Well Corona Viruses have been around since the 1930s, and we seemed to have coped with them until the last few years. It seems that the populations that are most affected by the virus, are the ones that have been injected with the ineffective anti-viral drugs.
Coronavirus was discovered by scientists in 1965 and the term was coined at the same time so what 1930 bs are you talking about? You got any scientific data to back up your claim that the infected ones have the antivirals? I mean not just baseless graphs and statistics that's in the video but peer reviewed study, if you have them, can I read them? |
|
|
|
Since everybody can not own a farm laend to make plantations it is very important for the government to help those existing farmers and encourage them to create more lands for farming because as the population is growing very fast, there is need for food to be available for people to buy and eat so that there will not be in availability of food for the populatiom to feed on. We can see that one of the things that are causing the high cost of food is because there is not surplus of food in the market to reduce the hike in price of food in the market.
To add to your solution, I propose that there's a way where the government encourages urban gardening, I've seen a few people that have done this and document it through YouTube and I think that it's safe to assume that it's a good solution since urban farming helps in the utilization of spaces that's not mostly used or not treaded in an urban setting. Regarding food surplus, it's in the best interest in my opinion to create a better logistics if not improve the current logistics, most of the time, the logistics is what's causing the delays and wastage in food. Conversion of some lands as farms in highly urbanized cities is the dream though when it comes to the future of farming, will literally solve logistics, food prices, and food waste altogether. |
|
|
|
~
So get in the habit of being skeptical of any offers even by reputable people especially regarding free lunch money. No one deserves to be fully trusted on the internet, but greed and laziness are the main reasons people get scammed which bypasses important processes to identify scams. You deleted the part where I exactly said that. Don't blame the victims, it's not greed from the people who gets scammed that needs to be blamed, it's the scammers that we should be blaming, who wouldn't say no to something when there's a sign that says it's free? I'm sure some asshole out there would pretend that they would say no to that just to be different but my point is, you're blaming the wrong side in this, the victims just needs to be informed and educated about the different types of scam and they're good to go. |
|
|
|
Twitter giveaways should always be taken with a grain of salt even its an official account especially if it needs deposit for a giveaway lmao. This kind of issue is not new and already exists since 2 years ago or so. People should really learn these things already.
That's a common sense, but if the reputation of the owner of the giveaway exceeds the suspicion and there's zero indication that it's a scam then why not jump right in? Also it's a good habit that you always check their partners Twitter handles to see if the facts are corroborated, it's going to save you a lot of heartache since that habit as a first line of defense is going to protect you against scammers. |
|
|
|
Let's ignore the above, why didn't you report the bug to housebets.io? Didn't you think it is risky to continue playing on a casino that has such a critical bug?
Dude, the bug helps him get back 0.02 USD when OP is losing, it's not a lot of money but considering that you can exploit it to your benefit, why report it? We all know why OP haven't reported the bug, don't be naive. Also, it's a critical bug only to the casino not to the player so OP will continue to play. |
|
|
|
~
Binance is known for being a good and reputable company, but I don’t think it will still be the same in the next years or decade. @DooMAD already said what I was about to say about this so... ~
The reason why we don’t need to trust them wholeheartedly as we might only regret our decision in the future. However, I respect your decision to store your bitcoins in an exchange like Binance because what you think is what matters for you. But you should know at least that centralized exchanges will never guarantee the safety and security of our coins and what had happened to FTX might also happen to your trusted exchange. That’s the reason why instead of prioritizing Binance and other centralized exchanges, I think it’s best to just avoid them and settle for self-custodial wallets. That way, we own our personal coins and we are solely responsible of their security, and not another third party company. Dude, what you're saying, I already know that, if you've read my whole reply regarding why I still ise Binance, your paragraph would be much shorter. But for you and others to see I will repeat it, "I don't care about the money too much", I want to gradually detach myself from material things and I hope that my indifference to the fate of my bitcoins in the hands of Binance is a step forward to that. |
|
|
|
Many people always think that they do not need government regulation and take away their freedom, but when they are scammed by someone, they always look to the law for help. That is really too funny and despicable.
P2P is really a transaction method that can guarantee our privacy, but it is really too dangerous and too risky, I also can't trust using P2P exchange platforms without a middleman.
That's cause people don't appreciate what they don't normally use for their daily lives so that's bound to happen. It's not really a good assumption though, that anarchy is going to be a bad thing for more people, don't the people in Slab City in California live in peace even though they're the closest to a lawlessness? I can understand the scare of using P2P but when the system in place is working properly and ensures the safety of both parties, it's safe to assume that using P2P for transactions is relatively safe. Safety and risk is relative to how competent the system is in my opinion. |
|
|
|
|
Current number of posts (including this one): 1989
Rank: Full Member
bech32 address: bc1qh0e0dqesn25ndem973dp5f5dv42d0fauh6tdmz
Merit earned in the last 120 days: 31
|
|
|
|
Lost Bitcoin is considered lost until the owner of the account makes a transaction. Maybe they are still holding of the amount of Bitcoins they mined in the early days?
