If it were easy to find fraudulent ICO projects, then the problem with fraud in ICO projects would have been solved long ago. However, identifying them is not so easy, and the possibilities in us are limited. And fraudsters invent new ways of fraud. I believe that government regulation of ICO activities will be a reliable way to defeat fraud in ICO projects. Many states are taking certain steps in this direction.

Now produced stable coins that are not equal to the dollar. Japan, Switzerland, produces its stable coin, equal to its national currency. Going to release Russia, South Korea. I think that in the future there will be a lot of them. It is also necessary to distinguish between ordinary centralized coins of various states and stable coins of such states. Stable coins can only have a price equivalent to their currencies. They greatly simplify the work with cryptocurrency.

Of course. Anyone who demands money from bounty hunters in any form should be considered fraudsters. There are certain cases in which we may be asked to provide assistance, however this should be on a voluntary basis and not be related to our earnings.
The fraudsters will continue to show their activity in this regard and we need to be very careful.

If all governments have banned the circulation of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies, I think that after a certain time they would cease to exist. Most people would not have long relied on government bans, and the state’s exchange and cryptocurrency exchange platforms would close. Separate groups of people would still use cryptocurrency, but it would not play much value.
However, we see that in practice this is unlikely to happen. The main states have already legalized cryptocurrency or are going to do it. Cryptocurrency continues to develop successfully.

There is no other way out. Bitcoin will remain with high price volatility. To others he cannot yet be by nature. What it will be at the same time means of payment, time will tell. It is most likely that it will be used for expensive goods and services. If its functionality does not fundamentally change for the better, then it will be ineffective for small purchases.

I agree with your opinion. The market of cryptocurrency can not constantly grow in value. If the price of Bitcoin continued to be pumped up in early 2018, the consequences would have been much worse. Now the cryptocurrency market has fallen, however, the projects of coins and tokens continue to develop. This provides a good basis for the development of cryptocurrency in the future. So do not panic. you need to calmly prepare for the slower growth of the cryptocurrency market.

No, there will be no benefit from such early learning of cryptocurrency for children, we will only get additional insoluble problems. Children must first obtain the necessary basic knowledge. The cryptocurrency market is not for the child's mind, there will be many problems, including suicide through failures in cryptocurrency. Everything has its time.

Such databases on liners and bullets have long existed in all countries. In any case, this is in my country and I came across information about the existence of such a base in the United States and other countries by the nature of my work. However, only individual specialists from the Ministry of Internal Affairs have access to this database. Employees of the relevant government agencies, expert organizations send written requests and receive information from such a database. If an unidentified bullet or cartridge case appears in a criminal proceeding, the investigator must appoint an examination, and one of the questions should be the question of the coincidence of traces on the bullet and cartridge cases with the data available in that database. In this case, the expert is obliged to send already photos of unidentified bullets and cartridge cases with their detailed description to this database. This is how it all works.

I do not see any sense for everyone to release their own cryptocurrency. The meaning of money is not in their availability, but in what they provide and how they are provided. If you just release your cryptocurrency, without real features and product, these will be useless badges without any cost. Better not to do it. There are so many useless cryptocurrencies on the market now.

It is necessary to use new technologies, including cryptocurrency to generate income, but to keep earned best in proven values, such as gold. Cryptocurrency and gold can and should complement each other. A smart person will use the best qualities of these two values, and not oppose each other. I can only say that as a means of accumulating value, bitcoin loses to gold because of its high volatility.

Investors have too few opportunities to test the ICO team and its project. Therefore, no matter how much potential investors try to test the ICO team for the possibility of fraud, in many cases this possibility will remain the same. Only government regulation of ICO activities can have a positive effect. It is government agencies that are well placed to prevent fraud and punish the perpetrators if they occur. Taking other measures will not have the desired effect.

The KYC check generally has nothing to do with banning several accounts from this forum at the same time. This topic came up along the way to justify such verification. The ICO team is actually a temporary association of citizens with a commercial purpose. They are prohibited on their own initiative to collect confidential information about other citizens.
The KYC check is used exclusively for the prevention of money laundering and the fight against the financing of terrorism. Now tell me what relation, as bounty hunters, can we have to laundering dirty money and financing terrorism? If you think there are other special powers on the ICO team, please grant them. In the meantime, the KYC check on bounty hunters should be considered the usual fraud by the ICO team.

Any positive outlook will also have a positive effect on the cryptocurrency market. However, any technical forecasts are not perfect and can not cover all market trends, and therefore do not reflect a complete and reliable situation and therefore can not objectively predict the market behavior in the future. Such forecasts should be considered as one of the possible variants of the development of events on the market, but not as a guide to action.

Decentralized cryptocurrency is very disadvantageous to governments and states. In practice, it largely competes with them. Therefore, governments are clearly not interested and can not be the creators of decentralized cryptocurrency. Now cryptocurrency delivers a lot of problems to governments and in the future there will be even more. Therefore, I do not think that governments may be involved in the creation of cryptocurrency. This is absolutely not logical.

It is hardly necessary to argue that cryptocurrency is not intended for use by people. There is practically no such area of ​​activity where one could argue that it is not intended for people. Another thing is that certain types of activities require special knowledge and training. Cryptocurrency, contrary to the opinion of some, also requires special knowledge and experience. In order to fully engage in cryptocurrency, and most importantly, to protect it, ordinary household knowledge is not enough. Therefore, for the mass user, cryptocurrency needs to be simplified.

Yes, we need stable coins and at the same time it is better that they are different and supported by different currencies. With the advent of stable coins, it has become easier and more convenient to work with cryptocurrency. This is a kind of buffer between different types of cryptocurrency, between which there are no direct pairs for exchange, or if you need to hold funds for some time without withdrawing from cryptocurrency until a certain moment.

Yes, now the situation with ICO projects is kind of very strange. In order for investors to give their money to strangers, they also provide their confidential data and copies of the documents required absolutely arbitrarily. At the same time, the ICO teams receiving this do not themselves pass any KYC checks and in many cases turn out to be scammers.
ICO teams must be tested in front of the relevant government agencies that must monitor this process in order to prevent fraud in this type of activity. Hope this will be soon.

I also read that STO is tokenized shares, but I have little idea how it all works at the fundraising and ICO stage, and most importantly, tokens are paid to the bounty hunters in this case or not? If so, then there will probably be different platforms, different forms of payment, in general, this is all new and again complicated and confusing. I still prefer the old ERC-20.

A KYC check is illegal for bounty hunters, but if it is carried out, then it must of course be carried out before the bounty hunters begin their work. This is quite logical, since this process is not regulated, it does not have general rules for its conduct and to the required information and to provide copies of documents. Some bounty hunters due to various life situations cannot provide some of the required documents and therefore they need to clearly see if they will be able to pass the KYC test or not. Many ICOs already write directly whether a KYC check will be conducted or not, and if so, they provide the opportunity to pass it immediately. And it is right.

Paying bounty hunters on a weekly or bi-weekly basis is not realistic. Too much work for the ICO team. But payment on a monthly basis, especially in those projects where ICOs last four to six, and even more than a month, is quite realistic. In some ICO projects, they do. It would also be nice if half of the funds were paid in new tokens, and the other half were in ethereum.