cryptsy/drkbtc
18:21:02 0.01042 5218.92
One was able to get rid of 5218 DASH in one swoop and another was able to get it all at a single price... hope both parties are happy. =) [or it could be the same person]
Yeah I just saw it too. We have a very patience dumper. I think he's the one with 10k DASH sell wall @ 112. |
|
|
|
Rewards again reduced by 30%  But hidden. The Ticks are normal, but if you watch the Balance you see that 30% are missing. Lol. People in IRC freaking out right now. So glad i'm out of this mess. I can't stop laughing although I lost around 40 BTCs for this shit. Sorry for people who lost too. You got CLEANED by TheCultGame. |
|
|
|
|
Just saw this sell wall at cryptsy
0.01120000 10067.56396487 112.75671641
I wonder who wants to manipulate the market now ?
|
|
|
|
it is just TALK ... I'd like to use this thread as a front page to all the other coin threads worth a read ... no one person can follow them all ... but as a group we can collectively keep each other up-to-date on any important news. (and if you've posted an address it includes tips in TALK)
Finex was the major btc futures market and gateway to hong kong banks (aka China/Asia access with banking practices also suited to Western investors like the Easts version of Switzerland), you seem more informed whats your read on bitfinex?
I shouldn't pay attention to your post at all if you didn't mention XMR/BYTE/VNL. This is just beyond stupidity, the anon race. We habe more problems to solve with bitcoin alone, why some people are still obsessing with the stupid anon stuff? |
|
|
|
We really do have an end-to-end solution to all problems within crypto now. I'm working on a 50+ page whitepaper that details the rest of the solution, I'm quite excited about it  I'm waiting for Evan to publish his 50+ page whitepaper... It sounds like he has solved the block size problem, and many others haunting crypto at the moment :-) Just keep buying DASH and waiting for the news.  |
|
|
|
We are back to > 0.01. Congrats !  You freaked me out for 2 seconds until i checked the price on Cryptsy Maybe you wanted to say "back to >0.001" Anyway, go go go DMD!!! Or better, like crazyivan said "this is...." DMD  ) Oops sorry mistyped . But it will be soon a reality |
|
|
|
|
The dev gone already ? I did see him for a while. Any news from him or did I miss something ?
|
|
|
|
the dailyTALK high hopes dashedmyraid buy time? https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/3j76zs/myriad_the_first_multipow_coin_about_to_hard_fork/============ Darkcoin (AKA Dash) to cease trading
Posted: August 06, 2015 22:12
Due to persistently low demand for trading in Darkcoin (AKA Dash), we have decided to remove Darkcoin from our crypto-currency trading pairs. Darkcoin trading will terminate on August 31st, 2015 at midnight UTC. Users will have one month - until midnight UTC on September 30, 2015 - to withdraw their darkcoins before all Darkcoin wallets are removed from the site. After removal, any darkcoins not withdrawn will be moved to a separate wallet controlled by Bitfinex, requiring users to contact support to claim any remaining funds. DASH losses it's one claim to fame and top tier justification the Bitfinex listing this opens a window for monero or even byte and VNL to challenge Dash for anon top spot Finex lost its position as top exchange too. Look at the volume. Could we please stop the stupid anon race? It brings nothing, just harming and splitting the community more. |
|
|
|
We are back to > 0.01. Congrats ! |
|
|
|
Great job finding the culprit who dumping my beloved coin, guys. Time to put a buy order |
|
|
|
The continual lowering of rewards are putting the ROI in the line with regular mining companies.
I do not think they are counting on new money to follow on. They have lost too much credibility. If they are still maintaining the site, it should mean that they would try to regain some credibility first.
No need. As long as the reward rises, greedy people will jump in the ponzi train again. This site is actually died once.
At the moment with 15k satoshi per mhs the roi is 12 days. Thats not like other cloud mining companies offer.
