I think that we will continue to use paper money for a long time, along with active circulation of digital money. In order for the society to turn completely to the use of the crypto currency, special conditions for a material, technological and psychological plan are needed. Some people will not want to use crypto currency and this will be their right. Will someone make them switch to crypto currency? I think not. I know that Sweden and Denmark announced that they want to completely switch to the use of digital money and that in a few years they plan to do it, but I doubt that they will succeed.

I also had a previous problem with the digital ID of the profile. The fact is that if you copy the link, being in your profile, the digital ID will not be. You need to send any message and when it is sent and the message appears, you need to click on your nickname, that is, the name of your profile and through it enter your profile. Already when this way you go to your profile, copy the link and there will already be a digital ID. Good luck.

When the Chinese government imposed restrictions and some bans on the crypto currency in September, it motivated its actions by saying that it sees a threat to its economy in the crypto currency, because the money supply can pass uncontrollably from the country through the crypto currency.
    In countries with an authoritarian form of government, they are simply afraid to lose universal control over the flow of money and actions with the crypto currency of their citizens, since the movement of the crypto currency is relatively anonymous.

We should welcome the work of the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to maintain reasonable control over the proposal for the production of initial coins (ICO), which recently turned into a not entirely honest type of business to raise funds from credulous investors. It is necessary that this activity is regulated in each country, then potential fraudsters will find it rather difficult to implement their criminal plans. It is necessary to restore confidence in the ICO, because in general this is a very necessary and useful activity.

Not so happy is the rise of bitcoin to its record level, which it reached last time, as the increase in litecoin rate by 71 percent and ethereum by 30 percent. The Altcoins are now very undervalued and would like the market to level off towards the Altocoys. In bitcoin, there is potential for growth, and he will take his, but the altkoins in connection with the growth of bitcoins have been oppressed for quite some time.

Such a large number of transactions - 400 000 per day, this indicates that interest in bitkoyu as payment means increases. In addition, it is necessary to take into account the approach of New Year and Christmas holidays, on the eve of which people are forced to make different purchases.
     I think that the situation of bitcoin bandwidth will improve as the "lightning" project is implemented, which ensures fast transactions, including small transactions and with commission charges of less than one dollar.

If the platform is Munched. Inc did indeed violate the requirements and did not register before holding its ICO due to the fact that the produced tons are recognized as securities, then imposing certain sanctions on it is a logical and lawful decision. This should be done in the future, because the activity on the initial issue of coins (ICO) has recently been associated with greater risks of fraud. If such activities are registered and verified, the credibility of the ICO will return and will increase.

With such a greatly increased volume of trading in the crypto currency, it would be foolish to prohibit bitcoin in South Korea. This country would lose a lot of income from this step and a general revival of the economy. Yes, and the announced decision to ban crypto currency looked somehow strange on the background of previous loyalty to it. Therefore, the decision to regulate it, and the regulation is really reasonable, is a wise decision of the South Korean leadership. Now South Korea is one of the leading places in the volume of trading in the crypto currency and, apparently, this state of affairs will continue in the future.

The fact that the price of gold falls against the backdrop of rising costs of bitcoins is quite logical and logical. The yield of bitkoyna this year exceeded 1500 percent. Such income does not give either gold, not one of the world's banks for deposits or other legitimate business activities. Therefore, people invest in bitcoin, and not in gold, as a result of which gold falls in value. While the bitcoin rate will grow rapidly, the gold rate will accordingly fall. This state of affairs will continue as long as bitkoyn more or less stabilizes in price, or its growth will not be so significant.

The price bokoynana recently really got out of all the previous forecasts, increasing so much that no one expected it. And it happened too quickly. Bitcoin increased in value every few hours per thousand dollars, which caused mixed reactions and talk that such a sharp increase will negatively affect the image of bitcoin as an unstable crypto currency. As for controllability, it should not be manageable if we say that it is decentralized.

