Of course, if you purchased a cryptocurrency at the peak of its price at the end of 2017, then one of the best ways to save your invested funds will be their further retention until they again rise to the previous record price. What to do with this cryptocurrency further should depend on how promising the blow job itself or token is how successful their project is.
However, just holding coins is not the most successful method of making a profit. It is best to combine cryptocurrency with partial trading with significant decreases and increases in its price.

It is never too late to choose and buy altcoins. However, now we see a slow steady rise in the cryptocurrency market, which means that the Altcoins have begun to rise in price. Therefore, it is no longer necessary to hesitate, however, they should be chosen with special care not to invest in useless coins. For inexperienced investors better suited coins. listed at the top of the CoinMarketCap table.

I wish it were. I used to use wallets with ERC-20 tokens and participate in ICO projects that release their tokens on the ethereum platform. Therefore, I practically do not participate in the campaigns of the ICO bounty, where you do not need to have MyEtherWallet wallets.
Ethereum has all chances to be the first platform for smart contracts. For the time being, improvements are being made to this coin and two more stages of the next improvements are planned.

Right. A small number of exchanges means their greater centralization. Therefore, the more exchange we have, the more difficult it will be for states to track us. Therefore, I believe that we need the more exchangers. Some of them will be closed all the time for various objective and subjective reasons. The more there will be in the world of exchangers, the more competition will be among them and the better conditions we will have as their customers.

Yes, I keep in my wallets a lot of tokens, received as a result of participation in the bounty campaigns ICO. However, it seems to me that it is still too early to conclude that many of them are useless. For the development of many projects need a long time, up to several years. Therefore, I do not lose hope. Of course, some of the tokens seem useless and we knew that this would happen. However, the rest of the tokens should bring us a good profit. In the world of cryptocurrency, losses are always unavoidable and need to be put up with.

Yes, I also agree with you. The cryptocurrency created by banks is likely to be more like a stable cryptocurrency if such a centralized cryptocurrency is supported by the state and has national status. Only the centralized cryptocurrency of individual state bodies and commercial structures will create their own centralized cryptocurrency, which can bring profit to their owners. It is difficult to predict the popularity of such coins and the demand for them.

Yes, I agree that these are two advantages of IEO over ICO projects. This slightly reduces the risk of investors losing money. However, the same risk of fraud remains the same, since the exchanges cannot conduct a comprehensive review of the submitted projects and their teams. In all other respects, IEO projects are the same ICO projects and no one is immune from the fact that after the fundraising, the IEO teams will not leave their projects without further implementation and their tokens will not become useless.

I also agree that the ethereum coin would be the best investment in this case. Now it is relatively cheap and, given its constant demand, this coin will continue to grow well in value. In addition, we see that the team of this coin has recently intensified and is improving it, as well as two more stages of improvement are planned.
Of course, the throne is also considered a promising coin. Partially can be purchased and this coin.

I think that such a danger exists. Certain states may well prohibit the circulation of coins with a high degree of anonymity and Japan is an example of such an attitude towards anonymous cryptocurrencies. It is alarming precisely because. that Japan as a whole has a very friendly cryptocurrency policy. Therefore, it is possible that many other states will follow the example of Japan. However, I think the community will come up with an optimal way out of this situation for using anonymous cryptocurrencies. It may be decentralized exchanges that will be located in offshore zones.

John McAfee just attracts attention. On his name, he recently earns a good idea. Therefore, do not pay special attention to his words. Even if we assume that he knows who is hiding under the name of the creator of Bitcoin Satoshi Nakamoto. then without hard evidence his words mean nothing. If Satoshi himself does not want to show up, no one can force him to do this. But it seems that he is not going to do it.

What are you, however, naive. With the spread of cryptocurrency, nothing substantial will happen in this world. Cryptocurrency will become one of the types of non-cash forms of payment and will go along with the national currencies of the states.
No state will ever give up their national money. It is vseravno what to abandon the regulation of its economy and give it into the hands of a foreign state

If the Chinese government prohibits mining Bitcoin, I think that nothing will change. About the prohibition of mining Bitcoin in China, they say about two years. During this time, many with their farms left China for other countries and there are mining cryptocurrency. So I do not see any problems. Let them finally decide in China what they want, and this uncertainty that has been going on for two years is annoying.

Of course not. Bitcoin or other decentralized cryptocurrency will not be able to affect banks or other financial institutions so as to be the reason for the termination of their activities. Banks, especially state-owned, are under the direct protection of the state. Their activities will always be in demand by the state, as well as legal entities for servicing businesses and individuals for lending, depositing and receiving other types of services.
Yes, Bitcoin and can not damage the banks. In the future, after the legalization of cryptocurrency, they will exist together and complement the capabilities of each other.

If the ICO teams do not accept national documents for their KYC checks, then I’m absolutely sure that such a KYC check is carried out after the ICO and it is carried out only in order for artificial reasons not to pay to the head hunters the tokens they earned.
It should be said that the KYC check on bounty hunters is generally illegal, since it should be carried out only with the aim of preventing the laundering of dirty money and fighting the financing of terrorism. ICO bounty campaigners do not invest in ICO projects and therefore cannot be suspected of laundering dirty money or financing terrorists. Therefore, only KYC investors can be tested. ICO teams are now abusing their rights, taking advantage of the fact that this activity is not yet regulated.

I doubt that Sweden will really refuse to use cash. In my opinion, this is not yet possible. Of course, technically highly developed countries with high incomes of citizens can try to switch exclusively to non-cash forms of payment. However, it seems to me that there will always be situations. when cash is needed.

I have repeatedly asked questions to the ICO team and everyone who is associated with bounty hunters on their behalf on the basis of what legal document they require to pass KYC bounty hunters and that this document says about the participants of the ICO bounty campaign. I never received any answer on the essence of this question. I am also confident that everyone who writes on the forum that ICO teams have the right to require us to undergo KYC checks have no idea about such a right.
It is illegal to require ICO bounty campaigners to pass KYC checks. I hope that when there will be government regulation of ICO activities, such a check against us will disappear.

Of course, the cryptocurrency market will fall more than once and will recover and grow more than once. We need patience and an understanding of the characteristics of this market. It develops cyclically, since it is practically not secured and its price is formed solely on the basis of the relationship between supply and demand. Smart people will stay in crypto at any price.

Now the situation is really very difficult for bounty hunters. This type of activity no longer brings profit, which would justify this type of activity. Therefore, it is logical that many have left this occupation. Only those who consider this occupation as a hobby and have the need to simply communicate on the topic of cryptocurrency will be active participants in this forum for a long time. We are sure that the initial offer of coins will be revived, perhaps even in a different form, but this will be because this is the main way of developing cryptocurrency. In this regard, we need to continue to follow the events in the world of cryptocurrency and one of the good options in this is this forum.

National money of the states will not disappear neither in a hundred, nor in two hundred years. Don't be so naive. As long as there are different states with different conflicting interests and there will be economic, political and military conflicts in the world, until then every state will have its own currency. So it was, is and always will be. If you believe that in a few decades world peace will come, which has not yet existed on the planet since the appearance of the first human civilization, then this is a very bold and stupid statement.

We already have a lot of currencies that are used by most countries and can be considered world currencies.
World currency can hardly be based on the Internet. If it is a generally accepted world currency, it should have guarantees of security, stability, security, and so on. The currency that will exist on the Internet cannot meet such criteria. In any case, a decentralized cryptocurrency can hardly be a world currency. I admit the possibility of a world centralized cryptocurrency of one of the most powerful state or union of states.