You can't buy much with this price, unfortunately. |
|
|
|
4 MNs of mine crashed yesterday almost on the same time, all was using v12.47 It makes one node without payment for 20 days straight  To be honest I never experienced the same situation since the first time I opened my MN 8 months ago. Here is the last log from debug.log of each MN: MN1 015-08-23 06:51:07 CActiveMasternode::SendMasternodePing() - Relay Masternode Ping vin = CTxIn(COutPoint(d19db4048a102838dd000412e45119d311d90b01f077082bde224c4830f1ba53, 1), scriptSig=)
2015-08-23 06:51:52 mnb - Got NEW Masternode entry - 012cec97f2e4c4db6e0c7fd445ec8f8bebd35cdfc57d7baebec8feda698dd86f - 108.61.167.246:9999 - CTxIn(COutPoint(6ab09587c49daeb8bb6f0de1291d7219dad75693e3cb58b999848b9efc0d69b5, 1), scriptSig=) - 1439985732
2015-08-23 06:52:20 receive version message: /darkcoinseeder:0.1.2/: version 70103, blocks=320000, us=178.62.110.62:9999, peer=1531
2015-08-23 06:52:27 receive version message: /Satoshi:0.8.6/: version 70076, blocks=288800, us=178.62.110.62:9999, peer=1532
2015-08-23 06:52:29 socket send error Bad file descriptor (9)
2015-08-23 06:52:29 receive version message: /Satoshi:0.8.6/: version 70076, blocks=288800, us=178.62.110.62:9999, peer=1533
2015-08-23 06:53:53 receive version message: /darkcoinseeder:0.1.2/: version 70103, blocks=320000, us=178.62.110.62:9999, peer=1534 MN2 2015-08-23 05:13:18 receive version message: /darkcoinseeder:0.1.2/: version 70103, blocks=320000, us=46.101.39.160:9999, peer=1878
2015-08-23 05:13:28 CActiveMasternode::SendMasternodePing() - Relay Masternode Ping vin = CTxIn(COutPoint(48c109789d65732fc7093391699ec5f5a7e6eebda46d1f9d3647f9cea30bb538, 1), scriptSig=)
2015-08-23 05:13:43 CreateNewLock - New Transaction Lock 0639fd5e9a4cf893d1b6f0da72cac05adf1e2c695ea78ef347651dd92b7a1004 !
2015-08-23 05:13:43 ProcessMessageInstantX::ix - Transaction Lock Request: 162.243.205.212:9999 /Dash Core:0.12.0.47/ : accepted 0639fd5e9a4cf893d1b6f0da72cac05adf1e2c695ea78ef347651dd92b7a1004
2015-08-23 05:13:45 mnget - Sent Masternode winners to 104.131.193.7:51547
MN3 2015-08-23 07:33:31 CBudgetManager::CheckAndRemove
2015-08-23 07:33:31 ProcessNewBlock : ACCEPTED
2015-08-23 07:34:21 CActiveMasternode::SendMasternodePing() - Relay Masternode Ping vin = CTxIn(COutPoint(0647b3e45cb3586364506c45b0c6631b5e8193c5b0c2ecfd5fed5d23bef4c860, 0), scriptSig=)
2015-08-23 07:36:03 CheckBlock() : skipping transaction locking checks
2015-08-23 07:36:03 CheckBlock() : skipping transaction locking checks
2015-08-23 07:36:03 CheckBlock() : skipping transaction locking checks
2015-08-23 07:36:03 UpdateTip: new best=00000000001481c9b88736ab126d43b51d4cda291403c5d267946deae4fc29e0 height=324019 log2_work=61.660689 tx=1307825 date=2015-08-23 07:35:22 progress=0.999998 cache=2399
2015-08-23 07:36:03 ProcessNewBlock : ACCEPTED
2015-08-23 07:36:06 CMasternodePaymentWinner::IsValid - Masternode not in the top 10 (11)
2015-08-23 07:36:06 mnw - invalid message - Masternode not in the top 10 (11) MN4 2015-08-23 07:11:24 CheckBlock() : skipping transaction locking checks
2015-08-23 07:11:24 CheckBlock() : skipping transaction locking checks
2015-08-23 07:11:24 CheckBlock() : skipping transaction locking checks
