Of course, it's better to join the ICO signature campaign, which is managed by a familiar manager from BitcoinTalk. In this case, he already knows all the features of the signature campaign and, therefore, usually with them fewer problems and controversial issues. If the generosity campaigns are managed by a member of the ICO team, most often he does not know this work and when joining the campaign and further in the process of work there are a lot of inconsistencies. I participated in campaigns with such managers, sometimes ICO ended well, sometimes not. I give preference to the prospects of the ICO project, and then I look at the manager.

Over the past day, bitcoin and almost all altcoins have fallen by more than ten percent. There was information that this was due to the hacking of private wallets that were on the central exchanger Coinrail, which is located in South Korea. There are stolen tokens NPXS, NPER, Aston and a small part of the Tron for more than 40 million dollars. However, one does not quite believe that the theft from purses on a little-known exchanger can cause such a large drop in the currency. Most likely, these are manipulations before the big rise of the crypto-currency market.

Such a statement is very ill-considered. If there is no government, the right of the strong will act. Vseravno there are people, and most likely, a group of people who then under the threat of weapons will want to control you. I do not think that different rascals with weapons would be a worthy alternative to a civilized government.

As for banks, they are in fact an integral part of the current state system. In the present conditions, a state without banks can not exist. They perform various very important functions. If you can do without banks, it does not mean that everyone without them can do without. I'm pretty sure that your views are not shared by a significant part of society.

Yes, but no one says that payments to ETH must occur before the expiry of the ICO. Everything remains as before. If the ICO campaign has not been successful, ETH hunters are not paid.
In general, it would be nice if the hunters behind the heads would be presented with a choice of payment - whether he wants to be paid at the end of the ICO in the released tokens or ETH.

To give up your main job and only deal with earnings in the crypto currency is possible, but only if the necessary circumstances have been created for this. First, you should already have good theoretical training and a decent practice in the crypto currency by this time. This is necessary to ensure that you already have confidence that this type of activity will be successful for you. Secondly, you should have a significant cash reserve to service current expenses so that the decisions you make in the crypto currency are weighed and do not depend on the need to withdraw funds from the crypto currency. Thirdly, your main job should not be very important to you, or you would be able, if desired, to recover from your previous work.

It can not be said that any effort spent on anything, it will be an investment. Investments are considered to be an investment of exactly money resources and nothing more. It is necessary to use words correctly in their meanings, otherwise we will soon not understand each other. Each word has its specific meaning and it is in this sense that it should be used.

Here they talk about earnings for participation in the ICO signature campaign at about a thousand dollars a month. Such earnings are very high. ICO campaigns sometimes last for 3-5 months, then another month and a half waiting for payment. Recently, about half of the campaigns either fail or are fraudulent. Therefore, with earnings in the bounty are pretty serious problems. However, this activity as a whole brings a good profit.

The number of tokens received for participating in an ICO signature campaign varies from a few dozen tokens to several thousand hundreds. However, the amount does not indicate directly the amount of the earnings. Of great importance is also the price of the token on the exchange. It happens that two hundred thousand tokens cost only a few hundred dollars. The cost of the token itself depends largely on the number of tokens produced. They can range from several tens of millions to several billions.

The retention of coins and tokens does lead to an increase in their prices, as the offer for their sale is reduced. However, at the same time, this artificial influence on the market price. We have already seen what this means by the example of the December increase in the price of bitcoin. The market is still moving away from these price drops. If people did not try to keep bitcoin in this way, then it would grow more slowly, and I think that its rate would now be much higher. Therefore, I do not think that willful retention is a good way to increase the price of crypto currency.

Now there are really a lot of fraudulent ICO projects and investing in them is very risky. It is necessary or very carefully to select and verify ICO projects, or for the time being to stop such investment until the situation is resolved and the ICO process is not regulated by the state. Perhaps now it is worth investing in top coins or young promising ones, such as EOS.

