Sorry, forgot to mention you need to tell ccminer where the cuda libraries are. Think this should do it: sudo ldconfig /usr/local/cuda-5.5/lib64
Let me know if that doesn't fix it... |
|
|
|
I posted a public AMI on Oregon region called XMRminer. It has Wolf cpuminer and tsiv ccminer already compiled and ready to go. There should be .sh files in home directory that you can edit to connect to pools for the two miners, and the compiled miners are also in the home directory. I usually get about 400-500 h/s for the cpu and gpu combined. Let me know if you have any questions or anything. If you'd like to send me a few XMR, can do so here: 49jkaP1xDZrEYaWxtoToPzitbQh6Z7Vv8c3MwtP49wsZhJUR5VojrxcKgb76zT8XRU5AAWHVptx4RgxgLb5fX7iM2vBSKXA Edit: You need to run this command after launching instance to tell ccminer where cuda libraries are (probably should have put this in init.d or something in retrospect): sudo ldconfig /usr/local/cuda-5.5/lib64 |
|
|
|
Just love these monero trolls..
lol you mad? It's a newbie account who didn't say anything about monero, and has never posted before this thread. Sounds like you have some anger issues with monero you need to work through or something  |
|
|
|
Never a better time to sell  except, you know, when the price was 10x higher... |
|
|
|
extremehash.com pool issue - anyone have a large pending with no payouts?!?
I have close to 3 XMR and counting which is pending. Anyone from the pool who can help?
Not sure what's up, but I haven't seen wildstrangething (pool op) on irc lately, for like a few weeks. Might be time for you to switch pools... |
|
|
|
The coin (s)he mined is designed to be completely anonymous, so you will likely have to find a different way to ascertain who the perpetrator is/was. He or she has good taste in altcoins, imho. Good luck  You mean the coin being Monero makes things harder? What about waiting till he exchanges it for actual money? Will I be able to find him then? Also, on a related note, will he be able to avoid even the above situation by making a dummy Monero to Monero transfer where both accounts are his? Thanks He or she wouldn't even need to make dummy transfers. Each transaction is designed to be completely anonymous, so you can't track the transfer from the pool to his/her wallet, nor from wallet to exchange. You're not going to track them down this way. I'm assuming people don't have to log onto the computers, otherwise you would have caught them already, but really the only way I can think of is to check the modified date on the miner and batch files (see when they were put on each computer), and see if you can figure out who was using that comp at that time. |
|
|
|
Already done. I posted a public AMI on Oregon region called XMRminer. It has Wolf cpuminer and tsiv ccminer already compiled and ready to go. Edit: If you'd like to send me a few XMR, can do so here: 49jkaP1xDZrEYaWxtoToPzitbQh6Z7Vv8c3MwtP49wsZhJUR5VojrxcKgb76zT8XRU5AAWHVptx4RgxgLb5fX7iM2vBSKXA Edit2: There should be .sh files in home directory that you can edit to connect to pools for the two miners, and the compiled miners are also in the home directory. Let me know if you have any questions or anything. Edit3: Sorry, forgot to mention you need to tell ccminer where the cuda libraries are. Think this should do it: sudo ldconfig /usr/local/cuda-5.5/lib64 |
|
|
|
|
I'll stay away, stinks like a pile of shit from a horse named Scam. An asset that does nothing, to back a coin that does nothing yet, except maybe teleport coins into jl777's wallet.
|
|
|
|
Who cares? There are plenty of other coins. Why pay attention to such a fuckup (i.e. either corrupt or incompetent, often impossible to tell from the outside especially when one masquerades as the other) coin anyway. The instamine was a mostly symptom, not the underlying problem.
From what I've heard it was a fuckup due to incompetence/sloppiness, but that could just as well be a masquerade as you say. Half of all coins in 12 hours is just ridiculous though, practically worse than these 1 week PoW then switch to PoS coins. |
|
|
|
why MYR price is so cheap?
good progress, good plans, good dev's, profesional programing and future plans?
and the price is stagnated! ?
flat is better than \ \ \ \ \ |
|
|
|
So. What do you guys think about burning it to a coloured coin instead [on counterparty/dogeparty]? Any thoughts? I could rewrite the v2 doc and explain what benefits a coloured coin has? So we can discuss it? I see hashrate + buy support have increased lately, which is great! [at this rate we can maybe even stick to what we have.  ] Hey Simon, My thoughts would be that if the coin is going to stay a scrypt PoW coin, then it should probably fork to include auxpow so we can merge mine with doge, peseta, and ltc or even myriad. I just checked, and network hash is up a bit, but still only 4 Mh/s, which at this point amounts to about $100 of scrypt asic hardware (or less). If it's going to stay PoW, maybe even consider forking to multi-algo, so each algo could be merge mined with myriad. (I'm mining myriad, in case you couldn't tell ) I'm not a huge fan of the asset stuff (or even PoS), but if you want to put together the v2 doc I'd be glad to help proof/critique it. I just feel like if there are no more coins/tokens being created, it's hard to get new people interested. |
|
|
|
Again I repeat, China's Solar Debacle.