Whether bitcoin will be the leader of the crypto currency in the future, depends to a large extent on the bitcoin itself, or rather on the team of its developers. If bitkoyn will constantly improve and timely eliminate the shortcomings, then he can be a leader for an infinitely long time. Recently, it has accumulated quite a few shortcomings and this caused a lot of talk about how bitcoins became obsolete, became slow, and transactions became quite expensive. Very timely became the improvement bitkoyna associated with the introduction of the project "lightning", which will allow to solve almost all of its problems with the slowness and high transaction costs. If such improvements become regular, bitcoin will be number one crypto currency for a very long time.

I think entering the crypto currency market of large financial companies will have little effect on reducing bitcoat volatility. Volatility will be significantly reduced when a significant part of the world's population will use bitkoyn and when it reaches its sustainable price level. While bitkomnom enjoys a small part of the population, its volatility will manifest itself every time when the market will be any changes or will receive relevant information that may affect the market change.

It is possible that by the end of next year bitkoyn can go on a course of 50 000 dollars. In the first decade of December, he already showed us what he is capable of. Given the last uncontrolled rise in the price of bitcoins, such a course no longer seems impossible.
     Concerning the quoted opinion that next year we can see the first crypto currency, which will be created and supported by the government, and it is hinted that it will be from China, deserves special attention. Many states have announced the creation of their own crypto currency, but so far we have not seen such a crypto currency.

If bitkoyn will grow unregulated in its value, and then also sharply fall in price, and this movement will be repeated, governments of different countries will be forced to restrict bitokoy in circulation in order to protect their economies from unbalancing. Therefore, in order to grow and develop as a financial instrument integrated into the economy of most countries, we need to ensure that bitkoyn grows smoothly and its volatility is not so great.

Bitcoin can not be attributed to the Ponzi scheme, because it does not conform to such a scheme and is not a fraud. Bitcoin is to some extent a financial bubble, but not a Ponzi scheme. Some properties of the bubble bubble have due to the fact that, being unsecured, it grows in price by increasing demand for it, and demand is growing, because its price is growing and people are investing in it, hoping to profit from its growth in value.

The way it is. Recently I read that most of China's crypto-currency traders are women. I can not even explain the reason for this phenomenon. Do Chinese housewives spend their free time at home using a computer? Very versatile Chinese women.

With this reasoning, I completely disagree. In principle, bitcoin is not much different from other digital coins. It is very popular because it was the first crypto currency and very high in value, because as the first crypto currency became very widely known, while some other types of crypto currency are still unknown to the broad public stake. The Altkoins play and will continue to play a very big role in our life, until they simply have not yet manifested themselves, since the crypto currency and the infrastructure under it are only developing. This can not be done in a few years, since the crypto currency is too revolutionary and unusual.

The fact that bitkoyn does not play any role in the real world, such a statement does not correspond to reality. Bitkoyn now has a strong influence on the economy of most countries. China even recognized bitcoin as a threat to the economy of its country. For bitkoyn it is possible to buy now almost everything, having paid directly to them as a means of payment, or before transferring it to fiat. Therefore, we can not assume that it does not affect the real world in any way.

To sell now bitkoyn or not, it's personal. Now, probably, many partially translate bitcoin into fiat, or are just preparing to buy for bitkoyn in connection with the New Year holidays and Christmas. In addition to the usual correction bitcoin, perhaps this also affects him in lowering his course. We will see if it will stay in place for some time, or even drop a little, then, most likely, it is. So it was a good time to use the bitcoin stop and take some profit. However, it must be borne in mind that soon again bitkoyn will quickly rise up.

Becoming bitcoin as a digital currency and recognizing it as a legal tender will take a very long time. However, in the end, I think bitkoyn will be recognized as legitimate in almost all states. Crypto currency is so new and peculiar kind of financial calculations that its appearance has caused an ambiguous reaction of different states, which are still studying it and trying to classify it as a subject of financial relations.