Recently, I read a topic in this forum as in January 2014, the question of whether ethereum was a fraud was discussed. Many agreed that at that time the new coin, which had separated from bitcoin, was fraud. Now no one doubts that ethereum is quite a promising coin, which now as a workhorse performs many of its useful functions.
        Now, I see, the situation with the bitcoin that has recently separated from Bitcoin, bitcoin gold and bitcoquine diamond, is about the same. Why, in fact, resent? If these coins prove to be useless, much less fraudulent, they will just wither away and leave the market.

Providing a national currency with gold and oil, this is something original. This is a peculiar combination of cryptovata and ordinary fiat money. I think, no matter how much the president of Venezuela is criticized, such an experiment must be supported and watched closely. We need similar experiments to choose the best model for the functioning of the crypto currency.

The last coins, bitkoyn cash, bitkoyn gold and bitkoyn diamond, separated from the bitcoin, in my opinion, advertise the same improvements - increasing the level of confidentiality, reducing the time of the transaction and reducing the amount of commission fees for the transaction. There are also some differences between them. However, I do not like this uniformity, although improvements are very necessary. Will these coins, in particular, bitkoyn diamond better than the original bitkoyna, time will tell. While there was not enough time that they could show themselves and, accordingly, give them an assessment.

Undoubtedly, when it comes to crypto-currency, most people perceive it as a talk about bitkoyne, which indicates that while bitkoyn was and is the main one among the crypto currency. However, such a situation will exist until people start to become more interested in crypto currency and find that the crypto currency is not only bitkoyn, but also more than a thousand different altcoins, many of which are interesting in their own way.

While we can only observe all these forks, since we can not influence this process. I, in principle, still hope that the coins detached from bitcoin will later refuse to have a positive influence on the formation of a perfect crypto currency. In any case, I am for a healthy market competition between bitcoin and his clones. Only in this way can they develop and improve. If bitkoyn exists monopolistically, this can have a negative effect on the quality of the entire crypto currency.

In my opinion, altcoyins clearly have a good future, but not all. Altkoins are mainly created as a result of ICO for some narrow purposes of marketing, finance, services and so on. If the projects were thought out, then the coins themselves will be useful and have a perspective.

It seems to me that investing in cash in cash is not without meaning. The original bitkoyn is now overvalued, it is inflated artificially and can later fall sharply in value. In addition, it accumulates flaws, which for a long time are not eliminated. The way out of this situation is just bitkoyn cash, which is largely devoid of the disadvantages of the original bitcoin and therefore is quite promising.

The price bikoyoyna compared with altkoinami really high and it is created, in my opinion artificially. Everything consists in the fact that bitkoyn is the first and well-known crypto currency, which is very popular. Most people know about bitkoyne and that it rises sharply in price, so they also invest in bitcoin because of the opportunity to make a big profit. Therefore altcoyins remain simply underestimated and with low cost. This state of affairs with the price of bitcoin leads to the fact that it is inflated artificially and this can further adversely affect both the bitcoin itself and the entire crypto currency.

Thus, only in December we have two forks with the formation of a super-bottle and bitto lightning. It seems to me that the situation with forks is that the original bitcoin does not develop or improve itself. Therefore, the forks are aimed at creating new clones of bitcoins with improvements that could be given to the bitcoin itself without the formation of its branches.
     As for carrying out the number of ICOs, the situation here is different. In principle, good ICO projects are aimed at the work of new coins in some narrow sphere of technology, finance, management and other areas where blockchein technology can be applied. This is a very necessary work, but it is compromised by the conduct of ICO with elements of fraud. ICO will be held for a long time, as long as this is necessary. Ultimately, the need to conduct an ICO will be regulated by the market itself, which will discard all useless and leave only worthwhile projects.

Apparently, no forks in December this year with the formation bitkoyn silver will not. Probably, it was still a joke after fork bitcoin gold. There was information that in the middle of December there will be another fork with the formation of some
 superbitoid. No specific information about this superbit was received.

ETN already by the New Year may cost $ 500, if yesterday its rate was $ 464. True, today he fell a few dollars. However, this is very good, given that he spent too long standing at around $ 300. I hope that it will continue to rise in value because, in my opinion, it is too undervalued, although it has a good perspective.

Do not promise that you will not buy bitkoyn in cash. Still everything can change and your opinion on this matter as well. Why do I have a non-functional bitcoin? It will soon be used as a container of value, not as a means of payment, since the transaction time is too long, and the commission costs are decent. Is it not better to use those coins that do not have such problems? There remains the difference in price. However, it is also very volatile.

Yes, ethereum is now really on the rise, now its rate is 466 dollars and I am very pleased that it has finally become quite good to rise in price. I think that it was underestimated compared to the functions that it performs at a given time. In addition, this may help and shake the rest of the altcoyins.

If investors were more careful in choosing projects for investment, potential scammers would be less likely to raise money from a contrived ICO project. Therefore, illegible investment of their funds in these projects allow fraudsters to make huge profits and deceive investors. In general, I think that the issue of state regulation of the process of issuing initial coins has long been ripe. It is necessary to identify the persons who are going to engage in this activity and some kind of primary evaluation of the project itself.

Like all investments, investing in ICO projects involves a certain risk. In connection with the great popularity of ICO, large and easy money collections, the number of frauds in their conduct increased, or simply projects are prepared badly and they do not reach the planned results. Due to the increased risk for investors, some states prohibit the conduct of ICO, and some try to regulate them to reduce risks and protect investors. Therefore, before investing, you need to carefully study both the project and the team that will conduct it.

Bitcoin in cash has some significant improvements over the original bitcoin. In addition, the miners switch to mining exactly bitkoyn cash because of the fact that it is easier to mine. Many now invest in bitcoin cash and expect that its value will increase in the near future. He has already shown himself, flying up to 2500 dollars. Now his rate is around 1200 dollars and I think that despite the fact that bitkoyn cash is criticized by many, he has a good future.

Already, the Crypto currency has a strong impact on the economy of various states. While it is too early to determine the results of such an impact. However, the Crypto-currency forces states to reckon with it and accept it as a legitimate means of payment.

The universe is very diverse and, probably, it has everything. I also read about the discovery of a large cloud in a space of many hundreds of millions of kilometers, consisting of alcohol. As for gold, if some of it were delivered to Earth, gold would immediately depreciate and cost no more than the utility of it as an ordinary metal. This also applies to bitcoin. To have value, it was limited to 21 million. If it was about as many as one type of tokens is sometimes issued, and be called a billion-one and a half, it would also be very cheap. Everything depends on the relationship between demand and supply.

If bitcoin cash outperforms the original bitcoin for some of its features, including a higher throughput of transactions, then surely, users will choose a more successful version of the bitcoin. These are the laws of business and the market. Therefore, I do not see anything unusual if large companies will switch to the use of bitcoin in cash.

We do not have time to react to the contradictory statements of various statesmen in Russia. And these statements are diametrically opposed. Regarding the great opportunities for holding an ICO in Russia and the availability of various ideas for young people about this, there are already a lot of complaints against Russians about a significant part of the fraudulent ICO