It doesn't matter that solar is 0.1% of installed capacity. Their push for solar started only a few years ago, and they have 5 more years to reach their stated goal of 100 GW by 2020. Beijing and Zurich, 23 January 2014 – China’s solar developers installed a record 12GW of photovoltaic projects in 2013, and a booming market at the very end of the year may even have pushed installations up to 14GW. No country has ever added more than 8GW of solar power in a single year prior to 2013, and China’s record outstripped even the most optimistic forecasts of 12 months ago. http://about.bnef.com/press-releases/chinas-12gw-solar-market-outstripped-all-expectations-in-2013/They're now targeting another 14 GW by end of this year, or 50% of all installed solar capacity in the world. More recent quote from today/yesterday: J.P. Morgan is bullish on solar outlook, saying PV solar demand could grow more than 20% this year.
Demand in developing markets seems to be accelerating, according to analysts Paul Coster, Mark Strouse and Paul J Chung:
China is emerging as the leading end-market for PV solar owing to ongoing need for clean energy. http://blogs.barrons.com/asiastocks/2014/09/04/china-solar-2h-should-be-strong-says-jpmorgan/It's ok to admit you're wrong, and you don't even have to call people socialist, tree hugging malthusians when you do, just fyi. |
|
|
|
Risto trying to pick the winner reminds me of the government agencies trying to pick the winning technologies, e.g. China provided incentives to push into solar and now solar didn't pan out and going bankrupt.
Not sure if really poor analogy or just spewing falsehoods? China Will Install More Solar This Year Than The U.S. Ever Has http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2014/08/08/3468974/china-solar-capacity-booming/China was responsible for almost one-fifth of total global investment, spending $52 billion on renewable energy last year. The United States was close behind with investments of $51 billion... http://www.forbes.com/sites/jackperkowski/2012/07/27/china-leads-the-world-in-renewable-energy-investment/China has a terrible pollution problem, and they are taking some strides at least to wrangle the problem in the longterm. They also manage to import so many solar panels into the USA that many manufacturers here are crying "uncle", despite installing more PV capacity than the USA has in their entire history in the same year. Not sure how you figure solar "didn't pan out" for them. |
|
|
|
also, there's a nice web wallet here: http://vtc.li/ where I'm pretty sure you keep your keys. |
|
|
|
What does that link mean, tacotime?
Successful attack achieved by including a corrupted block, we're trying to figure out what happened now. transactions for 0.0000000 xmr = successful attack ? |
|
|
|
Boolberry is a name I can imagine will be used everywhere in the world. I can already hear the conversation of the lady in the supermarket saying to my grand mother "That'll be 32 boolberries, thx"  sounds like a Snack or type of Fruit/Vegetable, or Cereal. The #1 choice of breakfast cereal for jewish space lobster doctors around the universe! |
|
|
|
Well, I'm not going anywhere... I still believe in the VTC / MON community. I'm not sure that many understand (other than us) how fast the block rewards are going down for this coin though and that it's going to be very rare in the future. It's not a BTC clone in regards to distribution at all. I just wish the VTC community would see the potential in this coin. It's just a matter of perception and that's why it would be great if the devs could highlight MON as something else than a testcoin for new VTC features. It's much more than that, it's "Vertcoin Limited"... at least in my eyes. Yes, there is a great number of supporters of Vertcoin. This is one of the strength of Vertcoin unlike many altcoins. MON has its place in the Vertcoin community. Unlike the big brother VTC, MON is deflationary. It will grow in scarcity as time goes. umm, aren't they both deflationary, since they will both get mined out eventually? They just have different approach to cutting block rewards, vert does it in abrupt halvenings like btc, while mon uses a constant exponential decay like monero. |
|
|
|
Bandwidth scales slower than Moore's law but is not in danger of ending: http://www.nngroup.com/articles/law-of-bandwidth/Neither can scale fast enough so XMR to reach 10 million users in 3 years, because XMR would need to scale 10^3 in 3 years. And there is a computation issue on verifying transactions if you want to scale up micro-transactions volume (e.g. 100,000 txs per sec): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=103172.0You appear to lack domain-specific knowledge that I have because I am in the trenches of development and you are not. Practice and application trumps theory. How do you get 100k tx per second with a userbase of 10M people? That would imply each user is making a transaction every 100 seconds, which seems pretty unrealistic. |
|
|
|
I like the name Napoleon Coin. Small but powerful. lol I like  |
|
|
|
Did that too, but now the wallet would not start to sync...... What to do?
Are you sure you're using the latest release from here: https://github.com/vertcoin/vertcoin/releasesIt shouldn't really matter, but it can't hurt. If it's not making any connections at all (starting to sync), then maybe you need to add some nodes. You can do that either in the conf file or from the debug console in the qt wallet. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
