 | mrkavasaki
96 | bandungan
97 | kramat
98 | Kevondo
98 | litepool.ru
99 | andriarto
99 | meldrio1
99 | n0ne
99 | Ucy
100| devis9990i
100| wahyu wida
101| ILScoin
101| Prompyboo
101| SaidNurs
101| TIDOVEE
103| FloridaKid
103| miklesm
103| pungopete468
104| immortal4now
104| Panchum
106| nur rochid
106| Ranly123
107| Best Dreams
108| bitcoinposts
108| fabiola!
109| Pamadar
109| zidanw
110| Gozie51
111| baeva2
113| Kay94
113| radjie
113| zaim7413
114| cvasy
114| OrangeII
114| S4VV4S
116| michellee
116| partysaurus
117| Mr.Noda
117| TheICE007
118| TheClownSong
119| breathlessz
119| coingrowth
119| Tungsten-1
120| ajeef
120| CaptainKid
120| quality.crypto
120| xSkylarx
122| btccoffee
123| Finestream
123| prof7bit
124| FlightyPouch
125| Bitfling
125| trauchot
125| XCANA
132| coin_1122
132| Noilee
133| quality.crypto
133| semobo
135| cribusen
140| gweedo
142| bobby1776
142| Moiyah
143| bitcoin31
144| leetcoiner
144| whirlcoin
148| kayvie
149| MonaLeeTracy
151| Ayiranorea
155| palle11
157| Indrawan77
161| iamzill
164| iMark
165| Viscore
167| ShowOff
169| Dhoe
169| ethereumhunter
172| MFahad
173| Xampeuu
174| princeyeboah
176| Vaculin
179| Klausi
179| rachman mahesa
186| logicgate
187| avarnet
187| crisanto01
187| Wawa2013
188| Cherylstar86
202| inanilujimi
216| horrifiedx1
224| Bagaji
227| Rufsilf
230| Apes
232| yvesp110
248| mersal
267| thirdlight
290| Thomas-s
295| goaldigger
296| syamster
302| fortunecrypto
341| Adriano2010
356| Irvinn
357| Karmakid
362| Fredomago
369| joshy23
389| zhekinsp
403| ardentvolcanoes
522| onrise
562| Vinaa77
|
|
|
|
The previous two days showed the participant pool dropping by 3 participants, from 76 to 73. Those that were dropped are the following:
Remaining participants just got their final prize increased by 4.10%, to 13.69 mBTC You are Steve from Sportsbet and managing more accounts. Hopefully, the transparent statistics that I publish don't give you any inclination that I'm some strange alt account. |
|
|
|
|
@Bthd if you are concerned about the linkage between users, just keep this in mind:
If a user A posts an address before user B, then if user B posts the same address they take on the reputation of user A, but not the other way around. This is what I like to call an A->B link. If, however, there is concrete evidence that B is linked to A in a definitive way as well, then you can say that the two share the same cryptographic identity.
Obviously, you don't want people to start using negative-trust accounts to slander other users' names through framing.
|
|
|
|
So, the update says 139 users are eligible. What am I missing? 139 eliglble, 100 picked. Foxhole problem. |
|
|
|
The player count has not changed as of September 5th, and is still therefore 76 players. The reward for each player is still set at 13.15 mBTC, and below are the current entrants: 040****n
act****e
aki****3
ant****v
bho****y
bor****s
Bor****s
cal****i
cdy****7
cha****l
cho****o
cry****y
dea****y
din****o
dog****d
Dog****y
Dou****9
DRE****s
fid****7
fum****o
hab****o
har****5
hir****5
hir****9
Hir****y
hnk****1
hop****r
Jac****t
jon****4
jos****7
Kan****e
kii****5
kim****8
Kiy****0
koi****i
kok****n
mar****e
mas****8
mha****a
mos****2
mum****n
nag****9
nik****3
no4****5
nok****5
noz****m
rai****5
raj****r
ral****4
ren****8
rrs****a
ryo****x
ryu****u
sab****3
SHI****7
shi****i
shi****6
shi****4
sit****m
soj****r
sun****n
Sus****n
Swe****2
taa****o
tak****7
tak****9
TEN****N
ten****3
ume****n
van****8
wyt****r
yas****1
yas****4
you****e
Yuk****u
zer****n
Leaderboard updated: 05-09-2020 07:00 GMT |
|
|
|
spam:>agree,
spam:eth of course
other:sesc= |
|
|
|
|
The leaderboard was not updated on September 4th, and thus the next update will contain two days worth of participant changes.
I don't think that too many people dropped out, though. I don't expect the number to dwindle by more than a few.
|
|
|
|
4. No referral code (ref link) spam. [1]
5. No link shorteners that require users to view an ad.
6. No linking to phishing or malware, without a warning and a valid reason. [e]
Report posts to mods. I recommend prefacing it with [P1] to indicate high priority. If more adopt the system, this allows reports to be streamlined. (I rank priorities 1-5 from malware to bumps) 
If you want something that's actually worse than a simple URL change, check this out: I am Craig S Wright. |
|
|
|
Yes but because of the massive merit inflation on WO, you can basically "like"(merit) every message you see, hence the memes which have nothing to do with bitcoin and such getting merited in WO, which just furthur increases the inflation problem Just to toss a stick in the pile.
