Many governments really dislike cryptocurrency for several reasons. First of all, it is almost impossible to control the movement of funds in the cryptocurrency. This is not the currency of a particular country, which is created by a certain state and the same state is supported in price. Cryptocurrency is not supported by anyone in its value and, as a rule, is not provided with anything. Therefore, it will always have a very high price volatility. Due to high price spikes, many countries call the bitcoin bubble and this makes it difficult to legalize cryptocurrency.

Now it is very dangerous to invest in ICO projects. This is primarily due to the presence of many fraudulent ICO projects, which are already quite difficult to distinguish from real ones, as well as the current poor state of the cryptocurrency market, in which even promising ICO projects cannot collect even the minimum amount through investor passivity. Even many bounty hunters are wondering if it is worth joining ICO's bounty campaigns in this market condition.

Yes, the MyEtherWallet wallet is pretty reliable and easy to use. When you create it, you get the public address of the wallet and the private or secret key. The secret key is a long set of numbers and letters that cannot be picked up or decrypted. You can enter the wallet from any device, it is important not to get to a phishing site with a similar name. However, it is better to browse the contents of the wallet using the etherscan function. io, in which only the address of the wallet is entered. Thus, we once again do not enter the secret key. For security reasons, you can use me and some other precautionary measures, which is not superfluous.

For example, I sometimes think about what would happen if Bitcoin lost its high level of capitalization and in the level of capitalization ethereum would be in the first place, however, it was very little ahead of the others. Does this mean that not a single coin would have a strong price domination, as Bitcoin now has such dominance? Would then all types of cryptocurrency be independent in their pricing from other coins? In general, this would be very good. Indeed, the market would then be free. I really do not like the price dominance of Bitcoin over other types of cryptocurrency.

I believe that people have the right to anonymity. It is not always necessary to disclose all your actions to the public. I see nothing wrong with that. I think that anonymous coins have the right to circulate regardless of the fact that they can be used for criminal purposes. Criminals - this is a problem law enforcement agencies.

The national cash money of the states will not disappear in the near future. And what will happen next, nobody knows. However, I doubt that people are satisfied only with non-cash money and cryptocurrency. I personally see that there are constantly a lot of cases when cash is simply irreplaceable. Still, I tend to think that fiat will never disappear.

Yes you are right. Large investments in cryptocurrency do not always play a crucial role in making good profits. Sometimes a small investment is enough, however, in that coin or token that will develop and grow in value. It may even be a particularly obscure coin or token. Some tokens have risen in price hundreds of thousands and millions of times.

So far I do not see real improvements for business opportunities with the advent of cryptocurrency. Until the states legalize cryptocurrency, until it is allowed as a means of payment by the tax authorities, business structures will not use cryptocurrency en masse. In addition, a very big problem for a business is too much cryptocurrency volatility. For the time being we cannot even say for sure whether it will be profitable for a business to use cryptocurrency for its activities.

People are still massively investing in cryptocurrency and keep it in the hope of making a good profit from the increase in its value. As long as this profit is big, it will always be. Moreover, the infrastructure for the direct use of cryptocurrency as a means of payment is very poorly developed. In addition, it is quite difficult: to buy cryptocurrency to just buy goods for it does not make much sense. It's easier to use the usual currency.
I think that when the practical use of tokens increases, only then their turnover and the value of cryptocurrency as a means of payment will grow.

And why should we, in fact, have a single currency? Each currency and each type of currency has its advantages and disadvantages. Depending on the dignity we are going to use, we choose a specific type of currency. I hope you are not for using a single type of shoe? This is about the same.
  In addition, if such a large number of states continue to exist in the world, then the varieties of currencies will continue. After all, each state will use its own currency. International or global will be the currency that will be recognized and enshrined in the relevant agreements of states. Due to various factors, I do not think it will be a cryptocurrency.

If a cryptocurrency, including Bitcoin, is not yet regulated by the state, which is still present in most countries, then its circulation in the country, as a general rule, should be recognized as legal. Also, if the rules establishing taxation in a particular state have not yet been introduced, then the cryptocurrency can be freely used without fear of the tax authorities.
Only when the cryptocurrency will be legalized by the state, from now on, you need to know the rules established by them for the circulation of cryptocurrency and be guided by them.

Most likely, these managers have so far ceased their activities in the ICO generosity campaigns, because these projects are going through a very bad time and rarely one of them even reaches Softcap, so they don’t want to participate in deliberately losing projects, so that later they would be accused of not paying tokens. If the market starts to recover, I think that these managers will appear again. We assume that they went on vacation.

Fraud is a crime, and therefore states can unite in the fight against this global evil. For this there is Interpol, orders in the framework of international agreements, and work through diplomatic channels, if there are no such agreements. However, it would be better if states set up an ICO regulatory authority and checked the ICO teams for possible fraud.

I see that optimism in the forecasts of growth of the cryptocurrency market for this year decreases as we move towards the end of the year. If the figures were previously called 40 000 dollars and. more as a bitcoin price by the end of the year, now the figure of 10,000 looks more than modest. Many no longer pin their hopes for this year.
It seems that 2018 will go down in the history of the development of cryptocurrency as not the most successful.

Blockchaine is a technology, and just a technology cannot replace such a multifunctional structure as banks. If you mean Bitcoin, then he can not replace the banks. Banks perform various useful for the state and for people functions that neither cryptocurrency nor its blockchaine technology can perform.
And in general, banks will remain as long as the state exists, because banks serve the country's economy. If there is any threat to the existence of banks, the state will eliminate any threat, including the prohibition of any cryptocurrency, if it interferes with the functioning of banks.

Do you think that such a Bitcoin will be able to rise in price to one hundred thousand dollars? Let's see how Bitcoin comes out of this situation after the rise in the price of up to $ 20,000. In many ways, the popularity of Bitcoin will depend on how it behaves in the coming months before the new year, as well as after it. However, if Bitcoin begins to grow in price, many will now try to sell them at a high price, and it will again start falling. However, everything can be. Cryptocurrency market is very unpredictable.

Bitcoin, like any other decentralized cryptocurrency, can never be stable in its price. The price of bitcoin depends entirely on the ratio of supply and demand in the market, and supply and demand depends on many factors and can never be constant.
Common currency is always supported by the state, its central banks. It is also provided with gold reserves of the country and gross domestic product, that is, all movable and immovable property of this country. This is not in a decentralized cryptocurrency.

We have already witnessed a strong upward surge in the price of bitcoin in December last year. Almost a year has passed and we still ask ourselves the question whether bitcoin will recover in price or not. If bitcoin had grown slowly and progressively during this time, there would have been no particular problems, and now the price of bitcoin would be far beyond $ 10,000. I am for a bit of bitcoin volatility with slow overall price growth. This, in my opinion, is the most optimal model that would suit everyone.

Regardless of our desire, fiat will not disappear anywhere and no cryptocurrency, neither decentralized nor centralized, will replace it. No government will ever make such a decision. The national money of each state always reflects the state of the economy of this state and is always associated with it. Cryptocurrency is in no way connected with the economy of any state and therefore cannot replace with itself national money. She can walk only along with national money and in this plan will really coexist with her. There are no other options here.

Some interesting thoughts on this forum. Suppose there was negative information about Bitcoin, there was a big panic, Bitcoin devalued, collapsed. Yes, for some time there will be confusion in the market. However, then everything will settle down and line up in a new system. Now each cryptocurrency is able to work independently. The choice of the exchange mechanism, the selection of pairs, these are already technical details. This, of course, is simplistic, but I see no reason for the market to disappear in this case.