I belong to a camp that believes that altcoyins are very useful and deserve to survive, no matter how many of them there were. Indeed, a lot is created by carrying out unnecessary tokens ICO, mostly because they earn on the ICO itself and therefore their teams are not interested in and do not support their generated tokens. Also many ICO projects are just fraudulent. However, even the few useful tokens that are created from the introduction of promising and necessary projects in general deserve such an activity to continue. Unnecessary tokens vseravno later withdraw from the market and do no harm to anyone. The crypto-currency market filters them quite well.
The main problem of ICO projects is possible fraud on the part of their team. Such a problem will exist until state bodies or public organizations control their transparency and protect the rights of investors. Attempts to create a regulatory framework for this have already been undertaken in France, Russia, Japan, Australia. Therefore, the solution of this basic issue in the activities of the ICO should soon move from its place.

We can imagine that this will be for the regulation of the crypto currency and its legalization in Russia, if there by means of this they are going to struggle with illegal withdrawal of funds abroad. This will be an almost complete ban on the use of crypto currency. Therefore, I would not particularly be happy that Russia is going to be friends with the crypto currency. There politicians and government officials have already talked so much different and contradictory about the crypto currency that it is necessary to finally see what they are taking out of specific laws there. I do not think that the laws in Russia will be friendly to the crypto currency. This is a country with an authoritarian way of management.

While there is no other way than to go through their mistakes, people do not. Not everyone has the desire and ability to first learn the crypto currency, especially its technical side, and only then try to use it for earnings. People will inevitably come to the crypto currency almost with zero knowledge about it with the sole purpose of earning money. Therefore, the crypto-currency market will continue to develop in large leaps. People will come to the crypto currency, lose their money and leave. In their place will come new. This is unavoidable.

Now, only a few percent of the world's population is engaged in crypto currency. Therefore, it is still too early to say that people are ready to use it. Older people, apparently, will never use crypto currency. Most likely, a whole generation will pass for the situation to change. First of all, it is necessary to fully legalize and support the crypto currency from the state. With such a skeptical attitude of people to crypto-currency without its state support, the process of transition to its use by all people will continue indefinitely.

I have not yet seen the ICO team demanding to pass a KYC check, referred to any regulatory legal acts that give them the right to demand from us as participants in the generosity campaign of their ICO project, the right to conduct such verification. Not state bodies, but civilians, often being fraudsters, require us to provide our identification data and copies of documents, while themselves, in fact, remain unknown. The publication of photographs showing the name and surname does not prove anything.

In other words, this report actually says that false rumors are spreading about the crypto currency again in this regard. In an attempt to cause the non-acceptance of the crypto currency and denigrate it, rumors have been circulating about it for a long time already that the crypto currency is used by terrorists and other criminals. Using it by cybercriminals is not so much a threat to the world.

Such a statement from Switzerland is very useful for the implementation of crypto-currencies around the world. Switzerland is the place where the richest people in the world are investing their usual money and Swiss banks have long been put on their reliability and reasonable neutrality in political matters. Therefore, if they decided to turn the country into a place of concentration of crypto currency from around the world, this should positively influence the development of the crypto currency. Very timely statement. However, I do not know what exactly they are going to do. Form banks that will store on deposit crypto currency?

I do not think that Satosh will ever be one dollar. In this case, bitcoin should cost one hundred million dollars. Even if theoretically bitcoin could achieve such a high cost, in practice it simply can not reach such a peak because of the alarmists who will always be. Given the very high cost of bitcoin, negative information will not disappear and its high volatility also. With any negative information, some bitcoin owners will fear for their significant savings and will sell their bitcoins. This will be regarded by others as the action of negative information and the emergence of panic will be inevitable. In this case, bitcoin will inevitably drop in price.

Not surprisingly, the most popular debit cards in the US. They can also contain the main types of crypto currency. As the infrastructure for crypto currency is still poorly developed, it is now very difficult to buy goods and services directly in the crypto currency. Debit cards eliminate this drawback. They combine the possibilities of crypto currency with ordinary money, because it indicates the currency and your funds increase along with the increase in the value of the crypto currency, and at the same time you can calculate at any outlet in the usual currency, however, a certain number is being withdrawn from your account and a crypto currency. It is very profitable.

The problem of regulating the ICO process has been long overdue, and states are even already late in regulating this type of activity. However, the regulation of ICO projects may be different. It is important not to overtake the stick. We need to make this process transparent and protect the rights of investors. Needless to say, regulation can also be harmful. In the US, the regulation of the crypto currency is always harsh. I would like it to be done first by other countries (and about the upcoming regulation of ICO have already been announced in France, Russia, Japan and Australia), and only then that the US should use the practice that has been developed.

