|
Aww.... now your teasing me. I thought you might finally have a model while I'm available otherwise they've been at inconvenient times. I know it's an artifact of being a new site but it'll get there.
What do you mean by "offline crowdfunding campaigns with videos 24/7" ?
Is you're ddos suspect a competitor, opponent or jeleous btctalk member? No need for specific identification just curious on the category.
|
|
|
|
Done.
fucking hell, 1 hour from feature request to deployed implementation (I tested, it works) I draw my hat. 1 hour and 20 seconds per the forum timestamps. |
|
|
|
convenience.me  Is it possible to have the Enter key to start the process instead of having to move the mouse over to the button and click? convenience.me Is it possible to have the Enter key to start the process instead of having to move the mouse over to the button and click? I second this feature request. I'm regularly kept wondering why the download doesn't start. Then I remember: "use the mouse to click the button", stupid EDIT: you know you have produced great software when people start requesting convenience-features like that. Done. Thanks for the feedback. |
|
|
|
One other question! Mining at NOMP pool, how often do we get payout there?
Where is the payout info from NOMP pool site?
Cheers
referring to 176.9.59.110:9595? Payouts should be dispatched 30 seconds after a block matures. That being said though there is currently a bug impacting payouts I'm looking into. |
|
|
|
|
I was rather curious to see what the new Algo would have been... I'm more disappointed in that than there not being a coin we've got enough to go around already.
|
|
|
|
How are these top 3 miners making so much hash for a cpu only coin? Why are these always billed as cpu only when there are gpu miners being devised and tested.  It's quite possible for someone to hit those speeds using EC2. Sounds like a guy who may perhaps be using EC2 to achieve such rates. |
|
|
|
Damned nice progress Taek + Team! UPnP is good for mass adoption, but I don't know why that mining pool should be such a high priority? The way I see it these should be the next top priorities: 1. Password protection for the wallet (easy to do from the wallet UI) 2. Increasing file size cap (at least 4GB "DVD size", but preferably 50GB "Blu-ray" and obviously much more in near future when 4k goes viral) 3. Dropbox style easy user interface and automated file contracts renewals and not manual. (without this there will be no mass adoption). Just my thoughts, but surely you know best your own project  One of the interns is working on the mining pool. It's a priority, but it's not the top priority. I am working on wallet encryption + some other wallet things right now. When I'm done, the wallet api will be sufficient for exchanges to add us, and losing coins on accident should no longer be a problem. I've been looking at a few of the most popular bitcoin + altcoin wallets to figure out how to make our wallet the best that's out there, and there's been a lot of progress. Siafunds from the UI is a goal. Luke is working on the file contract stuff right now. When he's done, the file cap will be raised to 5GB (enough to support DVDs), and uploading entire folders will be supported. Dropbox style uploading will not be ready by 0.4.0. Perhaps later on in September though. Depending on how the 0.4.0 launch goes, we want to focus on getting other developers and businesses involved. Sia is a lot bigger than just personal storage. It sorta seems like we're on target for August 15th. It's going to be tight but we haven't yet hit any major hurdles, and everyone seems reasonably confident that they'll be done with their part of the work in time. Is the mining pool work included in the tentative Aug 15th target or is that coming later? |
|
|
|
it using 100% of my cpu will that harm my computer if yes is their a way to turn it down
100% cpu usage will not harm your computer. But what might is a high temperature if you do not have adequate cooling, download a temperature monitor and keep an eye on it |
|
|
|
WTS 60000.00 AXIOM 1 BTC, Escrow accept
I will pay .8 if you have trustworthy escrow ok, i do not have one, maybe u can provide person ? ocminer maybe ? I don't know how many people offer escrow for coins like this but I'd be willing to act as one for this trade. If you feel I'm sufficiently qualified. Edit: PM me or find me on IRC in #axiomcrypto for a faster reply wild guess: dev speaking to himself: dev first puppet account: selling dev second puppet account: buying dev real id: doing escrow yeah nice try LOL is all I can say oh and there's 14 people in #axiomcrypto |
|
|
|
WTS 60000.00 AXIOM 1 BTC, Escrow accept
I will pay .8 if you have trustworthy escrow ok, i do not have one, maybe u can provide person ? ocminer maybe ? I don't know how many people offer escrow for coins like this but I'd be willing to act as one for this trade. If you feel I'm sufficiently qualified. Edit: PM me or find me on IRC in #axiomcrypto for a faster reply |
|
|
|
Thanks to bitspill and others in our irc.freenode.net #axiomcrypto chat, we have a NOMP server up: http://176.9.59.110:9595/And thanks to all working hard on the CPU miner. Moving to C++ > C is not easy in this instance Please explain how to use a Pool without a Miner.. you "can't" so it's up in the same sense that http://axiom.suprnova.cc is "up" |
|
|
|
hmm btw int p = (b - 1 + N) % N; <=> int p = b-1 lol
Not quite. What happens when b = 0? |
|
|
|
error: variable-sized object may not be initialized
uint32_t M[N] = { 0 };
Oh, perhaps you have to replace the N with 65536 so the compiler knows it's a constant and if you don't have uint256 available and must use uint32_t then it will require other changes which I don't know off hand... I'll try looking in a bit. Edit: I believe the alternative is to compile with C99 then you can keep it as M[N] |
|
|
|
Anyone here able to build a (stratum) cpu miner ? got my hashing function ready but i'm not sure how to convert <vector> from c++ to c
convert the vector to an array vectors are just fancy wrappers around arrays. i'm unsure how to do that with such a big array: int N = 65536;
std::vector<uint256> M(N);
Should do it and will initialize all cells to 0, from there the [] operator will work the same on the vector as it will on the array |
|
|
|
Anyone here able to build a (stratum) cpu miner ? got my hashing function ready but i'm not sure how to convert <vector> from c++ to c
convert the vector to an array vectors are just fancy wrappers around arrays. |
|
|
|
|
My node is now online and accepting connections.
addnode 176.9.59.110
|
|
|
|
Unfortunately #axiom on freenode is taken but I'm loitering alone in #axiomcrypto if anyone wants to stop by. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