2015-08-23 07:11:24 UpdateTip: new best=000000000014f13c33e2e3d0c17b1fa882dcfe002264353f0ddf487c9c835d31 height=324008 log2_work=61.660647 tx=1307801 date=2015-08-23 07:09:56 progress=0.999995 cache=2333
2015-08-23 07:11:25 ProcessNewBlock : ACCEPTED
2015-08-23 07:11:29 CheckBlock() : skipping transaction locking checks
2015-08-23 07:11:29 CheckBlock() : skipping transaction locking checks
2015-08-23 07:11:29 CheckBlock() : skipping transaction locking checks
2015-08-23 07:11:29 UpdateTip: new best=0000000000028f6a356961272b3ede51f87cded63ae713b6f20a9122521bd142 height=324009 log2_work=61.660651 tx=1307803 date=2015-08-23 07:11:19 progress=0.999999 cache=2335
2015-08-23 07:11:29 ProcessNewBlock : ACCEPTED |
|
|
|
When Alex talks, just shut up and listen. It's a great post and it deserved to be bumped. So which is it? You want smaller block size so we only use bitcoin for settlements or you want people to be their own banks? You can't have both.
I'm just pointing out that even with not so many transactions, you don't simply "die" - and evidence of that is the marketcap and mobility of gold, because bitcoin is not simply a payment system, but also a store-of-wealth system. BTC's transaction capacity was always small, and even with 8 or 32mb blocks, it's still small. If just 10% of the global population used BTC, and they did an average of just 1 transaction per day, we'd need blocks larger than 1 GB. Suppose we make it 1GB per block, to "scale". What will happen then? Will it "scale", or will it simply become unusable? It's a bullshit argument that "bigger is better" in this case. It isn't. And what if we take the scenario of the entire population using it, with an avg of 2 tx per day, which requires >20gb per block? Bitcoin will not scale to the level you want it to and definitely not by simply increasing the block size. It needs smart methods to do so. The fact that BTC requires a lot of resources to scale, should make it expensive to use those resources. Seeing dust transactions that take up space for minimum fees, is already too painful to watch. This is like the people who worried that browsers would clog up internet traffic back in the early nineties. or worries about picture files. or sound files. or video. 1TB hard drives are cheaper than a carton of cigarettes. Next year 10 TB drives will be. It's a bullshit argument.
Nobody in the Elite would benefit from abusing network resources back then. However, the situation is different with the blockchain which, if you supply the tools to abuse it, it will be abused and bloated and rendered unusable. Have you asked potential bitcoin users, whether they are interested in downloading TBs of blockchain before using it? We'll send all these potential guys to use online wallets or online-based wallets, meaning a centralized ecosystem? Besides, the cartel in the HDD industry, reminds me of the stagnation in the CPU industry after AMD lost the plot and Intel didn't rush things much in terms of evolution. I think it was early 2011 when I bought my WD 1TB for like 60 euros, and it still costs nearly the same: I'm not seeing any serious price reduction. So HD prices don't scale as much as we'd like. The urgency isn't even in block size or scalability. The urgency is in fixing the goddamn decision-making process among the core devs. You think Hearn was wrong about that?
