I do know that ANACS will not care about it grade wise.
having had a grade of ms60 for an error coin with missing bits i am not so sure they will not care.
Got a pic of that coin? I am guessing it has a lot more issues than some missing digits on the hologram. I had a handled coin that was rough that at least graded MS-63.
Blazed, why do you defend ANACS grading while admitting that you repeatedly send back coins to get re-graded basically admitting that their grading is arbitrary\inconsistent and in effect worthless? I love that you are transparent about this but confused by the defensive stance.
In the coin grading world coin resubmits are expected and common. I am not defending ANACs I am saying that no way his coin got MS-60 due to the hologram. ANACS even offers re-grading services and all grading companies admit grading is subjective and can change with the grader.
"it's estimated that as much as 75% of the graded population of some issues is from resubmissions - for instance, PCGS has graded 100 of them but there's really only 25, being submitted over and over again. If the coin is worth enough in a higher grade, people will submit it 25 times in the hopes of catching that one grader having a bad day who upgrades it"
It is how grading works with all companies not just ANACS
Show Posts
