This is not the first flow, where ICO Utrust is attacked, and without much motivation. But in fact, with a strong desire, it was possible to gather reasons to distrust this project and more, given that it has been held for a long time and should soon end. Because of all the shortcomings of this project, only the lack of proper experience of some employees in the jurisprudence is indicated, then this project is not so bad.

The Rlpple coin is an illustrative example of the fact that the world's largest banks have stopped resisting the introduction of crypto currency and are using the advanced technology of blockchein in their day to improve the functioning of the banking system. Although the crypto currency will take a significant part of their clients from banks, and therefore profits, banks have nothing left to do but to reconcile themselves with this and look for opportunities for compromises and cooperation with digital money.

Externally, the Energia project looks promising. True, we still need to clarify some points. I, perhaps, will take part in this project. It would be good if the coin created in the course of it was successful and valuable among customers in the energy sector.

ICO is really decentralized, so it does not have a single management center. However, I do not agree that in the future almost all of them will be fraud. In the near future, the states will take measures to regulate the circulation of the crypto currency. At the same time, most of them will envisage measures to regulate the process of issuing original coins (ICO) in order to prevent possible fraud and protection of the rights of investors and other persons who participate in the ICO, because indeed such a problem has matured. Therefore, in the future, I hope ICO will remain decentralized in terms of project selection, organization and implementation, but the risks of fraud in it will be diminished.

Now the crypto currency in connection with the strengthening of its influence on the economy of almost every country enters the phase of its regulation by the states. On the one hand, without such regulation and recognition of the crypto currency as a legitimate means of payment, the crypto currency can not be widely introduced into the lives of citizens. On the other hand, such regulation would mean a significant limitation of anonymity in the conduct of transactions. In any case, the state will establish a tax on income from operations with crypto currency and when exchanging crypto currency for fiat it will establish rules of identification of a person with a view to levying this tax. This will mainly consist of state regulation of the crypto currency.

I do not think that in the foreseeable future, the etherium will outstrip bitcoin. Both coins are very promising and they have a future, but bitcoin is more popular and supportive, and the course between them is too different. However, in many ways it will depend on the team of developers of these coins, how quickly they will eliminate their emerging vulnerabilities and improve their technology. After all, it may happen that some other, more perfect coin will take a leading position.

Since investing in the ICO has become quite risky, and in relation to the crypto currency, States have begun to increasingly regulate, this regulation will affect the conduct of the ICO. Therefore, I think next year to participate in the campaigns for the initial release of coins will become more secure.

Bitcoin is the most reliable for investment and gives a stable profit in long-term investment in comparison with other violas. Still you can without special fears to deal with the well-known altcoyins listed above, but you need to know their features at the same time, but it's very risky to engage in little-known altkoins, here you can burn very much. In general, it is necessary to take into account the situation. Right now, after a fork, bitcoin will fall for a while, and altcoyins will grow.

I do not invest in ICO projects, but I participate in them in signature campaigns. I can say that most, about 80 percent, are successfully settled, some are not brought to the end because they do not raise enough funds, and the units are scammers. For example, the BeOne campaign seems to have been promising, but it turned out ... Now the ICO campaign is being conducted by the Milkcoin campaign, it's interesting that they do not issue their medals, invest in agriculture in the Voronezh region, Russia, and pay for the airwaves. This is something that is not very similar to ICO and smacks of fraud. But in general, I'm pleased that I participate in different ICOs and consider them necessary.

I think that the next fork on November 14 will be smoother and will not be as noisy as bifurcating gold. The Altcoins should now rise slightly in price and perhaps drop a bit before the fork. So who wants to buy altcoyins, while their rate is very low, now is the time. A bitcoin should now smoothly sink to correct its current course, especially since many now will partially sell it, again buying altas.

Now there is a very interesting and unusual ICO, which does not issue coins, and pays for participation in the campaign in the etherium. It's called Milcoin. This investment in agriculture in the Voronezh region of Russia. Most of the team is naturally Russian. Even the study of this project does not give an idea of ​​whether it will be a fraud or not. Although the probability of this is quite high. Especially given its features. Nevertheless, you just have to choose whether to participate or not.

You can not worry that the price of bitcoin gold after bifurcating it with bitcoin will be too high. The Yobit exchange started trading bitcoin gold even before its appearance as a result of the fork from yesterday, setting the exchange rate at 460 dollars. Since its course can not be very different by rules on other exchanges, its rate will fluctuate within these limits.

I do not see such a trend that bitcoin before the fork fell, and the etherium rose so that it could be discussed. Yes, bitcoin yesterday was about 6000 dollars, and now its rate is 5664 dollars, the etherium was 298 dollars, and now 302 dollars. The growth of the etherium is insignificant, but the rate of bitcoin is within its volatility. Today, he has lowered a little, tomorrow he will rise again. I do not think that for a drop in the bitcoin rate there were good reasons for that, such as increasing its offer on the stock exchanges through a massive drop.

If you want to get rid of your bitcoin gold, the Yobit exchange has already started trading bitcoin gold before the official fork part at a price of $ 460. True, the exchange made this opportunity for its customers, who at that time were trading bitcoin at the exchange. If you want to sell bitcoin yourself, then I think that after the bitcoin of gold appears in your wallet, you can do it already. At that time they will not be connected to each other.

The news about regulation of the ICO is generally good. However, the question is how to regulate it. It is possible to establish such rules for conducting it, that it will be practically impossible. So it's too early to rejoice. In addition, news from Russia constantly comes contradictory, so tomorrow they may be in this issue the opposite.

Centralized and fully adjustable Cryptor, even as its name suggests, is something between the crypto currency and the ruble. That is, in fact, it will be the same ruble, only in digital form. What happens and how much such a hybrid will be in demand, we will soon see. One thing is clear: Cryptoruble will go predominantly within Russia itself and it will be minimal to influence the decentralized Crypto currency.

In Russia, as far as I know, never forbidden cryptovata and prohibit its circulation there are not going to. From Russia, there is indeed conflicting information about the crypto currency, but recently they were going to introduce their national regulated digital currency, Cryptorubl, into which the 13 percent tax on profits from operations with crypto-currency should be already integrated. However, until now there is not adopted any regulatory act on the crypto currency.

I also agree that bitcoin Cash does not have a serious prospect in the future and will drop in the course due to a drop in demand for it and investor confidence. This coin turned out to be almost never used and unnecessary.

Bitcoin and other crypto currency, especially in recent years, strongly affects the national currencies of almost all states. The volume of trading on the crypto-exchange markets is measured in billions of dollars. Such amounts that are pumped from one region and one state to another unequivocally affect both the national currencies of specific states and their economies.

Bitcoin, like the other crypto currency, does not need banks to store these assets there. It's even a stupid idea. The most reliable bank for storage is cold storage in a digital purse. And the very meaning of such a bank is incomprehensible. This, in fact, should be a room with servers for storing information. I personally do not see the point in this.