Yes he was. There wasn't any urgency or crisis that demonstrated a breakdown of the decision-making process. The dev team acknowledged that scaling improvements can be done, they issued BIPs and were debating what's the best. Is it some kind of best practices when someone comes along and says, yes, we'll do this, and if we don't, we'll fork it? If Hearn's dictatorship plan passes, there will be no core devs remaining to even have a decision process. I doubt any will stay to be ordered by the "dictatorship" of Andersen/Hearn. Who will maintain bitcoin then? Hearn -who isn't very active- and Andersen? That's not going to work and it's extremely bad for the future of Bitcoin. In the end of the day, if you ask me what Bitcoin-dev-team will do the best for the currency, it's a no brainer that current core-devs are far better, active and responsible than XT's devs. |
|
|
|
This is an attempted coup alright, but it's from idiot miners who want a bigger slice of a smaller pie. If we cave on this, they will never allow our network to become competitive enough to disrupt the banksters.
Bloating the blockchain to DOA levels will disrupt bitcoin, not the banksters. Besides, 8mb blocks, or even 80mb blocks, aren't enough to scale to such levels. You'd need enormous storage (and bandwidth) per day to compete with the volume of banks and credit cards. Visa does 2000 tx/s. Bitcoin needs 300-700mb/blocks to do that, not accounting for spam. If you add mastercard, bank transfers, swift, paypal, and, finally, cash transactions from person to person that could be digitized with btc, not even 1gb blocks would scale. Exactly. And BitcoinXT looks like an altcoin IMHO. All Gavin fanboys are screaming: Scale or die. They just don't understand that increasing the block size is not a permanent solution. It's a quick fix. And like every quick fix in your life, its consequence is always bad. Quick fix is to survive. XT is a backup in case we run out of time and the perfect solution still stays on paper. Quick fix to survive ? It's the most hilarious thing I ever heard. It might make you survive for a few months more, but then kills you much faster and more painful. |
|
|
|
Which version and protocol do u have on your node now? 5 nodes here and nothing since 9 days LOL I think it was two payments inn 45 and one in 46. I didn't check balance while I was changing version. They are both compiled from source for he pi2 Make it 10 days straight now without any payment. I'm pretty bad at lottery LOL. But at least my nodes are stable @ v46 now, don't crash every 2 hours anymore. |
|
|
|
This is an attempted coup alright, but it's from idiot miners who want a bigger slice of a smaller pie. If we cave on this, they will never allow our network to become competitive enough to disrupt the banksters.
Bloating the blockchain to DOA levels will disrupt bitcoin, not the banksters. Besides, 8mb blocks, or even 80mb blocks, aren't enough to scale to such levels. You'd need enormous storage (and bandwidth) per day to compete with the volume of banks and credit cards. Visa does 2000 tx/s. Bitcoin needs 300-700mb/blocks to do that, not accounting for spam. If you add mastercard, bank transfers, swift, paypal, and, finally, cash transactions from person to person that could be digitized with btc, not even 1gb blocks would scale. Exactly. And BitcoinXT looks like an altcoin IMHO. All Gavin fanboys are screaming: Scale or die. They just don't understand that increasing the block size is not a permanent solution. It's a quick fix. And like every quick fix in your life, its consequence is always bad. |
|
|
|
Which version and protocol do u have on your node now? 5 nodes here and nothing since 9 days LOL |
|
|
|
We are going down from 280$ to 220$ in less than 10 days because two shills want to prove their might by forking bitcoin?
Okay, so now we know how little you understand the market. Thanks for sharing, partner! The answer from community is clear now, Gavin & Mike ?
Yup. 14% of nodes now and rising.  LOL Gavin&Mike fanboys. I don't want to discuss about blockchain size anymore, I just look at the price, ok? Prove me wrong otherwise GTFO. Btw, your 14% is mostly new nodes. Existing nodes doesn't change. No, we're going down because investors are starting to pay attention and realize that a coin capped at 2-3 tps does not deserve a $3 billion market cap.
Scaling to 56 transaction per second by forcing doesn't magically increase the market cap either. |
|
|
|
|
We are going down from 280$ to 220$ in less than 10 days because two shills want to prove their might by forking bitcoin?
The answer from community is clear now, Gavin & Mike ?
|
|
|
|
DASH got shot up to 0.0148 in the mean time @ finex too |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
