I'm surprised there's not enough money now to payout anybody. Rather odd...
Why? Figures add up to me... |
|
|
|
|
Can you provide proof of the 30BTC you have processed? The address associated to your current Ponzi website has turned over less than 1 BTC!!!
I enjoy playing Ponzis, but until sufficient proof is provided, I will be avoiding this one...
|
|
|
|
We need more deposit keep promote this  Ditto - I'm awaiting my next payout before going again. |
|
|
|
|
I think 150% is too much for the first 10 deposits. Maybe reduce the percentage or reduce the number of deposits. It's killing the round at the minute!
|
|
|
|
Read my comment, there are not launching their own coin but using an existing one rebranded  ouch.. if that is true which i hope not. then people that already have millions of that coin can go to hull and withdraw millions of pounds.. stpid idea it would be to use a coin that is minable for anyone and premined by different people.. imagine it. day 1 a customer buys £10 of hull coin. putting £10 into the economy. day two.. someone cash's out 500k of coin mined before the software branding. now hull is £499,990 in debt. the only way for hull to succeed starting a new economy for swapping for Pound coins. is a closed blockchain and sole supply.. I'm pretty sure that is exactly what they have planned. |
|
|
|
|
Glad to see this one is picking up some speed, hopefully we might hit the "Bonus Payments" within a couple of rounds??
|
|
|
|
|
I'm guessing it's 45minutes until the restart? It's 18.25 here but the clocks did go forward an hour this weekend...
|
|
|
|
Morning everyone - as deposits have slowed down over the past couple of days I will be start round #2 tonight at 18:00 UTC!
Make sure you're in early for the best chance of receiving your payout!!!
I'll be there...again lol |
|
|
|
How about a weekend offer to try pick things up a little bit?  |
|
|
|
He has given no reason as of yet to cause people to think it was a scam so why say it is a scam? Not all ponzis were scams. Some were very successful and honest ubtil the very end when shit got complicated which is what happens. I don't see you guys crying scam at new sports books and ducking dice sites despite most being scams for the most part so just stop. I'm reporting every post I see calling this ponzi a scam until it is proven.
To understand Riverboatbtc's anger you must understand the situation. Riverboat begged people on here for funds for his dream of owning an online casino. He was politely told to piss off and find his own money. Since that time he becomes angry and outraged whenever he sees people freely and carelessly spending their money anywhere other than his site. He sees potential money going to him rather than a ponzi. Even when a ponzi straight up tells you that its risky money and you could lose, it's not good enough for RiverboatBTC. He will flood your forum with unfounded claims of scam, hoping to try to ruin you. He will then try to have your site shut down. This boy living in mama's basement does not appreciate free economy and wishes only that his failing casino might see success. I suggest: 1) post self moderated threads from here on. click the (+) additional options when you post, and select self-moderated. Then delete as necessary. 2) Add rivrboatbtc to your ignore list, to avoid seeing his own threads he will surely post when he is silenced on your own threads Ponzi sites can be fun if you allow it to be fun. Moderate your threads, do not reply to his troll attempts in other threads. Find a website host that is friendly to such sites or use an offshore provider in Cayman Islands. Prices are cheap.  Also Juggerponz is not a scam - they PAY!! https://blockchain.info/en/tx/5ff6b1d8e2b3255692162b0bf9381699bd7823d09ad8775e7e4c48a822566a17great job guys Lol. RiverBoat's been shot down! |
|
|
|
The tx fee on site is total transactions fee of all transactions the tx fee size is decided by the BTC client itself to ensure payouts will go smothly.
Yeah saw that later on when more transactions where paid. I've lowered required confirmations to 2. This makes extra 10 minutes (this is the BTC block time). I will research more deeply into it and decide if lowering it to 1 confirmation would be wise decision. It's an safety metter.
From what I know from the bitcoin protocol if a transaction is confirmed one time it's confirmed forever. I am considering unlocking wallet for instant payouts. Any more investors want instant payouts in exchange for lower security (I'm not saying wallet will be fully exposed but it will in fact be less secure)? Your idea of replacing the 200% payouts seems interesting I will consider it and decide tomorow/after tomorow. - If there is no deposit within 48 hours instead of paying 200% pay out the wallet balance to the last deposit.
I'm not sure the 48 hour rule is going to work. Not if it's applied to the deposits. What if you apply the 48 rule to the payout time? It would be easy to change but could You please explain me why should it be better? This would shorten the round few hours but nothing more. The reason behind is this. If someone sees that the 48 hours are almost up he can send a small deposit that is not high enough to trigger a payout.. Then the 48 hours starts again so this can go forever. If on the other hand the 48 hours start to count from the last payout it does not matter how many small deposits come in that trigger no payout. When the last payout is 48 hours old then you start paying 200% from the last deposit made to the second to last etc until the wallet is empty. By the way try to combine referrer payouts. A transaction fee of 0.0001 on a payout of 0.000055 is rather wasteful. Which means players can abuse the counter. E.g send a few satoshi (w/e the min limit is) just to stop the counter - essentially grief playing. |
|
|
|
Didnt you run BitInvestment, or w/e the other ponzi was called? It was a decent game until the round died. Glad to see you have added rounds for this one. I'll be throwing a few satoshis into it in a few hours time |
|
|
|
|
I have code which works using BlockChain's API and\or directly through a local bitcoind instance. Let me know if you're still looking for this.
|
|
|
|
... which is having an impact on my trade.
Should'a thought of that before promoting ponzis. Lrn 2 free market -- people are free to chose what to believe. You're free to promote scams, and others are free to call you a scammer. I am free to promote what I want, if any of the sites I promote turn out to be scams or indeed fraudulent that I will need to take any heat that comes with it. As it stands, I have only played a handful of Ponzi games, and only recommended one of them (which I can remember), none of the games I have taken part in have turned out to be "scams" therefore I still dont understand how that indirectly now makes me a "scammer". Perhaps it's some weird-ass BitCoinTalk logic I'm unaware of. |
|
|
|
That doesn't help other users thought does it. He can post what ever he likes in my threads discouraging potential traders - and this is being allowed. Make no bones about it - I'm happy to be shot down should there be any substance to these accusations, but without any sort of evidence\proof\whatever this is pure griefing which is having an impact on my trade. |
|
|
|
Yet it's only "griefing" when the other guy does it, am I right? As was pointed out, you played a good role in this yourself.
Not at all, I will happily be reprimanded for griefing if thats what the mods\admins deem my posts to be. My retorts were in response to clear facts present before me. A user who claims to run a gambling site with no maximum bet limits, yet requires a 4-5 BTC business loan for said site. That rings alarm bells to me. Whereas, I see no evidence, or even a sniff of suspicion to suggest I am anything but honest in my own transactions. |
|
|
|
How is this not griefing? scam
scam
scam
scam
scam
scam
Scam
Scam
Scam
Scam
Scam
Scam
Scam
Scam
Scam
PONZI SCAM
PONZI SCAM
PONZI SCAM
PONZI SCAM
PONZI SCAM
PONZI SCAM
PONZI SCAM
PONZI SCAM
PONZI SCAM
PONZI SCAM
Believe me, I have no problem with outing scammers, con-men etc. But this is pure griefing without any sort of evidence of justification. |
|
|
|
Which part of CrazyRabbi's assessment do you find fallacious and/or defamatory? Openly Enters Ponzi Schemes , Promotes Ponzi Schemes and generally has his dick so far up Vort's (Ponzi Scheme Operator) ass it's not even funny. Avoid at all costs and report to theymos.
Where is that posted? I am referring to this thread; https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=506698.0 |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
