The best would be to use freq/voltage graph and lock desired freq/vol with "L" but problem its only apply to one GPU per rig, so each GPU need to be done manualy  Unwinder sad its designed as that because each GPU have different freq/volt table, which is shame Also sliding TDP to 60% and OC-ing you can get undervolt but if miner is low GPU usage it gona "boost" as insane so GPU will crash, I would like to see some new OC tool that can define static freq/voltage to all same GPU in rigs! |
|
|
|
|
@zawawa
Works here but still some CPU usage with 2x instances (2x 1070 30% from i5)
Win10 x64 375.57
1070 gives ~112sol/s
|
|
|
|
So, Can I finally upload some content?,
I was trying a month ago, but it wasn't working.
yes you can, for download you need some credits because download cost and the one hosting get some change for a bandwith... |
|
|
|
@eXtremal
Agree that NV can be competitive, but I know due the larger AMD community, fee miners and AMD devs are a lot more inclined to release and work on miners, so ppl/miners are even more happy with paying then getting free miners, due their interests
just wish that some fair distribution can be done in better way then its today
i don't think NV will be competitive in mining world because their architecture are inclined toward floating point performance (for gaming or HPC scientific purpose), NV performance on integers always slower than AMD hardware architecture, despite CUDA and their great power efficiency so if you are NV owner, just go back to gaming or sell ur card for AMD one LOL you don`t know what you talk about, atm AMD is only better in ethereum because its dependent on memory latency and bandwith which both 1070 and RX 480 share same of 256bit width where GPU calculation matter NV is at least 10xx series are outperforming AMD, but when ppl only mine ethereum its their only bases for comparation for instance NV 1070 is faster with blake ago then RX480 and it used in a part of algo for zcash wtf dude, 1070 are not an equal match for RX480 its for RX490 compare with same price range, if you want to go with 1070 compare it with 2x RX480, you don't know what you talk about... i've been on gpu mining since bitcoin price was 1$, and i do openCL coding too, and never see any NV card that beat AMD on same price range, either because NV just slow, or their price is a shit. I am a miner, i don't care which one are superior in their performance, what i do care is Efficiency, Cost, and Profit so price matters we are at offtopic here, but get you line straight, NV is better or same at compute, the only problem that ppl atm mine memory limited coins as ethereum and prolly zcash (we still don`t know full scope of GPU and memory usage because optimization is still far behind full optimization) just look at lbry for instance or any other algo that is GPU limited, shame most were never profitable and their optimization is bad on both opencl and cuda, but situation is clear that Nvidia is better with GPU coins, expecially if you include power and sure here I talk about 10xx range of cards, where nvidia have a clear lead, shame that they used less width memory interface of AMD would be dead shit of the card!  |
|
|
|
@eXtremal
Agree that NV can be competitive, but I know due the larger AMD community, fee miners and AMD devs are a lot more inclined to release and work on miners, so ppl/miners are even more happy with paying then getting free miners, due their interests
just wish that some fair distribution can be done in better way then its today
i don't think NV will be competitive in mining world because their architecture are inclined toward floating point performance (for gaming or HPC scientific purpose), NV performance on integers always slower than AMD hardware architecture, despite CUDA and their great power efficiency so if you are NV owner, just go back to gaming or sell ur card for AMD one LOL you don`t know what you talk about, atm AMD is only better in ethereum because its dependent on memory latency and bandwith which both 1070 and RX 480 share same of 256bit width where GPU calculation matter NV is at least 10xx series are outperforming AMD, but when ppl only mine ethereum its their only bases for comparation for instance NV 1070 is faster with blake ago then RX480 and it used in a part of algo for zcash |
|
|
|
|
@eXtremal
Agree that NV can be competitive, but I know due the larger AMD community, fee miners and AMD devs are a lot more inclined to release and work on miners, so ppl/miners are even more happy with paying then getting free miners, due their interests
just wish that some fair distribution can be done in better way then its today
|
|
|
|
"Capitalism vs communism mining" shows that with proper $ fee incentive, capitalism beat communism due to human (greedy) nature. Now we have minner sw wars where one side gets 2.5% and thrive with speed well motivated by earnings, while other side gets %0 or free will people donation. We see how it ends. Both author and its users of people version earn less then author and users of paid version. What an mind fk
Sad but mostly true... |
|
|
|
yeah meanwhile a 470 is doing 135 on clymore or optiminer, i'm really thinking to sell those 1070 and get those cheap 470
Sold 5 GTx1080 and 2 GTx1070 and ordered 10 480 Powercolor 480 RED Dragon two of them doing currently 340H/s ..insane. based on those hashrate the 1070 should perform 200 sol at least, 50% is missed in optimization It might be 155 as its 256bit memory interface both for 1070 and 480.. GTX 1070 memory can clock more and mem controller is more efficient, also with claymore 6 rx 480 to get 150sol/s need clock of 1300Mhz at which point it use 170w, so GPU also might be limiting factor with same optimization I am expecting 30% more from 1070 over RX 480 |
|
|
|
For NVidia: processing 2 nonces per iteration gives +5-6% performance, AMD not affected.
yeah cuda port can give you 100sol if you run 2x exe per 1070 but nheqminer was usntable (creseh after ~1h) on 5x 1070 and worked fine on 2x 1070.. duno why |
|
|
|
Thanks for porting, I see alot of possible improvements. atm you can have ~98-100 sol/s from 1070, you make fee miner only if you hit 200  280x is 150sol atm on optiminer kernel |
|
|
|
What's new in r6 version?
A speedup up to 5%. For 1070 I noticed no speedup for r5 -> r6, maybe the speedup was for amd |
|
|
|
|
5x 1070 cards on celeron dual core is no go, CPU usage is 100% and speed is 40% or 30-35 sol/s per card
|
|
|
|
Seems like you guys with 1060/1070 are better off going back to dual mining ETH.
there is actually a 80-90 sol miner available, from silentarmy, very akin to amd, still nvidia can go as high as 134, really strange that no one besides djm34 figured it out yet... well he worked kernel from the start, not taking a easy route tweaking open source kernels which are not so good it seams |
|
|
|
@krnlx
which clock you find optimum for 1070 and zcash?
I was testing ~+600 for memory and 1900Mhz for GPU
ethereum can go up to 800-900 but looks like zcash is more demanding on memory stability
I overclocked only memory +1300-1600 (in linux seems freq is doubled ??) cards are palit super jetstream yeah a bit confusing, afterburner use dubble rate, and looks like linux use quad gpu-z show real freq that, so they all are insane more all less |
|
|
|
|
@krnlx
which clock you find optimum for 1070 and zcash?
I was testing ~+600 for memory and 1900Mhz for GPU
ethereum can go up to 800-900 but looks like zcash is more demanding on memory stability
|
|
|
|
|
We can only hope, claymore is working for a fee and his only interests are GPU with more mining share which is AMD, he care none for NV he may be even paid to not release NV version as he was with ETH miner in past
Shame there is no some way so miners could participate in dev funding, none AMD nor NV farms are not included in any way, only if they pay over fee or private miner
|
|
|
|
|
Is the NV support being done in OpenCL or porting kernel to cuda?
sure windows support is needed, but NV should have priority, tested linux fee miner it goes 50+ on 1070 so I guess a lot more optimization is possible
|
|
|
|
|
-ot 2 is only for opencl mode, for me opencl mode does not work on silent army and win10 with NV 1070 so option has no effect for cuda
|
|
|
|
Claymore is here, only market share for other dev is now NV |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