Or what if they have created multiple wallets back then and they do not want to withdraw/move Bitcoin from some of their wallets.
If there is a confirmed of the address, would that still be considered a lost coin? The notion that they have multiple addresses that they don't want to move the bitcoins in it is baffling to me because I ask myself and put myself in that position where I own those "addresses" and then ask myself, why would I do that? And right now I don't see any reason why I should do what you're saying yhese people might've done with their bitcoins. |
|
|
|
|
More than just 100k I think because there's more demand than ever overtime for bitcoin if it ever gets a legal status in a lot of countries especially US and other consumerist capitalist countries out there. 100k would probably soon be considered a lowest point in bitcoin if that dream ever happens. As long as demand increases for a limited supply product, we can expect the price to continue increasing.
|
|
|
|
The only disadvantage is that, it will require you to wait for a period of time or until the market price increases, in order to generate profit from investing into this technology Also, no one is certain when would be or how long sjould we hold into our assets in order for it to be profitable. But as you learn from this industry, you'd understand it more.
I think a good beginner baseline for how long you should wait is the halving, I think the halving is always a guaranteed profit when you are planning to hodl your bitcoin for a long time, definitely no one is certain but a good rule of thumb is to never marry the bag when the profit is already 100% or higher. |
|
|
|
|
To answer the question in the title, mixers are accused of money laundering because they're used by shady entities to launder their money, I think that's the truth, people that have shady business sees what mixers do so they try to take advantage of it, anything to be one step ahead of the law is going to be helpful to these criminals. Mixers work by mixing or mashing up coins in a private pool then is sent to the receivers, it's compared often to money laundering but that doesn't mean that those who use it doesn't mean that they are committing a crime, some just want to increase their privacy.
|
|
|
|
I don't mind putting my bitcoins there so I can earn some satoshi everyday until it hits my target price This is insane mindset. So you're literally going to hold your coins in Binance for an undefined time, and with arbitrary reasoning (i.e., why until 100k, and not 90k?). I suggest you switch to self-custody the soonest possible. It's an insane mindset for you because you and people who think like you are tied to material things like money, I only have a couple thousands of USD worth of btc there so it's not big of a deal if there's a hack or some shit like that, I want to follow your advice and I know it's reasonable and you're concerned enough to care but I can't care enough what happens to those bitcoins, I'm learning to detach myself from material things, might sound like I'm condescending but that's the truth. I guess some people use CEX the same reason as mine. Individuals like yourself tend to make utterly unreasonable assumptions that their exchange is too big to fail, and they do so with unwavering confidence. I wonder, how many centralized exchanges need to go bankrupt or experience hacking incidents before you come to your senses? You're making an assumption too that I believe in that exchange and that I'm a bootlicker, no I'm not and I just laugh it off whenever something bad happens to the exchange. To answer your wonder, I don't care how many exchanges will go bankrupt before I change my mind because it won't. |
|
|
|
I get that convenience is important to some people (or seemingly most people). But isn't it missing the point somewhat when the whole idea was to remove the need for trusting intermediaries? I guess there are always going to be too many daytraders to make my idealism anything other than pure naivité.
I use Binance so to share my point of view as to why I still continue to use it even though I already have Peach in my other phone is that I have my crypto in Earn in Binance and since I plan to hodl until 100k, I don't mind putting my bitcoins there so I can earn some satoshi everyday until it hits my target price, I tried to think of any other reason why I still use CEX but no, that's all the reason why, I guess some people use CEX the same reason as mine. I wouldn't say your idealism is naive, it's noble because you are helping carry the torch that Satoshi left behind which is advocating absolute freedom in financial matters. |
|
|
|
|
Do you have a data to back up those claims about people leaving real estate and stocks in favor of cryptocurrency, that seems kind of unlikely because real estate is a bubble and I think that getting money right now while you still can is a good reason to stay for now in real estate and regarding stocks, isn't it a steady endeavor and people still make money there right? Regarding creating a group, there's already some discussions in the forum so I don't see the point of creating a Telegram group for discussing trends when there's already something for that already existing, don't fix it if it ain't broke right?
|
|
|
|
|
Current number of posts (including this one): 1981
Rank: Full Member
bech32 address: bc1qh0e0dqesn25ndem973dp5f5dv42d0fauh6tdmz
Merit earned in the last 120 days: 31
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