Even ordinary, simple at first glance, notification to citizens sent by banks that investing in crypto currency is a risky occupation, in many ways frightens citizens of the crypto currency, because they are used to trusting banks, especially public ones. Banks will oppose the introduction of the crypto currency until they see the hopelessness of their actions, after which they will adapt to the prevailing circumstances and provide services themselves with the crypto currency.

State regulation of the crypto currency in general is really not to be afraid. However, the rules of the circulation of crypto-currency in the country established by the state are different, especially people are afraid of strict taxation conditions with respect to the crypto currency and constant identification on each exchange and exchanger.

The further the technological progress moves in our technocratic society, the more we become dependent on advanced technologies. The Crypto currency is still at the top of the current technologies. Therefore, if in you temporarily for some reason the electricity disappears, you need to look for ways to eliminate this problem. Perhaps it's worth thinking about buying solar panels to have your own source of energy. If you mean the lack of energy in the global sense as a great natural disaster, then without the Internet and electricity, the crypto currency will be out of reach for us.

I do not think that generosity campaigns can exist for more than a year or two. This statement is based on the opinion that new ideas and areas of application of new tokens will be less and less. I do not think that this is so. Areas of application for the implementation of projects ICO is still very much, folk art is very diverse, like our life. Therefore, tokens will be used in many new areas of our lives. It seems to me that ten years of the ICO program will still exist. In the process, the essence of the crypto currency must change and develop, and this should also influence the change in the ICO process.

Over time, perhaps it will. When most countries legalize crypto currency, bitcoin and some other crypto-currencies such as ethereum, litecoin, monero can be used internationally as a single currency for various trade transactions and other types of financial settlements. However, it should be borne in mind that the crypto currency has very high volatility, and international agreements from the stage of preliminary agreement to the practical implementation of the agreement can take a very long time. The cost of crypto currency during this time can significantly change. Will it be profitable in these circumstances for states to carry out transactions in the Crypto-currency, time will tell.

Now all states will be forced to consider the issue of legalization of the crypto currency. At the same time, they must determine its status, that is, what they consider to be a crypto currency, determine the conditions for its circulation on the territory of the country, and also solve the issue of its taxation. This is an inevitable stage in the development of the crypto currency. Therefore, if in Brazil are going to consider these issues, then in general it is very good. Simply, the solution to the crypto currency, the conditions for its circulation and legalization, as well as taxation may be different, loyal to the crypto currency, or vice versa, rigid.

If you have prospective altcoins, then they should not be sold. At one time they can make a big profit. We can not yet say how bitcoin will behave in the near future. Therefore, you need to distribute your funds on many coins, including some of the funds in bitcoin. Therefore, it is better to revise your altcoyins and unpromising convert to bitcoin and ethereum.

The price of bitcoin is now high, because it is based on an agiotage speculative demand for it. In fact, he really does not have and can not have such a high cost. Its characteristics do not differ so much from the characteristics of other crypto-currencies in order to have a value thousands of times greater. The higher the cost of bitcoin, the more it manifests itself as a financial bubble. Some altcoins are far superior to bitcoin in terms of functionality and cost thousands of times less than bitcoin. At the same time, bitcoin, which does not even fulfill its basic function of payment means, that is, the function of money, is valued so highly.

By itself, bitcoin technology does not contain any signs of a bubble. However, when, due to the speculative speculative demand for it, it rose to $ 20,000 in December last year, it proved to be a financial bubble. Only those who do not want to see this do not see this fact. Bitcoin needs to be developed functionally, first of all, to make it so that it can be used for its intended purpose as a means of payment, that is, that it fulfills its direct functions of money. Otherwise, we, it turns out, grow unclear what is very high cost. What for? To console yourself with the fact that we have a lot of capital? However, it can depreciate completely in one day with this approach. This approach is very harmful to all the crypto currency, most of which are very useful for people.

It all sounds beautiful if you live in a metropolis, with a high level of automation and amenities. I do not know, maybe 20-30 of the world's population lives in such conditions. The bulk of the population lives in the countryside, away from civilization, where the car will always travel along local roads. Tell them about the advantages of debit and credit cards. If they take away cash, the only thing they have left is to go to barter, as in the Middle Ages. So far, to the cashless society, we are still very far away as a whole.