It's not hard to detect, there some telltale signs that someone is using AI for writing their posts, just look at the grammar, not a lot of people are using grammar checking apps to checks for grammatical errors in their post, although that's still not enough to determine if someone is using an AI. Another one that I can think of is trying to find if there's an emotion in the post, it's kind of weird but I think an AI generated post will sound more logical compared to someone who has written their own post, there's emotion in the latter because it's personal.

Removal of the negative feedbacks from inactive members will defeat the purpose of that system, the feedbacks serves as a warning and caution for other people that might engage the person that has the feedback in the future so the system works just fine. Of course OP would say that it's unfair because he got almost all of the DT members on his bad side not to mention that the feedback is mentioning extortion which I think is a pretty serious offense, I mean isn't that a crime irl? His case isn't definitely one of those unfair ones, DT members in my experience in the forum aren't vindictive and logical when it comes to giving someone the ever infamous red trust.

What do you mean be reasoning with my own point of view? How else would I formulate my "reasoning" or opinion if not my own point of view and anyone is welcome to challenge that "reasoning". Also, what reality are you talking about? I just said in the quote that I doubt that you're really surprised, I do agree with you on the experience though.

What arguments are you talking about? What contradictions? The stuff that I've only talked about is that I doubt your reaction to the plethora of media that has bitcoin as the center of the theme or the story and the easing of your worry about information distortion. Also, I wasn't recommending that documentary to you, it's a general recommendation.

The bias in gender in bitcoin is just an illusion and to be honest, the people that keeps pressing on that issue are the ones that's having that has real issue with the bias. Bitcoin has always been inclusive and I think that the reason why we think that there's few women in this space is in the matter of interest, I am not entirely sure but if we look at the demographic in technology, there's more men than women involved and from that assumption I conclude that it's probably from interest in tech as to why we don't have that many women. Hopefully things are changing with more people interested in investing and more people wanting financial freedom.

No maybes, this is definitely his strategy, he wants to secure the vote of the crypto population and what better way to do that than to say what they want and need to hear about bitcoin and I saw some clips of his speech about bitcoin, he seem genuine about his support with bitcoin but I think that if he ever gets elected, the people behind the curtain as I like to describe our real masters will try to influence his decisions that might make bitcoin much stronger in USA.

I think that the obvious reason as to why they don't accept is as Ron DeSantis has said in the quote of the OP, they can't control it and we know that any government that wants to assert control over their domain will kill or remove anything that they have no way of controlling, it would be nice if there's coexistence but so it happens, we are living in a greedy world.

Username: Latviand
BTC SegWit Address: bc1qh0e0dqesn25ndem973dp5f5dv42d0fauh6tdmz

I knew some people who knew about bitcoin as far as 2011, but they don't know where to get it and back then, online transactions is not as trustworthy as the present so they have a hard time getting their hands in one. One probable reason why there's so few people that have the money to buy bitcoin back then was that most of them was probably young people who doesn't have their own money or the appeal of bitcoin isn't there yet.

If bitcoin were a physical product, it wouldn't reach what it has reached so far as a virtual currency because of logistics, there won't be a lot of people that will be able to get their hands on it and not to mention that they will shelved together with other fad like pet rock except that there's a notion that it will increase in value. Bitcoin will become a coin collectible if it was a physical product.

You just need to search bitcoin and then add movies or documentary to your search engine and you would be given out the results that you're looking for. I doubt that you're really surprised because bitcoin's been around for a decade and I don't think that content creators and filmmakers will pass up on bitcoin as a theme of their documentary or movie. You needn't worry about the distortion of information, there's a lot of smart people out there that can filter out the bad information about bitcoin.

They're not movies OP, most of the titles that you've listed are documentaries and they're pretty different from a movie, it's just semantics though so who cares? Right? I recommend watching the Bitcoin Gospel, hard to watch if you are close minded because it talks about the negatives and suspicions that many detractors have pointed out over the years but all in all it's a good documentary. Accidentally watched that documentary while scrolling through my social media account.

Dude, I think you should consider using Grammarly or put your thoughts in your native language first then use Google Translate your native language thoughts into English, I tried to understand what you're trying to say but to no avail. Are you talking about marriage? Economy? Or are you trying to point out similarities between economy and marriage.

Education is general, what you're talking about is financial education, let's assume your "education" is financial education, I do agree with that notion but what you're saying is already a given thing when we talk about financial literacy. Also, not all those things that you've listed is needed to be learned if you want to be financially literate, not everyone who is financially educated does investing although it's rare, some of them just wants to be better at managing their household finances. Also worth mentioning that financial market is a big concept, and I think it's something that's too advanced if not worthless for someone who just wants to be better at budgeting their money.

Besides reading from different sources to gain more financial knowledge and get more familiarized with the concept, I think it's also important that we also should ask questions, be inquisitive when it comes to what you're reading like is the author really on my side here? Does it benefit my goal? Is the contents appropriate to the current times or financial climate? Better to be knowledgeable and wise, remember that.

It's not limitied acceptance because these BRICS countries have ironed out all the details for their plans so I do believe that this is not the case of acceptance, I think that it's the case that they're still trading with other countries with dollars and they probably don't have enough dollar for their trades with the other countries. Not to mention, that the hold of dollar in the international market is so strong and deep, they need a lot of countries to completely abandon the dollar for international trade before they can make any difference. Don't get me started with politics too, that's another matter that has a big influence why this dedollarization isn't working as intended.

They didn't realize, they're well aware of the power and profitability of crypto so they do a push and pull approach because they want the best for the party and the worst for the people.

That is a stupid statement, they don't work for small wages, they don't work because the small wages isn't a livable wage, your statement is defending businesses that pay dirt cheap to their workers, have you seen the pay raise that many union workers ask? They're not a lot, they're smart enough to know the limit. Give me evidences that the state isn't accountable? Say if there's a war, will there be a continuous prosperity in that state?

Give me a country that cared for their micro economy? I really want to see if they did good and do they have policies that's helpful to their economy. It's no-brainer to focus your attention on macro scale when it comes to economy, that's where the billion dollars in profit come in compare that to the combined businesses in micro scale, it won't leave a sizable dent. I'm no economist so I'd like to be disproven that macro is better than micro.

You know another thing that can help? Voting the right people to run your country, no one wants to talk about it but it's a big factor why inflation in uncontrollable, everyone talks about increasing your income stream but no one is talking about pay raise that matches the inflation and making lobbying an illegal practice.  There's a lot of opportunities but so is the amount of people and not everyone can do what those opportunity demands

I have been long debating with myself whether I want to do lending because I do have a considerable amount of bitcoin being hodled but given that there's people out there that will default their loans, I say that it's too risky and I don't think it's worth to do so. Maybe if you really know the person and you have a way to find them so he/she can pay the loan, then at that point the risk is mitigated.

I don't think peace is in the table right now, I think that the only way that the war will stop is if Ukraine gives up the part that's already occupied or they could revoke their invitation to join NATO, Putin has a lot of resources and even with all the sanctions, in a war of attrition they will be victorious. Economy wise, I don't think we're going to see any green pastures anytime soon even if the war ended, the cost of the destruction will be of paramount importance to be addressed.

Re-apply

Re-apply

Combining the right strategy is intensive though, it has to be that what you're combining needs to cover the weakness that each strategy has, it will be worthwhile to do this but if you don't want that maybe just one strategy will work for you. At the end of the day, it's a matter of preference.