Now bitcoin has not yet risen so high in price to be afraid that it can depreciate for any reason. Therefore, I do not think that it is necessary to withdraw funds from bitcoin during its fall or stagnation. This is an extra waste of money for wasted movement. So far, I think, we need to keep our funds in bitcoin and expect its further price growth.

If we are talking about the survival of 6,400 ICO projects, then this is not so bad. However, if we look, for example, from the point of view of a participant in the ICO signature campaign, who can only pay one out of ten projects, this is very small. True, I do not know where the figure of 8 percent of successful and surviving ICOs came from. If you look at my practice, more than half of the ICO projects in which I took part ended more or less successfully. True, some of them could cease their activity at later stages. In order to raise this percentage of the success of the ICO, we need the regulation of ICO projects, the only way to cut off a significant part of the fraud in these projects.

I hope that will be the same this year. Although the crypto currency is very unpredictable, people usually do the same thing in the summer. Therefore, the crypto-currency market should rise from this month. The market is already without any special movement for about six months. A crypto currency, as we know, has great volatility. She should not be without movement for a long time. Therefore, we hope that this movement will only be up.

The spread of the demand for confidential information from the participants of the ICO signature campaign and a copy of our passports is illegal and very dangerous. We need to require the ICO team to point out a specific regulatory act that gives them the right to require us to pass a KYC test. I am absolutely sure that such a normative document does not exist and it is all exceeding its authority. We really are not investors and should not undergo such verification. In addition, we are not clients of the ICO team either. We provide them with services to promote their ICO project and they pay us for it. Therefore, they are our customers and they, in that case, must pass the KYC check, if this is mandatory.

If you have enough time to participate in this forum, then continue to stand. This forum is largely cognitive, it is interesting to communicate and besides, you can earn good money in parallel. However, after the introduction of the system of merit, it is unlikely that you will be able to achieve high ranks. However, vseravno, here you can earn new tokens, which can then be used for trading activities.

However much we study the ICO project and its team, and it's impossible to avoid the possibility that you will fall on a fraudulent project. Therefore, sometimes joining the ICO signature campaign, we have to rely on our previous experience in general, and on intuition.
However, it would be incorrect to call our hard work in ICO signatory companies passive income. We work here very actively. We invest our forces, resources and time in every ICO campaign advertised by us.

The whole of the crypto currency is not a bubble. The signs of a bubble are only shown by bitcoin, when people invest a lot in it without the purpose of using it as a means of payment, only with the aim of extracting profits from it, as a result of increasing demand for it. In this case, bitcoin really grows in value and behaves like a financial bubble, because it is unreasonably inflated in price and is separated from its real value as a kind of crypto currency.
All the rest of the crypto currency has no signs of a bubble yet. To say how dangerous it is for bitcoin is still difficult. We have no practical experience in this regard. Most likely, it will be associated with a specific case, a concrete coincidence of a number of factors.

Still, it looks like the stock exchange was asked about when the ICO generosity campaign will be paid to the expected tokens due to the fact that, firstly, the offer of such coins in the market will increase and they can be bought physically in the absence of them, and in Second, the price of new tokens should fall. It seems that the price of new tokens actually falls on the exchange after the members of the ICO generosity campaign give out the tokens they earned and they hurry to put them on the stock exchange for sale.

If the same situation continues with the prevalence of the bitcoin price in the crypto currency market, then ethereum has no chance of ever overtaking bitcoin in the price. In addition, there is a tenfold difference in price between them and overcoming such a gap in the ethereum price will be very difficult, as soon as the ethereum begins to grow in price, bitcoin at this time will also increase in its value and the price gap between them will persist.

This percentage of fraud in ICO projects is too exaggerated. Really it reaches about a third, 80 percent it can not be. If there was such a large percentage of fraud, no one would invest in these projects and would not take part in them. Do not you frighten people with such figures. After all, they will scatter.