Crypto currency in time will definitely survive us with you and, probably, transform into something more perfect. At bitcoin, we now really have problems, but they are resolvable. Other types of crypto-currency, especially tokens, will periodically appear and weak and unnecessary to leave the market. However, in general, the crypto currency will develop and grow stronger. In general, it is very necessary for a person, because it makes life easier and makes it much more comfortable. Individual types of crypto currency will always be in demand and will always be in price.

The Crypto currency has only just begun to develop and this process will continue for many more years, and possibly decades. In its development there will always be ups and downs of the price. The current situation is provoked by the artificial pumping of bitcoins. From this, the market is recovering to this day. However, these are temporary difficulties. We will survive and the market will develop further, and everything will be fine. People were panic-stricken and will always be. Because of them, bitcoin is unlikely to reach ever and hundred thousand dollars in its price. The panic will constantly knock down the price.

Crypto currency always assumes a certain risk. Without risk, profit would be impossible. The risk, of course, directly depends on the amount of your investment in the crypto currency. However, it still depends on the price level of the crypto currency, in this case bitcoin. The higher the price of bitcoin, the greater the risk of investing in your funds.

Yes, we will have to pay taxes on activities in crypto currency. In order for the state to legalize the crypto currency and not to prohibit it in the future, we will have to pay taxes. However, given that this activity is rather anonymous and is carried out with the help of the Internet, and exchanges and exchangers of crypto-currencies are located all over the planet, taxes can be paid in a dosed way, at its discretion, depending on the amount of tax imposed.

Even now, the governments of different states are different depending on the possibility of their violation of the rights of citizens and their authoritarianism. However, in general, governments themselves are afraid of crypto-currencies. In any case, they do not need a decentralized crypto currency. It is needed by citizens and they need to unite in order to defend their rights to use crypto currency.

I never join the ICO generosity campaigns if I see the possibility of requiring the passage of a KYC check. It is absolutely not normal if people who do not themselves pass due verification are allowed to confidential information of citizens. Moreover, if the statistics in more than half of the cases, the ICO team itself is fraudulent. The sending of such information to them is also not only very risky, but also an illegal demand for bounty hunters from such teams. We do not need to pass such a test, because we do not invest in ICO projects.

I think that it is necessary to demand information from the ICO team on what basis they require the participants of the ICO generosity campaign to pass a KYC check. We should not pass such a test, because we are not investors in ICO projects. The requirement that we pass the KYC test is illegal.

In my country they say: "Listen to your wife and do the opposite." In my opinion, this is just the case, when it should be done. If you have been waiting for seven months since the time when the currency has fallen in price, there is very little time left and the market will rise. Now it really does not make any sense to sell your coins and tokens at such a low price. Do not listen to your wife, you need to be patient and wait for the rise of the crypto-currency market.

With banks nothing bad can happen. They are in fact part of the state system. Therefore, if there is a real threat to the existence of the banking system, the state will quickly eliminate it, from whom this threat does not come. Especially, if the threat comes from the state's unnecessary decentralized crypto currency. However, in fact decentralized crypto currency does not pose any threat to the existence of banks. Rumors and reflections on this are too exaggerated.

Do not hang in the clouds, drop to the ground. If there is a situation when 80 percent of citizens who are engaged in crypto currency will not pay taxes, the state with great pleasure uses it for a severe restriction in circulation, or in general prohibition of decentralized crypto currency under pain of criminal punishment for its use. And then there will be nothing to object. So if we want the crypto currency to actively spread around the world, taxes need to be paid. See how it happens in Japan. They are accustomed to observe the law, citizens pay taxes on profits from crypto currency and the state is also pretty. Last year, taxes from activities in the crypto currency gave the treasury of Japan 0.3 gross income.

