w00t! 3BTC deposit, that kicks ass! Challenge is to top that now  |
|
|
|
|
Working like a charm for me. Best ponzi by far!
|
|
|
|
There have been some deposits which could easily pay back some of the ones queued there, whats up with that? There is .6 balance but .01 confirmed hasn't been paid (first in queue)
Vort said he was reindexing the blockchain, which can take a couple of hours. If you look in his site the balance is still at 0 which would suggest the reindex hasn't finished yet. I'm sure he will be around soon with an update, he's a great guy. Keep depositing people! Once Vort has finished his work there will be a massive backlog to be paid out to everyone  |
|
|
|
|
Starting playing people. I want my latest deposit back lol
|
|
|
|
Come-on guys, lots of players have been paid out lately, please leave some feedback here!
I've been playing for the past couple of days and receive the majority of my deposits back already. I'm 0.3 BTC better off so far Keep up the good work Vort, your site is by far the most comprehensive! |
|
|
|
I've not had any problems. Always paid out for me.
I have got my money too. Probably someone related to one of the other ponzis trying to discredit this one. Shameful! I will continue playing this one. OR you're related to this and helping perpetuate the scam.
Did you even read the posts in my link???
Not really how someone should do business is it - ignoring his liabilities but spending time encouraging people to send him funds filling his pockets.
No problems if he wasn't logged on since i posted or PM'd him - everyone deserves a chance and some time. But he was, and spent all his time drumming up business.
POOR FORM.I read the thread fully, thanks. I would suggest giving the OP a chance to give his side of events before labelling them a scammer. For all everyone else knows there could be a perfectly reasonable explaination and you have caused a negative image for no reason. To my knowledge there has been no problem with this ponzi to date which would suggest he is legit! I don't think anyone will run away with your 0.5mBTC lol. Think about it. |
|
|
|
I've not had any problems. Always paid out for me.
I have got my money too. Probably someone related to one of the other ponzis trying to discredit this one. Shameful! I will continue playing this one. |
|
|
|
|
I've not had any problems. Always paid out for me.
|
|
|
|
Occasion!
The first 3 investments will get 150% return!
be first, win first !! Occasion!
The first 3 investments will get 150% return!
be first, win first !! Really? You best change your thread title then, as that is now false advertising. You've had your "first 3 investments" ... twice ... lol. This will all end in tears. Proceed with caution people! What is problem with this? I dont see anything bad about give that bonus sometimes to get people in faster. if you're happy there is no problem whatsoever. Carry on |
|
|
|
Occasion!
The first 3 investments will get 150% return!
be first, win first !! Occasion!
The first 3 investments will get 150% return!
be first, win first !! Really? You best change your thread title then, as that is now false advertising. You've had your "first 3 investments" ... twice ... lol. This will all end in tears. Proceed with caution people! |
|
|
|
How many "first 3 investors" have you had so far? Smells fishy to me! |
|
|
|
They posted this on their facebook page 15 minutes ago: It shouldn't be long. We'll make an announcement when everything is back up. Seems kind of slack IMO, BlockChain.info are meant to be one of the big players in the BitCoin industry yet they have had no end of problems over the past week or some, some out of their control, but others; like this downtime, and similar downtime to their APIs is just poor. |
|
|
|
|
Looking to sell 1.5BTC, UKBT only, I'll pay for escrow, no exceptions.
Let me know if you're interested!
|
|
|
|
|
Hello, I've sent a couple of transactions via PHP using BlockChains Wallet API, and a var_dump of the response comes back similar to;
string(118) "{"message":"Sent To Multiple Recipients","tx_hash":"xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"}"
However when I lookup the tx_hashs returned by BlockChain's API on their website they come back as an invalid transaction IDs, and when checking my wallet through the BlockChain website, the transactions now have totally different IDs.
Am I doing something wrong?
|
|
|
|
I'm looking for a way to include the source\sending address within the callback string when using BlockChain's Receive Payments API. Does anyone know if this is possible?
I would have thought it would be a fair straight forward requirement, but I cant see any reference to the source address in their limited documentation.
They don't have a function for that. Instead, get its transaction ID and then use the transaction API to do it. This is probably done this way because there can be mote than one input address for transactions. You could also just use a different address per transaction. Thanks for that, if you're referring to something like " http://blockchain.info/rawtx/$tx_hash", $tx_hash being the ID sent to the callback page, unfortunately that shows me the transaction for newly generated address -> destination addressI need a way of reversing that a step further and logically identifying the ID for the source address -> newly generated address transaction. |
|
|
|
|
Hello, can you tell me if it is possible to identify the source address when receiving payments using the "Receive Payment API"?
When the callback page is called I can see the destination address and the newly created payment deposit address, but no source address from where the payment originated.
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
I'm using BlockChain's Receive Payment API, is there anyway to get the source address from the callback URL call? Currently I am only seeing the generated address and the destination address, but I need the source address too, somehow!
|
|
|
|
|
I'm looking for a way to include the source\sending address within the callback string when using BlockChain's Receive Payments API. Does anyone know if this is possible?
I would have thought it would be a fair straight forward requirement, but I cant see any reference to the source address in their limited documentation.
|
|
|
|
|
Twitter update 3 hours ago saying it should be up "shortly"
|
|
|
|
|
Anyone have an news\updates on this?
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
