CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded GPU kernels.

[bensam1231]

Looks like Claymore v4 has completely bombed the difficulty on Equihash. That and whattomine adding ZCL, that's not safe anymore. Even with the 'new' miner which has binaries now for Windows, it's not fast enough to keep up with the 100 hash (with old hardware) Claymore.

[tbearhere]

Nvidia Zcash miner for Windows with dev fee:
https://forum.z.cash/t/cuda-equihash-miner-with-devfee/6492
1070 ~ 55 sol.

Did anyone try this?   Thx

[Velgelm]

yes
I3 2100 +1070+960 no clocked
nhqminer 0.4b with -t 4 gives 55 s/s
zcminer 1070+960 gives 70 s/s (without CPU)

[jeanjean15]

Nvidia Zcash miner for Windows with dev fee:
https://forum.z.cash/t/cuda-equihash-miner-with-devfee/6492
1070 ~ 55 sol.

Did anyone try this?   Thx

Yes . Works with windows 7 but not with windows 10 .

2 gtx 1080 + 1 gtx 1060 => 165 sols/s .

Not bad ! But i suppose that it can be largely  improved !

On the other hand , overclocking has only a small impact on hashrate .

[ivan1975]

gtx 1070 + gtx 970 ~ 75-80sol (witout CPU).

[bathrobehero]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1677369.0

~68 sol per 1070 without CPU but it's locked to nicehash directly (not even to their awful ZEC pool) so it's crap.

[giagge]

Anyone to fork this for suprnova pool ? .

[ivan1975]

Anyone to fork this for suprnova pool ? .

No source, only binary.
May be someone makes patch?

[Amph]

Nvidia Zcash miner for Windows with dev fee:
https://forum.z.cash/t/cuda-equihash-miner-with-devfee/6492
1070 ~ 55 sol.

Did anyone try this?   Thx

Yes . Works with windows 7 but not with windows 10 .

2 gtx 1080 + 1 gtx 1060 => 165 sols/s .

Not bad ! But i suppose that it can be largely  improved !

On the other hand , overclocking has only a small impact on hashrate .

maybe i'm missing something but i'm doing only 230 sol with six 1070, what is the correct number of thread to use here?

[pokeytex]

Nvidia Zcash miner for Windows with dev fee:
https://forum.z.cash/t/cuda-equihash-miner-with-devfee/6492
1070 ~ 55 sol.

Did anyone try this?   Thx

Yes . Works with windows 7 but not with windows 10 .

2 gtx 1080 + 1 gtx 1060 => 165 sols/s .

Not bad ! But i suppose that it can be largely  improved !

On the other hand , overclocking has only a small impact on hashrate .

maybe i'm missing something but i'm doing only 230 sol with six 1070, what is the correct number of thread to use here?

Also have the same problem - (1) machine (2) evga gtx 1070 sc - 120 sols/s, (2) machine (5) evga gtx 1070 sc - 215 sols/s, (3) machine (5) evga gtx 1070 sc - 215 sols/s - very weird!

[jiggytom]

Nvidia Zcash miner for Windows with dev fee:
https://forum.z.cash/t/cuda-equihash-miner-with-devfee/6492
1070 ~ 55 sol.

Did anyone try this?   Thx

Yes . Works with windows 7 but not with windows 10 .

2 gtx 1080 + 1 gtx 1060 => 165 sols/s .

Not bad ! But i suppose that it can be largely  improved !

On the other hand , overclocking has only a small impact on hashrate .

maybe i'm missing something but i'm doing only 230 sol with six 1070, what is the correct number of thread to use here?

Also have the same problem - (1) machine (2) evga gtx 1070 sc - 120 sols/s, (2) machine (5) evga gtx 1070 sc - 215 sols/s, (3) machine (5) evga gtx 1070 sc - 215 sols/s - very weird!

I've noticed some disparities in the zcminer as well.  I think it has something to do with Pcie bandwidth usage, and each motherboard / chipset handles it differently.  Otherwise, make sure you are on the latest Windows update and driver version.  Make sure nothing else is taxing the cpu.

[bensam1231]

Less threads means it's going to run slower. In order to run at full speed you need to have default threads set.

Hopefully Nicehash adds a dev fee and allows you to use their miner elsewhere, I suggested that in their thread. Not worth using it over ZC's miner until they change that.

[Amph]

default thread does not work for me, it result in a crash, that's why i wasn't sure anymore what was the number of thread to use, everything above 6 and it crash

so basically it work only from 1 to 6

[bensam1231]

It consumes a ridiculously large amount of memory. Pretty sure you're getting a out of memory crash... It probably even tells you that. Increase your pagefile size to something around 50GB if you have 6x 1070s.

[adaseb]

Seems like you guys with 1060/1070 are better off going back to dual mining ETH.

[Amph]

Seems like you guys with 1060/1070 are better off going back to dual mining ETH.

there is actually a 80-90 sol miner available, from silentarmy, very akin to amd, still nvidia can go as high as 134, really strange that no one besides djm34 figured it out yet...

[reb0rn21]

Seems like you guys with 1060/1070 are better off going back to dual mining ETH.

there is actually a 80-90 sol miner available, from silentarmy, very akin to amd, still nvidia can go as high as 134, really strange that no one besides djm34 figured it out yet...

well he worked kernel from the start, not taking a easy route tweaking open source kernels which are not so good it seams

[giagge]

Anyone compile this for windows ? Version V5 :

https://github.com/mbevand/silentarmy

.

[bensam1231]

Seems like you guys with 1060/1070 are better off going back to dual mining ETH.

there is actually a 80-90 sol miner available, from silentarmy, very akin to amd, still nvidia can go as high as 134, really strange that no one besides djm34 figured it out yet...

Silentarmy doesn't reach those speeds on Nvidia army. Also DJMs miner was never confirmed, so no we don't know if it can reach 'as high as 134'.

[bensam1231]

Correction, there is silentarmy v5 out now, but no windows executables yet.