Regulation of the crypto currency by the states is inevitable. There are both positive and negative points. And there are many more positive ones. Regulation, first of all, means that the state classifies the crypto currency, makes it legitimate and takes under its protection, including judicial protection. In addition, the conditions for its circulation are established and, as a rule, its taxation is introduced. All this is generally positive. However, the crypto currency under regulation partially loses its anonymity, because the rules of the holders of crypto-currencies imposed by exchange rules oblige you to register and identify your identity.

It seems that Putin's new plan is how to restore the USSR already under the pretext of creating a single state with a single crypto currency? And who is the initiator of such a project to unite the lands of neighboring states? Again, "green men"? After all, it is not clear who and where registered such a strange project, Russia is not directly mentioned, but it clearly stands behind this, and the figure directly indicates it.
It seems that everything starts with a crypto currency, but in the article it is already a matter of pensions, the return of the USSR's deposits and everything goes smoothly into politics with a claim to the territories of neighboring states. As citizens can join territorially, if the constitutions of neighboring states do not allow it. Do not incite national hatred here. I believe that this topic should be removed altogether.

In my opinion, still now it is impossible to say which is better - bitcoin or banknotes. Bitcoin can not do without fiat. The crypto currency and ordinary money has its advantages and disadvantages. Therefore, you need to take advantage of both types of money. Now you do not need to use just one thing. For the time being, we mainly earn in the crypto currency, and the profit is partially transferred to fiat, since it is not possible to directly use the crypto currency as a kind of money.

In general, it is better not to join ICO campaigns that require bounty hunters to undergo a KYC check. However, if the team actually deceived the participants in the ICO generosity campaign and announced such a check after the end of the ICO, in order to make fewer payments to earned tokens, I think that it is possible to respond the same and send other people's data. In addition, you can not be sure that your data will not be published anywhere in the public place or even sold to criminals.
In addition, the requirement to pass a KYC test for participants in the ICO generosity campaigns is generally illegal, as we are not investors. This has already been recognized by some ICO teams and requires the passage of a KYC review only against investors.

Neither in this, nor in the next year ETH  will not be able to overtake bitcoin, of course, if bitcoin itself does not begin to fall sharply in price and in its popularity. At us still bitcoin renders very rigid price domination over other криптовойлютой, including on ethereum. Therefore ethereum can not beat bitcoin, bitcoin just will not let it.

Very interesting information. Using a ripple coin as a base coin, this is a new solution and it can be quite promising. Because the use of constantly bitcoin for this constantly distorted the crypto-currency market. We need a different monetary variety. Of course, this will also contribute to the popularity of this bank coin.

In each year, ICO projects are always different. There are always good projects, there are bad ones. This year, the situation for the ICO is very bad, because the market is in decline from the beginning of the year. Because of this, investors are very inactive, teams even with promising projects can not raise sufficient funds even for Softcap. However, ICO projects are and are successful. Despite this, the number of ICO campaigns this year doubled and reached 537 in the first half of the year. Now, many ICO campaigns increase the ICO's deadline until about the end of October to capture the period of possible rise of the crypto-currency market. In principle, this is one of the possible ways out of this situation.

If you have a crypto currency that is not regulated in your country yet, it can not be regarded as a bank overseas account or shares of enterprises. Decentralized crypto currency exists on the Internet, which is officially authorized in your country and its use is legitimate. The same applies to the crypto currency. In fact, the Crypto currency is one of the forms of doing business, and according to the laws of most countries it is legal, unless it is specifically prohibited. This is the general rule of business of all countries. Therefore, if the crypto currency is not regulated in any country, it should be considered a legitimate activity.

This is a very good statement by the European Parliament for the future of the crypto currency. It is very valuable for decentralized crypto currency and creates the prospect for, the introduction of the same position in specific countries of the European Union. The European Parliament actually gave the highest assessment to the decentralized crypto currency, pointing out that it can be used in the EU countries as alternative money along with national money.

Bitcoin and other decentralized crypto currency were created to help people gain financial independence from government agencies and the banking system. Therefore, of course, this will not like these structures. States do not need decentralized crypto currency, it can allow this crypto currency to go on its territory, but it will never support it.