If a DT member tags you for something stupid involving merit (ie. probably anything less than selling merit), then they're not going to be a DT member for much longer. This one should relate to those cases you mentioned. Aside from that, if people complain about whether things deserve merit at all, then that's something to perhaps think about, but if you conclude that they're wrong, then that's that. You don't need to stress about it or defend yourself constantly. It's conceivable that someday you and I will end up disagreeing too much about this stuff and I'll remove your source status, but it's really not a big deal. And this is on merit sources, but it seems general enough to apply to most people. After all, the standards of those that are sources vs. those that are not (in a perfect world) would be equally high. |
|
|
|
I kinda dont want the merits to spiral down and turn into glorified like buttons, thats kinda the point of stopping the inflation of merit in WO Kind of too late for that. People aren't given restrictions on merit, and therefore merit can be sent arbitrarily. I don't tag anymore for merit abuse except in clear-cut egregious cases because of that fact: you cannot accurately determine subjective values via merit resulting in an excess of merit from circumstantial evidence resulting in a conclusion of abuse. The other thing is, to like someone's post, doesn't it automatically have to have something of substance that connects with you? I'm not going to merit something randomly, am I? |
|
|
|
Its not a hypothetical, people have been banned and flagged and distrusted for merit farming before. There it is! The equivalence between 'merit farming' and the WO thread! Tell me... what do these users without any merit-based incentives plan on doing with their merit other than to use it in the form of "likes" on the WO thread? also if merit really doesnt matter to them i dont understand why they would be so opposed to disabling merit on the thread "I could live with or without an extra lamp. I would like to keep it, though." |
|
|
|
Thing is, if me and my friends did the same thing but outside of WO we would definitely get banned, thats my problem here You are incorrect because you are proposing a result to a hypothetical. For one, I have seen posts outside of the WO thread that are not of "high quality". Shitposts, even, that were merited. Nobody really gives a shit anymore about merit, do they?
It's also a bit strange to be meriting people like El duderino_ when they have >4000 merit. What are they going to do with it?  (case in point: merit doesn't matter to a lot of these users) |
|
|
|
In that same scenario around 1000 sMerit got sent to Mr. Punkass for posting memes rather than being distributed on the rest of the forum. Dope. That means that whoever sent the merit decided that it was a proper use of their merit. Are you going to now start commandeering the merit system to restrict certain people from getting it? How about, let's prevent all Legendary users and above from receiving merit since it's clearly not going to the other members who obviously deserve it. theymos himself barely even fucking cares about merit abuse. |
|
|
|
|
Scenario:
Some punk-ass loser posts memes all day in WO thread.
Punk-ass loser is trying to get merit in order to rank up so they can farm signature campaigns.
Punk-ass loser spends all his time on the WO thread since they maximize their merit.
Punk-ass loser has no useful posts outside of WO.
Punk-ass loser applies for signature campaign.
Punk-ass loser does not get in.
Usually, people can follow the flow of merit. If a user is accumulating merit and they produce shitty posts, the posts will be reported. If a user produces quality posts, then it is no longer a problem.
|
|
|
|
|
One possible reason would actually be malice rather than laziness. If one wants to "spam attack" a blockchain, they can continually mine empty blocks with only the coinbase transaction to let the mempool fill up and raise the fee that the average transaction requires with a large number of transactions flooding the pool in conjunction.
You can effectively make the network operate on a higher difficulty if you have these malicious miners present.
|
|
|
|
I agree with this, well if you are in a hurry you can at least increase your fees. Electrum will let you set your own fees. Important to note that in Electrum, you can actually see how far your transaction is from the mempool tip when it's still unconfirmed. The XX.XX MB size you can find in the date section represents the distance. And even if you don't have RBF, child-pays-for-parent transactions work! Unconfirmed inputs can help in confirming the previous transaction if the fees are high enough to compensate the size. |
|
|
|
Hah, worked right away. The absolute state of localbitcoins though I finally could get verified there.
Anyway loan repaid w/tip! needed it quickly, thanks again Confirmed, cheers. Hey, at least you found a new service. I actually did forget that Paxful also exists, which you can get by with just phone verification. Could be something to look into, as well. |
|
|
|
I don't mind KYC if I'm trading huge amounts but under $100 for a traceable payment from a bank is ridiculous. What's the repayment address btw? 3KQGtukhXLtRzcAMFxnvkw9eSMpsnNq9Ps
It is what it is. When you don't have that many options and when you're 1/10th the population of your basement neighbor, there isn't much to do. ATM fees are still crazy though, aren't they? Last time I went to one it was something around 8%+. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
